Validation Panel Report (Summary Sheet)

Provider’s Name: Griffith CollegeAddress: South Circular Road, Dublin 8

1. Programmes submitted for approval:Bachelor of Engineering in Industrial Engineering (NFQ 7, 60 ECTS)

Leading to the award of:Bachelor of Engineering

Constituent Minor Awards:Industrial Engineering Principles (NFQ 7, 10 ECTS)Continuous Improvement Engineering (NFQ 7, 5 ECTS)Project Management in Industrial Engineering (NFQ 7, 5 ECTS) Logistics and Supply Chain Management (NFQ 7, 5 ECTS)Environment and Sustainability in Industrial Engineering (NFQ 7, 5 ECTS)Work Measurement and Methods Engineering (NFQ 6, 5 ECTS)

2. Date submitted to QQI: 14/08/2015 (final version)

Date of Evaluation: 17/08/2015Date of Report: 21/08/2015

3. Membership of the Programme Evaluation Panel:

Name Role Area of Expertise QQI Peer Review Reference Listing

David Denieffe 

Chairperson Registrar, Carlow IT

Damian Cox IT Blanchardstown

Discipline Expert Engineering

Brian ClareDIT

Discipline Expert Mechanical and Design Engineering

Dr. Leo Casey National College of Ireland

Education Teaching, Learning and Assessment

Mark Cooney Industry Programmes

Industry Expert Formerly Intel – Engineering – Industry / Academic

1

Director - Connect Research Institute, TCD

Partnerships

Orla Butler  Rapporteur Quality Assurance and Enhancement 

Griffith College

2

3

Report of the Programme Evaluation Panel

Provider’s Name: Griffith CollegeAddresses: South Circular Road, Dublin 18; O’Connell Avenue, Limerick City;

Wellington Road, Cork

QA procedures agreed Yes

Griffith College Quality Assurance procedures were agreed with HETAC in 2005. They have been reviewed on a regular basis since. Major modifications happened in 2010 when QA G4 was updated to formalise procedures for programmatic review published by HETAC. In September 2011 QA B2 was updated to formalise agreement with HETAC on devolution of sub-processes for validation. QA procedures reviewed Yes

As well as the ongoing annual QA review, the QA procedures in the College were reviewed as part of the Institutional Review carried out by HETAC in 2009. The panel reported that:

The effectiveness of the Quality Assurance arrangements operated by Griffith College has been assessed and has been found to be effective and broadly in accordance with the seven elements of Part One of the European Standards and Guidelines for Quality Assurance, and the HETAC Guidelines and Criteria for Quality Assurance Procedures in Higher Education, 2004.

1. Programmes submitted for approval:Bachelor of Engineering in Industrial Engineering

Leading to the award of:Bachelor of Engineering

Constituent Minor Awards:

Industrial Engineering Principles and Work System Design (NFQ 7, 10 ECTS)Continuous Improvement Engineering and Lean Six Sigma (NFQ 7, 5 ECTS)Project Management in Industrial Engineering (NFQ 7, 5 ECTS) Logistics and Supply Chain Management (NFQ 7, 5 ECTS)Environment and Sustainability in Industrial Engineering (NFQ 7, 5 ECTS)Work Measurement and Methods Engineering (NFQ 6, 5 ECTS)

2. Date submitted to QQI: 14/08/2015 (final version)Date of Evaluation: 17/08/2015Date of Report: 21/08/2015

4

5

Membership of the Programme Evaluation Panel:

Name Role Area of Expertise QQI Peer Review Reference Listing

David Denieffe 

Chairperson Registrar, Carlow IT

Damian Cox  Discipline Expert Engineering IT BlanchardstownBrian Clare Discipline Expert Mechanical and

Design Engineering DIT

Dr. Leo Casey  Education Teaching, Learning and Assessment

National College of Ireland

Mark Cooney  Industry Expert Formerly Intel – Engineering – Industry / Academic Partnerships

Industry Programmes Director - Connect Research Institute, TCD

Orla Butler  Rapporteur Quality Assurance and Enhancement 

Griffith College

Profile of providerGriffith College (GC) is an independent provider of higher education and professional training. It has been delivering successful training programmes leading to the examinations of professional bodies since 1972; academic programmes leading to QQI (HETAC / NCEA) awards since the early 1990s; degree programmes since 1991 (originally under the auspices of the University of Ulster); and postgraduate programmes since 1996.

