Upload
others
View
1
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
ONLINE SUPPLEMENTAL MATERIALS
Treatment of catecholaminergic polymorphic ventricular tachycardia in mice using novel RyR2
modifying drugs
Na Li, Qiongling Wang, Martha Sibrian-Vazquez, Robert Klipp, Julia O. Reynolds, Tarah A. Word,
Larry Scott Jr., Guy Salama, Robert Strongin, Jonathan J. Abramson, Xander H.T. Wehrens
Detailed methods
Synthesis of compounds. Unless otherwise indicated, all commercially available starting materials
were used directly without further purification. Silica gel Sorbent Technologies 32-63 m was used for
flash column chromatography. 1H- and 13C NMR were obtained on either ARX-400 Advance Bruker
spectrometer. Chemical shifts () are given in ppm relative to CDCl3 (7.26 ppm, 1H, 77.16 ppm 13C)
unless otherwise indicated. MS (HRMS, ESI) spectra were obtained at the PSU Bioanalytical Mass
Spectrometry Facility on a ThermoElectron LTQ-Orbitrap high-resolution mass spectrometer with a
dedicated Accela HPLC system.
Synthesis of 2-(dimethylamino)ethyl 4-(butylamino)-5-chloro-2-methoxybenzoate, EL1. 4-
amino-5-chloro-3-methyl-benzoic acid (0.258 g, 1.24 mmols) and butyraldehyde (0.135 g, 1.860
mmols) are dissolved in 45 ml of anhydrous dichloroethane. Sodium triacetoxyborohydride (0.415 g,
1.860 mmols) is added in one portion; the mixture stirred for 10 min, then acetic acid (0.075 g, 1.24
1
mmols) is added. The mixture is stirred at room temperature 24h. The mixture is diluted with 150 mL
of EtOAc; 150 ml of saturated solution of NaHCO3 are added, then the mixture is stirred for 15 min.
Phases are separated, the organic phase is dried over Na2SO4, filtered and the solvent evaporated
under vacuum to leave a precipitate that corresponds to the target product 2 (208 mg; 65% yield). 1H
NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3) δ 10.39 (s, 1H), 8.02 (s, 1H), 6.12 (s, 1H), 4.85 (s, 1H), 4.04 (s, 3H), 3.22 (d,
J = 4.0 Hz, 2H), 1.70 (dd, J = 8.5, 6.3 Hz, 2H), 1.48 (dd, J = 15.1, 7.4 Hz, 2H), 1.00 (t, J = 7.3 Hz, 3H).
13C NMR (101 MHz, CDCl3) δ 165.11, 158.94, 149.22, 133.69, 112.26, 105.60, 92.90, 56.81, 43.26,
31.12, 20.32, 13.95. Compound 2 (0.5 g, 1.94 mmols), EDCI (0.413 g, 2.134 mmols) and DMAP
(0.024 g, 0.194 mmols) are dissolved in 2 ml of anhydrous DMF. After 10 min, 2-
(dimethylamino)ethanol (0.191 g, 2.134 mmols) is added in one portion. The mixture is stirred at
room temperature for 48h. The mixture is quenched by the addition of 150 mL of saturated NaHCO3.
The mixture is extracted with EtOAc (3 x 100 ml). The organic extracts are pooled, dried over
Na2SO4, filtered and the solvent evaporated under vacuum. The target compound is isolated by flash
column chromatography on silica gel using DCM:MeOH 92:8 for elution. Yield 0.471 g (74%). 1H NMR
(400 MHz, CDCl3) δ 7.85 (s, 1H), 6.13 (s, 1H), 4.70 (t, J = 5.0 Hz, 1H), 4.39 (t, J = 5.9 Hz, 2H), 3.91
(s, 3H), 3.22 (td, J = 7.1, 5.3 Hz, 2H), 2.76 (t, J = 5.9 Hz, 2H), 2.38 (d, J = 6.1 Hz, 6H), 1.79 – 1.60 (m,
2H), 1.48 (dq, J = 14.5, 7.3 Hz, 2H), 1.01 (t, J = 7.4 Hz, 3H). 13C NMR (101 MHz, CDCl3) δ 164.75,
161.18, 148.60, 132.78, 109.91, 107.10, 94.03, 62.04, 57.89, 56.20, 45.77, 43.16, 31.22, 20.32,
