Upload
dheeraj-srivastava
View
219
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
8/8/2019 What is a Corporate Culture
1/75
What is a corporate culture?
A culture forms any time a group of people meets to work together and in the case of corporate culture,
it forms when business team forms. The culture has two components. The first is that all individuals
have expectations how everyone should behave when they come together as a group and second, there
is a set of rules which dictates the ranges of acceptable behaviors when the group is together.
Putting it simple, the corporate culture can be described as the personality of the organization . The
culture also guides the employees, their thoughts, acts and feelings and vice versa. Companys culture
can be stated in the mission statement, decoration, employee outfits, titles and similar.
Why is corporate culture important for Human resource Managers and prospect employees? Because
the so called employee-employer fit in terms of culture is very important: how well the employee "fits"
the culture very often makes the difference between a successful and an unsuccessful hire. The
employee-employer fit is even more important in start-ups where there are just a few people employed
and where wrong decisions can have a huge impact on profitability or even survival.
Employees, owners acting as human resource managers and the corporate culture in small enterprise
are connected in many ways :
The hours of work per day, per week, including options such as flextime and telecommuting.
The work environment, including how employees interact, the degree of competition, and
whether it's a fun or hostile environment - or something in between.
The dress code, including the accepted styles of attire and things such as casual days.
The office space, including things such as cubicles, window offices, and rules regarding display of
personal items.
The training and skills development
Onsite perks, such as break rooms, gyms and play rooms, daycare facilities, and more.
The amount of time outside the office an employee is expected to spend with co-workers.
Interaction with other employees, including managers and/or owners.
Importance of corporate culture in SME's.
Soderquist has done a research and identified the corporate culture as part of five critical success
factors for improving performance in SMEs. The other four success factors are: the development of
networks and partnerships; creating an effective structure; analyzing competitors; developing flexibility
and speed of response to customers.
When the corporate culture is of utmost importance in a new venture (in high-tech ventures, for
instance) some management practices need to be followed :
8/8/2019 What is a Corporate Culture
2/75
Management support. Employees must feel the support from all levels of management. Managers must
be trusted and employees encouraged to take risk without fear and undue punishments.
Reward systems supportive of innovation. Compensation must support innovation and the reward
system must be recognized as supportive of calculated risks - takers. When there are creative and/or
outstanding accomplishments the system must reward them and the system must be a part of theculture. Then the creativeness and innovation become a vital part of the corporate culture and its
competitive advantage.
Workload pressures. Even if the culture by itself supports innovation the excessive workload pressures
might hold back creativity and innovation when employees do not have enough time or resources to
complete assigned tasks
Small business owners in many cases fail to realize that the culture might be the most valuable asset
they have. A research done by Choueke and Armstrong showed that the SME managers recognized the
role and importance of corporate culture in the success of their companies. It was also evident that in
many cases the development of a corporate culture became an organic organizational process as more
people adapted to the owners view of the internal and external world of the business and combining
their previous work and life experience. One of the key tasks of the management and HR officials in
small and growing enterprises might therefore be to promote adaptation of corporate culture by new
employees and their successful integration. An organic culture fostering a positive environment and a
climate where staff aspirations are a central focus is l ikely to be one of the determinants of a successful
start-up business.
Culture and Ethics
Even though ethics are not the most important thing that the entrepreneur has on his or her mind it canplay an important role in the critical first months and years of a companys existence. Many larger
companies have ethics programs, officers or even departments but startups usually dont have the
resources to set up formal ethics programs. How can they make their young business both ethical and
value centered?
Usually the CEO declares himself to be the ethics officer but this does not demonstrate an effective
commitment to ethical practice. The company should follow some key steps to make ethics an
important part of their corporate culture:
Recognize the early dilemmas. When deciding how to reward first employees and their contributions
and how to divide profits between yourself and your employees, the entrepreneur is faced with aplethora of difficult decisions, for instance how to split stock ownership comparatively among the
founders and later hires and how generous can you be in employee benefits in the early days.
Make ethics a core value. Founders should explicitly emphasize that they are doing their business
ethically, ethics must be embraced in business plans, mission statements and other documents. Make
new hires understand the ethical commitment.
8/8/2019 What is a Corporate Culture
3/75
Seize the opportunity and make the commitment real. If you are faced with a dilemma, make the right,
most ethical decision. Build up a superb reputation. Make that a part of the companies culture and
reward employees who follow your practice.
Anticipate ethical tensions. Ethical tensions between the truthful and the hopeful are inevitable. When
you want to attract top talents to your new business, what picture of the company do you draw forthem? Exaggerating is not ethical and providing false information to prospects is illegal too.
Welcome ethical questions and debates. Cooperate with and talk to your employees, keep an open door
so that ethical dilemmas can be solved.
Watch about conflicts of interests. With many partnerships, strategic alliances and new employees it is
hard to avoid conflicts of interests.
Weed out employees who do not embrace the ethical values of the company. Even though hiring is one
of the most important steps in a start-up business it is very likely that the venture will hire some people
who think that personal financial success is the most important value. Lay off those employees beforethey damage the reputation and culture of the company.
Renew the commitment. Do not forget that the success of the company also depends on the corporate
culture and consequently ethics. Keep on prepaing the employees to successfully deal with future
dilemmas. .
Workers who feel that the company they work for is ethical and that their ethical behavior is cherished
will feel better about themselves. The culture will improve and together with personal satisfaction
translate to higher productivity and lower employee turnover. It is also easier to attract valuable
employees when the company has a good reputation.
HP way and the HP culture from a small business to a multinational
In 1956, Bill Hewlett, Dave Packard, and a handful of other HP executives gathered at the Mission Inn in
Sonoma, California, to create a set of values and principles to guide
their company. The six objectives that this small group consequently created not only helped shape a
new kind of company, but ultimately became the foundation for what came to be known as the HP
way. As Bill and Dave understood, the real genius of the HP Way is that it's a legacy built on innovation,
bold enough to embrace change and flexible enough to absorb it.
These six objectives, which later became seven, are:
1. Recognize that profit is the best measure of a companys contribution to society and the
ultimate source of corporate strength;
2. Continually improve the value of the products and services offered to customers;
8/8/2019 What is a Corporate Culture
4/75
3. Seek new opportunities for growth but focus efforts on fields in which the company can make a
contribution;
4. Provide employment opportunities that include the chance to share in the companys success;
5. Maintain an organizational environment that fosters individual motivation, initiative and
creativity;
6. Demonstrate good citizenship by making contributions to the community;
7. Emphasize growth as a requirement for survival.
Packards management style is committed to teamwork and monitoring. Packard learned about the
importance of human factor in manufacturing quality and practiced a special type of management
simply called management by walking around. He also practiced management by objectives which
gave employees flexibility to achieve broader goals. When HP moved its headquarters to an industrial
park their new building was designed to enhance employee satisfaction and performance, to support
the HP Way. Both Dave and Bill agreed that their company would focus on innovation and organic
growth rather than economies of scale. Bill and Dave even encouraged workers to work on personal
projects with companys equipment and parts.
Critically assess whether Human Resource Management is any different in SME's than large
organisations?
"The study of human resource management has been invigorated by the promise that there is a best-
practice, high-involvement management that can guarantee superior organisational performance"
(Wood, 1999).
This paper is structured to critically assess the differences of human resource management (HRM) in
small to medium sized enterprises (SME's) with comparison to large organisations. Initially this will
provide the fundamental processes involved with the implications of HRM in all organisations. The
differences, or lack thereof, of HRM polices, are derived from the vast difference in the sizes of the
respective organisations. Research shows that HR practices also vary extensively between small firms(Dumberlry and Walley, 1995; Julien, 1998; Bacon et al, 1998) and are often determined by the ideology
and pluralistic goals of the small business owner (Kock and De Kok, 1999; Wagar, 1998). Anderson
(2003) takes this one step further by claiming that HRM in SME's is not ambiguous and homogenous
phenomenon. On the other hand, HRM in large organisations is more about the relationship between
strategic management and employee relations in the firm, and focuses on the overall direction of the
8/8/2019 What is a Corporate Culture
5/75
organisation in pursuit of its stated goals and objectives. Other central issues examined are recruitment,
training, performance, pay, management theories, flexibility, and employee retention.
