29
1 2- EE 539B Integrated Optics and Nanophotonics 2 Waveguide Losses and Input/Output Coupling 2.1 Losses in optical waveguides 2.2 Waveguide input and output coupling “Integrated Optics Theory and Technology,” by R. G. Hunsperger, 5th ed., Ch. 6-7, Springer Verlag.

Waveguide Losses and Input-output Coupling

Embed Size (px)

DESCRIPTION

optical soi application

Citation preview

  • 1

    Lih Y. LinEE 539B 2-

    EE 539BIntegrated Optics and Nanophotonics

    2 Waveguide Losses and Input/Output Coupling

    2.1 Losses in optical waveguides2.2 Waveguide input and output coupling

    Integrated Optics Theory and Technology, by R. G. Hunsperger, 5th ed., Ch. 6-7, Springer Verlag.

  • 2

    Lih Y. LinEE 539B 2-

    Loss Mechanisms

    Scattering loss Predominates in glass or dielectric (such as

    oxide) waveguides. Absorption loss

    Most important in semiconductor and other crystalline materials.

    Radiation loss Significant when waveguides are bent.

  • 3

    Lih Y. LinEE 539B 2-

    Scattering Losses

    Volume scattering loss Caused by imperfections Loss/unit length proportional to number of

    scattering centers per length Depends strongly on the relative size of the

    imperfections compared to in the material Volume scattering negligible compared to

    surface scattering loss Surface scattering loss

  • 4

    Lih Y. LinEE 539B 2-

    Surface Scattering Loss (I)More significant for higher-order modes.

    mgR t

    LN

    =cot2

    Number of reflections from each surface:

    Exercise:A waveguide has tg = 3 m and n2 = 2.0. An optical wave with m = 0.8kn2 and = 900 nm propagates in the waveguide. How many reflections from each surface will the light experience for each cm traveled?

    Convert loss coefficient to dB:

    )cm( 3.4)cmdB(

    )(

    1-

    0

    =

    =

    L

    zeIzI

  • 5

    Lih Y. LinEE 539B 2-

    Surface Scattering Loss (II)

    roughness surface of Variances :

    )(4 ,

    111

    sincos

    21

    2

    2/1223

    212

    223

    23

    221

    21

    31

    '

    '32

    +

    =

    ==

    ++

    =

    A

    knkn

    tA

    gm

    ms

    s increases as increases. Higher order mode (smaller m) has higher surface scattering loss.In dielectric film waveguide, such as glasses and oxides, surface variation ~ 0.1 m s ~ 0.5-5 dB/cm.In semiconductor waveguides, thickness variation ~ 0.01 m. Surface scattering loss is negligible compared to absorption loss.

    Ref: P.K. Tien, Appl. Opt. V. 10, 2395 (1971)

  • 6

    Lih Y. LinEE 539B 2-

    Interband Absorption

    Design wavguide material compositions so that the operating wavelength lies beyond the tail of the absorption curve to minimize interband absorption.

  • 7

    Lih Y. LinEE 539B 2-

    Free-Carrier Absorption

  • 8

    Lih Y. LinEE 539B 2-

    Loss Coefficient for Free-Carrier Absorption (I)

    Motion of the free electrons under an applied electric field E0exp(jt)

    )exp(*20

    tjgj

    meE

    x

    =

    Nexp =1The displacement causes polarization

    220

    2

    222

    02

    20

    20

    220

    )*/()(

    )*/()(

    )*/()(

    gmgNeK

    ngmNenK

    gjmNenK

    i

    r

    +

    =

    =+

    =

    =And complex dielectric constant

    n0: Index of refraction without the free carriers

    mobilityElectron : *

  • 9

    Lih Y. LinEE 539B 2-

    Loss Coefficient for Free-Carrier Absorption (II)

    30

    22

    20

    3

    *)(4

    cnmNe

    nkK

    KKk ir

    ifc

    =

    =

    Example: n-type GaAs at = 1.15 m

    )cmin ( 10)(cm -318-1 NNfc

    Complex dielectric constant Loss

  • 10

    Lih Y. LinEE 539B 2-

    Radiation Loss (I)Main loss mechanism for curved waveguide.To preserve the phase front, the tangential phase velocity must be proportional to the distance from the center of curvature.