13.96. HR ESI [M + H]+ m/z 329.1626; calc. for C16H26ClN2O3, 329.1637.
Synthesis of 2-(dibutylamino)ethyl 4-(butylamino)-2-methoxybenzoate, EL2. 4-amino-2-
methoxybenzoic acid, 3 (2.062 g, 11.96 mmols) and butyraldehyde (1.307 g, 17.95 mmols) are
dissolved in 40 ml of anhydrous dichloroethane. Sodium triacetoxyborohydride (4.0 g, 17.95 mmols) 2
is added in one portion followed by the addition of acetic acid (0.726 g, 11.96 mmols). The mixture is
stirred at room temperature 24h. The mixture is diluted with 150 mL of EtOAc, 150 ml of saturated
solution of NaHCO3 are added and the mixture is stirred for 15 min. Phases are separated; the
organic phase is dried over Na2SO4, filtered and the solvent evaporated under vacuum. The target
compound 4, is isolated by flash column chromatography on silica gel using DCM:MeOH 96:4 for
elution. Yield 2.24 g, 84%. 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3) δ 7.93 (d, J = 8.7 Hz, 1H), 6.27 (dd, J = 8.7, 2.1
Hz, 1H), 6.09 (d, J = 2.1 Hz, 1H), 4.00 (d, J = 2.5 Hz, 3H), 3.17 (t, J = 7.1 Hz, 2H), 1.62 (ddd, J = 12.4,
8.4, 6.5 Hz, 2H), 1.43 (dq, J = 14.4, 7.3 Hz, 2H), 0.96 (dd, J = 8.2, 6.5 Hz, 3H). 13C NMR (101 MHz,
CDCl3) δ 166.57, 160.59, 154.75, 135.82, 106.66, 105.93, 94.51, 56.78, 43.60, 31.81, 20.73, 14.36.
Compound 4 (0.5 g, 2.239 mmols), EDCI (0.477 g, 2.463 mmols) and DMAP (0.028 g, 0.224 mmols)
are dissolved in 2.4 ml of anhydrous DMF. After 10 min, 2-(dibutylamino)ethanol (0.429 g, 2.463
mmols) is added in one portion. The mixture is stirred at room temperature for 72h. The mixture is
quenched by the addition of 150 ml of saturated NaHCO3. The mixture is extracted with EtOAc (3 x
100 ml). The organic extracts are pooled, dried over Na2SO4, filtered and the solvent evaporated
under vacuum. The target compound is isolated by flash column chromatography on silica gel using
DCM:MeOH 95:5 for elution. 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3) δ 7.74 (d, J = 8.6 Hz, 1H), 6.13 (dd, J = 8.7,
2.1 Hz, 1H), 6.06 (d, J = 2.1 Hz, 1H), 4.34 (s, 2H), 4.10 (s, 1H), 3.86 (s, 3H), 3.15 (dd, J = 12.5, 7.0
Hz, 2H), 2.88 (d, J = 5.2 Hz, 2H), 2.58 (s, 4H), 1.60 (dd, J = 14.8, 7.3 Hz, 2H), 1.46 (ddd, J = 22.5,
13.1, 7.2 Hz, 6H), 1.30 (dq, J = 14.7, 7.3 Hz, 4H), 0.96 (t, J = 7.3 Hz, 3H), 0.89 (t, J = 7.3 Hz, 6H). 13C
NMR (101 MHz, CDCl3) δ 165.56, 162.30, 153.61, 134.21, 104.14, 95.17, 55.80, 54.47, 52.21, 43.18,
31.54, 20.67, 20.33, 14.12, 13.97. HR ESI [M + H]+ m/z 379.2950; calc for C22H38N2O3, 379.2966.
3
Synthesis of 2-(dibutylamino)ethyl 4-(butylamino)-5-chloro-2-methoxybenzoate, EL3.