The College currently provides a wide range of QQI accredited programmes at levels 6 to 9 on the National Framework of Qualifications. The College has campuses in Dublin, Limerick and Cork. The College’s annual learner population is over 6,000.

6

Planning:

Programme development since agreement of QA procedures/the last review The College’s QA procedures have been approved by QQI (formerly HETAC). The College’s Quality Assurance and Enhancement Procedures, Policies and Practices were reviewed by HETAC 2009 as part of the College’s successful institutional review.

The College continues to enhance its Quality Assurance Policies, Procedures, Practices and Guidelines (QAE Manual) through its active engagement with QQI and related national and international fora. Examples of engagements include: the College’s establishment of ICEP – the International Conference for Engaging Pedagogy; the College’s leading role in the development of IHEQN’s code of practice for International Students; and the College’s active participation in bodies such as the National Teaching Forum.

The College’s teaching and learning practices are further informed through its direct engagement with industry partners, for example in the collaborative development and delivery of the programmes with ISME – Ireland’s Small and Medium Enterprise Association; ICPAI – the Institute of Certified Public Accountants of Ireland; WLA – Windmill Lane Academy (Pulse College); Sports Council of Ireland; and many others.

The development of this particular programme is directly informed and enhanced through the active participation of the Institute of Industrial Engineers (IIE). This active engagement is formally reflected at executive board level; through the engagement of IIE members in programme delivery; and the support of IIE member companies in providing access to learners to industry projects for learning purposes.

Purpose of the award The programme is designed to meet specific education, training and development needs within the industrial engineering sector, with its programme learning outcomes chosen to meet the engineering awards standards of Ireland’s National Framework of Qualifications (NFQ) at level 7.

Does the proposed programme address a clear market demand? Yes No __

Avoidance of duplication

Has the Programme Development Team identified the availability of similar programmes locally, regionally, nationally?

Yes No __

Lists of related programmes supporting access, transfer and progression are presented in Appendix 2 of the proposal document.

7

Stakeholder consultation Was the level of stakeholder engagement in satisfactory? Yes No __

Sections 5.2.5 and 5.2.6 of the document outline the programme’s extensive engagement with stakeholders.

Support for the programme (industry/business/community) Yes No __

The proposed programme is actively supported by the Institute of Industrial Engineers (IIE); its members; and its member organisations.

Efficient and effective use of resourcesDoes the proposed programme represent both efficient and effective use of the provider’s resources?

Yes No __

Resource development over last 5 years (or in direct support of this programme) Specific Comments:

Staff: The College has grown in recent years and currently employs over 400 staff members. These include over 250 teaching staff. As the College’s programmes range from NFQ levels 6 to 9, the qualification and experience profile of staff members has also changed. In recent years, academic staff members have been supported in undertaking postgraduate programmes in teaching and learning offered internally and externally. An increasing number of academic staff have undertaken or completed doctoral programmes in their particular discipline.

Accommodation: The College’s campus in Dublin provides a comprehensive range of resources for learners. The College’s move to a new campus in Cork offers similar potential. The College’s city location in Limerick provides adequate resources for full-time and part-time learners.

Information technology: The College already has considerable IT resources and related capability. These include computer labs, Wi-Fi, Moodle, commercial online learning resources, etc.

The evaluation panel   considers   that   the College’s  existing  resources;  coupled with  the  limited additional resources outlined in the submission proposal; will meet the learners’ IT  requirements for the programme. 

Library:

8

The College’s library provides a comprehensive range of physical and online learning resources to learners.

The evaluation panel is satisfied that the College’s existing library resources, coupled with  the specific textbook and resource provisions outlined in the proposal are appropriate for  learners on the programme.

Administration: The College has existing teams of programme directors, programme administrators with many years’ experience of managing the College’s programmes.

The evaluation panel suggested that the programme team members managing the B.Eng.  in   Industrial   Engineering   programme   be   given   the  mentored   support   of   one   of   the  College’s existing faculties, for example Computing Science. 

