60
Diane Ebert-May Department of Plant Biology Michigan State University [email protected] http://first2.org What do we think?

What do we think?

  • Upload
    sabine

  • View
    53

  • Download
    4

Embed Size (px)

DESCRIPTION

What do we think?. Diane Ebert-May Department of Plant Biology Michigan State University [email protected] http://first2.org. Engage. Question 1. Active learning strategies enable students to learn science better than passive lectures. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Citation preview

Page 1: What do we think?

Diane Ebert-MayDepartment of Plant Biology

Michigan State University

[email protected]://first2.org

What do we think?

Page 2: What do we think?
Page 3: What do we think?

Engage

Page 4: What do we think?

Question 1

Active learning strategies enable students to learn science better than passive lectures.

Please respond on a scale of 1-5: 1=strongly agree; 2=agree; 3=neutral; 4= disagree; 5=strongly

disagree

Page 5: What do we think?

Question 2

Transition from a teacher-centered to a learner-centered classroom must accompany use of any learning resources.

Please respond on a scale of 1-5: 1=strongly agree; 2=agree; 3=neutral; 4= disagree; 5=strongly

disagree

Page 6: What do we think?

Question 3

At the beginning of each course, I inventory my students’ learning styles and adjust my classes according to the results.

Please respond on a scale of 1-5: 1=strongly agree; 2=agree; 3=neutral; 4= disagree; 5=strongly

disagree

Page 7: What do we think?

Question 4

How important is it to use multiple kinds of assessments to determine student learning?

Please respond on a scale of 0-100 in increments of 10:

Page 8: What do we think?

Question 5

The proportion of assessments I use in my course that demonstrate students’ critical thinking abilities is....

Please respond on a scale of 0-100 (%) in increments of 10:

Page 9: What do we think?

Question 6

In my department, excellence in teaching is highly regarded by my peers.

Please respond on a scale of 1-5: 1=strongly agree; 2=agree; 3=neutral; 4= disagree; 5=strongly

disagree

Page 10: What do we think?

Question 1

Active learning strategies enable students to learn science better than passive lectures.

Please respond on a scale of 1-5: 1=strongly agree; 2=agree; 3=neutral; 4= disagree; 5=strongly

disagree

Page 11: What do we think?

Who are our undergraduates?

Page 12: What do we think?
Page 13: What do we think?

Large Class Meeting

Page 14: What do we think?
Page 15: What do we think?

Scientific Teaching

Scientific teaching involves active learning strategies to engage students in the process of science.

Page 16: What do we think?

Question 2

Transition from a teacher-centered to a learner-centered classroom must accompany use of any learning resources.

Please respond on a scale of 1-5: 1=strongly agree; 2=agree; 3=neutral; 4= disagree; 5=strongly

disagree

Page 17: What do we think?
Page 18: What do we think?
Page 19: What do we think?
Page 20: What do we think?
Page 21: What do we think?

Question 3

At the beginning of each course, I inventory my students’ learning styles and adjust my classes according to the results.

Please respond on a scale of 1-5: 1=strongly agree; 2=agree; 3=neutral; 4= disagree; 5=strongly

disagree

Page 22: What do we think?

Learning Styles and Strategies

1. Felder and Solomon..styles are:

Active and reflective

Sensing and intuitive

Visual and verbal

Sequential and global

2. VARK by Neil Fleming...styles are:

Visual, aural, read/write, kinesthetic

Page 23: What do we think?

Question 4

How important is it to use multiple kinds of assessments to determine student learning?

Please respond on a scale of 0-100 in increments of 10:

Page 24: What do we think?

Question 5

The proportion of assessments I use in my course that demonstrate students’ critical thinking abilities is....

Please respond on a scale of 0-100 (%) in increments of 10:

Page 25: What do we think?

What level of learning do we ask of our students?

Bloom (1956) Cognitive Domain of Educational Objectives

6 categories - KnowledgeComprehensionApplicationAnalysisSynthesisEvaluation

Page 26: What do we think?

Holistic Critical Thinking Scoring Rubric

Facione and Facione 1994

Page 27: What do we think?

Question 6

In my department, excellence in teaching is highly regarded by my peers.

Please respond on a scale of 1-5: 1=strongly agree; 2=agree; 3=neutral; 4= disagree; 5=strongly

disagree

Page 28: What do we think?
Page 29: What do we think?

Articles derived from journal papers

Page 30: What do we think?

Explore

Page 31: What do we think?

How People LearnBransford et al 2004

SystemModel

Courses Curriculum

Page 32: What do we think?

Identify desired goals/objectives

Determine acceptable evidence

Design learning experiences

and instruction

Wiggins and McTighe 1998

Backwards Design

Page 33: What do we think?

What is assessment?

Data collection with the purpose of answering questions about…

students’ understanding

students’ attitudes

students’ skills

instructional design and implementation

curricular reform (at multiple grainsizes)

Page 34: What do we think?

Multiple Choice … … Concept Maps … … Essay … … Interview

high Ease of Assessment low

low Potential for Assessment of Learning high

Theoretical Framework• Ausubel 1968; meaningful learning• Novak 1998; visual representations• King and Kitchner 1994; reflective judgment• National Research Council 1999; theoretical frameworks for assessment

Assessment Gradient

Page 35: What do we think?

