Upload
others
View
17
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
IB Questionbank Test
2.2 SL
1a. [1 mark]
Markscheme
(must be an equation) A1 N1
[1 mark]
Examiners report
[N/A]
1b. [3 marks]
Markscheme
interchanging and (seen anywhere) (M1)
eg ,
evidence of correct manipulation (A1)
eg , ,
(accept ) A1 N3
[3 marks]
Examiners report
[N/A]
1c. [2 marks]
Markscheme
valid approach to find horizontal asymptote (M1)
eg , vert.asymp of becomes horiz.asymp of , ,
(must be an equation) A1 N2
[2 marks]
Examiners report
[N/A]
2a. [1 mark]
Markscheme
(must be an equation) A1 N1
[1 mark]
Examiners report
[N/A]
2b. [2 marks]
Markscheme
valid approach (M1)
eg , , , , ,
(must be an equation) A1 N2
[2 marks]
Examiners report
[N/A]
2c. [3 marks]
Markscheme
METHOD 1
attempt to substitute 1 into or (M1)
eg ,
(A1)
A1 N2
METHOD 2
attempt to form composite function (in any order) (M1)
eg ,
correct substitution (A1)
eg
A1 N2
[3 marks]
Examiners report
[N/A]
3a. [4 marks]
Markscheme
evidence of valid approach (M1)
eg sketch of triangle with sides 3 and 5,
correct working (A1)
eg missing side is 4 (may be seen in sketch), ,
A2 N4
[4 marks]
Examiners report
[N/A]
3b. [2 marks]
Markscheme
correct substitution of either gradient or origin into equation of line (A1)
(do not accept )
eg , ,
A2 N4
Note: Award A1A0 for .
[2 marks]
Examiners report
[N/A]
3c. [5 marks]
Markscheme
(seen anywhere, including answer) A1
choosing product rule (M1)
eg
correct derivatives (must be seen in a correct product rule) A1A1
eg ,
A1 N5
[5 marks]
Examiners report
[N/A]
3d. [4 marks]
Markscheme
valid approach to equate their gradients (M1)
eg , , ,
correct equation without (A1)
eg , ,
correct working (A1)
eg ,
(do not accept ) A1 N1
Note: Do not award the final A1 if additional answers are given.
[4 marks]
Examiners report
[N/A]
4a. [3 marks]
Markscheme
A1A1A1 N3
Note: Only if the shape is approximately correct with exactly 2 maximums and 1 minimum on the interval 0 ≤ ≤ 0, award the following:A1 for correct domain with both endpoints within circle and oval.A1 for passing through the other -intercepts within the circles.A1 for passing through the three turning points within circles (ignore -intercepts and extrema outside of the domain).
[3 marks]
Examiners report
[N/A]
4b. [3 marks]
Markscheme
evidence of reasoning (may be seen on graph) (M1)
eg , (0.524, 0), (0.785, 0)
0.523598, 0.785398
, A1A1 N3
Note: Award M1A1A0 if any solution outside domain (eg ) is also included.
[3 marks]
Examiners report
[N/A]
4c. [2 marks]
Markscheme
A2 N2
Note: Award A1 if any correct interval outside domain also included, unless additional solutions already penalized in (b).Award A0 if any incorrect intervals are also included.
[2 marks]
Examiners report
[N/A]
5a. [2 marks]
Markscheme
attempt to find (M1)
eg , ,
−0.25 (exact) A1 N2
[2 marks]
Examiners report
[N/A]
5b. [2 marks]
Markscheme
u or any scalar multiple A2 N2
[2 marks]
Examiners report
[N/A]
5c. [5 marks]
Markscheme
correct scalar product and magnitudes (A1)(A1)(A1)
scalar product
magnitudes ,
substitution of their values into correct formula (M1)
eg , , 2.1112, 120.96°
1.03037 , 59.0362°
angle = 1.03 , 59.0° A1 N4
[5 marks]
Examiners report
[N/A]
5d. [3 marks]
Markscheme
attempt to form composite (M1)
eg , ,
correct working (A1)
eg ,
A1 N2
[3 marks]
Examiners report
[N/A]
5e. [1 mark]
Markscheme
(accept , ) A1 N1
Note: Award A0 in part (ii) if part (i) is incorrect.Award A0 in part (ii) if the candidate has found by interchanging and .