Compound 2 (0.1 g, 0.388 mmols), EDCI (0.083 g, 0.427 mmols) and DMAP (0.0047 g, 0.039 mmols)
are dissolved in 1 ml of anhydrous DMF. After 10 min, 2-(dibutylamino)ethanol (0.075 g, 0.427
mmols) is added in one portion. The mixture is stirred at room temperature for 48 h. The mixture is
quenched by the addition of 150 mL of saturated NaHCO3. The mixture is extracted with EtOAc (3 x
100 ml); the organic extracts are pooled, dried over Na2SO4, filtered and the solvent evaporated
under vacuum. The target compound is isolated by flash column chromatography on silica gel using
DCM:MeOH 9:1 for elution. Yield 0.072 g, (45%). 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3) δ 7.82 (s, 1H), 6.11 (s,
1H), 4.68 (s, 1H), 4.34 (s, 2H), 3.89 (s, 3H), 3.21 (td, J = 7.1, 5.4 Hz, 2H), 2.95 – 2.82 (m, 2H), 2.57
(s, 4H), 1.68 (dd, J = 14.7, 7.2 Hz, 2H), 1.55 – 1.39 (m, 6H), 1.32 (dt, J = 15.0, 7.3 Hz, 4H), 0.99 (t, J
= 7.3 Hz, 3H), 0.90 (t, J = 7.3 Hz, 6H). 13C NMR (101 MHz, CDCl3) δ 164.59, 161.27, 148.67, 132.70,
109.92, 94.01, 56.23, 54.40, 52.03, 43.17, 31.23, 20.65, 20.33, 14.09, 13.97. HR ESI [M + H]+ m/z
413.2576; calc. for C22H38ClN2O3, 413.2576.
Synthesis of 2-(diethylamino)ethyl 4-(butylamino)-3-methoxybenzoate, EL4. Compound EL6
(0.5 g, 2.239 mmols), EDCI (0.477 g, 2.463 mmols) and DMAP (0.028 g, 0.224 mmols) are dissolved
in 2.3 ml of anhydrous DMF. After 10 min, 2-(diethylamino)ethanol (0.290 g, 2.463 mmols) is added
in one portion. The mixture is stirred at room temperature for 72h, then quenched by the addition of
150 mL of saturated NaHCO3. The mixture is extracted with EtOAc (3 x 100 ml). The organic
extracts are pooled, dried over Na2SO4, filtered and the solvent evaporated under vacuum. The
target compound is isolated by flash column chromatography on silica gel using DCM:MeOH 95:5 for
elution. Yield 0.063 g (8.8 %). 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3) δ 7.62 (dd, J = 8.3, 1.8 Hz, 1H), 7.39 (d, J =
4
1.8 Hz, 1H), 6.52 (d, J = 8.4 Hz, 1H), 4.67 (s, 1H), 4.42 (t, J = 6.1 Hz, 2H), 3.87 (s, 3H), 3.18 (t, J =
6.8 Hz, 2H), 2.95 (t, J = 6.1 Hz, 2H), 2.75 (q, J = 7.1 Hz, 4H), 1.65 (dt, J = 19.8, 7.3 Hz, 2H), 1.44 (dq,
J = 14.5, 7.3 Hz, 2H), 1.17 – 1.09 (m, 6H), 0.96 (t, J = 7.3 Hz, 3H). 13C NMR (101 MHz, CDCl3) δ
167.08, 145.65, 142.91, 124.92, 116.72, 109.93, 107.73, 61.99, 55.69, 50.87, 47.82, 42.88, 31.49,
20.40, 14.00, 11.59. HR ESI [M + H]+ m/z 323.2336; calc. for C18H31N2O3, 323.2340.
