4
Strategy and Macro Research – Large Corporates & Institutions 1 of 5 Title Macro analysis – 12 May 2014 Macro focus – Sweden What is needed for a 50 basis point cut in July? Several events during May and June can in- crease the likelihood of a 50 basis point cut in July At present the likelihood of a 50 basis point cut in July is about 10 percent There is a strong economic case for a 50 basis point cut in July. Inflation in Sweden shows a remarkable deviation from the inflation target. In March the CPI was -0.6 percent and the CPIF (consumer price index with a fixed mort- gage rate) year on year change was 0.0 percent. The average for the past 12 months also shows that the CPI is a long way from the Riksbank’s target of 2 percent. The market, and Swedbank, anticipates a repo rate cut of 25 basis points in July. Here we present a list of the most important leads prior to the Riksbank’s monetary decision in July. We suggest that the likelihood of a 50 basis point cut in present circumstances is 10 percent, but that the probability may rise if a number of events occur. The three main variables will be (1) the inflation outcome, (2) action by the ECB, and (3) the meeting of the Financial Stability Council in May. What is required for the Riksbank to make a 50 basis point cut? There are a number of events which together would increase the likelihood of a 50 basis point interest rate cut. In our judgment, at least three of these events should deviate sub- stantially from market expectations for a 50 basis point cut to become likely. In chronological order the most important events are as follows: 1. If actual inflation in April and/or May is a surprise on the downside (May 13 and June 12). 2. The Financial Stability Council makes clear, forceful recommendations for countering increased indebt- edness (May 23). 3. Weak GDP in 2014 Q1, and/or a downward revision of 2013 Q4. 4. A more expansive monetary policy from the ECB which weakens the euro and indirectly strengthens the Swedish krona (June 5). 5. The exchange rate strengthens more than the Riks- bank forecasts. The fifth event, the exchange rate trend during the period until the Riksbank meeting in July, does not have a specific date but is an important variable. All events in the list above can affect the exchange rate, but the exchange rate can also change as a result of other events around the world, which affect the Swedish krona exchange rate directly or indirectly. Graph 1 shows the trend of the Swedish krona in trade- weighted terms (the so-called KIX Index or Effective Ex- change Rate Index) and the Riksbank’s forecast. Date Date Date Date Event Event Event Event May 13 May 13 May 13 May 13 Inflation figure for April May 23 May 23 May 23 May 23 Meeting of the Financial Stability Council May 30 May 30 May 30 May 30 GDP, first quarter June 5 June 5 June 5 June 5 ECB interest rate announcement June 12 June 12 June 12 June 12 Inflation figure for May July 3 July 3 July 3 July 3 The Riksbank’s interest rate decision The trend of the KIX since the last Riksbank meeting in April suggests that a cut is not likely. On May 9 the Swedish krona was 1.4 percent weaker than in the Riksbank’s forecast, in KIX-weighted terms. In the opinion of ECB, a 10 percent strengthening of the euro would contribute to a 40-50 basis point reduction in inflation. Recalculated for Sweden, the latest weakening of the exchange rate could increase infla- tion by just about 10 basis points, i.e. a 0.1 percent increase according to this rule of thumb. This however is too little to get close to the inflation target in a meaningful way. Higher than expected actual inflation, strong GDP growth and measures by the ECB could again contribute to an apprecia- tion of the Swedish krona and lower inflationary pressure. Graph 1: The Swedish krona has weakened compared with the Riks- bank’s forecast

What is needed for a 50 basis point cut in July?

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: What is needed for a 50 basis point cut in July?

Strategy and Macro Research – Large Corporates & Institutions 1 of 5

Title Macro analysis – 12 May 2014

Macro focus – Sweden

What is needed for a 50 basis point cut in July?

• Several events during May and June can in-crease the likelihood of a 50 basis point cut in July

• At present the likelihood of a 50 basis point cut in July is about 10 percent

• There is a strong economic case for a 50 basis point cut in July.

Inflation in Sweden shows a remarkable deviation from the inflation target. In March the CPI was -0.6 percent and the CPIF (consumer price index with a fixed mort-gage rate) year on year change was 0.0 percent. The average for the past 12 months also shows that the CPI is a long way from the Riksbank’s target of 2 percent. The market, and Swedbank, anticipates a repo rate cut of 25 basis points in July. Here we present a list of the most important leads prior to the Riksbank’s monetary decision in July. We suggest that the likelihood of a 50 basis point cut in present circumstances is 10 percent, but that the probability may rise if a number of events occur. The three main variables will be (1) the inflation outcome, (2) action by the ECB, and (3) the meeting of the Financial Stability Council in May.