There are around 4.3 million SME's including 3.1 million sole-traders or partners with no employees, and
they are the driving force behind a large number of innovations and contribute to the growth of the
national economy through employment creation, investments and exports. Smalls firms, (0-49
employees) represent 99.3% of all UK businesses, and over 51% of all UK economic activity. Only 26,000
medium sized (50-250 staff) and 6,000 large firms (250 or more staff) exist in the UK and represent the
other 49% of the economic activity (www.dti.gov.uk/statistics). Due to the nature of SME's, each
individual employee would represent a substantive part of the workforce, thus increasing the
importance of every single HR decision (Bacon et al, 1998). In larger organisations, HRM plays an equally
significant role in larger organisations too, because of its impact on performance outcomes it has a
strategic role to play in business management, and merits careful attention by practically all types of
manager, irrespective of functional responsibilities (www.bized.ac.uk). Lado and Wilson (1994) have
suggested that HRM practices in large and multinational corporations "can contribute to sustained
competitive advantage through facilitating the development of competencies that are firm specific,
produce complex social relationships and generate organisational knowledge." Therefore, aside from
the number of employees employed by the firm, the importance of HRM is widely recognised as vastly
important to large organisations, and it has also been observed that SME's consider their HRM problems
to have top priority (Hornsby and Kuratko, 1990; Huang and Brown, 1999).
An interesting difference concerning small firms is their recruitment policies. They make extensive use of
job-tryouts (Duberley and Walley, 1995), which are inexpensive and very well suited to evaluate theactual fit of a person with the implicit demands of the job. The personal atmosphere of small firms is
reflected in the high use of informal procedures like job posting and bidding (Deshpande and Golhar,
1994). Small firms are also more likely to make the use of recruitment agencies to provide them with
temporary workers for period of heightened seasonal activity, and employ a number of part-time
workers due to the cheaper labour, and also providing more flexibility to the owner / manager and the
employees. However, within larger organisations, recruitment and selection are critical elements of
effective human resource management. Within the HRM paradigm, these are not simply mechanisms
for filling in vacancies, but are viewed as key push' and pull' levers for organisational change. The
behavioural competencies of the large workforce can be determined and gradually modified by the
management to fashion issues such as team working and company culture. Attention has switched fromrigid lists of individual skills and abilities that are much more valuable for SME's, to broader-based
competences. In general, there is greater regard for personal flexibility and adoptability a
reorientation from present to future stability (www.hrmguide.co.uk). In stark comparison to large
organisations, SME's often rely on extended social networks in attracting and retaining employees, as
many owe their survival to low labour costs (Hilbert et al, 1994) "The importance of the recruitment and
selection process which is essential of organisational competitiveness and a failure to approach this
8/8/2019 What is a Corporate Culture
6/75
function effectively will have consequences for future job performance," as was aptly recognised by
Nankervis, Compton & McCarthy, (1999). "A good recruitment system is crucial to the organisation,
because the recruitment of suitable employees will improve retention and morale among the existing
workforce by accentuating to those both inside and outside the organisation the importance it attaches
to people" (Hall et al 1991). Large organisations usually have an intense recruitment system composing
of various styles of interviews such as the behavioural based criterion, the biographical interview and
the situational interview, along with assessment centres and psychometric tests (www.shl.com).
A frequently mentioned element in HRM literature is the relative lack of training in SME's (Kitching,
2000). This "economies of training", as explained by Arthur and Hendry (1990) and Storey (1999), show
that due to the fact that they offer less opportunity for career development, SME's have a much higher
probability of labour turnover. As a result, better trained employees will chose opportunities elsewhere,
leaving the small firm behind with its less trained employees and depleted training budget. Company
specific, on-the-job training has been proposed as a solution to this; however this would have little value
to other firms. Over and above recruitment and work-time arrangements, the necessity to be
completitive has forced larger firms to set up intensive training schemes leading to qualifications which
can increase the quality of the products or services provided, while keeping jobs going (Tyson, 1997).
Training is necessary to ensure an adequate supply of staff who are technically and socially competent,
and capable of career advancement into specialist departments or management positions. Another
purpose of training in large organisations is to improve knowledge and skills, and to change attitudes. It
is one of the most important potential motivators and can lead to many possible benefits for both
individuals and the organisation, and therefore, to secure the full benefits of successful training there
must be a planned and systematic approach to the management of training (Mullins, 2005). We can see
here that although the methods of training differ in style and practise in relation to SME's and largeorganisations, it is of fundamental importance.
With respect to other topics, empirical proof is unfortunately scarce. In general, SME jobs tend to have
somewhat lower employee benefits Storey (1994) and Wagner (1997) are both of the opinion that this is
compensated for by a better working atmosphere, while others such as Holliday (1995) and Wilkinson
(1999) feel this is because of a supposed traditional and realatively backward nature of SME's industrial
relations. Larger firms provide benefits to their organisations in a variety of ways including set annual
leave with maternity and paternity schemes, medical and dental care, life insurance, pension schemes,
profit sharing, stock options, child care and many more (Baron and Kreps, 1999). SME's are unable tocompete with larger firms on this basis as it would prove to costly for them to do so. This may also be
the case as a large proportion of SME's are managed in a fraternal or paternal style of management, and
these policies may exist, but not necessarily formalised. Zenger (1994) had found a positive effect in
smaller firms with respect to motivation because compensation was more directly related to employee's
performance. In comparison, employees in larger firms are provided with much more varying mediums
of motivation, ranging from not only performance related pay, but job enlargement and enrichment to,
8/8/2019 What is a Corporate Culture
7/75
greater responsibility, authority and autonomy over their own work, training and career development,
fringe benefits, and a compliance with Herzberg's (1959) two-factor hygiene and motivational theories
alongside Maslow's (1954) hierarchy of needs.
SME's ability to be flexible, both internally and externally, is a highly attributed feature. The firms' ability
to adapt the organisation internally by its small scale, personal involvement and independence all lead
to an absence of bureaucracy, creating a reputation of being able to respond readily to changing
circumstances. Externally, the firm is ably to influence its external environment, albeit with much
hindrance again due to its small size and therefore reduced power (Bax and Brand, 2002). Empirical
evidence, however, is rather disappointing concerning the flexibility of small firms, as they do not use
their flexibility to their full potential. This is due to the fact, as suggested by Volberda (1998), that it is
the personal attitude of the small business owner that determines whether the flexibility potential gets
used, or whether small firm myopia gets the upper hand. In contrast, larger firms would find these
issues much harder to deal with, in a physical nature as they are considerably larger in size, and thus
would have a much superior response time. The upper hand, however, could not be lost, because larger
firms would obviously also have much larger budgets at hand, and thus could employ the use of external
consultants and / or make the use of cutting edge technologies to keep at the forefronts of their chosen
industries.
Before concluding this assessment on the differences of HRM between SMEs and large organisations, I
feel Keenoy's (1999) analogy of HRM is rather fitting: "As with a hologram, HRM changes its appearance
as we move around its image. Each shift of stance reveals another facet, a darker depth, a different
contour. As a fluid entity of apparently multiple dimensions and forms, it is not surprising that everytime we look at it, it is slightly different. This is why, conceptually, HRMism appears to be a moving
target, and why, empirically, it has no fixed (fixable) forms." I find this very fitting as it is rare to find a
distinct variety of HRM theories that do not contradict each other, as is not uncommon in the vast
majority of l iterature.
We can clearly see that there are vast differences in HRM of SME's compared to that of large
organisations. These are essentially due to the fact that because there are so many various types and
styles of SME's it would be impossible to find policies and theories to support all of them under one
roof. Also, due the important fact that they have so few employees, as previously mentioned, it would
be too expensive and involve a substantial amount of red tape, time and effort to put into place all the
formalisation of these various policies. Larger organisations, however, are able to dedicate whole teams
and departments to manage their own human resources, and would have to follow different policies for
legal reasons.