Synthesis of 2-(dimethylamino)ethyl 4-(butylamino)-2-methoxybenzoate, EL5. Compound 4 (0.5
g, 2.239 mmols), EDCI (0.477 g, 2.463 mmols) and DMAP (0.028 g, 0.224 mmols) are dissolved in
2.4 ml of anhydrous DMF. After 10 min, 2-(dimethylamino)ethanol (0.221 g, 2.463 mmols) is added
in one portion. The mixture is stirred at room temperature for 72h, then quenched by the addition of
150 mL of saturated NaHCO3. The mixture is extracted with EtOAc (3 x 100 ml). The organic
extracts are pooled, dried over Na2SO4, filtered and the solvent evaporated under vacuum. The
target compound is isolated by flash column chromatography on silica gel using DCM:MeOH 85:15 for
elution. Yield 0.469 g, (71%). 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3) δ 7.76 (d, J = 8.6 Hz, 1H), 6.13 (dd, J = 8.7,
2.2 Hz, 1H), 6.05 (d, J = 2.1 Hz, 1H), 4.37 (t, J = 5.9 Hz, 2H), 4.09 (t, J = 5.1 Hz, 1H), 3.85 (s, 3H),
3.15 (td, J = 7.1, 5.6 Hz, 2H), 2.75 (t, J = 5.8 Hz, 2H), 2.36 (d, J = 9.5 Hz, 6H), 1.69 – 1.54 (m, 2H),
1.44 (dt, J = 14.8, 7.3 Hz, 2H), 0.96 (t, J = 7.3 Hz, 3H). 13C NMR (101 MHz, CDCl3) δ 165.61, 162.29,
153.62, 134.32, 107.28, 104.20, 95.19, 61.73, 57.92, 55.78, 45.75, 43.19, 31.54, 20.34, 13.98. HR
ESI [M + H]+ m/z 295.2012; calc. for C16H26N2O3, 295.2027.
5
Synthesis of 4-(butylamino)-3-methoxybenzoic acid, EL6. 4-amino-3-methoxybenzoic acid, 5
(2.105 g, 11.96 mmols) and butyraldehyde (1.307 g, 17.95 mmols) are dissolved in 40 ml of
anhydrous dichloroethane. Sodium triacetoxyborohydride (3.92 g, 17.95 mmols) is added in one
portion followed by the addition of acetic acid (0.792 g, 11.96 mmols). The mixture is stirred at room
temperature for 24h. The mixture is diluted with 150 ml of EtOAc; 150 ml of saturated solution of
NaHCO3 are added, then stirred for 15 min. Phases are separated, the organic phase is dried over
Na2SO4, filtered and the solvent evaporated under vacuum. The precipitate obtained corresponds to
the target product EL6. Yield 2.36 g (88%). 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3) δ 7.73 (dd, J = 8.3, 1.8 Hz,
1H), 7.44 (d, J = 1.8 Hz, 1H), 6.55 (d, J = 8.4 Hz, 1H), 3.89 (d, J = 5.7 Hz, 3H), 3.20 (t, J = 7.1 Hz,
2H), 1.71 – 1.61 (m, 2H), 1.45 (dd, J = 15.1, 7.4 Hz, 2H), 0.97 (t, J = 7.3 Hz, 3H). 13C NMR (101 MHz,
CDCl3) δ 172.83, 145.57, 143.52, 125.97, 115.85, 110.20, 55.69, 42.83, 31.47, 20.40, 13.99. HR ESI
[M]+ m/z 224.12895; calc for C12H18NO3, 224.12921.
