6
World History Name_______________________________ Class Activity – Nationalism & Germany Date____________ Period_________ What is the difference between patriotism and nationalism? Patriotism- is a love for one’s country that inspires one to serve for the benefit of its citizens. Nationalism- is also a love of one’s country, but with the belief that the country is superior to other countries. Nationalism is loyalty to the idea of the state rather than to the community. It is pride in the image of the nation-state and its accomplishments. It is a power belief that people who share common land, traditions, language, religion and blood belong together in a state of self-rule. In 1848, the map of Europe looked profoundly differ from hoe it would look in the 1900s. Most noticeably the states of ______________ and ______________ simply did not

€¦  · Web viewC: Otto von Bismarck, “Blood and Iron speech” As chancellor, or prime minister, of Prussia, Bismarck was the real builder of a unified German nation. He knew

  • Upload
    others

  • View
    1

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: €¦  · Web viewC: Otto von Bismarck, “Blood and Iron speech” As chancellor, or prime minister, of Prussia, Bismarck was the real builder of a unified German nation. He knew

World History Name_______________________________Class Activity – Nationalism & Germany Date____________ Period_________

What is the difference between patriotism and nationalism?

Patriotism- is a love for one’s country that inspires one to serve for the benefit of its citizens.Nationalism- is also a love of one’s country, but with the belief that the country is superior to other countries.

Nationalism is loyalty to the idea of the state rather than to the community. It is pride in the image of the nation-state and its accomplishments. It is a power belief that people who share common land, traditions, language, religion and blood belong together in a state of self-rule.

In 1848, the map of Europe looked profoundly differ from hoe it would look in the 1900s. Most noticeably the states of ______________ and ______________ simply did not exist in their current form until nationalist movements culminated in the 1860s and 1870s.

Page 2: €¦  · Web viewC: Otto von Bismarck, “Blood and Iron speech” As chancellor, or prime minister, of Prussia, Bismarck was the real builder of a unified German nation. He knew

Document A: Early Germany

1. What do you see?

2. How was Germany set up prior to unification?

Document B: Nationalistic Feelings in Germany A German Student, Carl Shurz’s account after news of uprisings in France

1. How was Germany influenced by the revolutions in France?

2. How did life change in Germany according to this passage?

Page 3: €¦  · Web viewC: Otto von Bismarck, “Blood and Iron speech” As chancellor, or prime minister, of Prussia, Bismarck was the real builder of a unified German nation. He knew

Document C: Otto von Bismarck, “Blood and Iron speech” As chancellor, or prime minister, of Prussia, Bismarck was the real builder of a unified German nation. He knew what he wanted to do, and he explained how he was going to do it. The passage below is a speech before the Prussian parliament on September 20, 1862.

1. What did Bismarck think of the democratic way (“majority votes”) of allowing the people to decide important questions?

2. What did he mean by his phrase “iron and blood” in the last sentence?

3. How did Bismarck feel the German people had been treated by other nations?

Document D “Speech to the German Parliament” February 6, 1888

“When I say that we must strive continually to be ready for all emergencies, I advance the proposition that, on account of our geographical position, we must make greater efforts than other powers would be obliged to make in view of the same ends. We lie in the middle of Europe. We have at least three fronts on which we can be attacked. France has only an eastern boundary; Russia only its western, exposed to assault…So we are spurred forward on both sides to endeavors which perhaps we would not make otherwise.”

1. According to Bismarck, what key factor makes Germany a potential target for invasion? Why?

2. Do you think Bismarck might have been overstating the threat to Germany? Why?

Page 4: €¦  · Web viewC: Otto von Bismarck, “Blood and Iron speech” As chancellor, or prime minister, of Prussia, Bismarck was the real builder of a unified German nation. He knew

Document E: Nationalist Speech by Otto von Bismarck Gentlemen! I have just heard from the lips of your teachers, the leaders of higher education, an appreciation of my past, which means much to me. From your greeting, I infer a promise for the future, and this means even more for a man of my years than his love of approbation. You will be able, at least many of you, to live according to the sentiments which your presence here today reveals, and to do so to the middle of the next century, while I have long been condemned to inactivity and belong to the days that are past. I find consolation in this observation, for the German is not so constitutedthat he could entirely dismiss in his old age what in his youth inspired him. Forty and sixty years hence you will not hold exactly the same views as today, but the seed planted in your young hearts by the reign of Emperor William I will bear fruit, and even when you grow old, your attitude will ever be German national because it is so today. . . .

We had to win our national independence in difficult wars. The preparation, the prologue, was the Holstein war. We had to fight with Austria for a settlement; no court of law could have given a decree of separation; we had to fight. That we were facing French war after our victory at Sadowa could not remain in doubt for anyone who knew the conditions of Europe. . . . After the war had been waged everybody here was saying that within five years we should have to wage the next war. This was to be feared it is true, but I have ever since considered it to be my duty to prevent it. We Germans had no longer any reason for war. We had what we needed. To fight for more, from a lust of conquest and for the annexation of countries which were not necessary for us always appeared to me like an atrocity; I am tempted to say like a Bonapartistic and a foreign atrocity, alien to the Germanic sense of justice. . . .

The men who made the biggest sacrifices that the empire might be born were undoubtedly the German princes, not excluding the king of Prussia. My old master hesitated long before he voluntarily yielded his independence to the empire. Let us then be thankful to the reigning houses who made sacrifices for the empire which after the full thousand years of German history must have been hard for them to make. . . .

I would then—and you will say I am an old, conservative man—compress what I have to say into these words: Let us keep above everything the things we have, before we look for new things, nor be afraid of those people who begrudge them to us. In Germany struggles have existed always. . . . Life is a struggle everywhere in nature, and without inner struggles we end by being like the Chinese, and become petrified. No struggle, no life! Only, in every fight where the national question arises, there must be a rallying point. For us this is the empire, not as it may seem to be desirable, but as it is, the empire and the emperor, who represents it. That is why I ask you to join me in wishing well to the emperorand the empire. I hope that in 1950 all of you who are still living will again respond with contented hearts to the toast.

LONG LIVE THE EMPEROR AND THE EMPIRE!DirectionsUsing at least three pieces of evidence from the primary sources, summarize the path to independence and the establishment of a German empire in a paragraph.__________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

Page 5: €¦  · Web viewC: Otto von Bismarck, “Blood and Iron speech” As chancellor, or prime minister, of Prussia, Bismarck was the real builder of a unified German nation. He knew

__________________________________________________________________________________________________