    RX

    dtdR

    dtdXR

    zr

    z

    r

    0

    0

    0)(

    =

    =

    =

    +

    Phase velocity > speed of light when X > Xr.

    How far must the photons travel before they can be considered as having been removed from the guided mode?Coherent length:

    1

    2

    2

    =

    aaZc

  • 11

    Lih Y. LinEE 539B 2-

    Radiation Loss (II)

    ct ZP

    PdzzdP

    zP11)(

    )(1

    =

    P1: Power in the tail of the mode beyond Xr (i.e., the power to be lost by radiation within a length Zc)Pt: Total power

    0

    0

    ( ) cos( ) for 2 2

    ( ) cos( )exp ( ( / 2)) for | |2 2

    a aE x E hx x

    a aE x E h x a x

    =

    =

    ( )2 0 10

    1 22 2

    1 cos ( )exp 2 exp2

    exp( )1 1sin( ) cos ( )

    2 2 2

    zha R aC C R

    a haha ah

    = =

    + +

  • 12

    Lih Y. LinEE 539B 2-

    Lets pack 16 stages of modulatorsd

    456

    6810

    Constraints: Spacing between waveguides at

    least d Input and output cannot be on the

    same side Waveguides cannot cross each other

    3d

    Scattering and absorption loss: 1 unit per d

    Radiation loss (in units):

    Whats the loss you obtain?

  • 13

    Lih Y. LinEE 539B 2-

    16 x 16 Thermo-Optic Switch

    Use Mach-Zehnder interferometer configuration for 2x2 switch unit Insertion loss = 6.6dB

    Thin-film heater3-dB directional

    couplerI0 I1

    I2

    ( ) ( ) ( )( ) ( )

    coupler ldirectiona in the ratio couplingpower :2cos14

    2sin2cos212

    02

    22201

    kkkIIkII

    =

    +=

    Apply heat to change refractive index: n/T(K) ~ 10-5

    T. Goh, M. Yasu, K. Hattori, A. Himeno, M. Okuno, and Y. Ohmori, IEEE Photonics Technol. Lett.,June, 1998.

  • 14

    Lih Y. LinEE 539B 2-

    Measurement of Waveguide Losses End-Fire Coupling to Waveguides of Different Lengths

    12

    21 )/ln(ZZPP

    =

    Q: Disadvantages?

  • 15

    Lih Y. LinEE 539B 2-

    Measurement of Waveguide Losses Prism-Coupled Loss Measurement

    Advantages: Non-destructive. Light can be selectively coupled into each mode by properly choosing the

    angle of incidence.

  • 16

    Lih Y. LinEE 539B 2-

    Coupling light into the waveguide and out of the waveguide incurs losses too.

    Efficient coupling design is important.

  • 17

    Lih Y. LinEE 539B 2-

    General Definitions for Coupling Loss

    PmPin z

    x

    Coupling efficiency to the m-th mode

    in

    mm P

    P=

    Q: A single mode optical beam is coupled into a waveguide with guiding core dimension a few times larger than the wavelength. What kind of modes will be generated in the waveguide?

    Coupling loss (dB)

    m

    in

    PPlog10=L

  • 18

    Lih Y. LinEE 539B 2-

    Direct Focusing

    modeth -m theofon distributi Field :),(beamincident theofon distributi Field :),(

    ),(),(

    ),(),(22

    2*

    yxByxA

    dxdyyxBdxdyyxA

    dxdyyxByxA

    m

    mm

    =

    In most cases, A(x,y) can be represented by Gaussian beams.

  • 19

    Lih Y. LinEE 539B 2-

    TEM0,0 Gaussian BeamWavefront changeBeam spreading

    2

    00 1)(

    +=zzWzW

    phase Radial )(2

    )(exp

    phase alLongitudin tanexp

    factor Amplitude )(

    exp)(

    )(

    22

    0

    1

    2

    220

    0

    +

    +=

    zRyxkj

    zzkzj

    zWyx

    zWWArA Beam radius

    +=

    201)(zzzzR Radius of curvature

    of the wavefront

    20

    0Wz Rayleigh range

    Q: Which factor affects the coupling most?

    Ref: Verdeyen, Laser Electronics, 3rd ed., Prentice Hall.

