Upload
evelyn-lucas
View
215
Download
1
Tags:
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Welcome!• The webinar will begin promptly at 2:00 p.m.• All participants will be placed on mute upon entry.• You will need to connect to audio after establishing the
computer portion of the webinar.• If you have difficulty connecting, call Brinda Berry at
501.230.5689.• This presentation refers to Appendices found in the Request
for Proposals and Guidelines for Submission document that has been distributed. You may want to have it available for reference as it will not be shown in its entirety.
• The webinar will be recorded for future viewing.• Additional instructions for submitting questions during the
presentation will be provided at the beginning of the webinar.
Legislative IntentCreation of statewide comprehensive structure for workforce
development that reduces skills gaps in the regional workforce pool• Evaluation of workforce needs of state• Coordination of secondary and postsecondary education,
including career and technical programs (CTE)• Pursuit of high demand jobs, including those that require industry
recognized credentials, short-term training through bachelor level programs
• Create long-term relationships between employers and regional workforce alliances
Facilitation of a skilled and employment-ready workforce through alignment of education and workforce needs through a competitive grant process
Core Requirements Representation from mandatory partners• CTE educators or appropriate local K-12 district that awards
concurrent credit• Technical institute, community college or university offering CTE
programs• Employers representing critical needs in the identified workforce
regionEnhance, expand or create clearly defined CTE pathway
program(s) at technical institutes, community colleges or universities that includes concurrent secondary center programs to fill a critical, demonstrable local workforce need
Core RequirementsInclude programs which emphasize basic skills instruction
concurrently with occupational trainingEmbrace diversity of student enrollmentProvide essential support services which link to resources that
assist students in progressing along the identified pathways, including advising on academic, employment, financial and personal issues
Develop and implement collaborative apprenticeship or training programs that prepare workers for rapid entry into the workforce or provide recognized industry certifications
General ProcessCompetitive RFP process
Awarded to regional workforce alliances
Grants awarded by ADHE based on recommendations from:• Arkansas Department of Education• Arkansas Department of Career Education• Arkansas Department of Higher Education• Arkansas Department of Workforce Services• Arkansas Economic Development Commission
Three Phases• Phase 1-Planning grants (up to $100K)• Phase 2-Implementation (up to $1M over two years)• Phase 3-Continutation (up to $1M over two years)
TimelineDate Action Item
May 2015 Guidelines Available
August 2015 Intent Letter Due
September 2015 Planning Grant Proposal Due
October 2015 Notification of Planning Grant Awards
June 2016 Implementation Grant Proposal Due
July 2016 Notification of Implementation Grant Awards
September 2016 Initiatives Begin (no later than)
September 2017 Interim Report due
June 2018 Continuation Grant Proposal Due
July 2018 Notification of Continuation Grant Awards
September 2019 Interim Report Due
August 2020 Continuation Award Period End
September 2020 Final Report Due
Planning GrantProposal SpecificationsRegional alliance with mandatory partners
Arkansas community college or university to serve as lead applicant and fiscal agent. Additional partners may include any public or private, non-profit, technical institute, two-year or four-year institutions
Two or more employers representing industry sectors with a demonstrated shortage of skilled workers seeking credentialed graduates from the proposed program
CTE educators or other appropriate representatives from a local K-12 school district
Based on input from Local Workforce Development Board
Proposal will present a detailed plan for achieving the outlined objectives in a Phase 2 Implementation Grant proposal
Northwest ArkansasBenton, Carroll, Boone, Marion, Baxter, Washington, Madison, Newton, Searcy
Northwest Technical InstituteNorthwest Arkansas Community CollegeNorth Arkansas College ASU – Mountain
HomeUniversity of Arkansas, Fayetteville
John Brown University Univ. of the Ozarks
North Central ArkansasFulton, Izard, Sharp, Stone,
Independence, Jackson, Van Buren, Cleburne, White, Woodruff
ASU – Beebe ASU – NewportOzarka College UACC – BatesvilleLyon College Harding University
Northeast ArkansasRandolph, Clay, Lawrence,
Greene, Craighead, Poinsett, Mississippi
Arkansas NortheasternBlack River Technical College
Arkansas State Univ.Crowley’s Ridge Williams
Baptist
Eastern ArkansasCross, Crittenden, St. Francis,
Lee, Phillips
East Arkansas CC Mid-South CC
Phillips CC of UA
Central Arkansas and Little Rock
Faulkner, Saline, Pulaski, Lonoke, Prairie, Monroe
Pulaski TechUniv. Arkansas – Little Rock
Univ. Central ArkansasPhilander Smith Shorter
College Arkansas Baptist Hendrix Coll.
Southeast ArkansasGrant, Jefferson, Arkansas, Cleveland, Lincoln, Desha, Drew, Bradley, Ashley, ChicotSoutheast Arkansas CollegePhillips CC of UAUniv. Arkansas – Pine BluffUniv. Arkansas - Monticello
Southwest Arkansas
Sevier, Howard, Hempstead, Nevada,
Dallas, Little River, Miller, Ouachita,
Calhoun, Lafayette, Columbia, Union
Cossatot CC of UA South Ark. CC
UACC – Hope SAU Tech
Southern Ark. Univ.
West Central ArkansasJohnson, Pope, Conway, Yell, Perry,
Montgomery, Garland, Hot Spring, Pike, Clark
National Park CC College of the OuachitasUACC - Morrilton
Ark. Tech Univ. Henderson State Univ.Ouachita Baptist Univ.
