Upload
elizar-jar
View
216
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
7/30/2019 Webmm.ahrq.Gov.17 Slideshow
1/22
Spotlight Case June 2003
Missed Appendicitis
webmm.ahrq.gov
7/30/2019 Webmm.ahrq.Gov.17 Slideshow
2/22
2
Source and Credits This presentation is based on June 2003
AHRQ WebM&M Spotlight Case in Surgery
See the full article at http://webmm.ahrq.gov CME credit is available through the Web site Commentary by: James Adams, MD, Feinberg
School of Medicine, Northwestern University
Editor, AHRQ WebM&M: Robert Wachter, MD Spotlight Editor: Tracy Minichiello, MD
Managing Editor: Erin Hartman, MS
http://webmm.ahrq.gov/http://webmm.ahrq.gov/7/30/2019 Webmm.ahrq.Gov.17 Slideshow
3/22
3
ObjectivesAt the conclusion of this educational activity,participants should be able to:
Appreciate the variable presentation of appendicitis
List complications of missed appendicitis Understand the advantages and disadvantages of
CT in diagnosing appendicitis
Define anchoring and metacognition and state their
impact on missed diagnoses List potential strategies to enhance patient safety in
the emergency department (ED)
7/30/2019 Webmm.ahrq.Gov.17 Slideshow
4/22
4
Case: Missed AppendicitisA 37-year-old woman with no past medicalhistory went to ED complaining of vomitingand periumbilical abdominal pain for 6 hours.On physical examination, she was afebrile,BP 110/70, HR 85. Abdomen was soft, with norebound or guarding. She was diagnosed withgastroenteritis, discharged with antiemetics,
and told to return for persistent vomiting, pain,or new fever.
7/30/2019 Webmm.ahrq.Gov.17 Slideshow
5/22
5
Abdominal Pain in the ED Most common chief complaint in the ED
6% of the 100 million yearly ED visits
Appendicitis is the most common surgicalcause of abdominal pain 7% of population affected over a lifetime
Small percentage of abdominal pain is due
to appendicitis 1%-3% of ED visits for abdominal pain are
appendicitis
McCaig LF, et al. CDC 2002;326:April 22.
Graff L, et al. Acad Emerg Med 2000;7:1244-55.
7/30/2019 Webmm.ahrq.Gov.17 Slideshow
6/22
6
Challenge of Diagnosing Appendicitis Diagnosis uncommon; clinicians accustomed
to ruling out rather than ruling in disease
High incidence of missed diagnoses due tolow suspicion
20%-40% misdiagnoses in some populations
Implementation of diagnostic algorithm may
combat this effect
Reduce misdiagnosis rates to 6%
Naoum JJ, et al. Am J Surg 2002;184:587-9.
7/30/2019 Webmm.ahrq.Gov.17 Slideshow
7/22
7
Challenge of Diagnosing Appendicitis Classic signs of appendicitis increase
likelihood of disease
Epigastric pain, radiating to RLQ, rebound, fever
Classic presentation not typical
WBC count normal in 10%-30%
Early disease often presents with normal vitals,
physical examination
Wagner JM, et al. JAMA 1996;276:1589-94.
7/30/2019 Webmm.ahrq.Gov.17 Slideshow
8/22
8
Abdominal CT in Appendicitis CT can enhance diagnostic accuracy
Sensitivity 80%-100%
CT can delay diagnosis Reserve for men with atypical presentation and
for women in whom pelvic pathology may mimicappendicitis
CT in low-risk population will lead to increase
in false positive readings Potential increase in unnecessary surgery
Ege G. et al. Br J Radiol 2002;75:721-5.
Maluccio MA. et al. Surg Infect 2001;2:205-11.
7/30/2019 Webmm.ahrq.Gov.17 Slideshow
9/22
9
Abdominal Pain in the ED Maintain suspicion for early disease
Consider CT in appropriate population
Consider inpatient observation
Always provide detailed follow-up anddischarge instructions
Include warning signs and symptoms to promptreturn visit to ED
7/30/2019 Webmm.ahrq.Gov.17 Slideshow
10/22
10
Case (cont.): Missed AppendicitisPatient went to PCPs office 2 days later with
persistent abdominal pain; vomiting had resolved.