[1 mark]
Examiners report
[N/A]
5f. [3 marks]
Markscheme
METHOD 1
recognition of symmetry about (M1)
eg (2, 8) ⇔ (8, 2)
evidence of doubling their angle (M1)
eg ,
2.06075, 118.072°
2.06 (radians) (118 degrees) A1 N2
METHOD 2
finding direction vector for tangent line at (A1)
eg ,
substitution of their values into correct formula (must be from vectors) (M1)
eg ,
2.06075, 118.072°
2.06 (radians) (118 degrees) A1 N2
METHOD 3
using trigonometry to find an angle with the horizontal (M1)
eg ,
finding both angles of rotation (A1)
eg ,
2.06075, 118.072°
2.06 (radians) (118 degrees) A1 N2
[3 marks]
Examiners report
[N/A]
6a. [2 marks]
Markscheme
valid approach (M1)
eg ,
0.693147
= ln 2 (exact), 0.693 A1 N2
[2 marks]
Examiners report
[N/A]
6b. [3 marks]
Markscheme
attempt to substitute either their correct limits or the function into formula (M1)
involving
eg , ,
3.42545
volume = 3.43 A2 N3
[3 marks]
Examiners report
[N/A]
7a. [2 marks]
Markscheme
valid approach (M1)
eg , , ,
(0, 6) (accept = 0 and = 6) A1 N2
[2 marks]
Examiners report
[N/A]
7b. [2 marks]
Markscheme
A2 N2
[2 marks]
Examiners report
[N/A]
7c. [4 marks]
Markscheme
valid approach (M1)
eg
correct working (A1)
eg , slope = ,
attempt to substitute gradient and coordinates into linear equation (M1)
eg , , , L
correct equation A1 N3
eg , ,
[4 marks]
Examiners report
[N/A]
7d. [8 marks]
Markscheme
valid approach to find intersection (M1)
eg
correct equation (A1)
eg
correct working (A1)
eg ,
at Q (A1)
valid approach to find minimum (M1)
eg
correct equation (A1)
eg
substitution of their value of at Q into their equation (M1)
eg ,
= −4 A1 N0
[8 marks]
Examiners report
[N/A]
8a. [2 marks]
Markscheme
valid method (M1)
eg (0), sketch of graph
-intercept is (exact), −0.333, A1 N2
[2 marks]
Examiners report
[N/A]
8b. [1 mark]
Markscheme
A1 N1
[1 mark]
Examiners report
[N/A]
8c. [2 marks]
Markscheme
valid method (M1)
eg , , sketch of graph
(must be an equation) A1 N2
[2 marks]
Examiners report
[N/A]
8d. [2 marks]
Markscheme
valid approach (M1)
eg recognizing that is related to the horizontal asymptote,
table with large values of , their value from (a)(iii), L’Hopital’s rule .
A1 N2
[2 marks]
Examiners report
[N/A]
9a. [1 mark]
Markscheme
A1 N1
[1 mark]
Examiners report
[N/A]
9b. [1 mark]
Markscheme
f (1) = 2 A1 N1
[1 mark]
Examiners report
[N/A]
9c. [1 mark]
Markscheme
−2 ≤ y ≤ 2, y∈ [−2, 2] (accept −2 ≤ x ≤ 2) A1 N1
[1 mark]
Examiners report
[N/A]
9d. [4 marks]
Markscheme
A1A1A1A1 N4
Note: Award A1 for evidence of approximately correct reflection in y = x with correct curvature.
(y = x does not need to be explicitly seen)
Only if this mark is awarded, award marks as follows:
A1 for both correct invariant points in circles,
A1 for the three other points in circles,
A1 for correct domain.
