Upload
devendraa-muniandy
View
215
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
8/17/2019 Week 4-Emission Air Pollution (L7)
1/37
1
CCB 4213 Air Pollution Engineering
Week 4- Lecture 7
May 2015 Semester
Em iss ion & A ir Pol lu t ion
Measurement
http://www.google.com.my/url?sa=i&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&frm=1&source=images&cd=&cad=rja&docid=xXPwF6i7PQ-h0M&tbnid=IntRv9JiZoHGJM:&ved=0CAUQjRw&url=http://relax-mind.blogspot.com/2011_07_01_archive.html&ei=vTyaUZCFPIPtrAfFtICABg&bvm=bv.46751780,d.bmk&psig=AFQjCNEz2Kd9dXaGr_IAdgFZgK7_4Tjmrg&ust=1369148846436765http://www.google.com.my/url?sa=i&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&frm=1&source=images&cd=&cad=rja&docid=xXPwF6i7PQ-h0M&tbnid=IntRv9JiZoHGJM:&ved=0CAUQjRw&url=http://relax-mind.blogspot.com/2011_07_01_archive.html&ei=vTyaUZCFPIPtrAfFtICABg&bvm=bv.46751780,d.bmk&psig=AFQjCNEz2Kd9dXaGr_IAdgFZgK7_4Tjmrg&ust=1369148846436765http://www.google.com.my/url?sa=i&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&frm=1&source=images&cd=&cad=rja&docid=xXPwF6i7PQ-h0M&tbnid=IntRv9JiZoHGJM:&ved=0CAUQjRw&url=http://relax-mind.blogspot.com/2011_07_01_archive.html&ei=vTyaUZCFPIPtrAfFtICABg&bvm=bv.46751780,d.bmk&psig=AFQjCNEz2Kd9dXaGr_IAdgFZgK7_4Tjmrg&ust=1369148846436765http://www.google.com.my/url?sa=i&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&frm=1&source=images&cd=&cad=rja&docid=xXPwF6i7PQ-h0M&tbnid=IntRv9JiZoHGJM:&ved=0CAUQjRw&url=http://relax-mind.blogspot.com/2011_07_01_archive.html&ei=vTyaUZCFPIPtrAfFtICABg&bvm=bv.46751780,d.bmk&psig=AFQjCNEz2Kd9dXaGr_IAdgFZgK7_4Tjmrg&ust=1369148846436765http://www.google.com.my/url?sa=i&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&frm=1&source=images&cd=&cad=rja&docid=xXPwF6i7PQ-h0M&tbnid=IntRv9JiZoHGJM:&ved=0CAUQjRw&url=http://relax-mind.blogspot.com/2011_07_01_archive.html&ei=vTyaUZCFPIPtrAfFtICABg&bvm=bv.46751780,d.bmk&psig=AFQjCNEz2Kd9dXaGr_IAdgFZgK7_4Tjmrg&ust=1369148846436765http://www.google.com.my/url?sa=i&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&frm=1&source=images&cd=&cad=rja&docid=xXPwF6i7PQ-h0M&tbnid=IntRv9JiZoHGJM:&ved=0CAUQjRw&url=http://relax-mind.blogspot.com/2011_07_01_archive.html&ei=vTyaUZCFPIPtrAfFtICABg&bvm=bv.46751780,d.bmk&psig=AFQjCNEz2Kd9dXaGr_IAdgFZgK7_4Tjmrg&ust=1369148846436765http://www.google.com.my/url?sa=i&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&frm=1&source=images&cd=&cad=rja&docid=xXPwF6i7PQ-h0M&tbnid=IntRv9JiZoHGJM:&ved=0CAUQjRw&url=http://relax-mind.blogspot.com/2011_07_01_archive.html&ei=vTyaUZCFPIPtrAfFtICABg&bvm=bv.46751780,d.bmk&psig=AFQjCNEz2Kd9dXaGr_IAdgFZgK7_4Tjmrg&ust=1369148846436765
8/17/2019 Week 4-Emission Air Pollution (L7)
2/37
ecture Outcome
By the end of this course, the students should
be able to understand:
• Air pollution measurements• Type of air pollution measurements
• Problems involved in air pollution
measurements
• Conduct sampling, determine flowratesand estimate emissions
• Emission Factor
8/17/2019 Week 4-Emission Air Pollution (L7)
3/37
INTRODUCTION
• Two kinds of air pollution measurements: – Ambient Measurement: concentration of
pollutants in the air in which the public breathes
– Source Measurement: concentration/emissionrates from air pollution sources
• Concentrations in the ambient is important todetermine whether the air is indeed safe for breathing
• Rates of various sources must be measured (to beable to regulate time, location & amount emitted) tocontrol the concentrations
8/17/2019 Week 4-Emission Air Pollution (L7)
4/37
• Ambient measurements (or simply
termed as Monitoring) and sourcemeasurement (source testing) caneither be carried out for legal purposes
or by the relevant industries’. • Both monitoring & source testing are
conducted by different people withdifferent terminologies but almost all airpollution measuring devices havesimilar set-up as shown in the nextfigure.
