Upload
jocelin-burke
View
216
Download
0
Tags:
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Welcome to Sig Day 2010
Jennifer Coffey
SPDG Program Lead
Audrey Desjarlais
SIGnetwork Coordinator
The SPDG Program Area Meeting
Thank you!2010 SIG Day Planning Committee
Denise Andreski (FL, MD, PA)Susan Bailey-Anderson (MT) Michele Bloodworth (NM)Anne Davin (CA)Hollie Filce (MS)Jonathan Dyson (RI)Susan Davis (NC)Jeanna Mullins, MSRRC
Agenda SIGnetwork Regional Meetings FY 2010 SPDG Program Performance Measures ARRA funding and the SPDGs 3-2-1 Discussions
SPDG ProgramSIGnetwork
www.signetwork.org SIGnetwork Coordinator Monthly Directors’ Webinars Bi-Monthly Evaluators’ Webinars Annual Face-to-Face Regional Meetings Nine Topical Professional Learning
Communities – Groups meet on a monthly, bi-monthly, or quarterly basis
SPDG Technology Initiative & the Tech Focus Work Group
SIGnetwork Listserv
If not currently on a Listserv, send your information to Audrey
Types of information provided through the listserv New SPDG competition announcement Continuation reporting reminders and tips Budget information Research and other resources
Contact Directory List
SIGnetwork Website
Register to http://signetwork.org/account/new Your account information will assist us in creating
an on-line directory To subscribe to the PLC wiki pages
February 3-4: Washington, DC
February 8-9: New Orleans, LA
February 15-16: Portland, OR, Vintage Plaza Hotel
Can’t Travel? Not to worry. You can attend virtually!
Segments of the Portland Regional Meeting will be offered via webcast to all interested SPDG Project Directors, Evaluators and Staff. Please contact Audrey at [email protected] by January 15 if you and/or members of your staff plan to attend as online participants.
2010 SPDG Regional Meetings
FY 2010 SPDG Program
• About $10 million for new grants• Applications were due by July 9th and
will be
Performance MeasuresReference cardOSEP Program Measures are
combined with GPRA Measures Should be aligned with your objectives
throughout your reportMore methodology guidance is coming
SPDG Performance Reporting Tips
• Data provided for the PROGRAM Measures are used to determine the success of the SPDG Program. • Although information about processes is
important, data regarding outcomes are critical for your quantitative data tables.
• The desired outcomes you described in your application are the outcomes you should report in your APR.
Setting Targets You are required to report on the targets (e.g.,
benchmarks or goals) that you established in your grant application, as well as your actual performance data.
If you did not establish targets in your approved grant application, please provide a detailed plan of how you will provide this information in future grant performance reports.
Final Reports
Final reports are due 90 days after the final day of your project. The final reports are not built into the online report system.
To complete the final report, download the continuation report and check the final report box.
Focus on the performance measures and outcomes/accomplishments and include the budgetary information for the entire grant cycle.
If there is money remaining at the end of the grant cycle and the project still has objectives to fulfill, there is an option to request a no-cost extension. Do not submit a final report if funds are still being spent.
No Cost Extensions Filing for No-Cost Extension: There is no
electronic form. You must notify your project officer in writing with the supporting reasons and revised expiration date at least 10 days before the project period end date.
You must submit a continuation report for that year.
14
Changes that Require Prior Approval
• Changing activities or objectives• New personnel or changes in FTE beyond .25
– Must request approval for changes in key personnel or significant changes in FTE• Send resume of proposed personnel
• The absence of the project director or principal investigator for more than three months (EDGAR § 74.25).
• Significant budget changes• The transfer of substantive work to a third party
Overview of “3-2-1 Reflection” Group Process
Brief discussions with a “next step” and succinct summary of the conversation.
Purposes Structuring Learning. Furthering the work of the PLCs. Helping the group determine the right next
step(s).
17
Outcomes of the 3-2-1 Process
3 big ideas that you and the rest of your group take away from the discussion
2 questions that you and the rest of your group will continue to ponder after today
1 action that you and the group will take
18
Directions
Find the table number for your discussion topics for Round 1 and Round 2
The facilitator will choose one person to do the group 3-2-1 recording and report out after the discussions
Be prepared to record your individual 3-2-1
19
TablesRound 1#1: Coaching
#2: Collab with IHEs
#3: Leadership Dvlpmnt
#4: Capacity Building
#5: Multi-Tiered Models
#6: Scaling Up
#7: Scaling Up
#8: Collab with Partners
#9: Technology – BEGINNER
#10: Participatory Evaluation
#11: Eval – Measuring Collab
#12: Eval – Measuring Collab
Round 2
#1: Coaching
#2: Collab with IHEs
#3: Leadership Dvlpmnt
#4: Capacity Building
#5: Multi-Tiered Models
#6: Scaling Up
#7: Scaling Up
#8: Collab with Partners
#9: Technology - ADVANCED
#10: Secondary Literacy
#11: Family Engagement
#12: RTI
Outcomes of the 3-2-1 Process
3 big ideas that you and the rest of your group take away from the discussion
2 questions that you and the rest of your group will continue to ponder after today
1 action that you and the group will take
22
Thank you to our3-2-1 Facilitators
Beth Steenwyk , MIBrent Garrett, KY, MS, NH, TNCarlos Romero, NMDavid Merves, NH, VT, MSDenise Andreski, MD, PA, FLDianna Carrizales, ORHollie Filce, MSJanet Sloand, PAJeanna Mullins, MSRRC Jon Dyson, RIKathy Cox, ILKerry Haag, KS
Leslie Pyper, WALori Romano, FLLynn Bailey, NC Marty Smith, MNMatt Giugno, NYNikki Sandve, MTPam Williams, MOPattie Noonan, MOSusan Bailey-Anderson, MTSusan Davis, NCWilma Jozwiak, NY