57
What have we covered so far – the Basic Questions 1. Climate has not always been similar to the present; in fact has rarely been like the present Holocene climate. 2. Climate depends on a large number of variables - with abundant feedbacks, and climate change is not necessarily intuitive. 3. The scientific community does not understand some basics about climate, even for recent periods where the data are good. This includes the causes of the glacial/interglacial cycles. 4.Climate change can be both dramatic, and fast: the return to glacial climate during the Younger Dryas may have happened in just a few decades. 5. Computer models are just (digital) plausibility arguments, and are limited by our understanding of what are the important variables, in resolution, and in ability to predict the future.

What have we covered so far – the Basic Questions

  • Upload
    caden

  • View
    32

  • Download
    3

Embed Size (px)

DESCRIPTION

What have we covered so far – the Basic Questions. 1. Climate has not always been similar to the present; in fact has rarely been like the present Holocene climate. 2. Climate depends on a large number of variables - with abundant feedbacks, and climate change is not necessarily intuitive. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Citation preview

Page 1: What have we covered so far – the Basic Questions

What have we covered so far – the Basic Questions

1. Climate has not always been similar to the present; in fact has rarely been like the present Holocene climate.

2. Climate depends on a large number of variables - with abundant feedbacks, and climate change is not necessarily intuitive.

3. The scientific community does not understand some basics about climate, even for recent periods where the data are good. This includes the causes of the glacial/interglacial cycles.

4.Climate change can be both dramatic, and fast: the return to glacial climate during the Younger Dryas may have happened in just a few decades.

5. Computer models are just (digital) plausibility arguments, and are limited by our understanding of what are the important variables, in resolution, and in ability to predict the future.

Page 2: What have we covered so far – the Basic Questions

Summary: Climate Conditions during LGM

• Insolation rates about the same as today.• Colder (~ -4 º C globally and ~ -10 ºC (or –

20) near the poles and ~-2 to -3 ºC in tropics).• Ice Sheet volume was ~ twice today.• Sea Level lower by ~ 125m. Exposed large

continental shelf areas.• Drier and dustier (globally).• Reduced atmospheric CO2 and CH4 levels• Vegetation more arctic like (tundra, steppe).• Deep Ocean circulation more sluggish.

Page 3: What have we covered so far – the Basic Questions

Rise in Temperature and Atmospheric Gases

• Temperature, CO2 and CH4 start increasing ~18K yrs.

• Implies changes in radiation budget (temperature), ocean circulation /biology/chemistry (CO2) and precipitation (CH4).

Page 4: What have we covered so far – the Basic Questions

Millenial Scale Oscillations in Temperature DURING the Last Glacial Period.

It wasn’t just cold back then….

During last glacial period (20-100 K yrs BP) there were many large and fast temperature swings recorded in the Greenland ice cores and deep sea sediments from N. Atlantic.

warmercolder

Page 5: What have we covered so far – the Basic Questions

Heinrich Events – massive discharge of icebergs (and ice-rafted rocks) into the North Atlantic

Dansgaard-Oeschger Events – Large (10°C), rapid warming events in the North Atlantic.

Page 6: What have we covered so far – the Basic Questions

Summary: Rapid Climate Change

• During the last 100K yrs there have been repeated oscillations between warm (Dansgaard-Oeschger: D-O) and cold (Heinrich) conditions, with very fast temperature changes (7ºC in 50 yrs in Greenland).

• The most recent (strong) cold event occurred about 12K yrs ago (Younger-Dryas) during the transition from LGM to current interglacial period.

• Current hypothesis is that variations in deep water formation rates in N. Atlantic driven by salinity, and thus poleward heat transport, is a likely mechanism for YD.

• These rapid climate change events are strongest in the N. Atlantic, but some evidence that they occurred globally.

• Generally, there is an anti-phasing of temperature fluctuations between N. and S. Hemispheres.

Page 7: What have we covered so far – the Basic Questions

Abrupt Climate Change between 60 kyrs and 23 kyrs.

Greenland ice cores

Portugal alkenones

Greenland IC methane

Caribbean sediments

Bermuda alkenones

Santa Barbara forams

ALL consistent with a 4 deg C temperature increase during D-O events

Page 8: What have we covered so far – the Basic Questions

WERE THE MILLENNIAL OSCILLATION EVENTS GLOBALLY DISTRIBUTED?

Answer – SORT OF...

CIRCLES ARE SITES WHERE THE DATA COVER APPROPRIATE TIME RANGE AND HAVE ADEQUATE RESOLUTION.

FILLED CIRCLES ARE THOSE THAT SHOW D-O EVENTS;

OPEN CIRCLES ARE THOSE THAT DON’T SHOW D-O EVENTS.