8/8/2019 What is a Corporate Culture
8/75
Therefore, to conclude, we can discern that there are indeed differences regarding the HRM of large
organisations in comparison to SME's, with the main differences stemming from company size, financial
capital, and general workforce and their attitudes. This is not to say that HRM department plays a critical
role in both the different types of organisations, as without it, the firms would surely have no
competitive edge to strive to be at the top of their industries.
CORPORATE SOCIAL RESPONSIBILITY IN A SMALL FIRM PERSPECTIVE
1 ABSTRACT
It has become apparent that, in the previous few years, public awareness and governmental conduct to
encourage Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) has ceased concentrating solely on multinational
enterprises and, presently, has begun to give attention to the mainstream collection of Small to Medium
enterprises (SMEs). (Murillo & Lozano. 2006:227) SMEs are the foundation of most financial systems,
predominantly in terms of their employment opportunities and their improvement effects on the
community. In countless sectors, their snowballing communal and ecological bearings are far more than
those of big conglomerates. With the sustained manifestation of the enterprise linkages theme
within the socially responsible programme, there have been indications that larger enterprises that are
functional in developing nations will more and more be required to increase their supplies from SMEs,
as a measurement of how responsible they are as an organisation. Even though this is a good thing, itsjust not enough. For genuine improvement en route for sustainable growth, there is a necessity that
SMEs need to be seen corporate citizens themselves, with their own societal and ecological influences.
The line of reasoning that being socially responsible is too expensive or immaterial or beside the point
for small to medium enterprises should not be exploited as an excuse behind which to withhold or close
the eyes to deprived public and ecological systems. (Fox: 2004:6) Most scholars stress in their literature
that Small to Medium Enterprises conscientious conduct are concentrated notably on internal
stakeholders. For the most part SMEs are incapable of conveying to exterior stakeholders their CSR-
related conduct in which they are currently and have presently been involved. Most SMEs are
powerlessly submissive, as they are not conscious of the existing laws and legislation. (Cilliberti,
Pontradolfo & Scozzi. 2008:1580)
2 KEY WORDS:
8/8/2019 What is a Corporate Culture
9/75
Business ethics, SME, corporate social responsibility, sustainable development, small business,
corporate citizenship, social capital, symbolic capital. CSR.
3 INTRODUCTION
From an individual street hawker to a complex multinational enterprise, every business entity its
stakeholders and its impacts on society, both positive and negative. - Tom Fox
It has become apparent that, in the previous few years, public awareness and governmental conduct to
encourage Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) has ceased concentrating solely on multinational
enterprises and, presently, has begun to give attention to the mainstream collection of Small to Medium
enterprises (SMEs). (Murillo & Lozano. 2006:227). Academics consider moral principles, values and
ethics an extravagant advantage which only affluent actors (i.e. Not small and medium endeavours or
enterprises) will be able to pay for. (Fuller & Tian. 2006:288)
Not much is understood or has been researched concerning the significance of community-level
corporate citizenship of small business enterprises (Niehm, Swinney & Miller.2008: 322) The Corporate
Social Responsibility (CSR) hypothesis portrays the association connecting business and the larger
civilization. A literal description of corporate social responsibility is hard to pin down because
philosophies and approaches on the subject of the features of this correlation oscillate with the
applicable concerns of the time. Per se, perspectives have diverged in due course and now and again
are even in conflict. Nonetheless, Milton Friedman played an important role to the conception of a
universal CSR hypothesis by posing problems such as, Should corporations take the reins for communal
matters? He also contended that the only public duty of organisations is to augment proceeds by
permissible methods. (Hill, Stevens & Smith. 2003:339)
Small and medium-sized enterprises are considerably the most widespread practice of private ventures
in both industrial and developing countries. There are many diverse characterizations, but a customary
one is the European Union adaptation, which classifies small to Medium enterprises as encompassingless than fifty workers. (Spence.2007:534) Spence (1999:169) adds to this and propose that small
businesses should also be defined according to their ownership and as being independent.
Corporate Social Responsibility then on the other hand, can be classified from a broad spectrum as the
obligation of the firm to use its resources in ways to benefit society, through committed participation as
8/8/2019 What is a Corporate Culture
10/75
a member of society, taking into account the society at large and improving welfare of society at large
independent of direct gains of the company. (Hill, Stevens & Smith. 2003:340) uniform to this
methodology, they go on to isolate four widely accepted constituents of Socially Responsibility namely,
economic, legal, ethical, and humanitarian or philanthropic. (Hill, Stevens & Smith. 2003:340)
Knowledge of Small and Medium organisational concerns proportionate to business principles and social
responsibility is imperative for the commercial sector. This is for the most part applicable in terms of
control over the supply chain given that frequently there is a situation where the larger customers (i.e.
large organisations) dictate the value chain and shape circumstances in which small enterprises have to
do business. These may extend from seeking reassurance that all the SMEs in their supply chain are
conforming to CSR principles (Hamann et al. 2005:2), to the equality of the handling of the contractor
and the application of authority and control in supplier associations (Cox 2004:347). Even where an
affiliation attitude (i.e. we are equal partners in this) is applied, small organisations have been
observed as being cynical regarding the advantages for them in applying CSR. (Spence.2007:534) A
probable motive for the lack of appreciation for corporate citizenship instruments by small and medium
organisations is their conflation with the concept of entrepreneurship. Entrepreneurs are universally
supposed to be short-range revenue maximizing, hard-nosed persons (Spence.2007: 539)
4 LITERATURE REVIEW / DISCUSSION
4.1 SMALL BUSINESSES AND SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT
According to the Brundtland Report (United Nations World Commission on Environment and
Development, 1987), the essential message of sustainable development is that economic development
and ecological conservation are mutually interdependent. A key pre-condition for sustainable
development is based on a production system that preserves the ecological base for development. The
United Nations Conference on Environment and Development held in Rio de Janeiro in 1992 resulted in
Agenda 21, which recognized sustainability as a key business imperative (Commonwealth of Australia,
1998). - (quoted from Kerr.2006:31)
It is possible that it can be supposed that knowledge of business ethics in large conglomerates may
perhaps be merely conveyed to the state of affairs and circumstances of the small enterprise. Preceding
research of small organisations would, on the other hand, propose that this is erroneous. Small
businesses are dissimilar in nature, not just in magnitude as described earlier, (Holliday, 1995: 2), but
also in the divergence in the character of ethics in small firms. Acutely of the essence is the reality that
8/8/2019 What is a Corporate Culture
11/75
in the owner-managed SMEs, command stay in the hands of one of the proprietors, possibly facilitating
him/her to make individual choices about the allotment of resources. Additionally, the propensity for
small firms to be subjugated by private associations and the favoured, and frequently suitable,
deficiency of officious jurisdiction may increase relations of honesty and sincerity in transactions.
(Spence & Rutherford. 2000:127) previous research places emphasis on the fact that SMEs are
incapable of conveying their responsible conduct to exterior stakeholders. . Most SMEs are
powerlessly submissive, as they are not conscious of the existing laws and legislation. (Cilliberti,
Pontradolfo & Scozzi. 2008:1580)
Small- to medium enterprises (SMEs) are the means of support of the majority of countries. On the
whole, they embody more than 90% of endeavours and comprise 50% to 60% of employment.
(Fox.2005:2).
Fox (2005:2) also mentions that SMEs are exceptionally vital in sustaining fiscal expansion and sources
of revenue in developing countries. This is because they:
Are inclined to employ more physical manufacturing procedures than their larger counterparts,
therefore increasing employment that makes more even-handed income distribution possible;
offer employment opportunities by means of straightforward, value-adding processing actions
in agriculturally-founded countries
develop and encourage private enterprise
Maintain the reinforcement of general prolific capabilities and the formation of durable financial
structures, by way of connections involving small and large ventures.