What is required for the Riksbank to make a 50 basis point cut?

There are a number of events which together would increase the likelihood of a 50 basis point interest rate cut. In our judgment, at least three of these events should deviate sub-stantially from market expectations for a 50 basis point cut to become likely. In chronological order the most important events are as follows:

1. If actual inflation in April and/or May is a surprise on the downside (May 13 and June 12).

2. The Financial Stability Council makes clear, forceful recommendations for countering increased indebt-edness (May 23).

3. Weak GDP in 2014 Q1, and/or a downward revision of 2013 Q4.

4. A more expansive monetary policy from the ECB which weakens the euro and indirectly strengthens the Swedish krona (June 5).

5. The exchange rate strengthens more than the Riks-bank forecasts.

The fifth event, the exchange rate trend during the period until the Riksbank meeting in July, does not have a specific date but is an important variable. All events in the list above can affect the exchange rate, but the exchange rate can also

change as a result of other events around the world, which affect the Swedish krona exchange rate directly or indirectly. Graph 1 shows the trend of the Swedish krona in trade-weighted terms (the so-called KIX Index or Effective Ex-change Rate Index) and the Riksbank’s forecast.

DateDateDateDate EventEventEventEvent

May 13May 13May 13May 13 Inflation figure for April

May 23May 23May 23May 23 Meeting of the Financial Stability Council

May 30May 30May 30May 30 GDP, first quarter

June 5June 5June 5June 5 ECB interest rate announcement

June 12June 12June 12June 12 Inflation figure for May

July 3July 3July 3July 3 The Riksbank’s interest rate decision

The trend of the KIX since the last Riksbank meeting in April suggests that a cut is not likely. On May 9 the Swedish krona was 1.4 percent weaker than in the Riksbank’s forecast, in KIX-weighted terms. In the opinion of ECB, a 10 percent strengthening of the euro would contribute to a 40-50 basis point reduction in inflation. Recalculated for Sweden, the latest weakening of the exchange rate could increase infla-tion by just about 10 basis points, i.e. a 0.1 percent increase according to this rule of thumb. This however is too little to get close to the inflation target in a meaningful way. Higher than expected actual inflation, strong GDP growth and measures by the ECB could again contribute to an apprecia-tion of the Swedish krona and lower inflationary pressure.

Graph 1: The Swedish krona has weakened compared with the Riks-bank’s forecast

Page 2: What is needed for a 50 basis point cut in July?

Macro focus – Sweden

2 of 5 Strategy and Macro Research – Large Corporates & Institutions

Remarkable deviation from the inflation target

Despite an upturn in economic activity in Europe and Swe-den, inflation continues to drop and unemployment remains at a persistently high level. In Sweden the year-on-year CPI was -0.6 percent in March. The year-on-year CPIF was 0.0 percent, the lowest figure recorded since the commencement of the series in 1988. Graph 2. Remarkable deviation from the inflation target

Falling inflation is not only a Swedish phenomenom. Graph 2 shows that inflation is below the inflation targets in a num-ber of developed economies. However, we can conclude that Sweden is further from its inflation target than, for example, Switzerland, the Eurozone and Canada. Also, Graph 1 shows a further drop of inflation in March compared with the average for the past 12 months in Sweden, the Eurozone and Nor-way. In the USA, Canada and Switzerland the latest outcome is marginally higher than the average for the past 12 months. The trend of falling interest rates in the majority of devel-oped economies can be divided up into three factors. First, a global decline in food and energy prices. Second, low capacity utilisation and a large surplus of unutilised resources in the labour market since the financial crisis are holding down wage increases. Third, structural changes are ongoing, lead-ing to greater competition in many sectors and making it difficult for companies to raise prices. This includes greater competition from e-commerce in the retail trade, lower mar-ginal costs, for example, in music, literature and journalism, and a larger international component in service sectors, pre-viously reserved for local markets. It is important to emphasise how difficult it is for the Riks-bank to achieve the inflation target, but it is economically very important that it actually happens. It is important for the Riksbank’s credibility. Well anchored inflation expecta-tions are central for the Swedish wage bargaining process. Accelerating urbanisation in combination with a low level of housing construction has led to a rise in household debt, pri-marily in the metropolitan areas. Statistics from the Riksbank show that the leverage of households with new loans is about 370 percent of disposable income. Low inflation will mean an additional burden for these households because the value of the debt will not decrease and might even increase if we have deflation. An inflation rate well below the inflation target will benefit those who do not have debt and have sub-stantial assets, primarily older, affluent households. House-holds with high debt levels will lose out when their debt does not decline in value.

