Upload
janis-parsons
View
213
Download
0
Tags:
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
What Can Test ScoresTell You about the
State of Your School?
CRCT DIBELS
Dr.Michael McKennaGeorgia Southern University
AYP Benchmarks
Subject 04 05 06 07 08 09 10 11 12 13 14
Rdg/Eng 60 66.7 66.7 66.7 73.3 73.3 73.3 80 86.7 93.3 100
Math 50 58.3 58.3 58.3 66.7 66.7 66.7 75 83.3 91.7 100
AYP Benchmarks
Subject 04 05 06 07 08 09 10 11 12 13 14
Rdg/Eng 60 66.7 66.7 66.7 73.3 73.3 73.3 80 86.7 93.3 100
Math 50 58.3 58.3 58.3 66.7 66.7 66.7 75 83.3 91.7 100
Kashinkerry 78 80.2 82.4 84.6 86.8 89.0 91.2 93.4 95.6 97.8 100
AYP Benchmarks
Subject 04 05 06 07 08 09 10 11 12 13 14
Rdg/Eng 60 66.7 66.7 66.7 73.3 73.3 73.3 80 86.7 93.3 100
Math 50 58.3 58.3 58.3 66.7 66.7 66.7 75 83.3 91.7 100
Kashinkerry 78 80.2 82.4 84.6 86.8 89.0 91.2 93.4 95.6 97.8 100
AYP Benchmarks
Subject 04 05 06 07 08 09 10 11 12 13 14
Rdg/Eng 60 66.7 66.7 66.7 73.3 73.3 73.3 80 86.7 93.3 100
Math 50 58.3 58.3 58.3 66.7 66.7 66.7 75 83.3 91.7 100
Kashinkerry 78 80.2 82.4 84.6 86.8 89.0 91.2 93.4 95.6 97.8 100
100 - 78 = 22
AYP Benchmarks
Subject 04 05 06 07 08 09 10 11 12 13 14
Rdg/Eng 60 66.7 66.7 66.7 73.3 73.3 73.3 80 86.7 93.3 100
Math 50 58.3 58.3 58.3 66.7 66.7 66.7 75 83.3 91.7 100
Kashinkerry 78 80.2 82.4 84.6 86.8 89.0 91.2 93.4 95.6 97.8 100
100 - 78 = 22 22 10 = 2.2
AYP Benchmarks
Subject 04 05 06 07 08 09 10 11 12 13 14
Rdg/Eng 60 66.7 66.7 66.7 73.3 73.3 73.3 80 86.7 93.3 100
Math 50 58.3 58.3 58.3 66.7 66.7 66.7 75 83.3 91.7 100
Kashinkerry 78 80.2 82.4 84.6 86.8 89.0 91.2 93.4 95.6 97.8 100
100 - 78 = 22 22 10 = 2.2
AYP Benchmarks
Subject 04 05 06 07 08 09 10 11 12 13 14
Rdg/Eng 60 66.7 66.7 66.7 73.3 73.3 73.3 80 86.7 93.3 100
Math 50 58.3 58.3 58.3 66.7 66.7 66.7 75 83.3 91.7 100
Kashinkerry 78 80.2 82.4 84.6 86.8 89.0 91.2 93.4 95.6 97.8 100
100 - 78 = 22 22 10 = 2.2
An Action Plan for the CRCT
1. Make a table for the past three years.
2. Contrast same-grade with cohort comparisons.
3. Consider disaggregated scores for key subgroups (special education categories, ethnicity, gender, LEP).
4. Compute equal increases through 2014.
5. Communicate these goals to teachers at each grade level, and discuss steps that might help attain them.
Test K 1 2 3
A S L A S L A S L A S L
ISF 7 23 70
LNF 3 10 87 5 15 80
PSF 20 26 54
NWF 18 20 62
ORF 18 20 62 22 22 56
Sample Beginning-of-Year DIBELS Distribution
Test K 1 2 3
A S L A S L A S L A S L
ISF 7 23 70
LNF 3 10 87 5 15 80
PSF 20 26 54
NWF 18 20 62
ORF 18 20 62 22 22 56
Sample Beginning-of-Year DIBELS Distribution
Test K 1 2 3
A S L A S L A S L A S L
ISF 7 23 70
LNF 3 10 87 5 15 80
PSF 20 26 54
NWF 18 20 62
ORF 18 20 62 22 22 56
Sample Beginning-of-Year DIBELS Distribution
Test K 1 2 3
A S L A S L A S L A S L
ISF 7 23 70
LNF 3 10 87 5 15 80
PSF 20 26 54
NWF 18 20 62
ORF 18 20 62 22 22 56
Sample Beginning-of-Year DIBELS Distribution
Test K 1 2 3
A S L A S L A S L A S L
ISF 7 23 70
LNF 3 10 87 5 15 80
PSF 20 26 54
NWF 18 20 62
ORF 18 20 62 22 22 56
Sample Beginning-of-Year DIBELS Distribution
Test K 1 2 3
A S L A S L A S L A S L
ISF 7 23 70
LNF 3 10 87 5 15 80
PSF 20 26 54
NWF 18 20 62
ORF 18 20 62 22 22 56
Sample Beginning-of-Year DIBELS Distribution
Test K 1 2 3
A S L A S L A S L A S L
ISF 7 23 70
LNF 3 10 87 5 15 80
PSF 20 26 54
NWF 18 20 62
ORF 18 20 62 22 22 56
Sample Beginning-of-Year DIBELS Distribution
Test K 1 2 3
A S L A S L A S L A S L
ISF 7 23 70
LNF 3 10 87 5 15 80
PSF 20 26 54
NWF 18 20 62
ORF 18 20 62 22 22 56
Sample Beginning-of-Year DIBELS Distribution
Test K 1 2 3
A S L A S L A S L A S L
ISF 7 23 70
LNF 3 10 87 5 15 80
PSF 20 26 54
NWF 18 20 62
ORF 18 20 62 22 22 56
Sample Beginning-of-Year DIBELS Distribution
Test K 1 2 3
A S L A S L A S L A S L
ISF 7 23 70
LNF 3 10 87 5 15 80
PSF 20 26 54
NWF 18 20 62
ORF 18 20 62 22 22 56
Sample Beginning-of-Year DIBELS Distribution
An Action Plan for DIBELS1. Make a table for fall, including results at the three levels
of risk, for each grade and test.
2. Identify points where large numbers of children are at high and moderate risk.
3. Discuss the “big picture” with teachers in grade groups.
4. Make clear to everyone that a central goal is to move all children into the low risk category.
5. Meet with individual teachers to plan for intervention and progress monitoring.