[4 marks]
Examiners report
[N/A]
10a. [2 marks]
Markscheme
recognize that is the gradient of the tangent at (M1)
eg
(accept m = 3) A1 N2
[2 marks]
Examiners report
[N/A]
10b. [2 marks]
Markscheme
recognize that (M1)
eg
A1 N2
[2 marks]
Examiners report
[N/A]
10c. [5 marks]
Markscheme
recognize that the gradient of the graph of g is (M1)
choosing chain rule to find (M1)
eg
A2
A1
AG N0
[5 marks]
Examiners report
[N/A]
10d. [7 marks]
Markscheme
at Q, L = L (seen anywhere) (M1)
recognize that the gradient of L is g'(1) (seen anywhere) (M1)eg m = 6
finding g (1) (seen anywhere) (A1)eg
attempt to substitute gradient and/or coordinates into equation of a straight line M1eg
correct equation for L
eg A1
correct working to find Q (A1)eg same y-intercept,
A1 N2
[7 marks]
Examiners report
[N/A]
11a. [2 marks]
Markscheme
A2 N2[2 marks]
Examiners report
[N/A]
11b. [4 marks]
Markscheme
recognizing horizontal shift/translation of 1 unit (M1)
eg b = 1, moved 1 right
recognizing vertical stretch/dilation with scale factor 2 (M1)
eg a = 2, y ×(−2)
a = −2, b = −1 A1A1 N2N2
[4 marks]
Examiners report
[N/A]
12a. [1 mark]
Markscheme
(1,5) (exact) A1 N1
[1 mark]
Examiners report
[N/A]
12b. [3 marks]
Markscheme
A1A1A1 N3
Note: The shape must be a concave-down parabola.Only if the shape is correct, award the following for points in circles:A1 for vertex,A1 for correct intersection points,A1 for correct endpoints.
[3 marks]
Examiners report
[N/A]
12c. [3 marks]
Markscheme
integrating and subtracting functions (in any order) (M1)eg
correct substitution of limits or functions (accept missing dx, but do not accept any errors, including extra bits) (A1)eg
area = 9 (exact) A1 N2
[3 marks]
Examiners report
[N/A]
13a. [2 marks]
Markscheme
valid approach (M1)eg or 0…
1.14472
(exact), 1.14 A1 N2
[2 marks]
Examiners report
[N/A]
13b. [3 marks]
Markscheme
attempt to substitute either their limits or the function into formula involving . (M1)
eg
2.49799
volume = 2.50 A2 N3
[3 marks]
Examiners report
[N/A]
14a. [2 marks]
Markscheme
valid approach (M1)eg
c = −2 A1 N2
[2 marks]
Examiners report
[N/A]
14b. [2 marks]
Markscheme
valid approach (M1)eg
y = −4 (must be an equation) A1 N2
[2 marks]
Examiners report
[N/A]
14c. [3 marks]
Markscheme
valid approach to analyze modulus function (M1)eg sketch, horizontal asymptote at y = 4, y = 0
k = 4, k = 0 A2 N3
[3 marks]
Examiners report
[N/A]
15a. [1 mark]
Markscheme
correct range (do not accept ) A1 N1
eg
[1 mark]
Examiners report
[N/A]
15b. [1 mark]
Markscheme
A1 N1
[1 mark]
Examiners report
[N/A]
15c. [1 mark]
Markscheme
A1 N1
[1 mark]
Examiners report
[N/A]
15d. [3 marks]
Markscheme
A1A1A1 N3
Notes: Award A1 for both end points within circles,
A1 for images of and within circles,
A1 for approximately correct reflection in , concave up then concave down shape (do not accept line segments).
[3 marks]
Examiners report
[N/A]
16a. [2 marks]
Markscheme
valid approach (M1)
eg
0.816496
(exact), 0.816 A1 N2
[2 marks]
Examiners report
[N/A]
16b. [2 marks]
Markscheme
A1A1 N2
[2 marks]
Examiners report
[N/A]
16c. [3 marks]
Markscheme
A1A1A1 N3
Notes: Award A1 for correct domain and endpoints at and in circles,
A1 for maximum in square,
A1 for approximately correct shape that passes through their -intercept in circle and has changed from concave down to concave up between 2.29 and 7.