Synthesis of 2-(dimethylamino)ethyl 4-(butylamino)-3-methylbenzoate, EL7. 4-amino-3-methyl-
benzoic acid, 6 (0.510 g, 3.31 mmols) and butyraldehyde (0.361 g, 4.96 mmols) are dissolved in 40 ml
of anhydrous dichloroethane. Sodium triacetoxyborohydride (1.107 g, 4.96 mmols) is added in one
portion followed by the addition of acetic acid (0.201 g, 3.31 mmols). The mixture is stirred at room
temperature for 24h. The mixture is diluted with 150 mL of EtOAc, 150 ml of saturated solution of
NaHCO3 are added; then is stirred for 15 min. Phases are separated, the organic phase is dried over
6
Na2SO4, filtered and the solvent evaporated under vacuum. The precipitate obtained corresponds to
the target compound 7 and is used without further purification. Yield 0.597 g (87%). 1H NMR (400
MHz, CDCl3) δ 7.91 (dd, J = 8.5, 2.0 Hz, 1H), 7.80 (d, J = 1.3 Hz, 1H), 6.58 (d, J = 8.6 Hz, 1H), 3.24
(t, J = 7.1 Hz, 2H), 2.15 (s, 3H), 1.74 – 1.59 (m, 2H), 1.46 (dd, J = 15.1, 7.4 Hz, 2H), 0.98 (t, J = 7.3
Hz, 3H). 13C NMR (101 MHz, CDCl3) δ 172.65, 151.02, 132.28, 130.86, 120.64, 116.51, 108.34,
43.32, 31.56, 20.42, 17.34, 14.01. Compound 7 (0.5 g, 2.412 mmols), EDCI (0.514 g, 2.65 mmols)
and DMAP (0.030 g, 0.241 mmols) are dissolved in 2.5 ml of anhydrous DMF. After 10 min, 2-
(dimethylamino)ethanol (0.238 g, 2.65 mmols) is added in one portion. The mixture is stirred at room
temperature for 72h, then quenched by the addition of 150 mL of saturated NaHCO3. The mixture is
extracted with EtOAc (3 x 100 ml). The organic extracts are pooled, dried over Na2SO4, filtered and
the solvent evaporated under vacuum. The target compound is isolated by flash column
chromatography on silica gel using DCM:MeOH 93:7 for elution. Yield 0.512 g (76%). 1H NMR (400
MHz, CDCl3) δ 7.85 (dd, J = 8.5, 2.0 Hz, 1H), 7.75 (d, J = 1.3 Hz, 1H), 6.57 (d, J = 8.6 Hz, 1H), 4.43 (t,
J = 5.8 Hz, 2H), 3.93 (s, 1H), 3.23 (d, J = 5.0 Hz, 2H), 2.79 (t, J = 5.8 Hz, 2H), 2.41 (s, 6H), 2.15 (s,
3H), 1.77 – 1.60 (m, 2H), 1.47 (dd, J = 15.1, 7.4 Hz, 2H), 0.99 (t, J = 7.3 Hz, 3H). 13C NMR (101 MHz,
CDCl3) δ 166.97, 150.33, 131.59, 129.95, 120.49, 117.23, 108.18, 61.86, 57.83, 45.62, 43.20, 31.45,
20.28, 17.23, 13.89. HR ESI [M + H]+ m/z 279.2062; calc. for C16H27N2O2, 279.2078.
Synthesis of 2-(diethylamino)ethyl 4-(butylamino)-3-methylbenzoate, EL8. Compound 7 (0.5 g,
2.412 mmols), EDCI (0.514 g, 2.65 mmols) and DMAP (0.030 g, 0.241 mmols) are dissolved in 2.5 ml
of anhydrous DMF. After 10 min, 2-(diethylamino)ethanol (0.313 g, 2.65 mmols) is added in one
portion. The mixture is stirred at room temperature for 72h; then is quenched by the addition of 150
mL of saturated NaHCO3. The mixture is extracted with EtOAc (3 x 100 ml). The organic extracts 7
are pooled, dried over Na2SO4, filtered and the solvent evaporated under vacuum. The target
compound is isolated by flash column chromatography on silica gel using DCM:MeOH 94:6 for
elution. Yield 0.461 g (63%). 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3) δ 7.81 (dd, J = 8.5, 2.0 Hz, 1H), 7.72 (d, J =
1.3 Hz, 1H), 6.55 (d, J = 8.6 Hz, 1H), 4.37 (t, J = 6.2 Hz, 2H), 3.91 (s, 1H), 3.21 (dd, J = 11.4, 7.1 Hz,
2H), 2.89 (t, J = 6.2 Hz, 2H), 2.69 (q, J = 7.2 Hz, 4H), 2.13 (s, 3H), 1.72 – 1.59 (m, 2H), 1.45 (dq, J =
14.5, 7.3 Hz, 2H), 1.10 (dd, J = 8.9, 5.4 Hz, 6H), 0.97 (t, J = 7.3 Hz, 3H). 13C NMR (101 MHz, CDCl3)
δ 167.11, 150.39, 131.69, 129.98, 120.60, 117.47, 108.29, 62.23, 51.07, 47.90, 43.32, 31.57, 20.40,
17.36, 14.00, 11.89. HR ESI [M + H]+ m/z 307.2380; calc. for C18H30N2O2, 307.23910
Synthesis of 2-(diethylamino)ethyl 4-(butylamino)-5-chloro-2-methoxybenzoate, EL9.