Publicity/public information: The College uses its website www.griffith.ie to communicate information about its programmes to the general public. Similar focused information is provided to prospective candidates by means of prospectuses.

Planned development over the coming 5 years?

The College intends to continue its development of the coming 5 years. Particular developments anticipated include its increased engagement with industry partners in the development and delivery of NFQ validated programmes. The College is committed to actively supporting the further development of its research active staff, through funding doctoral qualifications and seeking funded research projects related to the College’s existing faculty disciplines.

Have the QQI award standards been explicitly referred to in the programme and does the programme meet those standards at the specified level?

Yes No __

The programme meets NFQ Level 6 Engineering Awards Standards. It also necessarily meets NFQ Level 6 Generic Awards Standards.

9

Has the Provider complied with Protection for Enrolled Learner requirements?

The College complies with Protection for Enrolled Learners. Formal PEL arrangements will be forwarded by the College to QQI in advance of programme commencement.

AccessIs the expected minimum and maximum number of all learners entering the programme explicitly stated?

Yes No __These are outlined in Section 4.7 of the proposal document.

Have any/all prerequisite knowledge, skills or competence or any other specific entry requirement been articulated?

Yes No __

Holders of Higher Certificate awards in engineering disciplines, and graduates of the IIE Diploma in Industrial Engineering award working in industry meet the prerequisite knowledge, skills and competencies required for entry.

A specific requirement for learners to meet the NFQ Level 6 Engineering Awards Standards is to be explicitly stated.

Quality Assurance

Application of agreed quality assurance procedures for development of programmesWere the agreed quality assurance procedures for programme development followed?

Yes No __

The proposal document was developed in accordance with the College’s QAE procedures (Section QA B2)

10

Has the programme team demonstrated how programme delivery will be monitored in accordance with agreed QA procedures?

Yes No __

The methods are further outlined in the College’s QA Policies, Procedures, Practices and Guidelines and in related support documents provided to learners on the programme.

Are programme management arrangements adequate and coherent? Yes No __

The College’s programme management arrangements are presented in the College’s Quality Assurance and Enhancement Policies, Procedures, Practices and Guidelines. These are complemented by a variety of support documents for learners which include: Programme Handbooks; Assessment Guidelines; Project Handbooks, etc.

Programme structure and content

Is the programme structure well designed, coherent and fit for its stated purpose?

Yes No __

Programme learning outcomes

Do the programme learning outcomes comply with national standards for the level of award proposed?

Yes No __

The programme learning outcomes meet the Engineering Awards Standards specified in respect of Level 6 programmes on the National Framework of Qualifications.

Are module descriptions adequate and relevant? Yes No __

A few minor re-presentations are suggested in the recommendations below.

11

Are modules relevant and current? Yes No __

Does the combination of modules chosen have the coherence to support the proposed award?

Yes No __

Learning Modes

Can the teaching and learning strategies proposed support achievement of the required learning outcomes?

Yes No __

The programme’s varied combination of teaching and learning strategies is capable of supporting the required learning outcomes.

Are the delivery mechanisms proposed adequate to the needs of the programme and the proposed learner cohorts?

Yes No __

The delivery mechanism proposed for the full-time delivery is appropriate. Learners from industry attending the block-release in-person programme are supported with online blended supports to provide an equivalent learning experience. All candidates are required to complete equivalent projects and identical examinations.

Assessment strategies

Are assessment processes and methods adequately described? Yes No __

These are outlined in Section 5.4.6. Appendices 7 and 8 provide indicative examples of assessments and examinations in respect of the programme’s constituent modules.

Are these strategies appropriate to this type of award, in terms of type, frequency and volume?

Yes No __

12

Is assessment explicitly linked with intended learning outcomes? Yes No __

The linking of assessment to intended learning outcomes is presented in respect of the programme’s constituent modules. The mapping of programme learning outcomes to module learning outcomes is presented in Appendix 9.

Does the assessment strategy underpin the achievement of the relevant standard of knowledge, skill and competence?

Yes No __

Assessments have been chosen to meet programme and module learning outcomes. The mapping of assessments to learning outcomes is shown in the modules descriptors and in related appendices. (Appendices 3, 5, 7 to 10)

Duration

What is the intended duration of the Programme?

