Upload
others
View
3
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
OVERVIEW Stakeholders
Background
Tourism Kelowna Meetings
What makes a good wayfinding signage strategy?
What should be signed in Peachland?
Maps
Sign design
Sign examples (Okanagan signage and metal sign standards)
Costs and Distribution
Chamber of Commerce Meeting (February 28, 2013)
Recommendations and Budget allocation.
Project Timeline
STAKEHOLDERS
Wayfinding Signage Program
MOTI
District Council
Peachland Chamber and EDC
Tourism Kelowna
Bylaw Enforcement
Individual Business
BACKGROUND 2007 – Sign Bylaw Review and Update
Sign Survey – all business and random citizen sample
consultation with stakeholders – MOTI, developers, real estate
agent, chamber representative and citizen representative
Attended Chamber of Commerce Annual General Meeting
Reviewed other municipal bylaws in B.C.
Researched sign permit history
BACKGROUND Results / Findings and Concerns
Illegal signage in Peachland very problematic (Trepanier and Hwy 97
seen as a blight) – complaints found to exist as far back as 1985.
Signage is acceptable if it is of a high quality and aesthetically pleasing
Roof top signage problematic
Businesses expressed need for wayfinding signage strategy
Billboards not acceptable
Old Sign Bylaw Repealed and New Bylaw Adopted by
Council in 2007
BACKGROUND Trepanier Bench Road Gateway Sign Pilot Project
Negotiations with developer for the sign installation
Developer paid all costs of materials and installation
Upon completion the sign became a District asset
Wayfinding Signage Strategy (2007-2011)
No District budget for such a program
Chamber of Commerce must lead and drive process
District support in administration and maintenance
Branding Study to provide standardized marketing
BACKGROUND Wayfinding Signage Strategy (2012-2013)
Staff directed by Council to develop a strategy.
Program to be in place by May 1, 2013
Program to be developed, installed, administered and maintained by
the District.
Costs of the signage and installation to be borne by individual
business users.
TOURISM KELOWNA MEETING S - REGIONAL COLLABORATION
Tourism Kelowna driving a Regional approach
Staff from municipalities throughout Central Okanagan participate
MOTI – to adopt new signage program in 2013 (a move away from
individual signage to international signage)
Group agreed that keeping international signage standard very important
for tourism in the region (maintain MOTI standard)
District of Peachland to develop program before majority of the participating
municipalities (keep group including MOTI informed of progress)
WHAT MAKES A GOOD WAYFINDING SIGNAGE PROGRAM?
Consistent messaging – international symbols (MOTI designated)
Only key attractions, industries and destinations should be accommodated
Wayfinding is meant to provide direction not advertisement for business.
Gateway signage in major corridors in conjunction with wayfinding (where
appropriate and where ROW may be provided for safe use)
Consideration of design and materials – low maintenance preferred
Reflective signage important
Safety consideration in placement of signage
All signage leading to a business will use international signage. The last
sign directing to the actual business can have the business name.
WHAT SHOULD BE SIGNED IN PEACHLAND?
Some major home occupations (only those that meet
MOTI designation for signage to provide consistency).
B&B’s
Tourist attractions
Wineries
Industrial
MOTI has not released their new program. It is expected in
2013.
SIGN DESIGN
Custom Signage can be very expensive (cost
prohibitive – can be over $1000.00 each)
Best most cost effective option = standard
metal signage (cost, maintenance and
reflective).
More than likely the reason for it’s extensive
use throughout the Okanagan
COSTS AND DISTRIBUTION
Two Program Streams
Base Program and Extended Program
Base Program
To promote quick implementation a standard cost has been estimated
based on medium uptake.
This cost will cover all signage along main corridors (Princeton Ave.,
Ponderosa Dr., and Trepanier Bench Rd.)
The majority of businesses are along these corridors
Extended Program
Those businesses that may require additional signage because they are
outside of the major corridors will need to pay the additional cost
associated with signing to their location.
This is a minority of businesses in Peachland
Upon a request for this additional signage the District will provide those
costs to the applicant.
ESTIMATED COSTS
Sign Cost Estimates
3 Gateway Signs $ 2,047.50
7 Single pole signs $ 1,845.00
1 B&B Sign Plate bottom of 13th Street $ 26.00
2 arrow signs $ 26.00
SUB TOTAL $ 3,944.50
TOTAL with HST $ 4,417.84
TOTAL SIGN COST / ESTIMATED USERS = COST PER USER
$4,417.84 / 56 = $ 78.89
$4,417.84 / 40 = (STANDARDIZED COST ESTIMATE – MEDIUM UPTAKE) $ 110.45
$4,417.84/ 22 = $ 200.81
CHAMBER OF COMMERCE MEETING February 28, 2013
Presentation given to chamber representatives.
It was agreed that this was a good way to move forward.
It was noted that uptake may not happen all at once.
It was noted that the Chamber logo would be preferable
to the District logo on the gateway signs.
Consideration of signage for tourist destinations outside
of District boundary (see policy: Exemption).
RECOMMENDATIONS
Recommendation of the COTW February 12, 2013
“THAT the wayfinding sign budget for $10,000.00 be tabled until after the
staff meets with the Chamber of Commerce regarding wayfinding signs”.
COTW Report March 12, 2013 (under consideration)
THAT COTW recommend that Council approve the Wayfinding (Directory)
Signage Policy; and,
THAT COTW recommend that Council approve a recovery account (budget)
in the amount of $10,000.00 for program implementation; and,
THAT the Wayfinding Signage Program be initiated in 2013.
RECOVERY ACCOUNT (BUDGET - $10,000.00)
Can standardize a cost based on medium uptake to the
program.
With increased uptake of the program funds will be
recovered over time (if required).
Guarantees it is on the ground by May 1, 2013 (Timeline
for ordering may be met regardless of initial uptake to the
program).
TIMELINE
*Order received before May 1, 2013
*Installation by staff onto existing
poles (already installed)
*March 28th – Response from
business = assess order requirements and order signage
*Public Works begins installation of poles – in stock
*Packages sent to business (2 week response timeline
before order)
THANK YOU!
Dave Smith, MCIP, RPP (Director of Planning and Development Services)
Paul Dupuis, MCIP, RPP (Planning Technician)
DISCUSSION / QUESTIONS?