Compound 2 (0.5 g, 1.94 mmols), EDCI (0.413 g, 2.134 mmols) and DMAP (0.024 g, 0.194 mmols)
are dissolved in 2 ml of anhydrous DMF. After 10 min, 2-(diethylamino)ethanol (0.251 g, 2.134
mmols) is added in one portion. The mixture is stirred at room temperature for 48h. The reaction
mixture is quenched by the addition of 150 ml of saturated NaHCO3. The mixture is extracted with
EtOAc (3 x 100 ml). The organic extracts are pooled, dried over Na2SO4, filtered and the solvent
evaporated under vacuum. The target compound is isolated by flash column chromatography on
silica gel using DCM:MeOH 92:8 for elution. Yield 0.518 g (75%) 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3) δ 7.82
(s, 1H), 6.11 (s, 1H), 4.68 (t, J = 5.0 Hz, 1H), 4.36 (t, J = 6.3 Hz, 2H), 3.89 (s, 3H), 3.20 (td, J = 7.1,
5.3 Hz, 2H), 2.89 (t, J = 6.3 Hz, 2H), 2.70 (q, J = 7.1 Hz, 4H), 1.75 – 1.62 (m, 2H), 1.46 (dq, J = 14.5,
7.3 Hz, 2H), 1.11 (t, J = 7.2 Hz, 6H), 0.98 (dd, J = 9.1, 5.6 Hz, 3H). 13C NMR (101 MHz, CDCl3) δ
164.72, 161.18, 148.61, 132.77, 109.91, 107.07, 94.01, 62.03, 56.20, 51.00, 47.85, 43.16, 31.22,
20.32, 13.96, 11.74. HR ESI [M + H]+ m/z 357.1938; calc. for C18H30ClN2O3, 357.1950.
8
Isolation of ventricular myocytes. Hearts were removed from R176Q/+ and WT mice during
isoflurane anesthesia. After excising, the heart was rinsed in KB solution (90 mmol/L KCl, 30 mmol/L
K2HPO4, 5 mmol/L MgSO4, 5 mmol/L pyruvic acid, 5 mmol/L β-hydroxybutyric acid, 5 mmol/L
creatine, 20 mmol/L taurine, 10 mmol/L glucose, 0.5 mmol/L EGTA, 5 mmol/L HEPES, pH 7.2) and
cannulated through the aorta. The heart was perfused using a Langendorff setup with 0 Ca2+ Tyrode
solution (3 ~ 5 minutes, 37 °C), followed by Liberase (TH Research Grade, Roche Applied Science) in
0 Ca2+ Tyrode for 10-15 minutes at 37 °C. After digestion, the heart was perfused with 3 ml KB
solution to wash out remaining collagenase. The hearts were minced in KB solution, gently agitated,
then filtered through a 210μm polyethylene mesh. After settling, ventricular myocytes were washed
once with KB solution, and stored in KB solution at room temperature before use.
Confocal imaging of Ca2+ handling. Ventricular myocytes were isolated by a modified collagenase
method, and incubated with Ca2+ indicator Fluo-4-acetoxymethyl ester (Fluo-4-AM; 2 mol/L, Fluo-4
AM, Invitrogen) in KB solution for 30 minutes at room temperature as described.1 Cells were rinsed
with dye-free normal Tyrode solution (1.8 mmol/L Ca2+) for 20 minutes for de-esterification. Cells were
transferred to a chamber equipped with a pair of parallel platinum electrodes on a confocal
microscope (LSM 510, Carl Zeiss, Thornwood, NY) with a 40X oil immersion objective. Fluo-4 was
excited at 488 nm with emission collected through a 515 nm long pass filter. Fluorescence images
were recorded in line-scan mode with 1024 pixels per line at 500 Hz. After being paced at 1 Hz (5 ms
pulses, 10 V) for at least 2 minutes, only myocytes showing clear striation and normal contractility
were selected for further experiments. Once steady state Ca2+ transient was observed, pacing was
stopped and Ca2+ sparks were counted using SparkMaster.2
Programmed electrical stimulation. In vivo electrophysiology studies were performed in mice as
previously described.3 Briefly, atrial and ventricular intracardiac electrograms (ECGs) were recorded
using an 1.1F octapolar catheter (EPR-800, Millar Instruments, Houston, Texas) inserted via the right
9
jugular vein. Surface and intracardiac electrophysiology parameters were assessed simultaneously at
baseline using a computer-based data acquisition system (EMKA Technologies, Falls Church, VA).