8/17/2019 Week 4-Emission Air Pollution (L7)
5/37
Figure 4.1
The components of any ambient-monitoring or source-sampling device. If the detector
functions in real time (not cumulative), then the gas meter is not needed, but some kind of
signal integrator or recorder is not needed
Devices or
procedures
for
positioning
the sampling
probeDetector to
quantify
instantaneous or
cumulativeamount of
pollutant
Sample
gas
flow
Inlet devices
to remove
unwantedmaterials
Gas
Meter
Sampling probe,
heated if necessary
to preventcondensation
Air
mover
(pump)
Vent to
air
8/17/2019 Week 4-Emission Air Pollution (L7)
6/37
Air pollution measurements involve two
problems:
• To obtain a suitable, representative sample
• To determine the concentration of pollutant
of interest
To obtain a representative ambient air sample
is hard; the problem lies entirely on thisquestion:
What is the sui table location for obtaining a
sample of ambient air?
A Representative Sample
8/17/2019 Week 4-Emission Air Pollution (L7)
7/37
Example: CO measurement (EPA): Problems of
choosing a sampler site
Downtown
air-monitoringstation
Office building
Air-monitoringstation
County
courthouse
CO concentration
inside structure>NAAQS
Parkingstructure
8/17/2019 Week 4-Emission Air Pollution (L7)
8/37
• Location of ambient air sampler…
- to which the public has free access
- pollutant concentration is highest
• Ambient monitor should be placed where it has
power, shelter, constant temperature
environment, easy access to monitoring
personnel, protection from vandalism, (free
rent?)• Detailed guidelines for proper placement of
intakes for air samplers
8/17/2019 Week 4-Emission Air Pollution (L7)
9/37
• Variation invelocity and
concentration
• Multiple point
measurementand averaging is
needed
• Figure shows
that thedifferences in
velocities &
concentrations
are substantial.
Source Testing Problems
Horizontal
reading
8/17/2019 Week 4-Emission Air Pollution (L7)
10/37
Example 1.
In a source test, the stack was divided into four sectors, each of which
had the same cross-sectional area. The following velocities and
pollutant concentrations were measured in these sectors: Sector number Velocity V, m/s Concentration c, mg/m
3
1 10 500
2 12 600
3 14 650
4 15 675
What is the average pollutant concentration in the gas flowing in this
stack? The average concentration is
areasequalfor
avg
V
Vc
AV
AcV volumeTotal
massTotalc
areavelocity
ionconcentrat areaelocityv
3
61615141210
675x15650x14600x12500x10
m
mg
8/17/2019 Week 4-Emission Air Pollution (L7)
11/37
• If the sampled sectors did
not have equal areas this
calculation would be morecomplex
• If one went far enough
downstream in this duct one
would find that the flowvelocities and particle
concentrations had become
uniform, source sampling can
be done at that particularpoint
• Not practical in a real plant:
see Fig. 4.4
8/17/2019 Week 4-Emission Air Pollution (L7)
12/37
Getting Representative Samples
Problems and solutions:
• Inlets sucked into particulate sampler; Bug screens
exclude all but the smallest particles
• Possibility of gases to condense or reacts with
solids; heated probes are normally used
• Acid gases like SO2 will react with alkaline solids
on a filter, increasing solids weight
• Grab samples must not react with containers
8/17/2019 Week 4-Emission Air Pollution (L7)
13/37
Concentration Determination
• Concentrations may be measured by real timeinstruments, of which most is operated optically
• Interference in optical measuring instruments and
the problem is not trivial• Example: To measure SO2 in nitrogen gas, SO2 is
passed through a dilute solution of NaOH:
SO2 + 2 NaOH Na2SO3 + H2O
• Change in NaOH concentration can be easily
measured by acid-base titration
8/17/2019 Week 4-Emission Air Pollution (L7)
14/37
8/17/2019 Week 4-Emission Air Pollution (L7)
15/37
Averaging
• If we are measuring ambient air quality with real-timeinstruments, we generally want to know the average
concentration over some period of time so that we can
compare it with the applicable ambient standards, which all
have some measuring period.
