11
Name_______________________________________ AP HG 2.2 Date______________ POPULATION & MIGRATION How do we measure population? DO NOW: Fill in the blanks using the word box! Throughout human history, people have been unevenly _________________. Where people live is heavily influenced by ____________________________. Populations are often clustered around sustaining resources, such as bodies of water and ___________ land. Fewer people live in ______________, for example. Approximately 75% of all humans live on only 5% of Earth’s surface, the portion called the _________________. About ______ of people on Earth live in cities, whereas the other half live in rural areas. Approximately 80% of Earth’s population lives in poorer, __________ in Latin America, Africa and Asia. The largest concentration of people on Earth is found in _______________. Most Asians are subsistence _______________. coal farmers arable physical conditions LDCs East 50% deserts cities ecumene distributed Europe

 · Web viewDO NOW: Fill in the blanks using the word box! coalfarmers arablephysical conditionsLDCs East50% deserts citiesecumenedistributed EuropeBangladeshAsiaIndia Throughout

  • Upload
    others

  • View
    1

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Name_______________________________________AP HG 2.2

Date______________

POPULATION & MIGRATION

How do we measure population?

DO NOW: Fill in the blanks using the word box!

(coalfarmers arablephysical conditionsLDCs East50% deserts citiesecumenedistributed EuropeBangladeshAsiaIndia)

Throughout human history, people have been unevenly _________________. Where people live is heavily influenced by ____________________________.

Populations are often clustered around sustaining resources, such as bodies of water and ___________ land. Fewer people live in ______________, for example.

Approximately 75% of all humans live on only 5% of Earth’s surface, the portion called the _________________.

About ______ of people on Earth live in cities, whereas the other half live in rural areas.

Approximately 80% of Earth’s population lives in poorer, __________ in Latin America, Africa and Asia.

The largest concentration of people on Earth is found in _______________. Most Asians are subsistence _______________.

The second largest concentration of People is in South Asia (________________, Sri Lanka, ____________________ and Pakistan).

The third-largest concentration is in ___________________.

POPULATION DENSITY

ARITHMETIC/POPULATION DENSITY:

HIGH DENSITY = lot of people, little land

·

·

·

LOW DENSITY = little people, lot of land

·

·

·

PHYSIOLOGICAL DENSITY

HIGH DENSITY = lot of people, little arable land

·

·

Great pressure to produce enough food

LOW DENSITY = more arable land than people

·

·

AGRICULTURAL DENSITY

HIGH DENSITY = Lot of farmers for available farmland

·

·

LOW DENSITY = lot of farmland, little farmers

·

MDCS: technology and finance allow a few people to farm extensive land

1. What does it mean that Canada has a low arithmetic density?

2. The United States has a small agricultural density. What does this mean?

3. Why do MDCs have lower agricultural densities?

4. Which two countries have the largest amount of people per unit of arable land?

Canada is a huge country. Most of it is unfit for human habitation.

by Zack Beauchamp on May 5, 2016, 9:10 a.m. ET @zackbeauchamp [email protected]

Canada is a gigantic country — but most of its roughly 36 million people live in a very small area. This map, made by redditor Vugg, gives a sense of just how concentrated Canada's population is:

The area below the red line includes most of Nova Scotia, in Canada's east, but most of the population comes from the area a little farther west, in a sliver of Quebec and a densely populated stretch of Ontario near the Great Lakes.

Toronto's metropolitan area makes up the plurality the population in the region, around 6.1 million. Much of the Montreal metropolitan area is in there as well, which amounts to around 4 million people. Other relatively large population centers in Ontario — like London, Kitchener, and the nation's capital, Ottawa — fill out the remainder of the roughly 18 million people living below the red line.

So why did so many Canadians settle here? According to the late William Lewis Morton, an eminent Canadian historian, it's basically about agriculture. The best arable land has always been in Canada's south — no surprise, given the cold weather farther north. A lot of that arable land is in the area we see below the red line.

"Intensive commercial agriculture," Morton writes, "gave rise to a dense network of villages, towns, and cities." When Canada industrialized, it made sense to do that where the people already were, so the population in this area grew.

Even outside of the red line, Canada's population is mostly very close to the US. Ninety percent of Canadians live within 100 miles of the US border. Maybe they just really wanted to be close to America.