There isnt a lot of evidence that sustainable development is satisfactorily protected in small firms, even
though they set emergent consideration to ecological and value management. There has however been
research that has exposed the fact that there is only modest use of tactical forethought and universal
measurement techniques and that small firm management is often steered emotion. The grounds for
this are: currently SMEs are confronted with tricky international and provincial monetary
circumstances. (Will.2008:237)
The snowballing communal and ecological bearings of SMEs are exceedingly momentous, even
supposing their individual impacts are diminutive. This is not purely owing to the big amount of
ventures and their complete fiscal consequence, but also for the reason that SMEs are time and again
over-represented in manufacturing sectors with high ecological impacts, and since they may not be
exposed to the equivalent regulatory and enforcement procedures that help to alleviate the damaging
8/8/2019 What is a Corporate Culture
12/75
influences of large companies. There is as a result the possibility for considerable growth in the
direction of sustainable development if SMEs social and environmental operation could be bettered.
(Fox. 2004: 2-3)
Hypothesis 1: Small firms are less inclined to be socially responsible than big firms Hypothesis 2: Small
firms are more inclined to be socially responsible than big firms
4.2 SMALL TO MEDIUM ENTERPRISES (SMES) AND CORPORATE CITISENSHIP
To extend our love and care beyond our narrow self-interest is antithetical to neither our human
nature nor our financial success. Rather, it leads to the further fulfilment of both. Why do we not
encourage this in our theories of business and economics? Why do we restrict our theories to such a
pessimistic and crabby view of human nature? What are we afraid of? John Mackay
The CSR conception is non-specific in description and is appropriate to associations in spite of form,
nature or size from public to private, from small-to-medium enterprises (SMEs) to multinational
conglomerates (MNEs). (Castka, Balzarova, Bamber & Sharp.2004:142)There are various descriptions of
corporate social responsibility in small business that make them unique from the somewhat overriding
view of CSR that takes a corporate perspective (as adapted from Spence. 2007:537-538)
1. Individual incentives for taking socially responsible projects are critical.
2. Seeing as small go medium enterprises can on the odd occasion undercut their bigger
contestants on price or cost as a result of size shortcomings, they have to discover other means to attain
business. Elasticity and a private service are repeatedly aspects on which small firms can distinguish
themselves
3. There is a need for codification of CSR in SMEs. They are improbable to have enlisted for CSR
covenants, regulations, and principles or to have codes of conduct or vision statements in position.
4. In the majority of small enterprises the being with supreme accountability for management the
establishment is also the chief proprietor, that is, he/she is an owner-manager. There could possibly be
other shareholders, conceivably family members or business associates, but the junction of ownership
and influence of the firm indicates that the owner-manager operates as both the leader and the
manager.
8/8/2019 What is a Corporate Culture
13/75
5. Moreover, workers are very essential stakeholders in small firms. A vital feature of small
business social responsibility is to deal with their preferences in terms of compassionate support and
grants, and without a doubt directing efforts on making sure of the preservation of the living of
employees, supervisors, and proprietors.
6. The framework of the industry is for the most part significant for small businesses, manipulatingthe philosophy relative to social responsibility
7. Small businesses are usually entrenched in local communities.
The European Commissions publication on Responsible Entrepreneurship, defines the responsible
entrepreneur as one that (1) treats customers, business partners and competitors with fairness and
honesty; (2) cares about the health, safety and general well-being of employees and customers; (3)
motivates his workforce by offering training and development opportunities; (4) acts as a - good citizen
- in the local community; and (5) is respectful of natural resources and the environment (EuropeanCommission, 2003b). (Lepoutre & Haine. 2006: 259)
The SME entrepreneur may be in charge for numerous business errands simultaneously, and
responsiveness to problems outside the everyday administration of the business may be little. SMEs can
be complex to regulate as they are both hesitant to implement voluntary regulation but are also
suspicious of red tape, and are less receptive to institutional pressures, for example legal pressures,
contender benchmarking, governmental organizations, public and private pressure groups. However,
SMEs can also be very adaptive, being able to modify their trading capacities in a flash consistent with
varying market opportunities. (Goffee and Scase, 1995:18). this elasticity means that they can take
action without delay to shifting situations. (Jenkins.2006:242)
The principles and morals of the naissance tycoon / title-holder are of foremost value when determining
social or ecological tactics (Murillo et al. 2006: 237) the concept of executive uniqueness advocates that
corporations will take on in publicly accountable business procedures when to do otherwise is
unimaginable these apprehensions have been so crucial to who businesses are as an institute for so
long that they cannot envisage the establishment as anything but a good corporate citizen. Harmonizing
organizational characteristics, organizational persona is what executive representatives want theirexterior stakeholders to appreciate as most fundamental, long-term, and idiosyncratic about the firm.
Also, a firms repute is a specific kind of response, received by companies from their stakeholders,
relating to the trustworthiness of the companys character claims. (Whetten & Mackey, 2002:401). An
organizations persona is a perception of the organization, that is, deliberately proposed to interlopers
and its repute is the origin of the organization by interlopers, that is, revealed back to organizational
8/8/2019 What is a Corporate Culture
14/75
members. Appearance has been repeatedly correlated to commercial tactics, and character comprise of
an imperative organizational ability. (Dyer & Whetten. 2006:788)
A business minor dimension repeatedly produces inferior bargaining power. Bigger conglomerates
have more influence to inspire socially responsible performances amongst their Supply chain colleagues.
The implementation of CSR systems and their conveyance down the supply chain can be complex for
SMEs mostly for the reason of the excessive costs that can occur. For instance, to supervise contractors
SMEs are regularly obligated to depend on third parties, e.g., NGOs or multinational companies. As
consumer, SMEs can apply their weight through the supply chain by advocating CSR and promoting
associates to agree to socially responsible activities. Dissimilar approaches are assumed to this
objective, e.g., exercising absolute coercion up and down the supply chain, behaving as a best practice
study, and offering supply chain collaborators CSR-related presentations or an open-house for equals.
Small to medium enterprises can also illustrate an eminent motivation to employ the authorization of
exchanging contractors for socially responsible grounds, and they can also classify and contribute to
cost-savings and income-generation from corporate social responsibility with suppliers. In the majority
of instances, SMEs encourage more easily ecological than social conscientiousness the length of the
supply chain. (Cilliberti, Pontradolfo & Scozzi. 2008:1580)
4.2.1 Existing perspectives, approaches and instruments to corporate social responsibility (CSR) for
small businesses
Attempting to conceptualize CSR, a variety of descriptions have been specified which respect the fact
that the organisation has to act in response to a sequence of difficulties that go further than the
strategic, financial or official needs, thus attaining social advantages in conjunction with the
conventional monetary proceeds. Small corporations will possibly have diverse lines of attack to social
responsibility depending on the vision about this matter (narrow or broad) they implement, and the
consequences (costs or profits) they connect to social obligation of businesses (Deniz & Suarez.2005:28)
Narrow =this means that the business only provides goods and services that maximise profits for
shareholders
Broad = this means that businesses aim to meet the expectations of society. They are willing to go
beyond regulation
8/8/2019 What is a Corporate Culture
15/75
For that reason, we can possibly say that sustainable relationships with society means attending the
demands. Any group or individual that may affect or be affected by the achievement of business
objectives (Freeman, 1984:25).
