Upload
others
View
8
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
11
What is academic literature?
Dr. B. Pochet
Gembloux Agro-Bio Tech – Liège university (Belgium)
22
The support of this training are there:
http://infolit.be/write
33
44
The concept of information literacy
(Nichole Ackerman Martin, 2014)
55
Main objectives
✔ Understand the processes of the academic literature, measure its:➔ ethics aspects➔ economic aspect➔ technical aspects
... to know what we're looking for✔ Discover the extended literature search tools :
➔ their diversity➔ their languages
... to understand how to search✔ Train critical analysis
66
Main objectives
✔ Find your place, as a reader and as an author, in the network of academic communication;
✔ Be able to synthesize and restore the information obtained;✔ Integrate the main rules for writing a bibliography;✔ Understand the principles and rules of writing a scientific paper;✔ Write the different parts of an article;✔ Avoid the problems usually encountered (systematic causes of
rejection).
77
Your motivation?✔ Are objectives clear?✔ Is the training useful for you?✔ Are you really concerned about this training?✔ Are you able to take this training?
… you’re motivated!
88
Scientific communication is:
✔ Processes✔ Documents✔ Bibliometry and quality evaluation✔ Publication and diffusion✔ Bibliographic tools (to find the documents)
99
Scientific communication is:
✔ Processes✔ Documents✔ Bibliometry and quality evaluation✔ Publication and diffusion✔ Bibliographic tools (to find the documents)
1010
The processes
1111
Some processes
✔ Research process➔ From the research question to the answer
✔ Publication process➔ From submission to the diffusion
✔ Extended research process➔ From the question to the answer ...
1212
the research process
1313
the publication process
1414
the extended literature search process
1515
Scientific communication is:
✔ Processes✔ Documents✔ Bibliometry and quality evaluation✔ Publication and diffusion✔ Bibliographic tools (to find the documents)
1616
1717
Do you see the distinction between?
• A Book: Walsh, J., 2011. Information literacy instruction: selecting an effective model. Oxford: Chandos Publishing.
and• An edited book: Chuanfu C. & Ronald L. eds., 2014. Library and
Information Sciences: Trends and Research. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg.
• Containing chapters: Phelps J.V. et al., 2014. A group discussion on information literacy. In: Chuanfu C. & Ronald L. eds. Library and Information Sciences: Trends and Research. Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg, pp. 21–28.
1818
And between?
• A chapter in an edited book (the same): Phelps J.V. et al., 2014. A group discussion on information literacy. In: Chuanfu C. & Ronald L. eds. Library and Information Sciences: Trends and Research. Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg, pp. 21–28.
•
and
•
• An article in a Journal: Detlor B. et al., 2011. Learning outcomes of information literacy instruction at business schools. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 62(3), 572–585.
1919
Scientific communication is:
✔ Processes✔ Documents✔ Bibliometry and quality evaluation✔ Publication and diffusion✔ Bibliographic tools (to find the documents)
2020
Why metrics?
✔ The origin is the « Publish or perish » injunction to the researchers :
➔ Publication = evaluation of research(ers)➔ Importance of being able to measure the "value of the production"
✔ The primary (oldest) tool is the “Impact factor”➔ Count a number of citations of papers of a journal ➔ Does not measure quality but number of citations➔ Inequality between domains (biotechnology ++)➔ Essentially Anglo-Saxon journals➔ Never give a level of quality of a paper/scientist!
2121
2222
28 papers with 0 citation !
IF can never be attributed to a paper!
= IF 2015
the impact factor is a mean (number of citations divided by number of papers produced)
2323
Other bibliometric tools
✔ Scopus (owned by …. Elsevier)✔ The tools who use Google Scholar data✔ The alt-metrics based on:
✔ blogs✔ downloads✔ Tweets✔ Facebook posts✔ ...
2424Citation count to create metrics (// IF)
2525
2626
SJR = a free access tool to know the ranking and the visibility (citations!) of a scientific journal
2727
2828
= most cited papers
2929
= top 100 ranking
3030
3131
3232
3333
H index ?
41
42
43
44
...
3434
In summaryFor a journal We use:➔ Impact Factor➔ SJR (Scimago Journal Ranking) & CiteScore (Scopus)➔ Top 100 H5 Google Scholar Ranking
For a Paper We use:➔ Citations count in: Web of Science, Scopus, Google Scholar…➔ Altmetrics
For a researcher We use:➔ Google Scholar Personal page➔ Scopus Personal page➔ the H index (originally computed to select physics teachers)➔ Never Impact Factor!
3535
Scientific communication is:
✔ Processes✔ Documents✔ Bibliometry and quality evaluation✔ Publication and diffusion✔ Bibliographic tools (to find the documents)
3636
Publication and diffusion
✔ The most used: ➔ type of document is a journal article➔ language is English➔ the format is electronic format
✔ there is also grey literature (reports, research notes, theses…) which is: ➔ not always electronic➔ also an important source of information➔ Sometimes hard to find...
3737
There are about 25-30.000 journals to disseminate the science in the world.The first three publishers nearly represent 30% of all that is published. Is there abuse of dominance? … certainly!
3838
subscription fees increase every year (between 5 and 10%)
3939
✔ Why continue to buy items we write ourselves???✔ Why continue to outsource the sharing of our knowledge to
commercial third parties???
4040
Why continue to buy items we write ourselves???
One solution, the Open Access (1990) & two ways
the gold way the green way
4141
what's the difference between the gold way and the green way?
the gold way the green way- Direct publishing in OA - Deposit (by author) in an open - Article Processing Charge (APC) repository (with the permission for some titles (30%) of the publisher)
4242
We’ll discuss Open Access in We’ll discuss Open Access in the next modulethe next module
Open Access is part of Open Open Access is part of Open ScienceScience
4343
Scientific communication is:
✔ Processes✔ Documents✔ Bibliometry and quality evaluation✔ Publication and diffusion✔ Bibliographic tools (to find the documents)
4444
For information retrieval (extended literature search), We have:
Discovery tools➔ Primo for de ULiège Library
Scientific search engines➔ Google Scholar (= Google for scholarly publication)➔ Bielefeld Academic Search engine (= only for Open Access Documents)➔ Dimensions (Digital Science)➔ Microsoft Academic Search➔ WorldWideScience (U.S. Department of Energy's Office of Scientific and Technical Information)➔ CORE (Aggregating the world’s open access research papers)
General Bibliographic Databases➔ Scopus (Elsevier)➔ Web of Science (Clarivate Analytics)
Specialized Bibliographic Databases (in your field of research): free or not
$$
4545
4646
4747
4848
4949
5050
5151
5252
5353
! Scopus is not a free database (+/_ 30.000 $/year for a medium size university)
5454
Where to find the links to these bibliographic databases?Where to find the links to these bibliographic databases?On my blog, there is one page (in french, sorry) called: ToolboxOn my blog, there is one page (in french, sorry) called: Toolbox→ → http://infolit.be/baohttp://infolit.be/bao
5555
5656
5757
5858
5959
What is the best way to use the bibliographic tools?
We’ll see the best way in a next module!