Western ArkansasCrawford, Franklin, Logan,
Sebastian, Scott, Polk
Rich Mountain CCArkansas Tech - Ozark
Univ. Arkansas – Ft. Smith
Planning GrantProposal ElementsElements Points Possible
Program Need 30
Program Plan 25
Strength of Partnerships 25
Budget Plan 20
Total 100
Reference: Scoring Rubric on Appendix D of RFP Submission Guidelines
Program Need (Planning)
Program Need (30 points)• Labor needs overview• Current and projected skills gaps• Proposed program/equipment needs• How program/equipment will address stated labor needs
Exemplary26-30
Superior21-25
Adequate16-20
Needs Improvement0-15
Significantly address a top 3 workforce need in region
Addresses in a more limited way a top 3 workforce need in region
Addresses in a limited way a less critical workforce need in the region
Identified labor need is too narrow or not in a critical area
Program Plan (Planning)
Program Plan (25 points)• Meets the goals and core requirements of the Regional
Workforce Grants program• Summary of expected outcomes• Description of career pathways that will be created/enhanced• Description of anticipated equipment needs• Proposed governance and accountability structure for program
Exemplary22-25
Superior18-21
Adequate14-17
Needs Improvement0-13
All goals and core requirements and identifies significant outcomes
Most goals and requirements and identifies outcomes
Many goals and requirements and identifies few outcomes
Lacks significant requirements or lacks apparent outcomes
Strength of Partnerships (Planning)
Strength of Partnership (25 points)• How the program plan incorporates each mandatory partners• Other regional partners who can contribute significantly in
unique and meaningful role• Anticipated role for each member for the alliance• Commitment letter from each partner• Commitment letter from Local Workforce Development Board
Exemplary22-25
Superior18-21
Adequate14-17
Needs Improvement0-13
Includes broad representation and each partner has defined role with identified critical contributions
Includes broad representation but partner roles are not clearly defined
Plan lacks one or two important partners or not all partners are critical to success of the plan
Partner participation is too narrow or some partners do not contribute meaningfully
Budget Plan (Planning)
Budget Plan (20 points)• Detailed financial plan with cost estimates for all proposed
planning activities• Completed budget template• Efficiency in planning grant expenditures is expected
Exemplary18-20
Superior15-17
Adequate11-14
Needs Improvement0-10
All requested resources are essential and clearly support goals of plan
Most requested resources are important and clearly support goals of plan
Plan includes some questionable resource requests
Budget includes requests deemed unnecessary
Application Procedures (Planning)
Intent to SubmitSubmission• Application Cover Sheet• Proposal Narrative• Budget Template
Review and Approval• Scored by state workforce development partners using Scoring
Rubric for each application• ADHE will average individual scores and rank from most to least
favorable• Funding not guaranteed for any submitted proposal
ADHE will issue notice of approval and permission to proceedADHE disbursement of funds
Intent to Submit Proposal (Planning)
Reference: Appendix A of RFP GuidelinesRequired information includes:• Workforce Initiative Alliance Lead Institution• Workforce Initiative Alliance Partners• Contact information for Lead Institution• Project title (if one has been chosen)
Cover Sheet (Planning)
Reference: Appendix B of RFP GuidelinesRequired information includes:• Requesting Institution• Title of Project• Project Partners• Requested Budget (not to exceed $100,000)• Date Submitted• Applicant Contact• Authorized Signatures of all Project Partners
Budget Template (Planning)
Reference: Appendix C of RFP GuidelinesRequired financial information includes:Budget Item Amount
A. PARTNER PARTICIPANT SUPPORT COSTS1. Personnel/Stipends2. Travel3. OtherTotal Partner Participant Support Costs
B. OTHER DIRECT COSTS1. Materials and Supplies2. Publication Costs/Documentation/Dissemination3. Consultant Services4. OtherTotal Other Direct CostsC. TOTAL DIRECT COSTS (A & B)TOTAL REQUESTED PLANNING GRANT BUDGET
Proposal Specifications Implementation
Successful planning grants are expected to culminate in Implementation Grant proposals. Applicants must demonstrate the viability of a regional alliance with the same makeup as required in the Planning Grant application.
Implementation Grants must also be based on input from a Local Workforce Development Board and address the following proposal requirements:
Elements Points Possible
Program Need 20
Program Plan 25
Strength of Partnerships 20
Budget Plan 15
Sustainability 20
Total 100
Reference: Scoring Rubric on Appendix G of RFP Submission Guidelines
Implementation Grant NotesProcess and procedure is generally same as for Planning
Grants.Differences include:• Sustainability• Local Match ($10% of total request; maximum of $50,000)
Date Action Item
June 1, 2016 Implementation Grant Proposal Due
July 1, 2016 Notification of Award Implementation Grant Awards
September 1, 2016 Initiatives Begin (no later than)
August 1, 2016 25% of Grant Disbursed
January 1, 2017 25% of Grant Disbursed
September 2017 Interim Report due
August 1, 2017 25% of Grant Disbursed
January 1, 2018 25% of Grant Disbursed
August 2020 Continuation Award Period End
September 2020 Final Report due
Budget Template (Implementation)
Appendix F of RFP GuidelinesBudget Item Amount
A. PROGRAM LEADERSHIP SUPPORT COSTS1. Personnel2. Travel3. OtherTotal Program Leadership Support Costs
B. OTHER DIRECT COSTS1. Equipment2. Materials and Supplies3. Publication Costs/Documentation/Dissemination4. Consultant Services5. OtherTotal Other Direct CostsC. TOTAL DIRECT COSTS (A & B)D. COST SHARING (Minimum 10% of C; up to $50,000)TOTAL REQUESTED IMPLEMENTATION GRANT BUDGET
Questions & SummaryQuestions
Summary
Next Steps
For follow-up information:• Tara Smith, ADHE• 501.371.2026 [email protected]
Submission and submission related questions:• [email protected]