This instrument means that the nature of commercial dealings between SMEs and consumers, and how
market power is put into effect inside such relationships, are innermost to the CSR outline. This leads to
one of the most demanding assessments of the present CSR agenda that such supply chain principles
can prohibit SMEs in developing countries from rewarding markets. Without a doubt, investigations
propose that the almost certainly the motive for SMEs to initiate an environmental management
system is when it becomes indispensable to acquire and hold on to business, either with local or
international clients. In this sense, the concept of such principles as voluntary can be ambiguous. It may
more suitable to judge them as market entry requirements or economic imperatives. For small firms
that are confronted with such supply chain issues, either from local or international consumers, there
are several challenges, for the most part associated to affordability and applicability. Given the
magnitude of SMEs to employment and sources of revenue in developing countries, there are
apprehension that unless these issues are dealt with, the CSR agenda will carry on being innately partial
in contrast to SMEs. (Fox. 2004:4)
Spence and Rutherford (2000: 129) recommend four frames of distinguishing between the social
viewpoints of the small firm, these being: profit maximisation priority, subsistence priority, enlightened
self-interest and social priority. They propose that the rationale for being in business and managing an
organisation are far more multifaceted, and socially stimulated, than simply monetary motives and
declare that this multiplicity of perspectives needs to be deliberated if policy makers and supportorganisations are to sway the moral principles of small firms and engage them in CSR. There are
essential CSR issues that all SMEs have accountability for, in the midst of them the conception of a
positive working atmosphere where miscellany is supported, the impartial allocation of wealth in a
community, and the safeguard of the environment. SMEs are regularly represented defectively
proportionate to such necessary responsibilities. (Jenkins.2006:243|)
With the intention of passing on these ethical responsibilities, many firms have expounded codes of
conduct. A code of conduct is a text that outlines the crucial duties of the organisation with regard to its
stakeholders. Previous studies have pointed out that the workers from organisations with a code of
conduct experience a more encouraging and supportive environment for ethical behaviour than workers
without a code (Adams et al., 2001).1
A code of conduct can enclose three categories of accounts: the mission statement that defines the
function of the organisation; the value declaration that illustrate the chief morals of the firm; and lastly
8/8/2019 What is a Corporate Culture
16/75
the rules of conduct that explain the sort of behaviour that the establishment requires from its
employees or contractors. (Graafland, van de Ven & Stoffele.2003:47)
Auditing is the procedure in which a business appraises, assesses, testifies and adjusts its communal
bearings and moral performance in light of the standards and expectations of stakeholders. For small
firms its frequently not easy to systematize this procedure by itself. A more sensible approach is to
make use of active certifications, like ISO 9001 and ISO 14001.2 Firms can willingly choose to subject
themselves to the ruling of self-governing organisations that are sanctioned to endorse the social or
environmental superiority of the manufacturing procedures of the organisation. Whereas ISO 9001 is
predominantly concerned with security and safety concerns, ISO 14001 relates to ecological aspects.
The benefit of the ISO 14001 model is the matter-of-fact application. It is a renowned comprehensive
paradigm, amenable to all businesses. (Graafland et al.2003:48)
A method associated with auditing is the publication of an annual social report. An exceptional case in
point is the statement of Shell. In this statement Shell gives many data, figures and statistics on the
environment like their emission of CO2 and other gases, security, functional measures to certify uniform
opportunities, gender diversity, grievance processes, social investments and reported cases of
enticement and corruption. (Graafland, et al.2003:48)
4.2.2 Family businesses and CSR: A special perspective on small enterprises
Family-centred businesses may have unique perspectives of socially responsible behaviour due to
family involvement and ties to the community. (Niehm, Swinney & Miller. 2008:331)
Family businesses embrace the most important occupant and money-making base in most country
communities. The surroundings in which they function are the same place that they call home. As a
consequence of family association in the business and connections to the society, family businesses may
hold a rare standpoint of socially responsible business conduct. (Niehm et al. 2008: 332)
Family Firms have conventionally been linked to a number of positive and negative features in their
relationships with workers, possessors, patrons, the public and other stakeholders. This could be an
indication of a distinct orientation toward corporate social responsibility and the family firm. (Deniz &
Suarez.2005:27)
8/8/2019 What is a Corporate Culture
17/75
One way of appreciating CSR from the perception of a family firms operator is the enlightened self-
interest model (Kerr.2006:32). (See appendix A) This methodology propose that socially responsible
behaviour by a community-based firm will be given back in return in due course by backing from
devoted clientele, workers, contractors, and other stakeholders
An interrelated concept, affiliate recognition, assists us in comprehending how individual-level
emotional procedures could possibly explain how family firm creators, shareholders, and administrators,
navigating their businesses toward socially responsible business behaviour. Affiliates are said to have
sympathy for their organization to the degree that they see an intersect between the character of the
business and their own personal persona. (Dyer et al. 2006: 790)
In the milieu of a family firm, a great deal of an owning-familys present revenue stream and its accrued
wealth may be completely connected with the firms productivity and the familys ownership
investment in the firm. Hence, impairment to the firm through loss of repute, lawsuits, or other
detrimental proceedings, can have a considerable harmful effect on the familys wealth. To the
magnitude that a familys monetary comfort is tied to the firm, the family may be indisposed to gamble
the loss of that wealth. As a result, the family may be more enthusiastic to be hands-on in developing
constructive social capital, and the social indemnity it affords, than are managers who have no such
involvement in the firm. In the course of growing positive social and ethical capital, the family firm may
for that reason be more prepared to behave in socially responsible manner. (Dyer et al. 2006:780)
4.2.3 Social and Symbolic capital vs. Social responsibility
In most cases social capital and social responsibility are not one and the same. Social capital is
connected to the types of authority and denotations that subsists as structures. In other words, its the
type of authority that a business has in its community. Social Responsibility on the other hand is mostly
seen by scholars as existing in the realm of the ethical, a challenging theme at both the personal and the
communal level and one that must in the end sit at the focal point of discussion a propos social
responsibility. All the same, there is an obvious relationship concerning standards and ethics and the
character of reciprocated responsibilities, expectations and accountability concerning financial players
(i.e. The scale to which civilization manipulates ethical conduct). Without a doubt, much of the
structure for Corporate Social Responsibility is one of outside (stakeholder) domination of moral actions
at variance with financial necessities. There is a dear association involving individual intentions and
moral values (i.e. those motives and standards that are internally formed) and the conscientious
8/8/2019 What is a Corporate Culture
18/75
conduct in small firms where the approach is fashioned through the management of the minority of
persons. (i.e. Entrepreneurs or owner/managers.) (Fuller & Tian. 2006: 287)
One theoretical standpoint from a social capital perspective is that the ties from a set of connections
afford a small business the access to resources and information which are compulsory to be socially
responsible or be a good corporate citizen. Structural social capital amounts to a priceless source of
information advantages. In other words, who you know has an effect on what you know and
therefore the who is more important than the what. It has some bearing on three of the circumstances
for exchange in many ways, including confidence, norms, responsibilities and expectations, character,
admiration, esteem, friendliness and fidelity. Fuller (2006:289) continues to insinuate that the higher
the amount of communication, the more interaction avenues are accessible for use, the more
unproblematic it is to expand, and more effortlessly information can come to pass in the set of contacts.
(Fuller et al.2006: 289)
Symbolic capital, as embellished by Bourdieu and Fuller (2006:290), correlates to ones standing and
worth as understood by others. Such worth, and the control that is adjunct to this appraisal by others, is
assembled in due course. They propose that symbolic capital has a part to perform in social
responsibility (i.e. This is that socially responsible actions may produce symbolic capital or are in
themselves a form of symbolic capital. (Fuller et al. 2006:290-291)
If stakeholders such as the employees or the community perceive an organisation or small firm as having
an immoral reputation, bearing in mind malevolent purpose in an injurious event, they are more
probable to employ harsh social vetoes. On the contrary, firms with an extensive and praiseworthy
testimony of being upright and respectable will probably be given the benefit of the doubt by all
stakeholders when a comparable episode occurs. To sum up, Dyer and the rest of the authors
(2006:791) contends that resources of goodwill, what they denote as positive moral capital, supply
assurance-like safeguard defending a firms fundamental relational capital and income streams
against loss of monetary worth evolving from the risks of business operations. (Dyer et al. 2006: 791)
4.2.4 Why should SMEs implement CSR?
Milton Friedman's (1970) declaration that the social responsibility of an organisation is simply to
multiply income is no longer laconic in a humanity where governments are anew vigorously pushing
private, free market, solutions to public problems (Harvey, 1988: 131)
8/8/2019 What is a Corporate Culture
19/75
Although the mounting visibility and global effect of large conglomerates and brands has proclaimed
appeals for greater social transparency and answerability, SMEs continue to be essentially unseen and
improbable to see CSR in terms of risk to their brands persona or standing. For SMEs, topics closer to
home are far more prone to grab their interest such as motivating and retaining their workers orsomething like involvement by the community in which they function. Pragmatically, 60% of all small
firms are basically satisfied just to continue to exist, on condition that they are making a reasonable
income there is little need to diminish the triple bottom line with socially related systems (Jenkins.