[3 marks]
Examiners report
[N/A]
17a. [3 marks]
Markscheme
METHOD 1 (using x-intercept)
determining that 3 is an -intercept (M1)
eg,
valid approach (M1)
eg
A1 N2
METHOD 2 (expanding f (x))
correct expansion (accept absence of ) (A1)
eg
valid approach involving equation of axis of symmetry (M1)
eg
A1 N2
METHOD 3 (using derivative)
correct derivative (accept absence of ) (A1)
eg
valid approach (M1)
eg
A1 N2
[3 marks]
Examiners report
[N/A]
17b. [3 marks]
Markscheme
attempt to substitute (M1)
eg
correct working (A1)
eg
A1 N2
[3 marks]
Examiners report
[N/A]
17c. [8 marks]
Markscheme
METHOD 1 (using discriminant)
recognizing tangent intersects curve once (M1)
recognizing one solution when discriminant = 0 M1
attempt to set up equation (M1)
eg
rearranging their equation to equal zero (M1)
eg
correct discriminant (if seen explicitly, not just in quadratic formula) A1
eg
correct working (A1)
eg
A1A1 N0
METHOD 2 (using derivatives)
attempt to set up equation (M1)
eg
recognizing derivative/slope are equal (M1)
eg
correct derivative of (A1)
eg
attempt to set up equation in terms of either or M1
eg
rearranging their equation to equal zero (M1)
eg
correct working (A1)
eg
A1A1 N0
[8 marks]
Examiners report
[N/A]
18a. [1 mark]
Markscheme
A1 N1
[1 mark]
Examiners report
[N/A]
18b. [2 marks]
Markscheme
attempt to substitute into their derivative (M1)
gradient of is A1 N2
[2 marks]
Examiners report
[N/A]
18c. [5 marks]
Markscheme
METHOD 1
attempt to substitute coordinates of A and their gradient into equation of a line (M1)
eg
correct equation of in any form (A1)
eg
valid approach (M1)
eg
correct substitution into equation A1
eg
correct working A1
eg
AG N0
METHOD 2
valid approach (M1)
eg
recognizing at B (A1)
attempt to substitute coordinates of A and B into slope formula (M1)
eg
correct equation A1
eg
correct working A1
eg
AG N0
[5 marks]
Examiners report
[N/A]
18d. [2 marks]
Markscheme
valid approach to find area of triangle (M1)
eg
area of A1 N2
[2 marks]
Examiners report
[N/A]
18e. [7 marks]
Markscheme
METHOD 1 ()
valid approach to find area from to 0 (M1)
eg
correct integration (seen anywhere, even if M0 awarded) A1
eg
substituting their limits into their integrated function and subtracting (M1)
eg, area from to 0 is
Note: Award M0 for substituting into original or differentiated function.
attempt to find area of (M1)
eg
correct working for (A1)
eg
correct substitution into (A1)
eg
A1 N2
METHOD 2 ()
valid approach to find area of (M1)
eg
correct integration (seen anywhere, even if M0 awarded) A2
eg
substituting their limits into their integrated function and subtracting (M1)
eg
Note: Award M0 for substituting into original or differentiated function.
correct working for (A1)
eg
correct substitution into (A1)
eg
A1 N2
[7 marks]
Examiners report
[N/A]
19a. [2 marks]
Markscheme
valid approach (M1)
eg,
-intercept is 2.9 A1 N2
[2 marks]
Examiners report
[N/A]
19b. [2 marks]
Markscheme
valid approach involving equation or inequality (M1)
eg
(must be an equation) A1 N2
[2 marks]
Examiners report
[N/A]
19c. [2 marks]
Markscheme
7.01710
A2 N2
Note: If candidate gives the minimum point as their final answer, award A1 for .
[2 marks]
Examiners report
[N/A]
20a. [2 marks]
Markscheme
attempt to form composite in either order (M1)
eg
A1
AG N0
[2 marks]
Examiners report
[N/A]
20b. [3 marks]
Markscheme
A1
A1A1 N3
Note: Award A1 for approximately correct shape which changes from concave down to concave up. Only if this A1 is awarded, award the following:
A1 for left hand endpoint in circle and right hand endpoint in oval,
A1 for minimum in oval.
[3 marks]
Examiners report
[N/A]
20c. [3 marks]
Markscheme
evidence of identifying max/min as relevant points (M1)
eg
correct interval (inclusion/exclusion of endpoints must be correct) A2 N3
eg
[3 marks]
Examiners report
[N/A]
21a. [2 marks]
Markscheme
evidence of valid approach (M1)
eg
2.73205
A1 N2
[2 marks]
Examiners report
[N/A]
21b. [2 marks]
Markscheme
1.87938, 8.11721
A2 N2
[2 marks]
Examiners report
[N/A]
21c. [1 mark]
Markscheme
rate of change is 0 (do not accept decimals) A1 N1
[1 marks]
Examiners report
[N/A]
21d. [4 marks]
Markscheme
METHOD 1 (using GDC)
valid approach M1
eg, max/min on
sketch of either or , with max/min or root (respectively) (A1)
A1 N1
Substituting their value into (M1)
eg
A1 N1
METHOD 2 (analytical)
A1
setting (M1)
A1 N1
substituting their value into (M1)
eg
A1 N1
[4 marks]
Examiners report
[N/A]
21e. [3 marks]
Markscheme
recognizing rate of change is (M1)
eg
rate of change is 6 A1 N2
[3 marks]
Examiners report
[N/A]
21f. [3 marks]
Markscheme
attempt to substitute either limits or the function into formula (M1)
involving (accept absence of and/or )
eg
128.890
A2 N3
[3 marks]
Examiners report
[N/A]
22a. [2 marks]
Markscheme
A1A1 N2
[2 marks]
Examiners report
[N/A]
22b. [5 marks]
Markscheme
(i) (ii) A1
A1A1A1 N4
A1 N1
Notes: (i) Award A1 for correct cubic shape with correct curvature.