• This is calculated by
cdt
t Δ
1cavg
ionconcentratAverage
where c = the instantaneous concentration
indicated by the instrument
t = the time of measurement
8/17/2019 Week 4-Emission Air Pollution (L7)
16/37
• For averaging instruments (ex: PM10 & PM2.5
samplers)
timexrateflowAir
ghtfilter weiinIncreasecionconcentratAverage avg
8/17/2019 Week 4-Emission Air Pollution (L7)
17/37
Example 2
A PM2.5 sampler ran for 24 hours at an average flow
rate of 16.7 L/min. The tare weight of the fresh filterwas 0.1400 g, and the gross weight of the filter, dried
to the same humidity as the fresh filter, was 0.1405 g.
What was the average PM2.5 concentration in the air
drawn through the sampler?
8/17/2019 Week 4-Emission Air Pollution (L7)
18/37
Example 2
A PM2.5 sampler ran for 24 hours at an average flow
rate of 16.7 L/min. The tare weight of the fresh filterwas 0.1400 g, and the gross weight of the filter, dried
to the same humidity as the fresh filter, was 0.1405 g.
What was the average PM2.5 concentration in the air
drawn through the sampler?
3
-5
3 m
g
20.810x2.08m
L1000
xmin60
h
x24hx16.7L/min
0.1400)g(0.1405 μ
m
g
c 3avg
8/17/2019 Week 4-Emission Air Pollution (L7)
19/37
• For gaseous pollutant, sampling train would be
used in practice
8/17/2019 Week 4-Emission Air Pollution (L7)
20/37
Standard Analytical Methods
• Test methods for major pollutants in ambient air:• Reference Method
• Equivalent Method: simpler, easier and cheaper
• Particulate Matter, TSP, PM10, & PM2.5
• Filter’s weight gain is divided by the measured cumulativeair flow through the filter to determine particle
concentration
• Sulphur Dioxide, SO2 • West-Gaeke method - a known volume of air is bubbled
through sodium tetrachloromercurate, which forms a
complex with SO2. Then, the solution is treated with
pararosaniline to form intensely coloured pararosaniline
methyl sulfonic acid, which concentration is determined in
a colorimeter
8/17/2019 Week 4-Emission Air Pollution (L7)
21/37
• Ozone (O3)
• The air is mixed with ethylene, which reacts with
ozone in a light emitting (chemiluminescent) reaction.
The light is measured with a photomultiplier tube
• Carbon monoxide (CO)
• The concentration is measured by non-dispersive
infrared (NDIR) absorption. Here nondispersive means
that the infrared radiation is not dispersed by a prismor grating into specific wavelength; rather, filters are
used to obtain a wavelength band at which CO
strongly absorbs
• Lead (Pb)• A TSP filter is extracted with nitric and hydrochloric
acids to dissolve the lead. Atomic absorption
spectroscopy is then used to determine the amount of
lead in the extract
8/17/2019 Week 4-Emission Air Pollution (L7)
22/37
• Hydrocarbons (Non-methane)• Gas is passed through a flame ionization detector (FID),
where the hydrocarbon burn in a hydrogen flame.