2006:243)
Social responsibility is being promoted to small as well as big firms as a method to gain sustainable
competitive advantage. This move is sustained for the most part by case examples of economically
victorious organisations with a socially responsible attitude and conduct. The combined effect of CSR as
practiced by SMEs is key the capability of CSR to play a role in the creation of jobs and sustainable
development.
4.2.5 How can SMEs implement CSR?
1. Corporate social reporting: Corporate social reporting is a technique of self-presentation and
reputation/image management performed by corporations to indemnify an assortment of stakeholders
are pleased and content with the business public conduct and actions (Snider, Hill & martin.2003:176).Gray et al. (1996:3) characterizes corporate social reporting as the process of communicating the social
and environmental effects of organizations economic actions to particular interest groups within society
and to society at large.
2. Corporate Champion: To support socially responsible actions in a company, a champion is
necessary to lead the way and stanchion novel ideas. For CSR to become entrenched in the any
organisation, the workforce must buy-in to the hypothesis, something that many SMEs find tricky to
accomplish. One approach of conquering this sticking point is to channel CSR actions through workers,
for example, helping the school that the workers kids go to through monetary or other help, or by
making CSR activities directly applicable to the operational life of employees e.g., pro bono work in the
society. The pre-eminent way for an SME to start tackling CSR is to try to have an effect and change
things where they can. (Jenkins. 2006:252)
8/8/2019 What is a Corporate Culture
20/75
3. Culture: The solution to coordinating an enterprise for sustainable development is for management
to create a culture that is hands-on in putting together ecological and societal objectives, to engage in a
policy of unremitting ecological and social development and to give resources that plan. Organisations
need to take on a learning culture that distinguishes between and underlines the advantages and worth
of educating, training and cultivating their workforce to have lifetime learning outlooks and aptitudes in
thinking resourcefully and holistically on ecological and social sustainability concerns. It is by way of the
instruments for interaction and stakeholder relationship-building within an accommodating business
culture that the issues of social sustainability can be tackled. (Kerr.2006:32)
4. The enterprise leadership model: (see appendix A) - The idealized leadership model was developed
through a consideration of key approaches adopted in the research literature to modelling the
sustainable enterprise. Thus, the enterprise leadership model develops sustainability objectives of
economic, environmental and social sustainability, whereas Gladwins (1992) approach to the
sustainable enterprise considers ecological, resource and socioeconomic issues and Elkington (1997)
adopts the triple-bottom-line approach for these objectives of economic prosperity, environmental
quality and social justice. (Taken from Kerr.2006:32)
4. Leadership strategies:
a. Compliance strategy: company exploits tangible principles of conduct, which are imparted to all
constituents of the organisation. The focal point is on mandatory performance. Regulation of the
performance of the leaders and workers or other business affiliates certifies the moral worth of the
organisation. Those who are found skirting or fudging are penalized. (Graafland, van de Ven &
Stoffele.2003:46)
b. Integrity strategy his strategy is based on the personal accountability and trustworthiness of
each one of the employees on the base of internalised principles and values. Truthfulness and reliability
means that owners and workers are ready to complete their responsibilities in an expert, precise and
accountable way, taking into consideration all appropriate interests. With the intention of applying this
tactic in a lucrative way, the SME must identify comprehensible core principles and prepare managers
and employees to employ them in existing situations. (Graafland et al. 2003: 47)
c. Dialogue strategy: This strategy focuses on to the requirements of the stakeholders of the firm.
It also concentrates on the receptiveness to ideas, concerns and standards of others. The firm
continuously tries to gain knowledge from new situations and from what external parties convey.
(Graafland et al. 2003: 47)
5 CONCLUSION & POSSIBLE FINDINGS
8/8/2019 What is a Corporate Culture
21/75
8/8/2019 What is a Corporate Culture
22/75
In your opinion what is the best or most appropriate theory of industrial relations? Why?
There are many different approaches and theories regarding industrial relations nowadays. In order to
mount an opinion on which is the best or most appropriate theory of industrial relations, each theory
will have to be analyzed. The three most prevalent theories of industrial relations which exist are The
Unitarist theory, The Pluralist theory and The Marxist theory. Each offers a particular perception of
workplace relations and will therefore interpret such events as workplace conflict, the role of trade
unions and job regulation very differently. I will examine each of these theories in turn and then
formulate my own opinion regarding which is the best or most appropriate theory.
The Unitary theory is based on the assumption that the organisation is, or should be, an integrated
group of people with a single authority/loyalty structure with a set of common values, interests and
objectives shared by all members of the organisation. This is expressed by Gennard and Judge (1997),who state organisations are assumed to be harmonious and integrated, all employees sharing the
organizational goals and working as members of one team. Through the unitary approach it is assumed
that both management and employees can achieve and satisfy their common goals (high levels of
productivity, profitability, pay and job security). In the Unitarist theory management see their function
as controlling and directing the workforce and see the organisation as a unitary system which has one
source of authority which is itself and one source of loyalty which is the organisation. Under the unitary
theory the organisation system is in basic harmony and any opposition to or conflict with management
is regarded as both unnecessary and exceptional, (Salamon, 1992). As pointed out by (Gunnigle,
McMahon and Fitzgerald, 2004), the existence of conflict is not perceived to be a structural occurrence
within organisations. However when conflict does arise, it can be the result of breakdowns incommunication, clashes in personalities within the organisation or by troublemakers. As conflict is
abnormal and seen as irrational there is no need for trade union representation within the company.
Trade unionism is regarded as a threat as trade unions are seen as an intrusion into the organisation
from outside who compete with management for the loyalty of its employees. Employers are also
opposed to recognizing collective bargaining initiatives as this will only diminish their decision making
initiatives and responsibilities further. Under the Unitarist theory under no circumstances should unions
have a part to play in the exercise of authority and decision making within the organisation, as this
would represent a violation of managerial prerogative (Ed Rose, 2001). The existence of trade unions
and collective bargaining is therefore resisted wherever possible. A perfect example of where trade
unionism is resisted is with Ryanair. Ryanair have one of the highest turnover rates in the airlineindustry and in order to substantially decrease their turnover they may need to allow union
representation for their staff. Their cabin crews are not getting the wages they deserve for the hard
work they put in. Long flight hours, little rest time, all of this deserves better pay and proper
compensation. Staff in workplaces with a union and a collective agreement gets better pay and
conditions, and better income. This is true for most full-service airlines as well as low-cost carriers. Easy
jet for example has a collective agreement, and staff earns better wages there.
8/8/2019 What is a Corporate Culture
23/75
Unlike the unitarist theory the pluralist theory recognizes that both employers and employees have
different interests. In pluralism the organization is perceived as being made up of powerful and
divergent sub-groups, each with its own legitimate loyalties and with their own set of objectives,
interests and leaders. Fox (1966) argued that this gives rise to a complex of tensions and competingclaims which have to be managed in the interests of maintaining a viable collaborative structure. In
comparison to the unitarist theory where there is only one source of loyalty and authority which resides
with management, the pluralist theory has many sources of loyalty and authority to management, trade
unions and other interests groups. There will therefore inevitably be continuous tensions within the
organisation arising from conflicts of interest and loyalties which requires management by a variety of
role players or representatives, procedures, processes and specialist institutions. In contrast to the
unitarist theory, pluralism views conflict as a naturally occurring phenomenon in organisations. It is seen
as both rational and inevitable. It is accepted as a characteristic of organisations which arises from
different perspectives and interests between the different groups and individuals in a society. Trade
unions are recognized as legitimate representatives of employees which can enable groups ofemployees to influence management decisions. Conflict is dealt by collective bargaining, which, if
managed successfully, can in fact be channeled towards evolution and positive change. Therefore
greater stability is given to IR by Collective Bargaining than by shackling and outlawing trade unions
(Clegg 1975). In the past in Southern Asia the focus was on achieving economic efficiency and less on
achieving better rights for workers. Unions were viewed as potential obstacles that could get in the way
of economic development and little emphasis was placed on industrial relations. However, there are
now major changes taking place across Asia as both the government and employers are focusing more
on industrial relations. It is now recognized how better managed industrial relations programmes and
cooperation with trade unions can seriously impact on the prevention of disputes, the productivity
within organisations and help to align employee objectives with the organisations objectives.
