49
WEAP Demand Management

WEAP Demand Management

Embed Size (px)

DESCRIPTION

A Simple System

Citation preview

Page 1: WEAP Demand Management

WEAP Demand Management

Page 2: WEAP Demand Management

A Simple System

Page 3: WEAP Demand Management

An Infrastructure Constraint

Page 4: WEAP Demand Management

A Regulatory Constraint

Page 5: WEAP Demand Management

Different Priorities

Page 6: WEAP Demand Management

Different Priorities

For example, the demands of large farmers (70 units) might be Priority 1 in one scenario while the demands of smallholders (40 units) may be Priority 1 in another.

We will touch upon this further in the “Refining Supply” tutorial module

Page 7: WEAP Demand Management

Different Preferences

Page 8: WEAP Demand Management

Different Preferences

For example, a center pivot operator may prefer to take water from a tributary because of lower pumping costs.

Page 9: WEAP Demand Management

Example

How much water will the site with 70 units of demand receive?

Page 10: WEAP Demand Management

Example

How much water will be flowing in the reach between the Priority 2 diversion and the Priority 1 Return Flow?

Page 11: WEAP Demand Management

Example

What could we do in order to insure that this reach does not go dry?

Page 12: WEAP Demand Management

WEAP Hydrology Module-2 Bucket Method

Page 13: WEAP Demand Management

Example

What could we do in order to insure that this reach does not go dry?

Page 14: WEAP Demand Management

What are we assuming?

Page 15: WEAP Demand Management

What are we assuming?

1. That we know how much water is flowing at the top of each river.

Page 16: WEAP Demand Management

What are we assuming?

1. That we know how much water is flowing at the top of each river.

2. That no water is naturally flowing into or out of the river as it moves downstream.

Page 17: WEAP Demand Management

What are we assuming?

1. That we know how much water is flowing at the top of each river.

2. That no water is naturally flowing into or out of the river as it moves downstream.

3. That we know what the water demands are with certainty.

Page 18: WEAP Demand Management

What are we assuming?

1. That we know how much water is flowing at the top of each river.

2. That no water is naturally flowing into or out of the river as it moves downstream.

3. That we know what the water demands are with certainty.

4. Basicly, that this system has been removed from it HYDROLOGIC context.

Page 19: WEAP Demand Management

What do we do now?

Page 20: WEAP Demand Management

ADD HYDROLOGY!

Page 21: WEAP Demand Management

Types of Models Hydrology, Rainfall/Runoff Models Hydraulic, Biophysical Process Models Planning, Water Resource Systems

Models

A Context for the WEAP approach…

Page 22: WEAP Demand Management

Hydrology Model

Page 23: WEAP Demand Management

Hydrology Model

Critical questions: How does rainfall on a catchment translate into flow in a river?

Page 24: WEAP Demand Management

Hydrology Model

Critical questions: What pathways does water follow as it moves through a catchment?

Page 25: WEAP Demand Management

Hydrology Model

Critical questions: How does movement along these pathways impact the magnitude, timing, duration and frequency of river flows?

Page 26: WEAP Demand Management

Hydraulic Model

Page 27: WEAP Demand Management

Hydraulic Model

Critical questions: How will the velocity, depth and horizontal extent of water flowing in a river channel, and the associated services provided by the river, change if flows are adjusted or the channel is modified?

Page 28: WEAP Demand Management

Hydraulic Model

Critical questions: How fast, how deep and what is the horizontal extent of water flowing in a particular section of river?

Page 29: WEAP Demand Management

Hydraulic Model

Critical questions: What is the interaction between the velocity, depth and horizontal extent of water flowing in a river and important services provided by the river (e.g. fish habitat, sediment transport, etc.)?

Page 30: WEAP Demand Management

Planning Model

Page 31: WEAP Demand Management

Planning Model

Critical questions: How should water be allocated to various uses in time of shortage?

Page 32: WEAP Demand Management

Planning Model

Critical questions: How should infrastructure in the system (e.g. dams, diversion works, etc) be operated to achieve maximum benefit?

Page 33: WEAP Demand Management

Planning Model

Critical questions: How can these operations be constrained to protect the services provided by the river?

Page 34: WEAP Demand Management

Planning Model

Critical questions: How will allocation, operations and operating constraints change if new management strategies are introduced into the system?

Page 35: WEAP Demand Management

The WEAP Hydrology Molude provides a

framework for answering these sets of questions.

Page 36: WEAP Demand Management

The WEAP 2-Bucket Hydrology Module (Handout)

Smax

Rd z1(%) Interflow =

f(z1,ks, 1-f) Percolation = f(z1,ks,f)

Baseflow = f(z2,drainage_rate )

Et= f(z1,kc, ?, PET)

Pe = f(P, Snow Accum, Melt rate)

Plant Canopy

P

z2(%)

L

u

Surface Runoff =f(Pe,z1,1/LAI)

Irrigation

Rootzone Water Capacity (mm)

Deep Water Capacity (mm)

Page 37: WEAP Demand Management

One 2-Bucket Model Per Land Class

Page 38: WEAP Demand Management

WEAP Hydrology

Page 39: WEAP Demand Management

Some Comments The number of parameters in the model are

fairly limited and are at least related to biophysical characteristics of the catchment.

The irrigation routine includes an implicit notion of irrigation efficiency.

Page 40: WEAP Demand Management

Seepage can only pass from the lower bucket to the river, not the other way

hd

lw Sy,Ks

Percolation

Pumping

Groundwater representation

Page 41: WEAP Demand Management

Some Comments The geometry of the aquifers in question are

representative, not absolute.

Stream stage fluctuations are assumed to represent average conditions.

While the ‘water table’ can fluctuate, it ignores all local fluctuations.

Page 42: WEAP Demand Management

Time series wizard

Hydrology Data Input: Building Expressions

Expression Builder-Similar to EXCEL

Page 43: WEAP Demand Management

Hydrology Data Input: Water-Year Method

•Describe a series of water year types from very dry to very wet

•Enter the water year sequence

Page 44: WEAP Demand Management

Hydrology Data Input: Read from File

•Historical or synthetic data

•Import from ASCII files

Page 45: WEAP Demand Management

Conclusions Hydrology The hydrology module is a powerful tool for considering

changing catchment dynamics.

Hydrology is essential for conducting rigorous analysis of climate change impacts.

Hydrology could be very interesting for livelihoods analysis because it considers several resources in a catchment, rainfed and irrigated agriculture, forest and range management, fish appropriate flows.

The critical question is whether it is as simple as possible, and no simpler.

Page 46: WEAP Demand Management

Hydrology Tutorial Updates (Pg. 175)

Replaces Figure on Pg. 175 of tutorial

Page 47: WEAP Demand Management

Hydrology Tutorial Additional Figure

Flow to River Full Irrigation, Exhibiting rather constant soil moisture in first bucket throughout the year (at 45-50%)

Page 48: WEAP Demand Management

Hydrology Tutorial Updates (Pg. 180)

Replaces Figured on Pg. 180 of tutorial

Page 49: WEAP Demand Management

Hydrology Tutorial Updates (Pg. 181)

Replaces Figured on Pg. 181 of tutorial