Upload
others
View
1
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
WELCOME TO THE
UNIVERSITY
OF TWENTEAnne Muller, Daniëlle Aagten, Renilde van Seters
Tom Mulder, Irene Visscher-Voerman
OF TOM.UNIVERSITY
When What
9.30 - 10.30 Session 1 Opening: What is TOM?
10.30 - 11.30 Session 2: Project-led education @ UT
Coffee
12.00 - 13.00 Session 3: Innovation and implementation of TOM
Lunch
14.00 - 15.00 Session 4: TOM in practice – Campus tour
15.15 - 16.15 Session 5a: Q&A session
16.15 - 17.00 Session 5b: Q&A and drinks (one on one)
TODAYS’ PROGRAMME
SESSION 1: WHAY, WHAT AND RESULTS
WHY
1. 2. 3. 4. 5.
WHAT RESULTS GAINS & OPPORTUNITIES QUESTIONS
Irene Visscher-Voerman & Tom Mulder
1. WHY
WHY TOM: DRIVERS BEHIND THE MODEL
EducationalResearch (HE) Developments
& Constraints
UTVision, mission & profile
TOM
1-6-2017 7
WHY TOM: PROFILE OF THE UNIVERSITY
ENTREPRENEURIAL
• A steady workload is better than ‘binge learning’ for tests (Jansen, 1996; Vos, 1998);
• Frequent and adequate feedback helps students adjust their learning (Hattie & Timperly, 2007);
• A variety in teaching methods keep students engaged (Van den Berg & Hofman, 2005);
• Community helps students help each other (Tinto, 1993);
• Ambitions must be clear and high, yet realistic (Hattie, 2008); and
• Teachers work best in teams (Louis & Marks, 1998; McLaughlin & Talbert, 2006), with minimal regulation (Niemiec & Ryan, 2009).
1-6-2017 TOM Toolkit 8
WHY TOM: OUTCOMES OF EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH
• Dutch system
• 50% of first year students ever graduated (in their own discipline)
• Large number gives up after two years
• Average study time was 7.4 years (for a 5 year Ba+Ma programme)
• Less than 20% of the students chose STEM subjects
• Of which is 80% male
• Goals:
• Drop-out rates are to be below 30% (70% graduates within 4 years)
• Attract more students
• Attractive education: at least 20 hours of guided activities
• Cost reduction at UT level
1-6-2017 TOM 9
WHY TOM: HIGHER EDUCATION DEVELOPMENTS & CONSTRAINTS
2. WHAT
1. MODULES AND PROJECT-BASED WORK
2. STUDENT DRIVEN LEARNING
3. RESEARCHERS, DESIGNERS AND ORGANIZERS
UNIVERSITY OF..
WHAT: MODULES & PROJECT-BASED WORK
• Modules are the new courses (from 12 to 4 per year)
• All modules are 15 EC
• 1 grade in the end; towards integral/comprehensive testing
• BSA: 3 modules (45 EC)
• Shared education where possible
• Projects!
1. Developing skills and searching/deepening
knowledge
2. Applying theory to practical solutions
3. Group projects (or/with individual assignments)
4. Changing teacher role
WHAT: VARIOUS MODULE TYPES
1 2 3 4B1
5 6 7B2 8
9 10 11 + 12B3
WHAT: CURRICULUM STRUCTURE
Shared education:- Modules - Module parts- Mathematics / research
methodology & statistics- Reflection on Science,
technology and Society
WHAT: STUDENT-DRIVEN LEARNING
• (pro-) active, entrepreneurial
attitude
• flexibility
• in content, time, activities, role…
• not only help students apply or test
their understanding and develop
skills, but also invite them to ask new
questions and seek other learning
opportunities
WHAT: THREE PROFESSIONAL ROLES
Researcher
Designer
Organizer
The university of Twente wants to
train highly skilled professionals
who are able to critically assess,
combine and apply scientific
knowledge on societally relevant
issues
3. RESULTS
3. RESULTS
• ‘Shared’ education (module map)
3. RESULTS
• ‘Shared’ education (module map)
• Coherent modules:
• Content is (partly) integrated
• Assessment (mostly) separate
• Overall appreciation scores increase
3. RESULTS
• ‘Shared’ education (module map)
• Coherent modules:
• Content is (partly) integrated
• Assessment (mostly) separate
• Overall appreciation scores increase
• Reducement of (late) drop-out: students drop-out earlier (also because of BSA)
1-6-2017 TOM 22
3. RESULTS: DROP-OUT RATES (JUNE 2016)INCLUDING SWITCH TO OTHER UT PROGRAMME
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
16
18
< 6 months 6-12 months 12-24 months 24-36 months > 36 months
Drop-out rates (%) (including switch)
2011 2012 2013 2014 2015
3. RESULTS
• ‘Shared’ education (module map)
• Coherent modules:
• Content is (partly) integrated
• Assessment (mostly) separate
• Overall appreciation scores increase
• Reducement of (late) drop-out: students drop-out earlier (also because of BSA)
• Study yield: More students graduate within three years
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
Cohort 2008 Cohort 2009 Cohort 2010 Cohort 2011 Cohort 2012 Cohort 2013
PER
CEN
TAG
E R
E-EN
RO
LLER
S W
HO
FIN
ISH
ED T
HEI
R P
RO
GG
RA
MM
EW
ITH
IN A
CER
TAIN
NU
MB
ER O
F Y
EAR
S
Bachelor study yield re-enrollments per cohort
≤ 3 jaar ≤ 4 jaar ≤ 5 jaar ≤ 6 jaar
4. GAINS AND OPPORTUNITIES
|
GAINSFor teachers:
Innovative teaching methods
Collaboration in module teams
Integration and learning in
projects
For students:
Learning together
More distributed workload
Frequent feedback
Increased level of deep learning
OPPORTUNITIES• Decrease the testing pressure >
administration load high work load
students
• Student Driven Learning > for
example more free planning
• Improve the organizational
aspects of modules (SEQ) > clear
communication of expectations
• More integration of skills and
knowledge
ENGLISH SPOKEN
5. QUESTIONS?
MORE INFORMATION ON TOM: WWW.UTWENTE.NL/TOMTOOLS AND SUPPORT EDUCATION: WWW.UTWENTE.NL/CELTICT: WWW.UTWENTE.NL/TELT/SOLUTIONS/