Page 9: What have we covered so far – the Basic Questions

Heinrich EventsHeinrich Events: Ice Rafted Debris. Remember, these are COLD events

Page 10: What have we covered so far – the Basic Questions

Six periods of extreme cooling in the Northern Hemisphere—known as Heinrich events—were marked by an enhanced discharge of icebergs into the North Atlantic Ocean.

Increased ocean temperature reduces ice-shelf width, reducing buttress that are holding back ice sheet flow into the sea. Reduced butress increases ice-stream velocities.

Need high on-land snow accumulations to form thick ice sheet.

Then need cold temperatures to form sea ice – that butresses the ice sheet on land (thickens)

Then have warm ocean current melt fringing around continent and land-ice sheet discharges rapidly. H-event.

Page 11: What have we covered so far – the Basic Questions

Standard simulation. a–d, Time evolution of the oceanic forcing (a) (in terms of basal melting under the ice shelf), grounded ice thickness (b),ice-shelf length (c) and iceberg calving (d). e, The evolution of the same variables as well as the ice velocities at the grounding line over a simulated Bond cycle. Alvares-Solas et al, Nature, 2010.

Page 12: What have we covered so far – the Basic Questions

Dansgaard-Oeschger and Heinrich Events recorded in the N. Atlantic Region

Fairly consistent ~1500 yr period between warm periods (D-O events). Several of the coldest periods are associated with Heinrich events (e.g., Younger-Dryas). Sawtooth pattern of fast warming and slow cooling.

Page 13: What have we covered so far – the Basic Questions

Heinrich events are defined as ICE-RAFTED debris, found in sediments in the mid-North Atlantic sediments.

How are D-O events defined?

What parameter defines a WARM D-O event?

Page 14: What have we covered so far – the Basic Questions

Meltwater Pulses as a Climate Change Trigger

• Pulse of freshwater discharge into the N. Atlantic would reduce the formation rate of deep water (N. Atlantic Deep Water) by reducing salinity (density) of surface water.

• This would reduce the ocean’s transport rate of heat via Gulf Stream to N. Atlantic region and cause cooling in the region.

Page 15: What have we covered so far – the Basic Questions

Deep Water Formation: Present vs LGM

Page 16: What have we covered so far – the Basic Questions

NOTE that there are a lot more D-O warm cycles than there are H-events.

That is because in order to have H-events, you need the ice sheets to be advancing – which requires both cold temperatures AND moisture back on land to force them to advance (which takes time). I.e., the H-events come at the end of a cold period that is preceded by a warm period.

Page 17: What have we covered so far – the Basic Questions

Possible Mechanism: Salt Oscillator

Hypothesis: Changes in the salinity of the N. Atlantic, resulting from ice melting or ice formation, determines the strength of NADW formation and,

as a result, changes the rate of heat transport to the N. Atlantic region.

The H-event

Page 18: What have we covered so far – the Basic Questions

Salt Oscillator: Ocean circulation has two modes

Page 19: What have we covered so far – the Basic Questions

Model Simulations

Does S. Hemisphere warm when the N. Hemisphere cools?

Page 20: What have we covered so far – the Basic Questions

Salt Oscillator: Explaining the time sequence of D-O and Heinrich events

Hypothesis: The sawtooth pattern of temperature change is caused by a slow decrease in rate of NADW formation,

until it eventually stops,

which is then followed by rapid return of NADW formation after a critical value of salinity is reached.

small

big

Page 21: What have we covered so far – the Basic Questions
Page 22: What have we covered so far – the Basic Questions

Model Simulations

Does S. Hemisphere warm when the N. Hemisphere cools?

Page 23: What have we covered so far – the Basic Questions

Inter-hemispheric Seesaw

• Model simulations of Heinrich events indicate that reduced heat transport into the N. Atlantic yields less heat loss from S. Hemisphere and thus warming.

• Models indicate that when NADW formation is reduced, then Antarctic Bottom Water formation rate increases, which in turn means higher ocean to atmosphere heat transfer and warmer temperatures in Antarctica.

• Temperature records during Y-D from Antarctic ice

cores indicate warming while Greenland cooled.

Page 24: What have we covered so far – the Basic Questions

Possible Impact of Reduced NADW Formation Rates on Air Temperatures

Page 25: What have we covered so far – the Basic Questions

Comparison of Antarctic air temperature from ice cores inferred from 18O and D records) to the northern Greenland 18O record from the NGRIP ice core for the time interval 10,000– 60,000 years ago. All records are synchronized on the basis of their measured air bubble CH4 (methane) contents.

Shows a one-to-one match between Antarctic warming events and a corresponding cold stadial period in Greenland that has been attributed to the bipolar seesaw pattern in temperature predicted from models of variations in the ocean’s meridional overturning circulation.