On physical exam, patient was afebrile, with normal
vital signs. Abdomen was diffusely tender, with
localization around the umbilicus. Pelvic exam
revealed no cervical motion and mild adnexal
tenderness. Diagnosis: mittelschmerz vs. ovarian
cyst. Transvaginal ultrasound ordered for followingweek. Patient told to take naproxen for pain.
7/30/2019 Webmm.ahrq.Gov.17 Slideshow
11/22
11
Anchoring Cognitive error due to reliance on diagnostic
assumptions and prior reasoning of previous
assessments Transition of care points are high risk for
propagation
To minimize this type of error, take a stepback and think broadly about the casei.e.,apply metacognition
7/30/2019 Webmm.ahrq.Gov.17 Slideshow
12/22
12
Case (cont.):Missed Appendicitis
The next day, the patient returned to the ED
with persistent pain. She was seen by the
same ED attending, who then asked acolleague to evaluate the case. This second
ED attending performed a pelvic exam and
ordered a CT scan of the abdomen and
pelvis. CT revealed a perforated appendix.
7/30/2019 Webmm.ahrq.Gov.17 Slideshow
13/22
13
Perforated Appendix
7/30/2019 Webmm.ahrq.Gov.17 Slideshow
14/22
14
Case (cont.):Missed AppendicitisThe patient was seen by general surgery
and it was decided not to take her to the
operating room immediately due to theperitonitis. She was admitted and started
on IV antibiotics. Her hospital stay was
prolonged due to ileus. On hospital day
number #8, her WBC count began to rise.A repeat CT scan was obtained.
7/30/2019 Webmm.ahrq.Gov.17 Slideshow
15/22
15
Intra-abdominal Abscess
7/30/2019 Webmm.ahrq.Gov.17 Slideshow
16/22
16
Case (cont.):Missed AppendicitisCT revealed an intra-abdominal abscess
the size of an orange. The patient
underwent percutaneous drainage byinterventional radiology. On hospital day
#13, she was discharged home with a plan
to follow-up for elective appendectomy.
7/30/2019 Webmm.ahrq.Gov.17 Slideshow
17/22
17
Complications of Perforated Appendix Wound infection and dehiscence
Intra-abdominal abscess
Sepsis Prolonged ileus
Pneumonia
Bowel obstruction Infertility
Graff L, et al. Acad Emerg Med 2000;7:1244-55.
Mueller BA, et al. NEJM 1986;315:1506-8.
7/30/2019 Webmm.ahrq.Gov.17 Slideshow
18/22
18
Case (cont.):Missed AppendicitisShortly after discharge, the abdominal pain
returned. The patient returned to the ED and
underwent a repeat CT scan, which revealeda small bowel obstruction. The patient went
to the operating room the next day for lysis
of adhesions and appendectomy. Eight days
later, the patient was discharged home. Shehas returned to her previous state of health.
7/30/2019 Webmm.ahrq.Gov.17 Slideshow
19/22
19
Challenges to Patient Safety in ED Excessive cognitive burden
Time pressure
Multiple interruptions
No pre-existing relationship withpatients
7/30/2019 Webmm.ahrq.Gov.17 Slideshow
20/22
20
Implement strategies to provide doctorswith post-discharge feedback
Encourage providers to use ED patientsafety resources
Increase teamwork
Improve providerpatient communication
Enhancing Patient Safety in ED
Wears RL, et al. Top Health Information Mgmt. 2002;23:1-12.
7/30/2019 Webmm.ahrq.Gov.17 Slideshow
21/22
21
Take-Home Points Appendicitis is an uncommon but important
cause of abdominal pain in the ED
Presentation is often atypical
Complications of missed or delayeddiagnosis are multiple and morbid
To decrease missed appendicitis, considerCT scan, inpatient observation, and/ordetailed follow-up instructions
Use CT scan with caution
7/30/2019 Webmm.ahrq.Gov.17 Slideshow
22/22
22
Take-Home Points (cont.) Avoid anchoring
Always question conclusions of previous providers,particularly as new information accrues
Consider implementing diagnostic algorithmsto ensure that appendicitis is in thedifferential, even in atypical cases
Close the loop by obtaining follow-up onclinical outcomes