Upload
dillon-chavez
View
27
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
DESCRIPTION
WELCOME. The Constitution & Civil Liberties. CREC TEACHING AMERICAN HISTORY - 2011. CASE HISTORY APPROACH. Session 1 - RATIFICATION. HOW IMPORTANT WERE CIVIL LIBERTIES TO THOSE WHO WROTE AND ADOPTED THE CONSTITUTION?. BILL OF RIGHTS – may 4- August 25, 1780. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Citation preview
WELCOME
The Constitution & Civil The Constitution & Civil Liberties Liberties
CREC TEACHING AMERICAN HISTORY - 2011CREC TEACHING AMERICAN HISTORY - 2011
CASE HISTORY APPROACHCASE HISTORY APPROACH
Session 1 - RATIFICATIONSession 1 - RATIFICATION
HOW IMPORTANT WERE CIVIL LIBERTIES TO THOSE
WHO WROTE AND ADOPTED THE
CONSTITUTION?
JOHN E FINN –WESLEYAN UNIV MIKE BREEN
BILL OF RIGHTS – may 4- August 25, 1780 BILL OF RIGHTS – may 4- August 25, 1780
4
1. NATURALIZATION ACT:
2. ALIEN FRIENDS ACT:
3. ALIEN ENEMIES ACT:
4. SEDITION ACT: a crime to publish “false, scandlous or malicious writing against the President, or Congress (but not individual Congressmen)
ALIEN AND SEDITION ACTS OF 1798
First amendment case: THOMAS COOPER First amendment case: THOMAS COOPER PUBLISHED BROADSIDE ACCUSING ADAMS OF PUBLISHED BROADSIDE ACCUSING ADAMS OF
MISCONDUCT IN OFFICE MISCONDUCT IN OFFICE
UNDER WHAT CONDITIONS CAN OR SHOULD CIVIL
LIBERTIES BE DISPENSED WITH?
WHAT CONSTITUTES FREE SPEECH?
JULY 14, 1798 JULY 14, 1798
ALIEN AND SEDITION ACTS ALIEN AND SEDITION ACTS
When Was the Sedition Act
Scheduled to Expire?`
March 3, 1801
WHEN IS THE SUPPRESSION
OF CIVIL LIBERTIES A POLITICAL
TOOL?
Jefferson Jefferson kentucky resolveskentucky resolves
NULLIFICATIONNULLIFICATION
MADISON MADISON VIRGINIA resolvesVIRGINIA resolves
INTERPOSITIONINTERPOSITION
First amendment case: THOMAS COOPER First amendment case: THOMAS COOPER PUBLISHED BROADSIDE ACCUSING ADAMS OF PUBLISHED BROADSIDE ACCUSING ADAMS OF
MISCONDUCT IN OFFICE MISCONDUCT IN OFFICE
NONE OF THOSE QUESTIONS WERE EFFECTIVELY
ADDRESSED.
NOV. 9 SPECIAL NOV. 9 SPECIAL PROGRAM: OLD STATE PROGRAM: OLD STATE
HOUSEHOUSE6:00 PM“CIVIL
LIBERTIES & THE CIVIL WAR
IN CONNECTICUT
SUPREME CT JUSTICES JOHN FINN
MATT WARSHAUER
MATT WARSHAUER CCSU SALLY NYHAN
UNDER WHAT CONDITIONS UNDER WHAT CONDITIONS CAN OR SHOULD CIVIL CAN OR SHOULD CIVIL
LIBERTIES BE DISPENSED LIBERTIES BE DISPENSED WITH? WITH?
THE RIGHTS OF THE MAJORITY THE RIGHTS OF THE MAJORITY VERSUS THE RIGHTS OF THE VERSUS THE RIGHTS OF THE
INDIVIDUALINDIVIDUAL
WHOSE CIVIL LIBERTIES ARE WHOSE CIVIL LIBERTIES ARE PROTECTED BY THE PROTECTED BY THE
CONSTITUTION? WHOSE ARE CONSTITUTION? WHOSE ARE NOT?NOT?
THE RIGHTS OF THE MAJORITY THE RIGHTS OF THE MAJORITY VERSUS THE RIGHTS OF THE VERSUS THE RIGHTS OF THE
INDIVIDUALINDIVIDUAL
World War I Raised Crucial Questions World War I Raised Crucial Questions ABOUT THE RIGHT TO Free Expression ABOUT THE RIGHT TO Free Expression
. . • MANY CONSIDER FREEDOM OF SPEECH “THE MANY CONSIDER FREEDOM OF SPEECH “THE PREEMINENT FREEDOM”PREEMINENT FREEDOM”
• “ “the matrix, the indispensable condition of the matrix, the indispensable condition of nearly every other form pof freedom” - nearly every other form pof freedom” - Justice Justice
Cardozo, Palko v. Connecticut Cardozo, Palko v. Connecticut
• NO ONE BELIEVES IN NO ONE BELIEVES IN COMPLETE FREEDOM OF COMPLETE FREEDOM OF
SPEECHSPEECH
• AMERICANS SUPPORT FREE SPEECH IN THEORY, AMERICANS SUPPORT FREE SPEECH IN THEORY, AND RESTRICTIONS IN PRACTICEAND RESTRICTIONS IN PRACTICE
• THIS IS ESPECOIALLY TRUE IN TIMES OF THIS IS ESPECOIALLY TRUE IN TIMES OF HEIGHTENED THREATS TO NATIONAL SECURITYHEIGHTENED THREATS TO NATIONAL SECURITY
HOW MUCH FREEDOM OF
SPEECH IS ENOUGH?