The Marxism theory concentrates more on the structure and nature of society rather than the actual
workplaces in the society and assumes that conflict in the employment relationship is reflective of the
structure of the society. It embraces the political, social and economic structures of society and
therefore according to Rose, views and analyses industrial relations not only in organizational job
regulation terms but also in social, political and economic terms. Marxism focuses on the fundamental
division of interest between capital and labor, and views workplace relations against this background.Conflict is therefore seen as inevitable and trade unions are a natural response of workers to their
exploitation by owners. According to Wallace, Gunnigle and McMahon trade unions may perform a
central role in the wider political process for the attainment of significant alterations to the economic
and social system on behalf of the proletariat. Conflict is the result of an uneven distribution of wealth
and power between the dominant establishment group (employers, shareholders) and workers. The
8/8/2019 What is a Corporate Culture
24/75
Marxist view is that trade unions and collective bargaining would enhance rather than limit
management's position as they presume the continuation of capitalism rather than challenge it.
In conclusion it is clear that the Unitary, Pluralistic and Marxist theories make quiet different
assumptions about the nature of organisations, work and society and consequently view conflict and the
role of trade unions differently. The unitarist theory is unrealistic in its outlook. It assumes that
organisations will be harmonious and integrated and views conflict as abnormal whereas in todays
society conflict is seen as a naturally occurring phenomenon. One of the major weaknesses of this
theory is that it does not acknowledge the fact that employees and employers will have different
objectives which is one of the main reasons for industrial conflicts. The Marxist theory is considered to
be outdated as the whole nature of the class conflict has changed, as a result of contemporary society,
with its mixed economy and welfare state, is now more open and socially mobile, (Wallace, Gunnigle
and McMahon 2004). The theory which in my opinion is the best or most appropriate theory of
industrial relations is the Pluralist theory. This theory has been in pole position in western societies for
over thirty years. In todays environment it is the most realistic theory as it assumes conflict is inevitable
and recognizes that both employees and employers will have different objectives unlike the unitarist
theories beliefs. It is now recognized that better managed industrial relations programmes and
cooperation with trade unions can seriously impact on the prevention of disputes, increase productivity,
quality and the motivation of workers within organisations and help to align employee objectives with
the organisations objectives.
CONTENTS
1. Introduction
2. HRM activities
2.1 Employee relations
2.2 Handling organisational conflict
3. Conflict resolution: a theoretical framework
8/8/2019 What is a Corporate Culture
25/75
3.1 Techniques HR managers use for conflict management
3.2 Types of collisions they manage
3.3 Role of trade unions in regulating employee disputes
4. Conflict resolution: a comparative case study of UK and Russia
4.1 British approach to the employee relations
4.2 Employee relations in Russia
5. Conclusion
6. List of references
|
1
2
2
2
3
3
4
5
8/8/2019 What is a Corporate Culture
26/75
8/8/2019 What is a Corporate Culture
27/75
employee relations differ from industrial relations to the extent that there is an inclination on direct
communication with the labour and liaison with the staff at the level of individual (Bright, 1993, p.42).
On a more general note, Bright (1993) argued that organisations need to be capable of handling with
employees on both an individual and a representative basis.
2.2 Handling organisational conflict
There may be some justification for claiming that conflict might dissipate precious human resources that
would be better focused to other activities, including the pivotal objective of the organisation. Thereby,
managing conflict in an organisation is regulated by the rules and established procedures (Edwards,
1994). Sparrow and Hiltrop (1994, p.186) identify two levels of conflict in organisation: the collective
level and the individual level. With regard to the collective conflict, it can provoke industrial actions
including walkouts, go-slows and overtime bans. Likewise, individual conflict may expose itself astruancy, high personnel turnover and other subversive actions.
3. Conflict resolution: a theoretical framework
3.1 Techniques HR managers use for conflict management
Several effective conflict management techniques can be executed at all levels of an organisation. As a
case in point, Wilson (n.d., p.4) advocates to adopt five methods to curb certain types of conflict in the
workplace. The first technique is "straight speaking". In other words, manager should embolden his staff
members to abstain from "beating around the bush." His second concept is generous listening. It
involves sincere listening without prejudging others or their flow of thoughts, this, by-turn, eliminates
negative misconceptions that can lead to prejudice. Honouring agreements is the third method that
urges employee to honour internal and external agreements as well as oral and non-oral. The next
technique is making requests. It suggests that employee failing to fulfil agreements should devise
alternatives, make adjustments and set forth counter offer for consideration. Ultimately, another
approach that can be practised by HR management is mentoring. Setting up a successful mentor system
where fresh employees can "learn the ropes" guarantees that core practices are realised and
accomplished from the moment a new employee becomes the piece of the organisation.
3.2 Types of collisions they manage
8/8/2019 What is a Corporate Culture
28/75
Leopold, Harris and Watson (2005, p. 410) believe that conflict is a facet of cooperation and
cooperation is a facet of conflict. To illustrate this apparent paradox, we can closely examine the types
of conflicts and classify them clearly into six categories (see Figure 1). Research confirms that HR
managers face specific conflicts in each kind of dispute (Business Horizons, 1997).
|Types Of Conflicts |Specification |
|Interpersonal |Communication difficulties, personal irritations; jealousy, embarrassments,
insults, |
| |fights. |
|Operations issues |Work assignments, vacation scheduling, overtime, union rules, work load,
sick leave. |
|Discipline |Attendance, drug use, theft, policy violations, sleeping on the job. |
|Sexual harassment/ |Touching or offending person of the opposite sex/ |
|Race relations |Alleged bias because of race. |
|Pay and promotion |Compensation, transfers, seniority, bumping rights, promotion.
|
|Work flow |Scheduling, quality of work, work speed, responsibilities, dependencies.
|
Figure 1 Types of conflicts handled my human resource managers
*(Source: Results of the research conducted by Business Horizons magazine (BHM), May-June 1997)
3.3 Role of trade unions in regulating employee disputes
According to Flanders (1975, p.274), trade unions seek to control or influence the framework of the
employment relationship through a number of methods including collective bargaining, joint
consultation and individual representation.
8/8/2019 What is a Corporate Culture
29/75
When dispute between employers and employee remains unsolved, employer can take actions against
employees and their unions make take measures against their employer. Farnham (2000, p.7) assume
that unions balance the power between management and employees. For instance, if an employee is a
member of a trade union, he or she could tell workplace representative about complaint before taking
any formal action. The trade union can advise on how best to raise grievance and go with employee to
grievance meetings. Many employers, especially those which recognise trade unions, have written
procedures in place to discuss with representatives collective grievances or other significant issues
affecting all or part of the workforce. Those procedures are important and can be used to address
emerging problems at an early stage.
4. Conflict resolution: a comparative case study of UK and Russia
4.1 British approach to the employee relations
British employees were ones infamous for industrial quarrels and strikes (Price, 2007). Hollinshead,
Nicholls and Tailby (2003) denote that in the UK a worker is free to take industrial actions, but she or he
must acknowledge certain legal and practical aftermaths. But Brown (1994) argues that in the UK
withdrawing trade unions leads to worse people management. Inevitably, unions force managers to
manage.
An impressive body of evidence tells us that UK businesses are being badly affected by poorly managed
conflicts in the workplace (McHenry, 2008). McHenry (2008) also observed that:
the average British employee is spending more than two hours a week dealing with conflict. This adds
up to the loss of more than 370 million working days a year, costing UK employers more than 24
billion. (p. 19).
The table below indicates that UK employees are more likely to experience unfavourable emotions as a
consequence of conflict. Two thirds of UK employees (65%) confess to feeling animosity anddisappointment in the face of dispute at work, as opposed to 57% across total surveyed. This suggests
that UK employees are not easily irritated, but ones they are, the emotional tensity increases
considerably. Generally, only 12 % of UK employees see conflict as a constructive occasion where they
feel invigorated, energized, compared with 24% on average in other countries considered. It is also
interesting to note, that as much as 22% of respondents got used to conflict and do nothing to remedy
the collision. One of the reason for this could be that UK employees suppress their emotions rather then
8/8/2019 What is a Corporate Culture
30/75
trying to find the conflict resolution in the workplace. On the other hand, one can assume that poor line
management is culpable when conflict occurs. However, research concludes that of all the countries
surveyed the UK employees experience conflict the least, 20% claimed they never have faced with
conflict, versus 14% on average, whereas 27% asserted there are never any collisions among their top-
management, as opposed to 21% on average.