Hydrocarbons cause more ionization and is detectedelectronically. Part of the sample is diverted to a gas
chromatograph, where methane is separated from other
gases and then quantified. Its concentration is subtracted
from the total hydrocarbon value from the FID
• Nitrogen dioxide (NO2)• NO2 is converted to NO, which is then reacted with ozone.
The light from this chemiluminescent reaction is measured.
Because the ambient air contains NO (often more than NO2),
a parallel sample is run without conversion of the NO2 to NO,and the resulting NO reading is subtracted from the combined
NO and NO2 reading to give the NO2 value. The instrument
normally reports the NO concentration as well
8/17/2019 Week 4-Emission Air Pollution (L7)
23/37
The mass flow rate of pollutant is the product of theconcentration in the gas and the molar or mass
flow rate of the gas
Determining Pollutant Flow Rates
ionconcentratmolar pollutantxgasof flowratemolarflowratemolarPollutant
8/17/2019 Week 4-Emission Air Pollution (L7)
24/37
Example 3.
The train sampling shown Fig 4.5 (textbook) indicatesthat the concentration of SO2 in a stack is 600 ppm
(mole). The Pitot tube and manometer in the same
figure indicate that the flow velocity is 40 ft/s. The stack
diameter is 5ft. The stack gas temperature andpressure are 450oF and 1 atm. Determine, what is the
SO2 flow rate? Given molar density of SO2 at 20oC is
given as 0.00259 lb-mol/ft3.
8/17/2019 Week 4-Emission Air Pollution (L7)
25/37
Diameter= 5ft
Concentration=600 ppm
Flow rate= 40ft/s
P=1 atm at 450oF
Density of SO2= 0.00259 1b-mol/ft3 at 20oCstack
8/17/2019 Week 4-Emission Air Pollution (L7)
26/37
UNITS CONVERSIONS
THE GAS CONTANT
8.314 m3
.Pa (mol.K)0.08314 L.bar/(mol.K)
0.08206 L.atm/(mol.K)
62.36 L.mm Hg/(mol.K)
0.7302 ft3.atm/(lb-mole.oR)
10.73 ft3.psia/(lb-mole.oR)8.314 J/(mol.K)
1.987 cal/(mol.K)
1.987 Btu/(lb-mole.oR)
T(K) = T(oC) + 273.15
T(oR) = T(oF) + 459.67
T(oR) = 1.8T(K)
T(oF) = 1.8T(oC) + 32
8/17/2019 Week 4-Emission Air Pollution (L7)
27/37
Solution:
Pollutant molar flow rate
= molar flow rate of gas x pollutant molar concentration in gas
The molar flow rate of the gas is = velocity x Area x density
= V A ρ
C
R F
C
o
o
o
o
oo
232
910450at
R 528F6820STPat
Given;
8/17/2019 Week 4-Emission Air Pollution (L7)
28/37
The molar flow rate of SO2 is1.18 lb-mol/s x 600 x 10-6 = 7.08 x 10-4 lb-mol/s
= 0.32 mol/s
Multiplying by the molecular weight of SO27.08 x 10-4 x 64 = 4.53 x 10-2 lb/s = 163 lb/h = 20.6 g/s = 74.1 kg/h
(This calculation is suitable for a stack whose velocity
and concentration are the same at every point and
time in the stack. Otherwise, averaging is needed)
Solution:
The molar flow rate of the gas is = V A ρ
R
R
o910
528
xftstd
mol-lb
10x2.59xft54xs
ft
40
o
3
3-2
mol536mol-2.2lb
mol1000x
s
mol-lb 1.18
s
mol-lb 1.18
8/17/2019 Week 4-Emission Air Pollution (L7)
29/37
• Emission testing is expensive.
- for simple & well-defined sources, it is tedious but not difficult- for poorly defined sources, reliable test results are difficult
• To overcome the problem, emission factor is introduced, develop
based on the high-quality test data.
• Given for pulverized coal and assuming after combustion 25%
ash appears as bottom and 50% form as fly ash (carried away by
gas stream)
• This emission factor is used to estimate the new and existing
materials.