  • 20

    Lih Y. LinEE 539B 2-

    Gaussian Beam Through a Thin Lens

  • 21

    Lih Y. LinEE 539B 2-

    End-Butt CouplingExact coupling efficiency can be obtained by overlap integrals.

    Approximation: (assuming all waveguide modes are well confined, and )Lg tt

    +

    +

    +=

    2cos

    )1(1

    12

    cos)()1(

    64 222

    2222

    mtt

    tmtt

    tnnnn

    m Lg

    L

    gL

    g

    gL

    gLm

  • 22

    Lih Y. LinEE 539B 2-

    Misalignment EffectLongitudinal misalignmentLateral misalignment

    2 ,for cos2

    0

    gLLg

    L

    ttXtt

    tX

    PP

  • 23

    Lih Y. LinEE 539B 2-

    Tapered Mode Size Converters

  • 24

    Lih Y. LinEE 539B 2-

    Prism CouplersAir-waveguide coupling

    Phase-matching condition

    mm kn = sin1cannot be satisfied.

    Prism-waveguide coupling

    Phase-matching condition

    mpm kn = sin

    can be satisfied.(Assuming normal incidence to the prism.)

  • 25

    Lih Y. LinEE 539B 2-

    Example: Output Prism CouplerA prism coupler with index np = 2.2 is used to observe the modes of a waveguide. The light source is a He-Ne laser with 0 = 632.8 nm. If the light from a particular mode is seen at an angle of 26.43 with the normal to the prism surface, what is the propagation constant m for that mode?

    Q: What is the interaction length required to obtain complete coupling?

  • 26

    Lih Y. LinEE 539B 2-

    Coupled-Mode Theory

    L

    2: Coupling coefficient (depending on overlap integral

    between the prism mode and the waveguide mode)

    L =

    =

    =2cos m

    WL

    For a given L, the coupling coefficient required for complete coupling:

    Wm

    2cos

    = Q1: What defines W?Q2: What will happen if L > /2?

  • 27

    Lih Y. LinEE 539B 2-

    Notes on Prism Coupling In order to get 100% coupling with a uniform beam, the trailing edge

    of the beam must exactly intersect the right-angle corner of the prism.

    Disadvantages For most semiconductor waveguides, m ~ kn2 Difficult to find

    prism materials

    Incident beam must be highly collimated Coupling efficiency sensitive to the separation between the prism

    and the waveguide

  • 28

    Lih Y. LinEE 539B 2-

    Grating Coupler

    0

    Periodic structure of the grating perturbs the waveguide modes in the region underneath the grating.

    0

    0

    0 m

    2 , 0, 1, 2, ...

    : Propagation constant of the m-th mode covered by the grating

    ~

    = + =

    mkn = sin11m kn >

    Phase-matching condition:can be satisfied even though

  • 29

    Lih Y. LinEE 539B 2-

    Example of Grating CouplerGrating: = 0.4 m on a GaAs planar waveguide0 = 1.15 mPropagation constant for the lowest-order mode in the waveguide: 0 = 3.6k

    Assume 1st-order coupling, || = 1, what incident angle should the light make in order to couple to the lowest-order mode?At what 0 do we start to need higher-order coupling?

    EE 539BIntegrated Optics and NanophotonicsLoss MechanismsScattering LossesSurface Scattering Loss (I)Surface Scattering Loss (II)Interband AbsorptionFree-Carrier AbsorptionLoss Coefficient for Free-Carrier Absorption (I)Loss Coefficient for Free-Carrier Absorption (II)Radiation Loss (I)Radiation Loss (II)Lets pack 16 stages of modulators16 x 16 Thermo-Optic SwitchMeasurement of Waveguide Losses? End-Fire Coupling to Waveguides of Different LengthsMeasurement of Waveguide Losses? Prism-Coupled Loss MeasurementGeneral Definitions for Coupling LossDirect FocusingTEM0,0 Gaussian BeamGaussian Beam Through a Thin LensEnd-Butt CouplingMisalignment EffectTapered Mode Size ConvertersPrism CouplersExample: Output Prism CouplerCoupled-Mode TheoryNotes on Prism CouplingGrating CouplerExample of Grating Coupler