Webmm.ahrq.Gov.17 Slideshow

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

  • 7/30/2019 Webmm.ahrq.Gov.17 Slideshow

    1/22

    Spotlight Case June 2003

    Missed Appendicitis

    webmm.ahrq.gov

  • 7/30/2019 Webmm.ahrq.Gov.17 Slideshow

    2/22

    2

    Source and Credits This presentation is based on June 2003

    AHRQ WebM&M Spotlight Case in Surgery

    See the full article at http://webmm.ahrq.gov CME credit is available through the Web site Commentary by: James Adams, MD, Feinberg

    School of Medicine, Northwestern University

    Editor, AHRQ WebM&M: Robert Wachter, MD Spotlight Editor: Tracy Minichiello, MD

    Managing Editor: Erin Hartman, MS

    http://webmm.ahrq.gov/http://webmm.ahrq.gov/
  • 7/30/2019 Webmm.ahrq.Gov.17 Slideshow

    3/22

    3

    ObjectivesAt the conclusion of this educational activity,participants should be able to:

    Appreciate the variable presentation of appendicitis

    List complications of missed appendicitis Understand the advantages and disadvantages of

    CT in diagnosing appendicitis

    Define anchoring and metacognition and state their

    impact on missed diagnoses List potential strategies to enhance patient safety in

    the emergency department (ED)

  • 7/30/2019 Webmm.ahrq.Gov.17 Slideshow

    4/22

    4

    Case: Missed AppendicitisA 37-year-old woman with no past medicalhistory went to ED complaining of vomitingand periumbilical abdominal pain for 6 hours.On physical examination, she was afebrile,BP 110/70, HR 85. Abdomen was soft, with norebound or guarding. She was diagnosed withgastroenteritis, discharged with antiemetics,

    and told to return for persistent vomiting, pain,or new fever.

  • 7/30/2019 Webmm.ahrq.Gov.17 Slideshow

    5/22

    5

    Abdominal Pain in the ED Most common chief complaint in the ED

    6% of the 100 million yearly ED visits

    Appendicitis is the most common surgicalcause of abdominal pain 7% of population affected over a lifetime

    Small percentage of abdominal pain is due

    to appendicitis 1%-3% of ED visits for abdominal pain are

    appendicitis

    McCaig LF, et al. CDC 2002;326:April 22.

    Graff L, et al. Acad Emerg Med 2000;7:1244-55.

  • 7/30/2019 Webmm.ahrq.Gov.17 Slideshow

    6/22

    6

    Challenge of Diagnosing Appendicitis Diagnosis uncommon; clinicians accustomed

    to ruling out rather than ruling in disease

    High incidence of missed diagnoses due tolow suspicion

    20%-40% misdiagnoses in some populations

    Implementation of diagnostic algorithm may

    combat this effect

    Reduce misdiagnosis rates to 6%

    Naoum JJ, et al. Am J Surg 2002;184:587-9.

  • 7/30/2019 Webmm.ahrq.Gov.17 Slideshow

    7/22

    7

    Challenge of Diagnosing Appendicitis Classic signs of appendicitis increase

    likelihood of disease

    Epigastric pain, radiating to RLQ, rebound, fever

    Classic presentation not typical

    WBC count normal in 10%-30%

    Early disease often presents with normal vitals,

    physical examination

    Wagner JM, et al. JAMA 1996;276:1589-94.

  • 7/30/2019 Webmm.ahrq.Gov.17 Slideshow

    8/22

    8

    Abdominal CT in Appendicitis CT can enhance diagnostic accuracy

    Sensitivity 80%-100%

    CT can delay diagnosis Reserve for men with atypical presentation and

    for women in whom pelvic pathology may mimicappendicitis

    CT in low-risk population will lead to increase

    in false positive readings Potential increase in unnecessary surgery

    Ege G. et al. Br J Radiol 2002;75:721-5.

    Maluccio MA. et al. Surg Infect 2001;2:205-11.

  • 7/30/2019 Webmm.ahrq.Gov.17 Slideshow

    9/22

    9

    Abdominal Pain in the ED Maintain suspicion for early disease

    Consider CT in appropriate population

    Consider inpatient observation

    Always provide detailed follow-up anddischarge instructions

    Include warning signs and symptoms to promptreturn visit to ED

  • 7/30/2019 Webmm.ahrq.Gov.17 Slideshow

    10/22

    10

    Case (cont.): Missed AppendicitisPatient went to PCPs office 2 days later with

    persistent abdominal pain; vomiting had resolved.

