Upload
others
View
1
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
0
Our Climate Change Program
James Watson
WCS Lead, Climate Change Team IUCN Climate Change Task Force Chair
Anton Seimon
WCS Applied Climate Scientist
1
Mammals
Mammals, birds & amphibians
Birds
Plants Plants
Plants & animals
0.1
1
10
100
1000
10000
100000
Background extinction rate
Red list Jetz van Vuuren Malcom Thomas
E/MSY
Species extinction
Recent past Distant past 2050
GBO3 – Terrestrial Scenarios
Projected Terrestrial Species Extinctions
Land use & Climate Change
Land use & Climate Change
Climate Change
Climate Change
Plants & vertebrates
Spec
ies
Extin
ctio
n R
ates
O
bser
ved
for p
ast o
r “co
mm
itted
” fo
r fut
ure
2
The Red List Index (RLI) for all these species groups is decreasing.
Coral species are moving most
rapidly towards greater extinction risk
Amphibians are, on average, the
group most threatened.
Source: IUCN
3
Trends in habitats are varied but show declines overall
•Wetlands, salt marshes, coral reefs, seagrass beds and sea ice continue to decline •Extensive fragmentation of forests and rivers • Mangrove decline slowing (except in Asia) •The condition of many terrestrial habitats is deteriorating (degrading)
Source: NSIDC
4
MEA Major Findings
The world’s ecosystems changed more rapidly in the second half of the twentieth century than at any time in recorded human history; most rapid changes now are taking place in developing countries
Approximately 60% (15 out of 24) of
the ecosystem services evaluated are being degraded or used unsustainably.
Humans have substantially altered
regulating services by modifying the ecosystem providing the service and exceeding the capabilities of ecosystems to provide the service.
5
6
7
8
Response to the biodiversity crisis
Development of the discipline of Conservation Biology CBD treaty National governments developing environmental legislation Foreign aid focused on conservation Growth in number of concerned citizens Development of a third ‘life affirming movement’ – conservation
NGOs
Research Implementation Policy Advocacy
WCS TNC
CI
WWF
WRI
10
WCS Landscapes and Seascapes
60 countries, 490 projects, 3000 staff $200M annual budget
11
A change in conservation direction
Protected areas
1895 Today
Conservation of wildlife and critical ecosystems
Single species
Landscapes and Seascapes
WCS's evolution
since 1895
Target results Improved natural resource governance
Greater security and prosperity for local people
1
2
3
12
Our landscapes are witnessing change
1. Increasing mining and forestry 2. Increasing agricultural and fishing practices 3. Changes in human settlements 4. Growth of China 5. Climate change
13
Natural resource extraction activities are a growing threat to our landscapes and seascapes
Note: Includes mines for coal, iron, copper, chromium, nickel, gold, silver, diamond, lead, and others Source: Raw Materials Database
Mines of the world, by stage (2010)
OECD Outlook 2010-2030
More than US $10 trillion investment in mining sector $16 - $20 trillion investment to meet 53% increase in primary energy demand
• CO2 emissions expected to increase by 55%
14
15
Scientists in WCS land and sea-scapes have witnessed
1. Changing phenology of plants 2. Changing abundances and distribution of species 3. Changing migratory dates 4. Changing ecological processes 5. Changing natural disturbances 6. Changing human behavior
16
WCS dual response to climate change
Helping wildlife and people (and the ecosystems that sustain them) adapt to climate change
WCS
response
Adaptation
An adjustment in natural or human systems in response to expected climate stimuli… which moderates harm or exploits beneficial opportunities (IPCC)
Mitigation
Human intervention to reduce the sources or enhance the sinks of greenhouse gases (IPCC)
WCS response
Reducing deforestation and other land-use change
17
Protecting Biodiversity Mitigating Climate Change Supporting Local Communities
~49,000 individuals living inside project zone in 2009
• 200,000 additional people live in surrounding area
44 community management sites established 35,000 people engaged
Makira contains 50% of Madagascar’s endemic biodiversity
• 1% of global biodiversity • 20 of 97 identified Lemur
species, the greatest number in any protected area
• Critical forest corridor between outlying forest blocks
~35 million tons of CO2 to be sequestered over 30 years
• ~ 1 million tons of CO2 / year
Prevents deforestation that would result from business-as-usual land-use change
• Project area: 439,589 ha – 2,461 ha of forest
estimated to be protected every year
Source: WCS Madagascar Program
Mitigation: Makira generates triple benefits for climate change, biodiversity, and livelihoods
18
Adaptation: a proactive framework
1. Set objectives and targets
2. Conduct baseline of landscape or seascape
3. Assess how vulnerable species, ecosystems and local people are to climate change and develop solutions
4. Get stakeholders together and assess current actions and see if they align with these solutions
5. Develop adaptive management plan based on new targets and monitor situation
19
WCS experience on Climate Change in Africa
Albertine Rift Climate Assessment project & Western Indian Ocean coral reef initiatives
Recently completed first survey of
conservation NGO work on adaptation for conservation in Africa
Prepared state of the science assessment
of climate change for new MacArthur Foundation 10-yr strategy
20
The WCS Albertine Rift Climate Assessment Project
21
1. Climatological baseline studies 2. Ecological modeling using climate models 3. Monitoring for climate change 4. Stakeholder consultation and outreach 5. Implement adaptation activities 6. Repeat process every 5-10 years
Project stages
22
Trainings and outreach
23
Downscaled multimodel output statistics over the Albertine Rift model domain – A2 scenario
Baseline | Future
Max & Min = gridpoint extremes across the project domain Mean = average of all gridpoints.
