A way of investigating the world in order to form general rules about why things happen.

Science is a way of knowing based on experimental or observational evidence and its interpretation.

Science is a discipline largely defined by its primary method – the scientific method.

When did the study of science begin?

Paleolithic paintings on cave walls and recordings on bones- observations

32,000 years ago

When did the study of science begin?

Mesopotamian7,000 B.C. to 6th century B.C.

Bronze surgical knives

Medical text

Astronomy

• Scientific method (observation, inductive reasoning)

• Described hundreds of marine species

• Dolphin is a mammal• The earth is round• Biology (spontaneous generation)-

disproved by Francesco Redi (1668), an Italian doctor who proved maggots came from flies.

Aristotle (384-322 B.C.)

Ptolemy (170 A.D.)- geocentric universe

Copernicus (1500’s)- heliocentric universe; not accepted until 100 years after his death

Galileo (1600’s)- physicist, astronomer, scientific method

Subsidence theoryOrigin of Species (1859)

Galapagos Islands, Ecuador

Darwin- HMS Beagle (1831)

248 mya

65 mya

present

Continental drift theory

Wegener (1915)

• Alvin to Galapagos • Discovered hydrothermal vents• Sulfur-rich vents 660 oF, but quickly cool to 73 oF• Unique communities• New kingdom of bacteria

Ballard & Grassle (1977)

The nature of science• Science:

– A systematic process for learning about the world and testing our understanding of it

– The accumulated body of knowledge that results from a dynamic process of observation, testing, and discovery

• Science is essential:– To sort fact from fiction – Develop solutions to the problems we face

Global Warming

Fact or Fiction?

Pure Science- pursuit of knowledge

Applied Science- search for practical uses of scientific knowledge

tetradoxin

Pain relief in terminal cancer patients

• Hypothesis-driven or experimental science.

• Discovery or observational science.

Two Primary Approaches to ScienceScientists test ideas

Hypothesis-Driven Studies

Discovery/Observational Studies

Discovery/Observational Studies

Some Scientific Questions Can’t Be Answered By Experimentation

Discovery or observational science is still science; falsifiable hypotheses based on natural phenomenon are proposed to best account for observations.

Science is empirical. It relies on observation and experience.

The phenomenon studied must be measurable.

Phenomenon that cannot be measured:Is this painting beautiful?Does God exist?

It must be consistent with known natural laws and well-established, well-documented existing theories.

It must be derived objectively from independently confirmable observations.

All scientific knowledge must be regarded as tentative.

Characteristics of Scientific Explanations

Hypothesis: Hermatypic corals exposed to temperatures above 36oC expel their symbiotic zoothanthellae.

Hypothesis: Naval explosions at the thermocline layer cause hearing loss in whales.

Hypothesis:Ulua are better predators.

Scientific statements must be testable and reproducible (i.e., valid & reliable).

Hypothesis:The fibropapilloma virus causes tumors in green sea turtles.

Scientific MethodA way to answer questions

Must be testable & repeatable, i.e., validity and reliability

Deductive Reasoning- general to specificreasoning from general theories to account for specific experimental results(theory-data collection-analysis)

Inductive Reasoning- specific to generalreasoning from specific observations and experiments to more general theories(data collection-analysis-theory)

January1992 in the North Pacific

                                                                                                                                            

Rubber Duckies and Ocean currents.

• Jim Ingram (NOAA scientist)- offered a reward

• He graphed and studied the data as it came in.

• Hypothesis: ocean currents were moving the ducks in about the same speed and direction that the currents were going!

Toy trekResearchers expect some 29,000 bath toys lost at sea in 1992 to make the ice-covered trek over the North Pole and to the North Atlantic by this summer.

The scientific method

• Observations • Question • Formulate Hypothesis • Conduct Experiment • Analyze Results • Conclusions • Discussion

A technique for testing ideas

Testing predictions• Experiment: an activity that tests the validity of a

hypothesis• Variables: conditions that can be manipulated

and/or measured– Independent variable: a condition that is manipulated– Dependent variable: a variable that is affected by the

manipulation of the independent variable• Controlled experiment: one in which all variables

are controlled– Control: the unmanipulated point of comparison– Treatment: the manipulated point of comparison

• Data: information that is generally quantitative (numerical)

Experiments test the validity of a hypothesis

• Manipulative experiments yield the strongest evidence– Provides the strongest type of evidence– Reveal causal relationships: changes in independent

variables cause changes in dependent variables– But many things can’t be manipulated: long-term or

large-scale questions (i.e., global climate change) • Natural experiments show real-world complexity

– Only feasible approach for ecosystem or planet-scale– Results are not so neat and clean, so answers aren’t

simply black and white

Observation:

Question:

Hypothesis:

Test hypothesis:

Analyze Results:

Draw Conclusion:

Ben Franklin & the Gulf Stream

1996

1786

Pisaster

Paine’s study on Pisaster and blue musselsWhat effect does starfish removal have on community structure?

chiton limpet

mussels (Mytilus)

barnacles

Keystone Species

Paine’s study on Pisaster and blue mussels

Coral Mapping (Molokai)

Mangrove Study

Do sponges affect mangrove root growth?