Only if this A1 is awarded, award the following:
A1 for passing through their point A and the origin,
A1 for endpoints,
A1 for maximum.
(ii) Award A1 for horizontal line through their A.
[5 marks]
Examiners report
[N/A]
23a. [3 marks]
Markscheme
(i) 3 A1 N1
(ii) valid attempt to find the period (M1)
eg
period A1 N2
[3 marks]
Examiners report
Almost all candidates correctly stated the amplitude but then had difficulty finding the correct period. Few students faced problems in sketching the graph of the given function, even if they had found the wrong period, thus indicating a lack of understanding of the term ‘period’ in part a(ii). Most sketches were good although care should be taken to observe the given domain and to draw a neat curve.
23b. [4 marks]
Markscheme
A1A1A1A1 N4
[4 marks]
Examiners report
Almost all candidates correctly stated the amplitude but then had difficulty finding the correct period. Few students faced problems in sketching the graph of the given function, even if they had found the wrong period, thus indicating a lack of understanding of the term ‘period’ in part a(ii). Most sketches were good although care should be taken to observe the given domain and to draw a neat curve.
24a. [2 marks]
Markscheme
recognition that the -coordinate of the vertex is (seen anywhere) (M1)
egaxis of symmetry is , sketch,
correct working to find the zeroes A1
eg
and AG N0
[2 marks]
Examiners report
As a ‘show that’ question, part a) required a candidate to independently find the answers. Again, too many candidates used the given answers (of 3 and ) to show that the two zeros were 3 and (a circular argument). Those who were able to recognize that the -coordinate of the vertex is tended to then use the given answers and work backwards thus scoring no further marks in part a).
24b. [4 marks]
Markscheme
METHOD 1 (using factors)
attempt to write factors (M1)
eg
correct factors A1
eg
A1A1 N3
METHOD 2 (using derivative or vertex)
valid approach to find (M1)
eg
A1
correct substitution A1
eg
A1
N3
METHOD 3 (solving simultaneously)
valid approach setting up system of two equations (M1)
eg
one correct value
eg A1
correct substitution A1
eg
second correct value A1
eg
N3
[4 marks]
Examiners report
Answers to part b) were more successful with a good variety of methods used and correct solutions seen.
25a. [2 marks]
Markscheme
A1A1 N2
[2 marks]
Examiners report
Nearly all candidates performed well on this question, earning full marks on all three question parts.
25b. [2 marks]
Markscheme
A1A1 N2
[2 marks]
Examiners report
Nearly all candidates performed well on this question, earning full marks on all three question parts. In part (b), there were some candidates who factored the quadratic expression correctly, but went on to give negative values for and .
25c. [2 marks]
Markscheme
attempt to substitute into their (M1)
eg
A1 N2
[2 marks]
Examiners report
Nearly all candidates performed well on this question, earning full marks on all three question parts.
26a. [5 marks]
Markscheme
METHOD 1
recognizing (M1)
recognizing displacement of P in first 5 seconds (seen anywhere) A1
(accept missing )
eg
valid approach to find total displacement (M1)
eg
0.284086
0.284 (m) A2 N3
METHOD 2
recognizing (M1)
correct integration A1
eg (do not penalize missing “”)
attempt to find (M1)
eg
attempt to substitute into their expression with (M1)
eg
0.284086
0.284 (m) A1 N3
[5 marks]
Examiners report
This question was not well done throughout. Analytical approaches were almost always unsuccessful as a result of poor integration and differentiation skills and many of the errors were a result of having the GDC in degree mode. In (a), most candidates recognized the need to integrate to find the displacement, although a significant number differentiated . Of those that integrated, many assumed incorrectly that the initial displacement was the value of the constant of integration. Some candidates integrated and obtained no marks for an invalid approach. In the case where a correct definite integral was given, it was disappointing to see many candidates try to evaluate it analytically rather than using their GDC.