Emission Factors
8/17/2019 Week 4-Emission Air Pollution (L7)
30/37
Term used: A: best
E: worst
PC-pulverized coal
Reference
Pittsburgh seam coal
Analysis
C=75.8%
H=5%
O=7.4%
N=1.5%
S=1.6%
Ash=8.7
8/17/2019 Week 4-Emission Air Pollution (L7)
31/37
Example 4
Table 4.2 shows part of two tables from one section of the EPA emission factors
library. It shows the estimated emissions from the combustion of bituminous
coal if no control devices are used. These are the emissions going into thecontrol devices. Comparing them to the permitted emissions coming out of the
plant (see Table 3.1), one can estimate the degree of control required.
Using this table, estimate the emissions from a 500-MW power plant at full
load, burning a typical Pittsburgh steam coal. The thermal efficiency is 35
percent. The power plant’s boiler is assumed to be of the PC, wall-fired, dry
bottom type.
8/17/2019 Week 4-Emission Air Pollution (L7)
32/37
UNITS CONVERSIONS
Quantity Equivalent Values
Mass 1 kg =1000 g = 0.001 metric ton =2.20462 Ibm= 35.27392oz
1 Ibm = 16 oz = 5×10-4 ton= 453.593 g = 0.453593 kg
Length 1 m = 100 cm = 1000 mm = 106 microns (µm) = 1010 angstroms ()
= 39.37 in = 3.2808 ft = 1.0936 yd = 0.0006214 mile
1 ft = 12 in = 1/3 yd = 0.3048 m = 30.48 cm
Volume 1 m3 = 1000 L = 106 cm3 = 106 mL
= 35.3145 ft3 = 220.83 imperial gallons = 264.17 gal = 1056.68 qt
1 ft3 = 1728 in3 = 7.4805 gal = 0.028317 m3 = 28.317 L = 28,317 cm3
Force 1 N = 1 kg.m/s2 = 105 dynes = 105 g.cm/s2 = 0.22481 Ibf
1 Ibf = 32.174 Ibm.ft/s2 = 4.4482 N = 4.4482 × 105 dynes
Pressure 1 atm = 1.01325×105 N/m2 (Pa) = 101.325 kPa = 1.0325 bar
= 1.01325 × 106 dynes/cm2 = 760 mmHg at 0oC (torr) = 10.333 m H2O at 4oC
= 14.696 Ibf /in2 (psi) = 33.9 ft H2O at 4
oC = 29.921 in Hg at 0oC
Energy 1 J = 1 N.m = 107 ergs = 107 dyne.cm = 2.778 × 10-7 kW.h = 0.23901 cal
0.7376 ft.Ibf = 9.486 × 10-4 Btu
Power 1 W = 1 J/s = 0.23901 cal/s = 0.7376 ft.lbf /s = 9.486× 10-4 Btu/s = 1.341×10-3 hp
8/17/2019 Week 4-Emission Air Pollution (L7)
33/37
h
ton 17910x3.585
kW1000 x
Btu3413 x
Btu/lb13,600x35.0
MW500
valueheating.coalEfficiency
outputPowerratenConsumptioCoal
5
h
lb
MW kWh
Solution
8/17/2019 Week 4-Emission Air Pollution (L7)
34/37
h
tonne
hlb
tonlb
A
1.7h
ton 7.8
10x56.1h
ton179x8.7x10
rate
flowcoal
ton
lb10
rate
flowcoal
factor
emission
rateemissionParticle
israteemissione particulatThe
4
8/17/2019 Week 4-Emission Air Pollution (L7)
35/37
Group Activity (CLO3,C4:PO2)
Discuss how to make the ambient and source
measurement for the following industries.
• Palm oil
• Cement
8/17/2019 Week 4-Emission Air Pollution (L7)
36/37
CONCLUSION
You have understand the following:
• Air pollution measurements
• Determine air pollutionmeasurements
• Emission Factor
8/17/2019 Week 4-Emission Air Pollution (L7)
37/37
End of Lecture
Thank you