[pic]
Figure 2 How does conflict may be felt by British employees
*(Source: Result of the report by business psychology firm OPP and the CIPD, 2008, p.19).
4.2 Employee relations in Russia
In Russia employee relations are regulated by the Labour Code. Alasheev (2005, p.11) explains that
Labour Code provide a comprehensive framework of regulation of terms and conditions of labour and
extending unprecedented rights and protection to trade union bodies while the plan and collective
agreements enjoying juridical status. Interestingly, Russia pride itself on the fact that the legal
regulations and protection given to labour is the most advanced in the world.
The current Russian Labour Code is very employee directed and if conflict arises, the court predominate
the Code clauses over the individual labour contract and usually also sides with the employee.
Information relating to the employee, the work implemented by them, recruitment and layoff dates are
to be inserted in the employee labour book and/or labour contract.
According to the final body of research, on the one hand, Russian HR mangers could be unconfident,
dragging their feet until the problem became conspicuous at a senior level. On the other hand, they
could expediently take notice of the conflict and seek its resolution (Alasheev, 2005, p.23). Although,
Russian managers are knowledgeable and affirmative, they often lacked impartiality. Specifically, in
conflicts that pitted an employee against the organisation or a member of it, the HR manager often
assist the firm in information collection, communication with disputants, decision making, or resolutionexecution. Paradoxically, but such a bias is comprehensible, given that the HR manager is paid by the
firm, is hold as a member of the managerial class, and is expected to vindicate the firm's interests.
Howbeit, this partiality does, occasionally, seem to erode an HR manager's effectiveness in handling
conflict.
8/8/2019 What is a Corporate Culture
31/75
5. Conclusion
Conflict in the organisation can be on personal and collective levels and it is up to HR manager to
respond to conflict situations swiftly and professionally. Moreover, each manager has its own store of
techniques, such as straight speaking, generous listening and honouring agreements. Likewise, types of
conflict manager experience every day are diverse, starting from interpersonal difficulties, operational
issues, and finishing by work flow dilemmas. On the other end of the scale, the power of trade unions
should be taken into consideration as well. In fact, HR managers can view trade unions as a favourable
factor, contributing in the process of communicating and involving employees.
British approach in employee relations suggest that employees experience the conflict the least, and the
least likely to have seen a conflict escalate, but on the other hand they are the most likely to experience
negative emotions as a result of conflict. However, they are not easily aroused. If the conflict occurs theyare more likely to see compromise in disagreement. Moreover, the reluctance to get involve in conflict
stands British employees out. Whereas Russian levels of workplace conflict are relatively high.
Nonetheless, the possibility for conflict in the fast-paced Russian workplace is identified and dealt with
in a structured way. Russian employees are also most likely to have a formal direction in dealing with
conflict. The most striking feature is that Russian employees view conflict handling as crucially
important leadership skill (Alasheev 2005, p.41).
By and large, this paper, however, provided only the basics of employee relations and conflict resolution
and further research would be necessary, because the circumstances in which employee relations are
conducted vary considerably.
Employment Relationships- Problems and Perspectives
Introduction
The employment relationship is the heart of any industrial relations system. It is the relationship
between the employer and the employee. A successful employment relationship has always been the
foundation of any successful business or organisation no matter how big or small. Variety ofphilosophers and writers of management have written a lot of theories relating to employment
relationship. These theories have changed vastly from the classical era to the modern era, addressing
issues that have evolved through changes driven by the nature of work, technology, and globalisation.
Managers have adapted diverse management styles as the time has passed by which reflect the
environment in which work is carried out. In this paper I will be analysing classical and modern theories
8/8/2019 What is a Corporate Culture
32/75
of employee relationship and various management styles and discussing the different factors that have
brought about changes in these theories and styles of management.
Before industrialization, industries and companies had an environment in which the employees
were basically ruled on by the employers, submitting themselves to the rules and regulations imposed
on them by the management. Interests of the employers always prevailed over the interests of theemployees. In the post war era there was little globalisation and technology, which hadn't played a big
role in the industrial world. The employees had to bear the entire workload, which included mental and
physical labour, on top of that they had minimum support by their managers due to the management
styles they had adapted. Compared to the post modernisation era and nowadays there have been vast
improvement in the industries. Today a number of forces influence the workplace environment, such as:
political systems, legislation, economics, technology, globalisation, labor unions, and professional
organisations, which includes remarkable new technological advances, enhanced working places,
educated, trained, and experienced managers and employees with superior competence than those of
the classical era.
Unitary Theory
One of the earliest theories was the Unitary theory that described the work relationship of the
employer and the employee as that of a parent and son. Even though it required harmony in the
employment relationship, it agreed with the management exercising authority over the employees.
Since the employees weren't as educated as needed to be it demanded the employees to be dependent
on the policies of the management. Unitary theory was based on an idealised and a fix situation, with
management adapting oppressive approaches. If an employee acted against the interest of the
management it would most probably cause a conflict, which would hamper unity in the organisation and
would put himself at the brink of losing
his job. Therefore the Unitary theory was based on an idealised situation and didn't consider any
flexibility or changes brought into the industrial world due to environment, technology, and or
expansion of business.
Pluralist Theory
Theories kept evolving as the size and scope of businesses expanded, taking into consideration
technology and the nature of work of the employees. One of the theories that came about was the
pluralist theory, which acknowledged the complex situations such as conflict of interest between the
management and the employees. It suggested that these kinds of complex situations could only beresolved through the involvement of government. Pluralist theory originated in the UK when the
country was going trough cultural and social reforms. Pluralist theory recommended resolving any
complex conflicts of interest by negotiation, compromise or agreement. This also brought about the
formation of trade unions and other groups that considered the interests of both the management and
the labour. Even though the pluralist theory tried giving some kind of rights to the employee to speak
out and be heard, it still couldn't overcome the conditions of capitalist tendencies which always tilted
8/8/2019 What is a Corporate Culture
33/75
the balance in the employers favor. The formation of these institutions and trade unions helped the
employees on a limited base that included areas like wage bargaining or conflict of interests between
employees. The increased level of trade unions and institutions were beginning to be questioned and
were blamed to have contributed to the low levels of productivity in British companies.
Fredrick W. Taylor (Scientific Management)
The essence of all these classical theories of management styles is that there exists a single, best
approach to management, and the research was aimed at finding this best approach. One of the
recognized theorists was Fredrick W. Taylor. His purpose and idea was to maxamise efficiency, he
believed that the principal object of management should be to ensure maximum prosperity for the
employer, coupled with the maximum prosperity for each employee. He considered that the best
approach was for the employee to fulfill optimum goals, which would result in higher wages for them,
and managements' gain will be higher productivity. Therefore the employee himself will work harder
and try his level best to produce more since he is getting financial benefits for doing so, this was his
differential piece-rate system.
Elton Mayo(Human Relations Movement)
Various other theorist included Henri Fayol, Max Webber, and Rosemary Stewart, but one of the
standouts was Elton Mayo with his Human relations approach to management. Elton Mayo opposed the
writings of Taylor and thought that in spite of its aids to efficiency Taylor's system was an imposed one,
which took no account of employee's own views. Hawthorne experiments with which Mayo's name is
lined are one of the widely quoted researches in history. In this research his experiments included
separating six female operatives to assess the output and morale of changes in the nature of work. At
first an incentive payment scheme was introduced comparatively of Taylor's writings, as expected
output increased. The second experiment consisted of the same women but with original workingconditions with no incentive payments, no pauses for rest or for refreshments and yet the output was
the highest ever recorded. Therefore it proved that the nature of work which includes work satisfaction,
development of personal friendships, and a good social atmosph