26b. [2 marks]
Markscheme
recognizing that at rest, (M1)
A1 N2
[2 marks]
Examiners report
This question was not well done throughout. Analytical approaches were almost always unsuccessful as a result of poor integration and differentiation skills and many of the errors were a result of having the GDC in degree mode. In part (b), many candidates did not read the question carefully and gave the two occasions, in the given domain, where the particle was at rest.
26c. [2 marks]
Markscheme
recognizing when change of direction occurs (M1)
eg crosses axis
2 (times) A1 N2
[2 marks]
Examiners report
This question was not well done throughout. Analytical approaches were almost always unsuccessful as a result of poor integration and differentiation skills and many of the errors were a result of having the GDC in degree mode. In part (c), many candidates did not appreciate that velocity is a vector and that the particle would change direction when its velocity changes sign. Consequently, many candidates gave the incorrect answer of four changes in directions, rather than the correct two direction changes.
26d. [2 marks]
Markscheme
acceleration is (seen anywhere) (M1)
eg
0.743631
A1 N2
[2 marks]
Examiners report
This question was not well done throughout. Analytical approaches were almost always unsuccessful as a result of poor integration and differentiation skills and many of the errors were a result of having the GDC in degree mode. Part (d), was done very poorly, with candidates struggling to differentiate sine and cosine correctly and to evaluate their derivative. As with question 3, many candidates worked with the incorrect angle setting on their calculator.
26e. [3 marks]
Markscheme
valid approach involving max or min of (M1)
eg, graph
one correct co-ordinate for min (A1)
eg
A1 N2
[3 marks]
Examiners report
This question was not well done throughout. Analytical approaches were almost always unsuccessful as a result of poor integration and differentiation skills and many of the errors were a result of having the GDC in degree mode. Few candidates attempted part (e). Of those that did, many attempted to find the largest local maximum of the graph rather than least local minimum as they did not recognise speed as .
27a. [2 marks]
Markscheme
(correct equation only) A2 N2
[2 marks]
Examiners report
Part (a) was in general well answered. Many candidates lost the marks for writing 2 or instead of .
27b. [2 marks]
Markscheme
valid approach (M1)
eg
A1 N2
[2 marks]
Examiners report
In part (b) some candidates got confused and found instead of . When calculating the derivative, two types of approaches were seen. Most of the ones who rewrote the function as , applied the chain rule correctly. Those who tried to apply the quotient rule made various mistakes: incorrect derivative of a constant, incorrect multiplication by zero, wrong subtraction order in the numerator, omitted the negative sign in the answer.
27c. [2 marks]
Markscheme
correct equation for the asymptote of
eg (A1)
A1 N2
[2 marks]
Examiners report
In (c), most candidates were coherent and obtained the same value as the one written in part (a).
27d. [4 marks]
Markscheme
correct derivative of g (seen anywhere) (A2)
eg
correct equation (A1)
eg
7.38905
A1 N2
[4 marks]
Examiners report
In part (d) many candidates did not manage to differentiate the function g correctly. Of those who could, the equation was generally well solved algebraically.
27e. [4 marks]
Markscheme
attempt to equate their derivatives (M1)
eg
valid attempt to solve their equation (M1)
egcorrect value outside the domain of such as 0.522 or 4.51,
correct solution (may be seen in sketch) (A1)
eg
gradient is A1 N3
[4 marks]
Examiners report
For part (e), not many candidates wrote a correct equation with their derivatives. There was mixed performance for this question, as those who knew they needed to use their GDC managed to obtain an answer, while many got tangled in unsuccessful attempts to solve the equation algebraically. Many candidates tried to solve quite complex equations ‘manually’ instead of trying to graph the expressions on their calculators and finding the value of at the point of intersection. Of those students who tried to solve graphically only a small percentage actually sketched the two curves that they were considering. This sketch is particularly useful to examiners to see how the student is thinking, or what steps s/he is taking to solve the equations.
Only a few realized that the question asked for the gradient, which was represented by the -coordinate of the point of intersection, rather than the -coordinate.
Printed for International School of Monza
© International Baccalaureate Organization 2019
International Baccalaureate® - Baccalauréat International® - Bachillerato Internacional®
1