    On physical exam, patient was afebrile, with normal

    vital signs. Abdomen was diffusely tender, with

    localization around the umbilicus. Pelvic exam

    revealed no cervical motion and mild adnexal

    tenderness. Diagnosis: mittelschmerz vs. ovarian

    cyst. Transvaginal ultrasound ordered for followingweek. Patient told to take naproxen for pain.

  • 7/30/2019 Webmm.ahrq.Gov.17 Slideshow

    11/22

    11

    Anchoring Cognitive error due to reliance on diagnostic

    assumptions and prior reasoning of previous

    assessments Transition of care points are high risk for

    propagation

    To minimize this type of error, take a stepback and think broadly about the casei.e.,apply metacognition

  • 7/30/2019 Webmm.ahrq.Gov.17 Slideshow

    12/22

    12

    Case (cont.):Missed Appendicitis

    The next day, the patient returned to the ED

    with persistent pain. She was seen by the

    same ED attending, who then asked acolleague to evaluate the case. This second

    ED attending performed a pelvic exam and

    ordered a CT scan of the abdomen and

    pelvis. CT revealed a perforated appendix.

  • 7/30/2019 Webmm.ahrq.Gov.17 Slideshow

    13/22

    13

    Perforated Appendix

  • 7/30/2019 Webmm.ahrq.Gov.17 Slideshow

    14/22

    14

    Case (cont.):Missed AppendicitisThe patient was seen by general surgery

    and it was decided not to take her to the

    operating room immediately due to theperitonitis. She was admitted and started

    on IV antibiotics. Her hospital stay was

    prolonged due to ileus. On hospital day

    number #8, her WBC count began to rise.A repeat CT scan was obtained.

  • 7/30/2019 Webmm.ahrq.Gov.17 Slideshow

    15/22

    15

    Intra-abdominal Abscess

  • 7/30/2019 Webmm.ahrq.Gov.17 Slideshow

    16/22

    16

    Case (cont.):Missed AppendicitisCT revealed an intra-abdominal abscess

    the size of an orange. The patient

    underwent percutaneous drainage byinterventional radiology. On hospital day

    #13, she was discharged home with a plan

    to follow-up for elective appendectomy.

  • 7/30/2019 Webmm.ahrq.Gov.17 Slideshow

    17/22

    17

    Complications of Perforated Appendix Wound infection and dehiscence

    Intra-abdominal abscess

    Sepsis Prolonged ileus

    Pneumonia

    Bowel obstruction Infertility

    Graff L, et al. Acad Emerg Med 2000;7:1244-55.

    Mueller BA, et al. NEJM 1986;315:1506-8.

  • 7/30/2019 Webmm.ahrq.Gov.17 Slideshow

    18/22

    18

    Case (cont.):Missed AppendicitisShortly after discharge, the abdominal pain

    returned. The patient returned to the ED and

    underwent a repeat CT scan, which revealeda small bowel obstruction. The patient went

    to the operating room the next day for lysis

    of adhesions and appendectomy. Eight days

    later, the patient was discharged home. Shehas returned to her previous state of health.

  • 7/30/2019 Webmm.ahrq.Gov.17 Slideshow

    19/22

    19

    Challenges to Patient Safety in ED Excessive cognitive burden

    Time pressure

    Multiple interruptions

    No pre-existing relationship withpatients

  • 7/30/2019 Webmm.ahrq.Gov.17 Slideshow

    20/22

    20

    Implement strategies to provide doctorswith post-discharge feedback

    Encourage providers to use ED patientsafety resources

    Increase teamwork

    Improve providerpatient communication

    Enhancing Patient Safety in ED

    Wears RL, et al. Top Health Information Mgmt. 2002;23:1-12.

  • 7/30/2019 Webmm.ahrq.Gov.17 Slideshow

    21/22

    21

    Take-Home Points Appendicitis is an uncommon but important

    cause of abdominal pain in the ED

    Presentation is often atypical

    Complications of missed or delayeddiagnosis are multiple and morbid

    To decrease missed appendicitis, considerCT scan, inpatient observation, and/ordetailed follow-up instructions

    Use CT scan with caution

  • 7/30/2019 Webmm.ahrq.Gov.17 Slideshow

    22/22

    22

    Take-Home Points (cont.) Avoid anchoring

    Always question conclusions of previous providers,particularly as new information accrues

    Consider implementing diagnostic algorithmsto ensure that appendicitis is in thedifferential, even in atypical cases

    Close the loop by obtaining follow-up onclinical outcomes