The programme is intended for delivery on a full-time basis over two semesters. It is proposed that candidates in industry will also be facilitated through the in-person delivery of modules on a block-release basis over an extended time period. Learners will be supported with online resources providing a blended learning experience.

What is the lifespan of the programme (e.g. single cohort intake to satisfy limited local demand; multiple intakes over the following 5 years etc.?)

It is anticipated that the programme will be delivered to a number of learner cohorts over a five year period. Springboard funding has been provided in respect of a full-time cohort for 2015/6. Industry research by the IIE suggests separate demand from those in industry.

The evaluation panel is recommending approval for multiple intakes over the following five years from September 2015.

Does the Panel believe this to be realistic? Yes No __

Are there flexible modes of participation?

13

Yes No __

It is proposed to deliver the programme in a full-time mode.It is also proposed to deliver the programme in a flexible mode to facilitate mature learners in industry. This second mode will include in-person delivery on a block-release basis over an extended period of time. It will also support learners with complementary online resources and opportunities for synchronous and asynchronous learning sessions with lecturers and peer learners to reduce the requirement for their in-person attendance.

Credits

Is credit allocation in accordance with national and international guidelines?

Yes No __

Considering the level, outcomes and volume of each module, is the number of credits attached to each appropriate?

Yes No __

The evaluation panel recommended that one of the 10 ECTS modules be re-presented as two separate 5 ECTS modules.

Considering the stated objective of the programme is the number of credits attached to the award appropriate?

Yes No __

NFQ Level

Is the proposed level of the programme in accordance with institutional policy/national norms?

Yes No __

14

Programme titles and awardIs the title consistent with national policy, is it informative and is it fit for purpose?

Yes No __

Transfer and Progression

Has the Programme Development Team identified realistic transfer and progression opportunities/possibilities that learners may avail of following achievement of this award?

Yes No __

Specific transfer and progression opportunities / possibilities are presented in Appendix 2.

Module Titles, Content and Assessment Strategy

Module Title 1: Industrial Engineering PrinciplesIs the title informative and is it fit for purpose? Yes No __Are the specific learning outcomes a) properly stated, b) sufficient and c) achievable? Yes No __

Is the content sufficiently informative and is it fit for purpose? Yes No __Does the Assessment Strategy align sufficiently with the intended learning outcomes? Yes No __

Is the required reading and supplementary reading appropriate, current and realistic? Yes No __

Module Title 2: Continuous Improvement EngineeringIs the title informative and is it fit for purpose? Yes No __Are the specific learning outcomes a) properly stated, b) sufficient and c) achievable? Yes No __

Is the content sufficient informative and is it fit for purpose? Yes No __Does the Assessment Strategy align sufficiently with the intended learning outcomes? Yes No __

Is the required reading and supplementary reading appropriate, current and realistic? Yes No __

The   evaluation   panel   recommended   that   this  module   be   presented   as   two   separate  modules of 5 ECTS credits – with the first highlighting the treatment of statistics. 

15

Module Title 3: Industrial Engineering Project ManagementIs the title informative and is it fit for purpose? Yes No __Are the specific learning outcomes a) properly stated, b) sufficient and c) achievable? Yes No __

Is the content sufficient informative and is it fit for purpose? Yes No __Does the Assessment Strategy align sufficiently with the intended learning outcomes? Yes No __

Is the required reading and supplementary reading appropriate, current and realistic? Yes No __

Module Title 4: Professional PracticeIs the title informative and is it fit for purpose? Yes No __Are the specific learning outcomes a) properly stated, b) sufficient and c) achievable? Yes No __

Is the content sufficient informative and is it fit for purpose? Yes No __Does the Assessment Strategy align sufficiently with the intended learning outcomes? Yes No __

Is the required reading and supplementary reading appropriate, current and realistic? Yes No __

Module Title 5: Industrial Engineering FinancesIs the title informative and is it fit for purpose? Yes No __Are the specific learning outcomes a) properly stated, b) sufficient and c) achievable? Yes No __

Is the content sufficient informative and is it fit for purpose? Yes No __Does the Assessment Strategy align sufficiently with the intended learning outcomes? Yes No __

Is the required reading and supplementary reading appropriate, current and realistic? Yes No __