Antarctic

Greenland

Page 26: What have we covered so far – the Basic Questions

Transition from Glacial to Interglacial Conditions

Greenland Ice Core

• Rapid Bolling-Allerod warming event at ~14.5 Kyrs.

• Transition from the LGM climate to present interglacial climate was not smooth.

• Younger-Dryas is a period of cooling at ~12 Kyrs that lasted for ~ 1000 yrs.

Page 27: What have we covered so far – the Basic Questions

Younger Dryas – rapid return to glacial climate during warm-up to present inter-glacial period.

Page 28: What have we covered so far – the Basic Questions

• Antarctica temperature increases during Y-D cooling. Ice core data.

• Globally, atmospheric CO2 levels increase.

• Globally, atmospheric CH4 levels decrease.

Antarctic warmed during Younger Dryas

Page 29: What have we covered so far – the Basic Questions

Ice Sheet Retreat

Retreat begins ~18K and BOTH LIS and CIS ice sheets are gone by ~6K.

(Real calendar age = 14C age plus ~ 1700 yrs.)

Page 30: What have we covered so far – the Basic Questions

Rapid Temperature Change during the Y-D

At end of Y-D, temperature in Greenland increased by 7ºC in 50 yrs.

Sawtooth Pattern of Y-D

Heating is rapid,

Cooling is slower

Page 31: What have we covered so far – the Basic Questions

Role of Proglacial Lakes in Climate Change

Page 32: What have we covered so far – the Basic Questions

Possible Pathways of Meltwater Flow

Also out the Hudson River valley

Page 33: What have we covered so far – the Basic Questions

Appearance of Meltwater Pulses

From sea level record From18O-CaCO3 record

Why do meltwater pulses show up in 18O-CaCO3 record?

Page 34: What have we covered so far – the Basic Questions

Deep Water Formation: Present vs LGM

Page 35: What have we covered so far – the Basic Questions

Were D-O events and Younger-Dryas global?

Map showing locations where abrupt climate changes (i.e., D-O events) have been documented in marine sediments (red) or polar ice (blue). Yellow dots show those locations where the last of these events (i.e., Younger Dryas) is recorded by major advances of mountain glaciers. While for most of the globe, these events are in phase, in parts of the Southern Ocean and of the Antarctic ice cap, they are clearly anti-phased.

Page 36: What have we covered so far – the Basic Questions

Rapid Climate change evidence in

Santa Barbara Basin

• Warming events associated with negative 13C, which author interprets is a result of methane hydrate release.

• Did ocean circulation rates change between warming and cooling events?

Conclusion: a LOT of methane was released during the D-O interstadials into the BOTTOM water of SB Basin.

Page 37: What have we covered so far – the Basic Questions

Summary: Rapid Climate Change

• During the last 100K yrs there have been repeated oscillation between warm (D-O) and cold (Heinrich) conditions, with very fast temperature changes (7ºC in 50 yrs in Greenland).

• The most recent (strong) cold event occurred about 12K yrs ago (Younger-Dryas) during the transition from LGM to current interglacial period.

• Current hypothesis is that variations in deep water formation rates in N. Atlantic driven by salinity, and thus poleward heat transport, is a likely mechanism.

• These rapid climate change events are strongest in the N. Atlantic, but some evidence that they occurred globally.

• Generally, there is an antiphasing of temperature fluctuations between N. and S. Hemispheres.

Page 38: What have we covered so far – the Basic Questions

Relative sea level and insolation for the last glacial cycle.

a, The relative sea-level curve for the last glacial cycle for Huon Peninsula supplemented with observations from Bonaparte Gulf, Australia.

The timescale is based on uranium-series ages of corals older than about 30 kyr and on calibrated radiocarbon ages of the younger corals and sediments.

The main oxygen isotope stages MIS-5 to MIS-1, including the substages of MIS-5, are identified. The results represent conservative estimates, with each oscillation identified being supported by several precisely dated points from one or more reef section, by the stratigraphic relationship of the sampled corals to the reef crest position, and by models of reef growth in an environment of changing sea levels.

Solar insolation curve is 65°N.

Onset of the Last Glacial Maximum (30 kyr to 19 kyrs) was actually quite fast, with 30 to 40 meters of sea level drop in 1000 to 2000 years.

Indicating that ice sheets can grow quickly if temperature and moisture conditions are right (Lambeck et al, Nature, 2002).

Sea Level can change quickly!

Page 39: What have we covered so far – the Basic Questions

Comparison of MIS-3 sea-level oscillations and Atlantic sediment records.

a, Sea-level curve for MIS-3 coral terraces from Huon Peninsula, Papua New Guinea. Upper and lower bounds areshown.

b, Neogloboquadrina pachyderma abundances from the North Atlantic core plotted on the same calendar timescale. The original radiocarbon ages from the depths in the core marked by (+) have been converted to calendar ages.