Explain

Page 36: What do we think?

Question: How would you assess learning resources designed to help students think critically?

“Many issues about student learning are connected with motivating students to think critically and inspire them to take ownership and initiative for their own learning.” (Batzli et al 2006)

Consider the following statement:

Talk-to-your-neighbor....

Page 37: What do we think?

• Connections

• Organization

• Visualization

• Reasoning

• Testing mental models

What is the role of models in assessing critical thinking?

Page 38: What do we think?

www.ctools.msu.edu

Page 39: What do we think?
Page 40: What do we think?

Box ModelCan transgenes be kept on a leash?

Page 41: What do we think?

Avida-Ed Evolution of Prokaryotes

Page 42: What do we think?

1. Identify patterns of critical thinking.

Talk aloud protocol as students use tools

Code extended responses - align with rubric

2. Ask questions and derive hypotheses about student understanding.

Next steps for analysis

Page 43: What do we think?

Design classroom research

Faculty research goal:

Use both observational and empirical approaches to answer a question about student learning.

Student goals:

Use effective and repeatable processes to address ill-structured problems.

Demonstrate critical thinking.

Page 44: What do we think?

Systematic observation

• Design an ill-structured problem.

• Students use guiding questions in groups.

• Instructor uses systematic observations to identify elements of the problem that are difficult for students.

Page 45: What do we think?

Comparison studies

What is the effectiveness of guiding questions on problem-solving approaches to address ill-structured problems?

Page 46: What do we think?

Guiding questions

1.What things do you know or think you know about this problem?

2.What things do you not know?

3.What things are not known in the scientific community studying similar problems?

4.What things can you find out, given review papers, primary scientific literature, and data?

Page 47: What do we think?

Study designs

Challenge: determining the internal and external validity of the study design.

Multiple-group comparison

• Multiple sections one semester

• Single course - multiple years

Intervention:

iii. Homework with guiding questions

iv. Homework without guiding questions

•Split-group comparison

Page 48: What do we think?

Split-group comparisonPretest

In-class active learning

Guiding Qs

Pretest

In-class active learning

Guiding QsNo Guiding Qs

Con

cep

t 1

Day 1

Con

cep

t 2

Day 2

Multiple Forms of Assessment (midterm and final exams)

Class of 120 students randomly assigned to 2

treatment groups (n=60)

Students alternate between completing

guiding questions and not using guiding

questions.

No Guiding Qs

Page 49: What do we think?

What about dissemination?

Page 50: What do we think?

FIRST III Database

Faculty Computer

Student DataSpreadsheet

Questions

Spreadsheet

Link Qs and student answers

Student ID

Spreadsheet

De-identified student data

Upload

Search Resultseg. Excel, SAS, SPSS

Search

Download

EdMLFIRST III

Database

Database Server

Page 51: What do we think?

What is the Educational Metadata Standard?

•Where - institution, class size

•How - experimental and sampling design; administration of assessments; instructional design.

•Who - project personnel

•What - assessment instruments, rubrics

•Why - study description

Page 52: What do we think?

Do students learn better?

Page 53: What do we think?

“...we note that successful people are the ones who take advantage of those around them to ultimately benefit students.”

Ebert-May D, Weber R, Hodder J, Batzli J (2006)

Finally...

Page 54: What do we think?

Team at MSU•Rett Weber - Plant Biology (postdoctoral researcher)•Deb Linton - Plant Biology [Tri-C Community College)•Duncan Sibley - Geology•Doug Luckie - Physiology•Scott Harrison - Microbiology (graduate student)•Tammy Long - Plant Biology•Heejun Lim - Chemistry Education (Korea) •Rob Pennock - Philosophy•Charles Ofria - Engineering•Rich Lenski - Microbiolgy•Janet Batzli - Plant Biology [U of Wisconsin]

Page 55: What do we think?

How would you alter this design for your course?

• Objective: assess students’ higher-level thinking.

• What is the question?

• How would you change the problem?

• Would students do the problem in class, homework, lab, discussion section?

• Schemes to evaluate work.

• Classroom research design.

Page 56: What do we think?

Students will demonstrate understanding of evolution by natural selection.

Objective (outcome)

Page 57: What do we think?

•Changes in a population occur through a gradual change in individual members of a population.

•New traits in species are developed in response to need.

•All members of a population are genetically equivalent, variation and fitness are not considered.

•Traits acquired during an individual’s lifetime will be inherited by offspring.

Alternative Conceptions: Natural Selection

Page 58: What do we think?

Instructional Design

Enable students to gain meaningful understanding of evolution and natural selection through active learning.

Page 59: What do we think?

Pre-test: extended response. Explain the changes that occurred in the tree and animal. Use your current understanding of evolution by natural selection.

Hauser F. 1990. AAAS

Page 60: What do we think?

Rubric: Code Responses Misconceptions Correct

P = Change in the individual Change in the population

C = Need to Change/ Must Change/ Choice

Change due to genes

V = All members of a population are equally fit

Individuals within a population have varying

fitness levels

G = Traits acquired during a lifetime are passed on

Genetic traits help the individual to survive and

reproduce

I = Incorrect C =CorrectP = Partially correct

P __C __V __G__

ND = No data