Select a large sample size

Randomly divide the sample into 2 groups

Treat the groups equally in all ways but oneObserve or make measurements

Compare results

Mangrove Study

What is difference between hypothesis, theory & law?

Hypothesis - “an educated guess”; a tentative explanation of phenomena.

Theory - a widely accepted explanation of natural phenomena; has stood up to thorough &

continual testing.

Law - a statement of what always occurs under certain conditions.

Theories

Evolution

Cell Theory

Laws

Biology: Mendelian Inheritance

Physics, Chemistry, Math- Lots!!!!

The Blind Men and the Elephant (Saxe; 1816-1887)I.

It was six men of IndostanTo learn much inclined,

Who went to see the elephant(Though all of them were blind),

That each by observationMight satisfy their mind.

II.The First approached the elephant,

And happened to fallAgainst his broad sturdy side,

At once began to bawl:“Bless me!—but the Elephant is very like a wall!”

III.The Second, feeling of the tusk ,Cried, “Ho!—what have we here

So very round and smooth and sharp?To me ‘t is mighty clear

This wonder of an ElephantIs very like a spear!”

IV.The Third approached the animal,

And happening to takeThe squirming trunk within his hands,

Thus boldly up and spake:“I see,” quoth he, “the Elephant

Is very like a snake!”

V.The Fourth reached out his eager hand,

And felt about the knee.“What most this wondrous beast is like

Is might plain’” quoth he;“‘T is clear enough the Elephant

Is very like a tree!”

VI.The Fifth, who chanced to touch the ear,

Said, “E’en the blindest manCan tell what this resembles most;

Deny the fact who can,This marvel of an Elephant

Is very like a fan!”

VII.The Sixth no sooner had begun

About the beast to grope,Than seizing on the swinging tail

That fell within his scope,“I see,” quoth he, “the Elephant

Is very like a rope!”

VIII.And so these men of Indostan

Disputed loud and long,Each with his own opinionExceeding stiff and strong,

Though each was partly in the right,And all were in the wrong!

Moral.

So, oft in these theological wars

The disputants, I ween,

Rail on in utter ignorance

Of what each other mean,

And prate about an elephant

Not one of them has seen!

The Blind Men and the Elephant, Part 2,

I.They talked, those men from Indostan

While standing at the door,Of elephants and how they looked

(This talk was such a bore!),At last they agreed that the knowledge gained

Required something more.

II.Perhaps each one in his own way,

Did learn a bitOf the beast’s elusive mystery,

But just a part of itWith work, they thought, that they might see

The puzzle pieces fit.

III.‘Twas obvious to all of them

For learning to progress,That they must share in what they found—

Jointly sort out the mess.And seek to fully understand

Elephants, more or less.

IV.Some worked alone and some in teams,

In both the field and lab.Models were made: some soft, some hard

Some good, some pretty bad.But when they pooled the useful work,

And truth they made a grab.

V.They checked each other’s methods out,

Some kept, some put asunder.To use the ones which passed the test

Reduced the chance of blunder.Then they’d trust what they had learned

Of elephants’ fine wonders.

VI.They made great strides in what they knew

Of the nature of the beast.Of what and where and how and why

They knew much more at least.For blind men learned how best to learn

And vision soon increased!

Inquiry1. What is the difference between a

hypothesis, theory and law?2. Can a theory ever be proven?3. In the mangrove study, what is the

dependent variable?4. State Ben Franklin’s hypothesis.5. In Paine’s study on Pisaster, what

role did blue mussels play?

QUESTION: Review

Which is the correct order of the scientific method?

a) Observation, question, hypothesis, testing, results

b) Hypothesis, observation, testing, resultsc) Question, observation, testing, results,

hypothesisd) observation, question,testing, hypothesis,

results

QUESTION: Interpreting Graphs and Data

What happens if test results reject a hypothesis?

a) The scientist formulates a new hypothesis.

b) It shows the test failed.c) The scientist should be

fired.d) The scientist used faulty

data .