31
What was different about the FallSafe approach? 1.It was evidence-based 2.It prioritised the things we struggle with 3.It was multidisciplinary 4.The basic equipment they would need was made available

What was different about the FallSafe approach?

  • Upload
    marlow

  • View
    43

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

DESCRIPTION

What was different about the FallSafe approach?. It was evidence-based It prioritised the things we struggle with It was multidisciplinary The basic equipment they would need was made available. What was different about the FallSafe approach?. It was evidence-based - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Citation preview

Page 1: What was different about the FallSafe approach?

What was different about the FallSafe approach?1. It was evidence-based2. It prioritised the things we struggle with3. It was multidisciplinary4. The basic equipment they would need

was made available

Page 2: What was different about the FallSafe approach?
Page 3: What was different about the FallSafe approach?

What was different about the FallSafe approach?1. It was evidence-based2. It prioritised the things we struggle with3. It was multidisciplinary4. Basic equipment available5. The care bundle was implemented in stages

rather than all at once6. We measured delivery at least every month

Page 4: What was different about the FallSafe approach?
Page 5: What was different about the FallSafe approach?

Baseline Project end Six months later

1 Call Bell in reach 91% 98% 99%

2 Cognitive screen 50% 78% 63%

3 Asked about fear of falling 29% 68% 71%

4 History of falls taken 81% 89% 96%

5 Lying Standing BP 25% 50% 43%

6 Medication review 42% 84% 72%

7 Night sedation not given 82% 87% 90%

8 Safe footwear on feet 91% 97% 99%

9 Urine dip-test 63% 78% 82%

Page 6: What was different about the FallSafe approach?
Page 7: What was different about the FallSafe approach?

What was different about the FallSafe approach?

1. It was evidence-based2. It prioritised the things we struggle with3. It was multidisciplinary4. Basic equipment available5. The care bundle was implemented in stages6. We measured delivery at least every month7. We didn’t expect results to show overnight

Page 8: What was different about the FallSafe approach?
Page 9: What was different about the FallSafe approach?

What was different about the FallSafe approach?

1. It was evidence-based2. It prioritised the things we struggle with3. It was multidisciplinary4. Basic equipment available5. The care bundle was implemented in stages6. We measured delivery at least every month7. We didn’t expect results to show overnight8. We let patients be the judge

Page 10: What was different about the FallSafe approach?
Page 11: What was different about the FallSafe approach?

What was different about the FallSafe approach?

1. It was evidence-based2. It prioritised the things we struggle with3. It was multidisciplinary4. Basic equipment available5. The care bundle was implemented in stages6. We measured delivery at least every month7. We didn’t expect results to show overnight8. We let patients be the judge 9. We created a ‘safe space’

Page 12: What was different about the FallSafe approach?

“It’s a safe environment to talk about it – no one is standing over you saying ‘why have you had ten falls?’ – so you can really think about what can prevent them”

“Where do you buy your slippersocks? ”

“If we can do it, surely you can!”

Peer support and challenge

Page 13: What was different about the FallSafe approach?

Changing mindsets

“It used to be just one of those things you expected to happen; now it’s a big deal if a patient does fall and everyone will be thinking, ok, let’s try this or that – we know we can do something about it”

Page 14: What was different about the FallSafe approach?

What was different about the FallSafe approach?

1. It was evidence-based2. It prioritised the things we struggle with3. It was multidisciplinary4. Basic equipment available5. The care bundle was implemented in stages6. We measured delivery at least every month7. We didn’t expect results to show overnight8. We let patients be the judge 9. We created a ‘safe space’ 10. We gave each FallSafe lead enough education and support to make them confident

and knowledgeable

Page 15: What was different about the FallSafe approach?

FallSafe: training and support

Page 16: What was different about the FallSafe approach?

eLearning focused on nurses’ role

Page 17: What was different about the FallSafe approach?
Page 18: What was different about the FallSafe approach?
Page 19: What was different about the FallSafe approach?

“ Oh yes, the Occupational Therapists always do MMSE – they’ll be in the OT notes in their office somewhere”

“That’s a doctors’ job”

“We would do an AMTS when we notice that a patient’s confused…..”

19

Starting point for some FallSafe units

Page 20: What was different about the FallSafe approach?

20

Page 21: What was different about the FallSafe approach?

Delirium assessment?

Page 22: What was different about the FallSafe approach?

Key thinking 1. Are they confused?

• using an objective assessment like AMTS2. Is the confusion new/different?

• talk to their family & friends • listen to the last shift each handover • notice changes since your days off

3. Think of apathetic delirium • Remember they can be delirious without being agitated

“Could this be delirium?”

Page 23: What was different about the FallSafe approach?
Page 24: What was different about the FallSafe approach?

Special observation

24

Page 25: What was different about the FallSafe approach?

Intentional rounding: if you do use

Don’t standardise, individualise

Minimise documentation

Remember:– Communication skills in dementia – An hour is a long time

Page 26: What was different about the FallSafe approach?

Leadership commitment……

“I’d like to do FallSafe in my hospital, but we won’t be able to give staff for any training”

“ Two hours of eLearning is a bit much – can’t you do a version that covers everything in 15 minutes?”

Page 27: What was different about the FallSafe approach?

Provision of walking aids at weekends

Royal College of Physicians 2012 Clinical Effectiveness and Evaluation Unit Report of the 2011 inpatient falls pilot audit www.rcplondon.ac.uk

Page 28: What was different about the FallSafe approach?

Sometimes falls is not the priority

• 50 bed unit• No permanent unit manager in post• 30-40% temporary staff• Three FallSafe leads left in quick

succession

Page 29: What was different about the FallSafe approach?

2001 censusPeople aged 75 years or more

3,704,945

Hospital admission statistics 2006People aged 75 years or more

admitted as inpatients3,174,676

You will meet most of your patients again…..

Page 30: What was different about the FallSafe approach?

Separate to FallSafe but not to be forgotten

Page 31: What was different about the FallSafe approach?

Last words

Questions and comment? [email protected]

@FrancesHealey