Inflation which deviates from the inflation target over a long period has a negative effect on the real economy. It makes wage formation more difficult, the propensity of households to consume is weakened and incentives for companies to invest are reduced. There is a risk that the improvement in the economy will falter if the adverse effects of low inflation intensify. The case for a 50 basis point reduction in July

Swedbank’s forecast is that tSwedbank’s forecast is that tSwedbank’s forecast is that tSwedbank’s forecast is that thhhheeee Riksbank will cut the repo Riksbank will cut the repo Riksbank will cut the repo Riksbank will cut the repo rate by 25 basis points in Julyrate by 25 basis points in Julyrate by 25 basis points in Julyrate by 25 basis points in July. In our judgment, the likelihood of a 50 basis point cut is about 10 percent. It may become more likely if one or more of the events we list above actually occurs. However, there is a strong economic case for a 50 basis point cut, even on the basis of present information. Firstly, the remarkable deviation from the Riksbank’s inflation target puts the credibility of the Riksbank at risk and expec-tations of inflation will diminish. In the latest survey for Prospera, inflation expectations over five years are 1.8 per-cent (see Graph 3). Inflation expectations fell below 2 percent at the beginning of 2013, and since July 2013 the number has remained consistently below two percent. Two year in-flation expectations are 1.6 percent. The Riksbank’s credibil-ity is increasingly questioned in the economic-political debate in Sweden. There have even been calls for a less independent Riksbank. Graph 3: Inflation expectations drop

Secondly, it is reasonable to ask how much a 25 basis point cut will affect inflation and the real economy. A 25 basis point cut is already priced into the market and its effects on the Swedish krona should be limited. The effect on import prices would therefore be limited and thus not contribute to higher imported inflation. Interest costs for households and companies are already low and a 25 basis point cut will only produce a marginal increase in consumption and investment, and thus a weak effect on employment. Also, a 25 basis point cut would probably be countered by a somewhat wider spread on mortgage loans as a result of the Swedish Finan-cial Supervisory Authority’s decision of May 8 on higher capi-tal requirements for the banks. A 50 basis point cut could actually have some effect on infla-tion. Because the cut would be unexpected, the Swedish kro-na would weaken and contribute to higher imported inflation and contribute to stimulating Swedish exports. A 50 basis point cut in interest rates could also contribute to expecta-tions for a stronger economy. If households and companies expect higher growth in the future, this can lead to higher consumption and higher investment in the short term as well.

1

1,2

1,4

1,6

1,8

2

2,2

2,4

jan-12 apr-12 jul-12 okt-12 jan-13 apr-13 jul-13 okt-13 jan-14 apr-14

Pro

ce

nt

Prospera: Inflationsförväntningar bland penningmarkandens aktörer

2 års sikt 5 års sikt

Källa: TNS SIFO Prospera och Riksbanken

Page 3: What is needed for a 50 basis point cut in July?

Macro focus – Sweden

3 of 5 Strategy and Macro Research – Large Corporates & Institutions

Inflation would then be stimulated both by an exchange rate effect and greater domestic demand. Graph 4: The market’s price setting and the Riksbank’s repo rate track

A 50 basis point cut would strengthen the Riksbank’s credi-bility by demonstrating dedication to the inflation target. This is important for the economic-political debate in Swe-den. It can also contribute to improving the market’s confi-dence in the Riksbank and reduce the difference between the market’s expectations about the repo rate track and the Riks-bank’s forecast. A 50 basis point cut could realistically con-tribute to higher inflation and interest rate increases in the future more in accord with the Riksbank’s repo rate track (see Graph 4). Finally, it could be more effective to make a 50 basis point cut at one go rather than lowering the rate in two 25 basis point steps. If the Riksbank makes a 25 basis point cut and inflation remains weak, expectations of a further cut will increase. Two cuts, each of 25 basis points, risk having less impact than one cut of 50 basis points, not just because the second cut would lag by several months and therefore delay stimula-tion of the economy, but also because expectations will again have time to form, and the effect will then be less. Even if there is a case for 50 basis point cut in July, Swedbank’s forecast is a cut of 25 basis points. It is mainly the risks associated with the high level of household debt that will keep the Riksbank from cutting the repo rate by 50 basis points. Analyst: Anna Breman, [email protected], 070 314 95 87