ECG waveform results included a clearly defined P wave, denoting atrial depolarization, and a QRS
wave, which signified ventricular depolarization. PR, RR, and QTc (corrected QT interval) were
evaluated at baseline. Next, right ventricular pacing was performed using 2-ms current pulses
delivered by an external stimulator (STG-3008, Multi Channel Systems, Reutlingen, Germany) to
determine VT inducibility after injections of caffeine (2 mg/kg i.p.) and epinephrine (120 mg/kg i.p.).
The incidence of reproducible bidirectional and sustained VT (at least positive twice among three
tests) was determined. Standard pacing protocols were used to determine basic electrophysiologic
parameters such as effective refractory periods. Inducibility of ventricular tachycardia (VT) was
determined by using single extra stimuli protocols. Premature ventricular complexes (PVCs) were
defined as spontaneous abnormal ventricular contractions that occurred prior to programmed
stimulation protocols. These ventricular contractions were differentiated from aberrated atrial
premature beats and catheter ectopy based on intracardiac electrograms and surface morphology.
Non-sustained VT was defined as an episode of 4-9 beats of VT, whereas sustained VT was defined
as 10 or more consecutive beats of VT.4, 5 All occurrences were tested twice for reproducibility.
Echocardiography. To facilitate high-quality imaging, the chests of the mice were depilated using
Nair crème. Next, mice were placed supine on a heated ECG board to maintain the body temperature
within a narrow range of 36.5 ºC to 37.5 ºC. The heart rate was maintained above 400 beat per
minute in order to circumvent the confounding effects of hypothermia and bradycardia. Transthoracic
echocardiography was performed on mice anesthetized with inhaled 2% Isoflurane and using the
VisualSonics Vevo 2100 Imaging System with a high frequency (30 Mhz) probe. A combination of B-
mode short axis images and M-mode scans were collected as described.6.
10
11
Supplemental Figure 1. Tetracaine derivatives inhibit abnormal SR Ca2+ release events in
R176Q/+ myocytes.
(A) Representative confocal microscope recordings of Ca2+ sparks and (B) quantification of Ca2+ spark
frequency (CaSF) in ventricular myocytes of WT and R176Q/+ mice in the absence and presence of
isoproterenol (100 nmol/L). (C) The percent decrease in CaSF caused by tetracaine and 9 derivatives
(EL1-9) normalized to the vehicle-treated cells. *P<0.05.
12
Supplemental Figure 2. Chemical structure of tetracaine and the 9 tetracaine derivatives.
13
Supplemental Fig. 3. EL9 reduced CaSF in S2814D myocytes.
(A) Representative recordings of Ca2+ sparks in ventricular myocytes of WT and S2814D mice in the
presence of vehicle or EL9 (500 nmol/L). (B) Summary data showing that EL9 reduced CaSF in
S2814D myocytes compared to vehicle. *P<0.05, **P<0.01.
14
Supplemental Table S1. Effects of EL9 on Ca2+ spark parameters in WT and R176Q/+ myocytes.