Woodrow Wilson &The War Woodrow Wilson &The War
Progressive Reformer:
• 8 Hour Work Day • Ended Child Labor
• Trust Buster •Est. Federal Income
Tax
Racist• Federal Offices Segregated
•Photos Required of Job Applicants
Harshly Suppresed Civil Liberties During
& After WW I
Wilson (And America) Reluctant to Wilson (And America) Reluctant to enter the war. enter the war.
Wilson Feared the War Would End Progressive Reforms
Declared Neutrality
1916 Campaign Slogan “He Kept Us Out of War.”
Zimmerman Telegram Zimmerman Telegram Leads US to War 1917Leads US to War 1917
Mexico Promised Lands Lost to US in Mexican War 1846 if they Support Germany against the US
April 1917, US enters world War April 1917, US enters world War 1 1
“To Make the World Safe For
Democracy.”
US Mobilizes for warUS Mobilizes for war
In April 1917, The Total U S Army Force was 100,000 Men
US Mobilizes for warUS Mobilizes for war
By End of 1818, 2.8 Million Soldiers – 1.5 Million US Troops in Europe
Wilson CreateD CPI to Sell the War Wilson CreateD CPI to Sell the War to the American Peopleto the American People
Committee on Public
Information
Over 75 Million Copies of
30 Different Pamphlets
Anti-German Messages
and Pro-Patriotic Works
In Every Medium
Wilson CreateD CPI to Sell the War Wilson CreateD CPI to Sell the War to the American Peopleto the American People
Wilson CreateD CPI to Sell the War Wilson CreateD CPI to Sell the War to the American Peopleto the American People
Wilson CreateD CPI to Sell the War Wilson CreateD CPI to Sell the War to the American Peopleto the American People
War Propaganda Fed Pre-existing Fears of War Propaganda Fed Pre-existing Fears of an “enemy within”an “enemy within”
1/3 of Americans Were Immigrants or Children of Immigrants (32Million)
10 Million Americans Came From Central Powers Nations (At War With US)
Millions More were Irish who hated England
German-Americans Push For Neutrality Made Them Suspect
All “Hyphenated Americans” Came Under Suspicion
Wilson unleashed a veritable Wilson unleashed a veritable reign of terror reign of terror
“There are citizens of the United States . . . born under other flags, but welcomed under our generous naturalization laws to the full freedom and opportunity of America, who have poured the poison of disloyalty into the very arteries of our national life; who have sought to bring the authority and name of our good government into contempt.[ It is . . . Necessary that we should promptly make use of processes of law by which we may be purged of their corrupt distempers. I am urging you to do nothing less than save the honor and self-respect of the nation . . . Disloyalty and anarchy must be crushed out. I need not suggest the terms in which they may be dealt with”. – State of the Uniion, 1915
Espionage Act of 1917Espionage Act of 1917
RADICALLY CURTAILED FREEDOM OF SPEECH
SEDITIOUS NEWSPAPERS WERE BANNED FROM THE MAILS
20 YEAR SENTENCE FOR OPPOSING THE DRAFT
EUGENE V DEBS SERVED THREE YEARS EUGENE V DEBS SERVED THREE YEARS FOR SPEAKING AGAINST THE DRAFTFOR SPEAKING AGAINST THE DRAFT
RUSSIAN ANARCHIST EMIGRANT EMMA RUSSIAN ANARCHIST EMIGRANT EMMA GOLDMAN SENTENCED TO 2 YEARS FOR GOLDMAN SENTENCED TO 2 YEARS FOR
SPEAKING AGAINST THE DRAFT SPEAKING AGAINST THE DRAFT
SEDITION ACT OF 1918 SEDITION ACT OF 1918
EVEN MORE RADICALLY CURTAILED FREEDOM OF SPEECH
MADE IT A CRIME TO SAY ANYTHING “disloyal, profane, scurrilous, or abusive” about the US government or its policies
American Protective League American Protective League
Private Organization, founded in Chicago Encouraged people to spy on and report subversive neighbors
250,000 Members , 600 cities