Module Title 6: Emerging TechnologiesIs the title informative and is it fit for purpose? Yes No __Are the specific learning outcomes a) properly stated, b) sufficient and c) achievable? Yes No __

Is the content sufficient informative and is it fit for purpose? Yes No __Does the Assessment Strategy align sufficiently with the intended learning outcomes? Yes No __

Is the required reading and supplementary reading appropriate, current and realistic? Yes No __

16

Module Title 7: Logistics and Supply Chain ManagementIs the title informative and is it fit for purpose? Yes No __Are the specific learning outcomes a) properly stated, b) sufficient and c) achievable? Yes No __

Is the content sufficient informative and is it fit for purpose? Yes No __Does the Assessment Strategy align sufficiently with the intended learning outcomes? Yes No __

Is the required reading and supplementary reading appropriate, current and realistic? Yes No __

Module Title 8: Environment and SustainabilityIs the title informative and is it fit for purpose? Yes No __Are the specific learning outcomes a) properly stated, b) sufficient and c) achievable?

Yes No __

Is the content sufficient informative and is it fit for purpose? Yes No __Does the Assessment Strategy align sufficiently with the intended learning outcomes?

Yes No __

Is the required reading and supplementary reading appropriate, current and realistic?

Yes No __

Module Title 9: Industrial Engineering ProjectIs the title informative and is it fit for purpose? Yes No __Are the specific learning outcomes a) properly stated, b) sufficient and c) achievable?

Yes No __

Is the content sufficient informative and is it fit for purpose? Yes No __Does the Assessment Strategy align sufficiently with the intended learning outcomes?

Yes No __

Is the required reading and supplementary reading appropriate, current and realistic?

Yes No __

Module Title 10: Work Measurement and Methods Engineering (Elective)Is the title informative and is it fit for purpose? Yes No __Are the specific learning outcomes a) properly stated, b) sufficient and c) achievable?

Yes No __

Is the content sufficient informative and is it fit for purpose? Yes No __Does the Assessment Strategy align sufficiently with the intended learning outcomes?

Yes No __

Is the required reading and supplementary reading appropriate, current and realistic?

Yes No __

17

Specific Issues to be addressed by the provider

Conditions of Approval:

The panel is recommending the B.Eng. in Industrial Engineering and its constituent minor awards for approval subject to the following condition and recommendations.

Condition:

It must be made explicit that learners accessing the programme have met all the learning outcomes stipulated for engineering awards at level 6 of the National Framework of Qualifications

Recommendations:

1: The panel strongly recommend that material relating to “learning to learn” needs to be included in the bridging module. The panel are happy that the module is a constituent part of the programme. Clearly defined bridging requirements for applicants from differing engineering disciplines should be set out.

2: The panel strongly recommends that the team clarify the minor award titles in the document.

3: The panel recommends the inclusion of a section describing, in explicit detail, how the work-based projects are going to operate and be managed.

4: The panel asked the team to reconsider the naming of modules one and two.

5: The panel recommend that the team view the consistency of the allocation of marks within modules. Also, the team should add repeat assessment structures to their module descriptors.

6: The alignment of the learning outcomes and assessment and the mapping of same should be strengthened.

7: To rationalise module two by being more specific in certain elements and to consider splitting the module into two 5 credit modules.

8: The panel recommend that the team tie up or connect the pre-requisite knowledge in modules 1 and 7.

18

Appendix 1: Staff

Griffith College ManagementProf. Diarmuid Hegarty President Griffith CollegeTomás Mac Eochagáin Registrar / Director of Academic ProgrammesAilish Finucane Head of Academic AdministrationKevin O’Sullivan Director - Griffith College LimerickSean Martin Springboard Careers Advisor / Placement Officer

Institute of Industrial Engineers Jim O’Sullivan National Chairman

Programme team:John McDonough Programme DirectorDr. Waseem Akhtar Lecturer - Head of Computing ScienceJoe Walsh LecturerFinbarr Sheehy Lecturer Patrick Hickey LecturerCathal Gallagher LecturerNoel Dillon LecturerJim O’Sullivan Lecturer - Institute of Industrial Engineers IrelandSean Martin Mentor - Careers Advisor, Springboard

Observers: Mary O’Carroll Programme AdministratorKatie McCann Programme Administrator

19

20