0,00

0,50

1,00

1,50

2,00

2,50

3,00

20

10

-11

-01

20

11

-01

-01

20

11

-03

-01

20

11

-05

-01

20

11

-07

-01

20

11

-09

-01

20

11

-11

-01

20

12

-01

-01

20

12

-03

-01

20

12

-05

-01

20

12

-07

-01

20

12

-09

-01

20

12

-11

-01

20

13

-01

-01

20

13

-03

-01

20

13

-05

-01

20

13

-07

-01

20

13

-09

-01

20

13

-11

-01

20

14

-01

-01

20

14

-03

-01

20

14

-05

-01

20

14

-07

-01

20

14

-09

-01

20

14

-11

-01

20

15

-01

-01

20

15

-03

-01

20

15

-05

-01

20

15

-07

-01

20

15

-09

-01

20

15

-11

-01

20

16

-01

-01

20

16

-03

-01

20

16

-05

-01

20

16

-07

-01

20

16

-09

-01

20

16

-11

-01

Outcome

Riksbanken (Feb)

Riksbanken (Apr)

Swedbank (Apr)

Riba (9 maj)

Page 4: What is needed for a 50 basis point cut in July?

Macro focus – Sweden

4 of 5 Strategy and Macro Research – Large Corporates & Institutions

DisclaimerDisclaimerDisclaimerDisclaimer

What our research is based onWhat our research is based onWhat our research is based onWhat our research is based on

Swedbank Research, a unit within Large Corporates & Institutions, bases the research on a variety of aspects and analysis.

For example: A fundamental assessment of the cyclical and structural economic, current or expected market sentiment, expected or actual changes in credit rat-ing, and internal or external circumstances affecting the pricing of selected FX and fixed income instruments.

Based on the type of investment recommendation, the time horizon can range from short-term up to 12 months.

Recommendation structureRecommendation structureRecommendation structureRecommendation structure

Recommendations in FX and fixed income instruments are done both in the cash market and in derivatives.

Recommendations can be expressed in absolute terms, for example attractive price, yield or volatility levels. They can also be expressed in relative terms, for example long positions versus short positions.

Regarding the cash market, our recommendations include an entry level and our recommendation updates include profit and often, but not necessarily, exit levels. Regarding recommendations in derivative instruments, our recommendation include suggested entry cost, strike level and maturity.

In FX, we will only use options as directional bets and volatility bets with the restriction that we will not sell options on a net basis, i.e. we will only recommend positions that have a fixed maximum loss.

Analyst’s certificationAnalyst’s certificationAnalyst’s certificationAnalyst’s certification

The analyst(s) responsible for the content of this report hereby confirm that notwithstanding the existence of any such potential conflicts of interest referred to herein, the views expressed in this report accurately reflect their personal views about the securities covered. The analyst(s) further confirm not to have been, nor are or will be, receiving direct or indirect compensation in exchange for expressing any of the views or the specific recommendation contained in the report.

Issuer, distribution & recipientsIssuer, distribution & recipientsIssuer, distribution & recipientsIssuer, distribution & recipients

This report by Swedbank Research is issued by the Swedbank Large Corporates & Institutions business area within Swedbank AB (publ) (“Swedbank”). Swedbank is under the supervision of the Swedish Financial Supervisory Authority (Finansin-spektionen).

In no instance is this report altered by the distributor before distribution.

In Finland this report is distributed by Swedbank’s branch in Helsinki, which is under the supervision of the Finnish Financial Supervisory Authority (Finanssival-vonta).

In Norway this report is distributed by Swedbank’s branch in Oslo, which is under the supervision of the Financial Supervisory Authority of Norway (Finanstil-synet).

In Estonia this report is distributed by Swedbank AS, which is under the supervi-sion of the Estonian Financial Supervisory Authority (Finantsinspektsioon).

In Lithuania this report is distributed by “Swedbank” AB, which is under the su-pervision of the Central Bank of the Republic of Lithuania (Lietuvos bankas).