The extent of major Heinrich events identified in the North Atlantic cores, corresponding to cold periods, are within the colour bands. The arrows identify the mean timing of Heinrich events.

c IRD from two South Atlantic cores TTN057-21 and TTN057-13/1094 (ref. 60).

Within the uncertainties of the calendar age determinations, the South Atlantic IRD peaks correspond to the cold events in the North Atlantic.

Page 40: What have we covered so far – the Basic Questions

Changes in global ice volume from the time of the LGM to the present.The figure shows ice-volume equivalent sea level for the past 20 kyr based on isostatically adjusted sea-level data from different localities73,93–96. Because of spatial variability of the sea-level response to the glacial and water loading, sea-level observations from different localities should not be combined into a single sea-level curve unless the isostatic effects can be shown to be similar. The ice-volume equivalent sea-level function used here corresponds to the observed sea levels corrected for these effects75. It relates to the change in total ice volume, with respect to the present, of continent-based ice and any ice grounded on the shelves. With one exception, the results indicate an ice volume at the LGM that was ~552x 106 km3 greater than at present. The error bars, not shown, are typically 0.1–0.15 kyr in calendar years and 5 m or less in position. MWP-1A refers to the timing of the meltwater pulse at ~14 kyr ago. At the Younger Dryas (YD) at ~12 kyr ago, sea-level rise may have momentarily halted.

Page 41: What have we covered so far – the Basic Questions

Sea Level Rise

• Use 14C and 230Th/238U to date the age of a sequence of submerged corals that lived close to the sea surface.

• The rate of sea level rise has pulses.

(14C ages are too young by up to ~3K yrs.)

Page 42: What have we covered so far – the Basic Questions

Short discussion on why 14C years differ from calendar years

If you are dating corals (say from Barbados), you can use both 14C and Th/U age dating techniques.

BUT they don’t agree.

14C dates are systematically younger than the Th/U dates.

On the same samples.

Page 43: What have we covered so far – the Basic Questions

Tree rings (count rings and do 14C dating on wood) show the same effect, the 14C dates are TOO YOUNG.

Page 44: What have we covered so far – the Basic Questions

Here’ s why. 14C is generated in the atmosphere by cosmic rays hitting 14N.

The 14C decays at a constant rate, but the rate of PRODUCTION of 14C depends on the strength of the geomagnetic field.

If the field is strong, fewer cosmic rays hit the atmosphere. If it is weak (see below), then MORE 14C is generated.

Page 45: What have we covered so far – the Basic Questions

Formation:

14N + neutron => 14C + proton

Decay:

14C => 14N + - + a neutrino

Page 46: What have we covered so far – the Basic Questions

So – if the magnetic field was WEAKER than present, more 14C would have been produced then, and more would still be around (in the corals) now.

This would make the corals appear YOUNGER than they are.

Page 47: What have we covered so far – the Basic Questions
Page 48: What have we covered so far – the Basic Questions

This means that you have to correct 14C dates for the changes in the geomagnetic field.

If you do this, then 14C is a reliable dating technique.

Page 49: What have we covered so far – the Basic Questions

Compiled record of temperatures in Northern Europe, including tree-ring data, black line is ‘instrumental’ records, growing (vineyard) seasons.

Page 50: What have we covered so far – the Basic Questions

The Holocene Climate Optimum at 8000 yrs. It’s been warmer recently

Page 51: What have we covered so far – the Basic Questions

The “Little Ice Age”

Sea Ice off southern Iceland, compiled from records of the days that the fishing fleet could actually leave port – and had to return to port.

Page 52: What have we covered so far – the Basic Questions

Record of the advance/retreat of mountain glaciers

Derived from repeat drawings of the same scene in European paintings.

Page 53: What have we covered so far – the Basic Questions

We actually don’t know the cause of the Little Ice Age.

Other proposed causes are the Plague (by Ruddiman), that caused massive depopulation of Europe and the re-growth of farmland into forests.

Which pulled CO2 out of the atmosphere and cooled the climate.

Page 54: What have we covered so far – the Basic Questions
Page 55: What have we covered so far – the Basic Questions

Ice core record of Little Ice Age from Peru (mountain) ice cap.

Top graph, showing dust and d18O record of low temperatures (high winds) during interval 1600 to 1900 period.

Lower plots showing (left) ice core record taken in 1980, showing annual ice core temperature record.

Lower plot (right) showing same coring area in 1993, with ice melting. The first melting of the Peruvian ice cap in 1000 years.

Page 56: What have we covered so far – the Basic Questions

Moving into Modern Climates – compiled record from the last 1000 years.

Page 57: What have we covered so far – the Basic Questions

What do present solar insulation models predict for the future?