Climate predictions from CMIP3 models
24
Initiating climate monitoring in national parks
Kahuzi Biega National Park, DR-Congo, 2,435 m
25
OUTPUTS 1. Climatological variables • Monthly mean temperature (°C) • Monthly mean precipitation amount (mm) • Monthly mean cloud cover (% sky coverage) 2. Carbon Fluxes • Net Primary Production (NPP) • Land-Atmosphere flux • Carbon Loss from Fire • Heterotrophic respiration (Rh) 3. Carbon Pools •Vegetation Carbon •Soil Carbon •Litter Carbon •Annual Total Carbon 4. Hydrological Variables • Total Runoff (mm) • Actual Evapotranspiration (mm) 5. Vegetation and agriculture • Annual Phaseolus Bean Yield (kg ha-2) • Annual Brachiaria decumbens Yield (kg ha-2) • Annual Maize Yield (kg ha-2) • Fractional Cover of Plant Functional Type (%0
Environmental modeling of future ecological conditions Procedure used to generate ecologically meaningful products specific to the Albertine Rift
26
Downscaling limitations
2090 conditions compared to 1990
Pixel resolution ~55 km Scale does not meet conservation planning needs
27
LPJ model output: hydrological runoff
Initial drying followed by strong increases in runoff helpful for long-term planning in a general sense only Limitations: spatial resolution, land surface not specified, need to relate to streamflow, water use and ecosystem service provision, no inference on lake levels, etc.
28
Indicators of human response in rain-fed agricultural regions Increasing pressure on highlands for food production Limitations - Does not reference
present distributions - Cultivars assessed
individually rather than collectively
- Not performed for elevationally constrained cash crops (coffee, tea)
beans
maize
pasture
Crop yields
29
Nyungwe-Kibira study
Burundi
Rwanda
Effort to compare existing CESM/CLM outputs with our previous results Add hindcasting and more environmental variables to existing set
30
31
What we see in CESM
We would like to see how CESM maps conservation landscapes: How climate change affects biodiversity and ecosystem services
Use hindcasts and forecasts to better understand the role of climate
Sensitivity analyses & valuation studies to justify conservation measures
Mapping opportunities: where are optimal sites for developing durable REDD programs and payments for ecosystem services (PES) initiatives? Which sites would be poor choices?
32
East Africa Great Lakes initiative Developing guidance for conservation planning: - Changing ecological states - Ecosystem service provision - Human settlement - Agriculture and industrial development
Other major WCS programs in adaptation - Lower Mekong watershed - Pamirs highlands - Mongolian wetlands
Project opportunities
33
Do our conservation objectives make sense?
Are we working in the right places?
What does the Human Footprint look like in the future?
How can we explore trade-offs for development and conservation?
Integrated Assessment Modeling of future landscapes
Coupling CESM and IAM components would be powerful assets for envisioning environmental futures
34
WCS Landscapes and Seascapes
35
How do treaty obligations like CBD factor into scenario development? Can they be incorporated into models? Should environmental conservation community be helping to define the shared pathways? IPBES and the link with the IPCC
Biodiversity conservation and international climate policy
36
CBD 2020 targets
Target 5: By 2020, the rate of loss of all natural habitats, including forests, is at least halved and where feasible brought close to zero, and degradation and fragmentation is significantly reduced.
Target 10: By 2015 the multiple anthropogenic pressures on coral reefs, and
other vulnerable ecosystems impacted by climate change or ocean acidification are minimized, so as to maintain their integrity and functioning.
Target 11: By 2020, at least 17 per cent of terrestrial and inland water areas
and 10 per cent of coastal and marine areas, especially areas of particular importance for biodiversity and ecosystem services, are conserved through effectively and equitably managed, ecologically representative and well-connected systems of protected areas and other effective area-based conservation measures, and integrated into the wider landscape and seascape.
37
Key messages
WCS is a science based organization with a field focus Strong relationships with major donors, US and other
governments We are keen to collaborate with universities and research
institutions (Columbia – Earth Institute, Clark University, NCEAS, University of Queensland, University of Oxford, University of Durham)
We think the CESM can help us achieve long-term conservation
success