In Latvia this report is distributed by Swedbank AS, which is under the supervi-sion of The Financial and Capital Market Commission (Finanšu un kapitala tirgus komisija).

In the United States this report is distributed by Swedbank First Securities LLC ('Swedbank First'), which accepts responsibility for its contents. This report is for distribution only to institutional investors. Any United States institutional inves-tor receiving the report, who wishes to effect a transaction in any security dis-cussed in the report, should do so only through Swedbank First. Swedbank First is a U.S. broker-dealer, registered with the Securities and Exchange Commission, and is a member of the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority. Swedbank First is part of Swedbank Group.

For important U.S. disclosures, please reference: http://www.swedbankfs.com/disclaimer/index.htm

In the United Kingdom this communication is for distribution only to and directed only at "relevant persons". This communication must not be acted on – or relied on – by persons who are not "relevant persons". Any investment or investment activity to which this document relates is available only to "relevant persons" and

will be engaged in only with "relevant persons". By "relevant persons" we mean persons who:

• Have professional experience in matters relating to investments falling within Article 19(5) of the Financial Promotions Order.

• Are persons falling within Article 49(2)(a) to (d) of the Financial Promotion Order ("high net worth companies, unincorporated associations etc.").

• Are persons to whom an invitation or inducement to engage in investment activity (within the meaning of section 21 of the Financial Services and Markets Act 2000) – in connection with the issue or sale of any securities – may otherwise lawfully be communicated or caused to be communicated.

Limitation of liabilityLimitation of liabilityLimitation of liabilityLimitation of liability

All information, including statements of fact, contained in this research report has been obtained and compiled in good faith from sources believed to be reliable. However, no representation or warranty, express or implied, is made by Swedbank with respect to the completeness or accuracy of its contents, and it is not to be relied upon as authoritative and should not be taken in substitution for the exercise of reasoned, independent judgment by you.

Be aware that investments in capital markets – such as those described in this document – carry economic risks and that statements regarding future assess-ments comprise an element of uncertainty. You are responsible for such risks alone and we recommend that you supplement your decision-making with that material which is assessed to be necessary, including (but not limited to) knowledge of the financial instruments in question and the prevailing require-ments as regards trading in financial instruments.

Opinions contained in the report represent the analyst's present opinion only and may be subject to change. In the event that the analyst's opinion should change or a new analyst with a different opinion becomes responsible for our coverage of the company, we shall endeavour (but do not undertake) to disseminate any such change, within the constraints of any regulations, applicable laws, internal proce-dures within Swedbank, or other circumstances.

If you are in doubt as to the meaning of the recommendation structure used by Swedbank in its research, please refer to “Recommendation structure”.

Swedbank is not advising nor soliciting any action based upon this report. If you are not a client of ours, you are not entitled to this research report. This report is not, and should not be construed as, an offer to sell or as a solicitation of an offer to buy any securities.

To the extent permitted by applicable law, no liability whatsoever is accepted by Swedbank for any direct or consequential loss arising from the use of this report.

Conflicts of interestConflicts of interestConflicts of interestConflicts of interest

In Swedbank LC&I, internal guidelines are implemented in order to ensure the integrity and independence of the research analysts.

For example:

• Research reports are independent and based solely on publicly available information.

• The analysts are not permitted, in general, to have any holdings or any positions (long or short, direct or via derivatives) in such Financial Instru-ments that they recommend in their investment analysis.

• The remuneration of staff within the Swedbank Research department may include discretionary awards based on the firm’s total earnings, including investment banking income. However, no such staff shall receive remuner-ation based upon specific investment banking transactions.

Planned updatesPlanned updatesPlanned updatesPlanned updates An investment recommendation is normally updated twice a month.

Reproduction & disseminationReproduction & disseminationReproduction & disseminationReproduction & dissemination

This material may not be reproduced without permission from Swedbank Re-search. This report is not intended for physical or legal persons who are citizens of, or have domicile in, a country in which dissemination is not permitted accord-ing to applicable legislation or other decisions.

Produced by Swedbank Research a unit within Large Corporates & Institutions, Stockholm.

AddrAddrAddrAddressessessess

Swedbank LC&I, Swedbank AB (publ), SE-105 34 Stockholm.

Visiting address: Regeringsgatan 13, Stockholm