Parameter WT +
Vehicle
WT + EL9 P
value
R176Q +
Vehicle
R176Q +
EL9
P
value
N (mice) 5 5 3 3
N (cells) 13 12 18 13
N (sparks) 180 175 1195 205
Ca spark
amplitude
(F/F0)
0.40±0.01 0.38±0.01 0.28 0.35±0.003 0.40±0.008 <0.001
FWHM (µm) 1.32±0.06 1.20±0.05 0.12 1.51±0.03 1.34±0.05 0.03
FDHM (ms) 22.87±1.18 26.31±1.33 0.054 29.06±0.67 21.86±1.25 <0.001
Tau(ms) 27.49±2.71 28.25±2.05 0.82 38.29±2.03 25.61±4.77 0.02
∆F/F0/∆t
max(ms-1)
41.89±1.27 38.43±1.35 0.06 36.07±0.46 43.56±1.32 <0.001
15
Supplemental Table S2. Absence of EL9 effects on ventricular function of WT mice.
Baseline
(n=4)
EL9
(n=4)
ESD (mm) 2.7 ± 0.1 2.7 ± 0.1
EDD (mm) 4.1 ± 0.1 4.1 ± 0.1
FS (%) 64.1 ± 1.5 62.2 ± 1.4
Cardiac output (mL/min) 23.6 ± 0.7 21.2 ± 0.3
LVAWs (mm) 1.0 ± 0.07 1.0 ± 0.1
LVAWd (mm) 0.77 ± 0.03 0.78 ± 0.04
LVPWs (mm) 1.1 ± 0.05 1.1 ± 0.04
LVPWd (mm) 0.81 ± 0.05 0.77 ± 0.04
EDD, end-diastolic diameter; ESD, end-systolic diameter; FS, fractional shortening; LVAWd, left-
ventricular end-diastolic anterior wall thickness; LVAWs, left-ventricular end-systolic anterior wall
thickness; LVPWd, left-ventricular end-diastolic posterior wall thickness; LVPWs, left-ventricular end-
systolic posterior wall thickness.
16
Supplemental Table S3. Effects of EL9 on electrophysiological parameters in WT and R176Q/+
mice.
WT (n=8) R176Q/+ (n=6)
Pre-EL9 Post-EL9 Pre-EL9 Post-EL9
RR (ms) 98.1 ± 2.4 95.4 ± 1.1 129.3 ± 7.4 117.5 ± 6.6
HR (bpm) 613.9 ± 14.4 629.7 ± 7.6 471.7 ± 27.4 518.9 ± 29.6
PR (ms) 34.8 ± 1.1 34.3 ± 0.6 42.7 ± 2.7 39.5 ± 1.6
QRS (ms) 8.8 ± 0.4 8.9 ± 0.5 9.3 ± 0.6 8.8 ± 0.3
QTc (ms) 28.2 ± 1.5 29.3 ± 1.1 20.2 ± 1.1 23.2 ± 1.1
Bpm, beats per minute, HR, heart rate.
17
Supplemental References
1. Reynolds JO, Chiang DY, Wang W, Beavers DL, Dixit SS, Skapura DG, Landstrom AP, Song
LS, Ackerman MJ, Wehrens XH. Junctophilin-2 is necessary for t-tubule maturation during
mouse heart development. Cardiovasc Res. 2013;100:44-53.
2. Picht E, Zima AV, Blatter LA, Bers DM. Sparkmaster: Automated calcium spark analysis with
imagej. Am J Physiol Cell Physiol. 2007;293:C1073-1081.
3. Li N, Wehrens XH. Programmed electrical stimulation in mice. J Vis Exp. 2010; 1730.
4. Wehrens XH, Lehnart SE, Reiken SR, Deng SX, Vest JA, Cervantes D, Coromilas J, Landry
DW, Marks AR. Protection from cardiac arrhythmia through ryanodine receptor-stabilizing
protein calstabin2. Science. 2004;304:292-296.
5. van Oort RJ, McCauley MD, Dixit SS, Pereira L, Yang Y, Respress JL, Wang Q, De Almeida
AC, Skapura DG, Anderson ME, Bers DM, Wehrens XH. Ryanodine receptor phosphorylation
by calcium/calmodulin-dependent protein kinase ii promotes life-threatening ventricular
arrhythmias in mice with heart failure. Circulation. 2010;122:2669-2679.
6. Respress JL, Wehrens XH. Transthoracic echocardiography in mic.e. J Vis Exp. 2010:1738.
18