2

Web of Science Core Collection Trusted Data For Research Analysis & Evaluation

Content Selection

-Size & Quality of Content

-Peer review

-Editorial Conventions

-Publishing Standards

-International Diversity

-Citation Tracking

-Self Citations

Indexing Metadata -Bibliographic Information

-Abstracts

-Keywords

-All Author Names

-All Addresses

-Funding Acknowledgements

-Citing & Cited Articles

Data

Organization

-Subject Category

-Organization Enhanced

-Country/Territory

-Open Access

-Highly Cited Research

-Topical

-Document Type

3

Web of Science Core Colection: Objective and Unique Content Selection Process

Journal

Publishing

Standards

Editorial

Content

International

Diversity Citation

Analysis

A set of criteria developed across 50 years

Core coverage in Web of Science is not static !

12665 selected journals

12000 annual selected

conferences

62000 selected books

4

Web of Science Core Collection Different Levels Metadata Quality

5

6

InCites Applications of Bibliometric Analysis: Quantification

• Data reduction (extracting essential information)

• Data cleaning and data disambiguation

Web of Science Core Collection Data

•Journals, Books, Proceedings

•50 Million records

•90 Million citations

•1 Billion Cited References

Thomson Reuters Expertise & Processing

• Address unification

• Data cleansing & standardization

• Normalization & baselines

InCites Web of Science Profiles

• For more than five decades Thomson Reuters has provided a wide

range of tools and services supporting research evaluation.

• Our specialist work with Web of Science data and ensure maximum

standardization and unification before delivery to customers.

• Not just simple counts and averages, but real metrics founded on

baselines for comparison and normalized statistics.

7

InCites Applications of Bibliometric Analysis: Measuring & Benchmarking

Journal Ranking Indicators

Normalization &

Scientific Excellence

Productivity

and

Impact

Scientific

Collaborations

• Journal Impact Factor

•Journal Impact Factor

without self citations

•Journal Impact Factor for

5 years

•Quartile in Category

•Immediacy Index

•Eigenfactor Score

• Cited & Citing Relations

of a Journal with other

Journals

•By Authors

•By Institutions

•By Country

•By Field/Topic/Journal

•By Publications

• National

Collaborations

• International

Collaborations

• Industry Collaborations

•

•Category Normalized

Citation Impact

•Journal Normalized

Citation Impact

•% Documents in 1%

• % Documents in 10%

• Average Percentiles

•Hot Papers

• Highly Cited Papers

• Research Fronts

• Baselines

• # of documents

• # of OA documents

• # of funded documents

• # of citations

•% of Documents cited

•2nd generation citations

•Citation per document

•H-index

•Impact Relative to

Country

•Impact Relative to Area

•Impact Relative to World

• What can and what should be measured?

• What are appropriate measures for the purpose?

• Comparison (like with like)

• Putting data into context

8

InCites Applications of Bibliometric Analysis: Presentation & Visualization

• Visualizations + interpretation of observations

• Linking bibliometric indicators to results of other methods

9

InCites Bibliometric Analytical Tool for Research Evaluation

WEB OF SCIENCE

Core Collection

Web of Science

Documents

% Open Access

Journals

h-index

Highly Cited

Papers

Percentiles

Normalized

Citation

Impact Journal

Normalized

Citation Impact

Citation

Impact Productivity

and impact

Advanced

normalized

bibliometric

methodologies

Accountability

measures

Support

funding

proposals

Industry

Collaborations

Hot Papers

International

Collaborations

THE Ranked

ESI Most Cited

Author

Collaborations

Scientific

Collaborations

Top performance

and

scientific

excellence

INCITES A CASE STUDY ON CZECH REPUBLIC

10

11

National Comparisons – Monitor Productivity WoS Documents; 1994 - 2014

12

National Comparisons – Assess Performance Category Normalized Impact over time

Category

Normalized Impact;

2009-2014

Category

Normalized Impact;

2004-2008

13

Czech Republic – International Collaborations

Volume Category Normalized Impact

2004-2008; 36.7% (18,490) 2004-2008; 0.96

2009-2013; 35.8% (27,766) 2009-2013; 1.21

14

Czech Republic – International Collaborations

Top 10% Percentile Highly Cited Papers

2004-2008; 8.72%

2009-2013; 9.55%

2004-2008; 231

2009-2013; 566

15

33

25

18 23

34

23

17

24

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

40

0

1000

2000

3000

4000

5000

6000

Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4

2004-2008 WoS Docs

2009-2013 WoS Docs

2004-2008 % Journals in JIF Quartiles

2009-2013 % Journals in JIF Quartiles

Czech Republic – Journal output Top 100 journals Czech researchers have published the most (Articles & Reviews)

16

Czech Republic – International Collaborations Understand Strengths and Weaknesses per Field

Top 10 most productive WoS

Categories ranked by Normalized

Impact; 2004-2014

Top 10 most productive WoS

Categories; 2004-2014

17

Czech Republic – International Collaborations Discover Potential in Output of Smaller Size

WoS Categories (threshold 500-

700 docs) ranked by Normalized

Impact; 2004-2014

WoS Categories (threshold 500-700

documents); 2004-2014

18

Global Institutional Benchmarking Customizable Advanced Bibliometric Analysis

19

National Institutional Benchmarking – Monitor your Productivity 2000-2014

20

National Institutional Benchmarking – Performance Category Normalized Impact 2009-2013

Understand the National

Importance of your output

and its contribution to world

leading research activity

21

Leading Scientific Excellence - Highly Cited Research Highly Cited Papers

Highly Cited Papers have been

published in the past 10 years

and have received enough

citations to place them in the Top

1% of their scientific field

22

Assess Funded Research Combine Output Volume & Research Performance

0.94

0.81 0.89

0.53

1.18

1.45

0.99

0.79 0.42

Funded Output per Institution

assessed by number of

documents resulted by

funding and Category

Normalized Impact

23

National Institutional Benchmarking – Performance Category Normalized Impact 2009-2013 Czech Republic’s Top 5 ESI fields (output)

2014 Hot Research Topic in

Chemistry; Functional

Metal-Organic Frameworks

MOFs

Use WoS for a topical Search

on MOF’s

Export the results of your

search into InCites for

bibliometric analysis

WoS export to InCites

24

Web of Science Profiles Bibliometric Analysis at the Author/Department/Faculty level

• Pre-Population: Thomson Reuters will provide a set of articles from 2004- current to allow the customer to get started

• Feedback Loop: Institutions can easily curate their publications as reflected in the Web of Science

Integrated with Web of Science Data

• Supports flexible creation of groups, departments

• Allows integration of other data sources

• Organization can maintain themselves or open up to their user community

Built on Converis technology

• Article and Author level metrics

• Template reports and dynamic bibliometric reporting

• Global benchmarking in InCites

Analytics from InCites

Web of Science Profiles provides customers with a micro-level view of their

institution’s publications and performance, including department and author

metrics. It allows an organization to create, curate, and maintain a view of

their organization’s comprehensive research output, with reporting tailored to

the department and researcher level.

25

Web of Science Profiles Bibliometric Analysis at the Author/Department/Faculty level

26

Web of Science Profiles My Institution’s Dashboard • Dashboard comprising four charts providing a top level overview of the institution’s publication performance

27

Web of Science Profiles My Researchers’ Dashboard • Dashboard providing an overview of publications affiliated with an individual researcher

28

Web of Science Profiles Faculty Comparison Dashboard • Comparison of the publications performance of two organizations within your institution