“Organized with the Approval and Operating under the Direction of the United States Department of Justice
Waves of anti german vigilanteism swept Waves of anti german vigilanteism swept the country the country
German Language Cultural Expression Harshly Suppressed – Newspapers, Church Services
Tarring and Lynchings of German Activists - John Meintz, Duluth, MN, tarred and feathered for not buying war bonds
Robert Praeger of collinsville, MO. Robert Praeger of collinsville, MO. Lynched for opposing the draft Lynched for opposing the draft
LYNCHED FOR MAKING DISLOYAL UTTERANCES AGAINST PRESIDENT WILSON
Leftist & socialist Communist Labor Leftist & socialist Communist Labor Activists also Suppressed Activists also Suppressed
International Workers
of the World IWW
Specially Singled Out
Justice Dept Arrested
169 IWW Leaders
September, 1917
Most Received Stiff
Jail Terms – Effort to
Break the Union
RED SCARE of 1919 RED SCARE of 1919 Produced New RepressionProduced New Repression
Fear of a Bolshevik Revolution in the US
Attorney General A. Mitchell Palmer, authored, THE CASE AGAINST THE REDS
After bombs went off in 8 US cities in June, J Edgar Hoover led raids that led to the arrest and attempted deportation of 16,000 people, imprisoned without habeus corpus
In Connecticut, Joseph Yenowsky of Waterbury served 6 months in jail for saying Lenin was one of the “brainiest men in the world”
Schenck V. United States: First Schenck V. United States: First Court Attempt to Define Limits of Court Attempt to Define Limits of
Free Expression Free Expression
Upheld the Espionage Act of 1917, upheld guilty verdict
No protection for speech against the draft during World War I
Most notable for Oliver Wendell Holme’s “clear and present danger “ test.
CLEAR AND PRESENT DANGERCLEAR AND PRESENT DANGER
“The most stringent protection of free speech would not protect a man in falsely shouting fire in a theatre and causing a panic. [...] The question in every case is whether the words used are used in such circumstances and are of such a nature as to create
a CLEAR AND PRESENT DANGER that they will bring about the substantive evils that Congress has a right to prevent.”
GUIDING QUESTIONS: GUIDING QUESTIONS: CONTENTCONTENT
• HOW IMPORTANT WERE CIVIL LIBERTIES TO THE HOW IMPORTANT WERE CIVIL LIBERTIES TO THE CONSTITUTIONCONSTITUTION’’S FRAMERS?S FRAMERS?
• WHOSE RIGHTS ARE MORE IMPORTANT; THE WHOSE RIGHTS ARE MORE IMPORTANT; THE RIGHTS OF THE MAJORITY, OR THE RIGHTS OF RIGHTS OF THE MAJORITY, OR THE RIGHTS OF THE INDIVIDUAL?THE INDIVIDUAL?
• HOW HAS OUR UNDERSTANDING OF CIVIL HOW HAS OUR UNDERSTANDING OF CIVIL LIBERTIES CHANGED OVER TIME? LIBERTIES CHANGED OVER TIME?
• WHOSE CIVIL LIBERTIES ARE PROTECTED BY THE WHOSE CIVIL LIBERTIES ARE PROTECTED BY THE CONSTITUTION? WHOSE ARE NOT? CONSTITUTION? WHOSE ARE NOT?
• UNDER WHAT CONDITIONS CAN OR SHOULD UNDER WHAT CONDITIONS CAN OR SHOULD CIVIL LIBERTIES BE DISPENSED WITH? CIVIL LIBERTIES BE DISPENSED WITH?
GUIDING QUESTIONS: GUIDING QUESTIONS: METHODMETHOD
• WHAT MAKES AN EFFECTIVE DOCUMENT WHAT MAKES AN EFFECTIVE DOCUMENT BASED QUESTION?BASED QUESTION?
• HOW DO WE DEVELOP EFFECTIVE DBQS?HOW DO WE DEVELOP EFFECTIVE DBQS?
• HOW DO WE HELP OUR STUDENTS ENGAGE HOW DO WE HELP OUR STUDENTS ENGAGE AND MASTER DBQ ASSESSMENT?AND MASTER DBQ ASSESSMENT?
• WHAT WOULD A DBQ BASED APPROACH TO WHAT WOULD A DBQ BASED APPROACH TO TEACHING THE CONSTITUTION AND CIVIL TEACHING THE CONSTITUTION AND CIVIL LIBERTIES LOOK LIKE? LIBERTIES LOOK LIKE?
• HOW DO WE DEVELOP STUDENT-FRIENDLY DBHOW DO WE DEVELOP STUDENT-FRIENDLY DBQQ ’’S THAT FOCUS ON CRITICAL ASPECTS OF THE S THAT FOCUS ON CRITICAL ASPECTS OF THE CIVIL LIBERTIES/CONSTITUTIONAL DEBATE?CIVIL LIBERTIES/CONSTITUTIONAL DEBATE?