Upload
gil
View
19
Download
0
Tags:
Embed Size (px)
DESCRIPTION
What we learned about isotopes. Elizabeth Sulzman. Problem 1: Sources of nitrate in ground water. The ground water in your area exceeds the EPA standard of 10 ppm of nitrate. What nitrate sources are responsible?. 3 possible sources 2 isotopic signatures measured in sources and groundwater. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Citation preview
What we learned about isotopes
Elizabeth Sulzman
The ground water in your area exceeds the EPA standard of 10 ppm of nitrate. What nitrate sources are responsible?
Problem 1: Sources of nitrate in ground water
δ15N (‰) δ18O (‰)
ground water 14 (sd=1) 3 (sd=1)
fertilizer 1 (sd=1) 25 (sd=1)
soil organic N 3 (sd=1) 1 (sd=1)
livestock manure
16 (sd=1) 1 (sd=1)
3 possible sources
2 isotopic signatures measured in sources and groundwater
Problem 1: Sources of nitrate in ground water
Problem 1: Sources of nitrate in ground water
Problem 1: Sources of nitrate in ground water
Problem 2
What is the isotopic composition of soil respiration from a 40-yr-old stand dominated by Douglas-fir in the Cascade mountains of central Oregon.
Problem 2
What is the isotopic composition of soil respiration from a 40-yr-old stand dominated by Douglas-fir in the Cascade mountains of central Oregon.
• Differences north / south slopes?• Spatial aggregation to watershed level
Small scale Keeling plots • Soils & Foliage• North & South facing slopes• At different elevations
Watershed level Keeling plot
Keeling plotsKeeling (1958)
Cmix = Cbg + Csource
mixCmix = bgCbg + sourceCsource
mixCmix = bgCbg + source (Cmix – Cbg)
mixCmix = (bg - source)Cbg + source Cmix
mix = (bg - source)Cbg / Cmix+ source
mix = (slope)*(1/Cmix) + source
Keeling plot: mix = (slope)*(1/Cmix) + source
Hypothesis:North facing slope has a more negative (lighter) isotopic signature due to:1.Lower water stress2.Lower temperature
Isotopic signature soil respiration
Isotopic signature soil respiration
Difference in isotopic signatures between north and south facing slope not large enough ?
Problem 3: Contributions of C3 and C4 to ecosystem respiration
Miranda et al. 1997
Sampling height (m)
13C of canopy
air
canopy air [CO2]
Species 13C veg
15-7.9 351
Andropogon spp.
-12.9
13.5-8.5 370
Syagrus comosa
-28.8
9
-9.6 410
Annona crassiflora
-30.2
5
-10.3 430
Melinis minutiflora
-13.4
1-10.9 450
Palicourea rigida
-26.1
Problem 3: Contributions of C3 and C4 to ecosystem respiration
Miranda et al. 1997
Sampling height (m)
13C of canopy
air
canopy air [CO2]
Species 13C veg
15-7.9 351
Andropogon spp.
-12.9
13.5-8.5 370
Syagrus comosa
-28.8
9
-9.6 410
Annona crassiflora
-30.2
5
-10.3 430
Melinis minutiflora
-13.4
1-10.9 450
Palicourea rigida
-26.1
Problem 3: Contributions of C3 and C4 to ecosystem respiration
Miranda et al. 1997
Sampling height (m)
13C of canopy
air
canopy air [CO2]
Species 13C veg
15-7.9 351
Andropogon spp.
-12.9
13.5-8.5 370
Syagrus comosa
-28.8
9
-9.6 410
Annona crassiflora
-30.2
5
-10.3 430
Melinis minutiflora
-13.4
1-10.9 450
Palicourea rigida
-26.1
13C veg sd
C3 plants -28.3667 2.084067
C4 plants -13.15 0.353553
Ecosystem respiration
-21.4107 0.977209
Two source mixing model:54 +/- 7 % of ecosystem respiration stems from C3 sources.
On to radioactive isotopes …