1. Does Canada have a high or low arithmetic density? Explain.

2. Which Canadian city has the biggest population?

3. How can geographers explain Canada’s population distribution?

4. What percentage of people live within 100 miles of the United States border?

WHY DOES IT MATTER? THE IMPACT OF POPULATION DENSITY:

Arithmetic (crude) Density

This measure of population density is also called crude density. This statistic is probably the most general and least useful of the three measures of population density. To get crude density, divide the total land area by the total population. You can see that when you measure a large area of land, the arithmetic density becomes meaningless because it “blends in” the urban population and masks the sparsely-inhabited areas with an average. Arithmetic density is more useful when you study homogeneous areas, like single cities or towns, where populations are fairly evenly-distributed

Physiological Density

This may be the most helpful way of expressing population density. Physiological density is the number of persons per unit of agricultural land. This measure of density is useful, because it can give us a rough estimate of how many people an area of farmland can reasonably support.

Physiological density is also helpful when studying population pressure and overcrowding. Population pressure is the total of all the factors, like an increase in population, which reduces the ability of a geographic area to support the inhabitants.

The productivity of the land is also a factor in studying the physiological density of an area. Is the soil very fertile and arable or is it overworked and poor? Since there are other factors that you must consider, physiological density is not a foolproof statistic.

What can we deduce from looking at a country’s physiological density? We know that the higher the physiological density is, the more pressure people put on the land to produce enough food to survive. It also suggests that the available agricultural land is being used by more people, and it may reach its output limit sooner than a country that has a lower physiological density.

To put this concept into numbers, the United States has a physiological density of 179, whereas Djibouti, in the Middle East, comes in at 131,101. That means the government of Djibouti must rely on external sources of food.

Agricultural Density

The measure of population density refers to the number of people living in rural areas per unit of agricultural land. You do not count people who live in cities when calculating the agricultural density, only the estimated number of people actually living off the farmland.

To find the agricultural density, divide the area of farmland by the population of farmers in that area, giving you an average of land worked by each farmer. You will find a lower level of agricultural density in more developed countries, because they have access to better technology and money, which allows an individual to work more farmland. The condition of the soil can also affect agricultural density since some countries have much more fertile land than others. The bottom line is that a higher level of agricultural density may mean that that available arable may reach the end of its production potential sooner than an area of a lower level of agricultural density.

In general, increases in population density equate to problems for a country. Urban areas with a high arithmetic density have an increased need for food, infrastructure, and health/human services. These programs are extremely costly, and the economy of many high-growth countries can’t adequately provide basic services for their citizens. There are positive and negative influences of population density on political, economic and social processes.

Political

Economic

Social

· More laws are needed

· Large cities hold the power

· More jobs needed

· Poverty increases

· Higher tax base

· More crime

· More health/human services needed

· Greater diversity

As the world population grows, greater pressure is being placed on arable land, water, energy, and natural resources to provide a satisfactory supply of food while maintaining balance in our ecosystem. Population density can have a negative impact on our environment and natural resources. These pressures can lead to deforestation, result in overcrowding, and could lead to the destruction of our planet’s delicate ecosystem. Growing populations use large amounts of nonrenewable resources like timber, coal, and oil. Once these natural resources are gone, they are gone forever.

Population density impacts the carrying capacity of an area. The carrying capacity is defined as how many people an area can support on a sustained basis. Together with density, carrying capacity can define whether an area is overcrowded. You can have an area of high population density but is not considered overcrowded if the area has a high carrying capacity. The area may have very rich soil and modern farming methods. A country such as Greenland has a very low carrying capacity. This could make the country overpopulated at a density that would make other places underpopulated

Practice Questions:

1. If the physiological density is much larger than the arithmetic density, then a country has

a. Inefficient farmers

b. A large number of farmers

c. A small percentage of land suitable for agriculture

d. Too many people for the available resources

e. Too few farmers for the large area of land suitable for agriculture

2. India and the United States have approximately the same arithmetic density. From this we can conclude that the two countries have the same

a. Level of output per area of land

b. Number of people per area of land

c. Pressure placed by people on the land to produce food

d. Number of farmers per area of land

e. All of the above