Upload
others
View
1
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Reenergizing, advising, and
setting the path for
improvement efforts of the
Whatcom County dependency
court through the
Table of Ten
Whatcom County Table of Ten
ReVision Meeting
1.What we do well is…
1.If we could be a State leader in one area of our practice, I think it should be…
Fishbowl
1. Conversation about the Table of Ten and its work.
2. Break – gather questions
3. Resume, adding empty chair, talking about questions.
Data Presentation for Whatcom Dependency Court
Table of Ten ReVision
April 19, 2019
Median time to outcome? If you consider all the children who exited to an outcome in a particular year, 50% of them exited to that outcome by the “median months to outcome” number. (Note: the other half of the children took longer – this measure is often expressed in “median time to outcome” to eliminate unusually long-stayers from the “average” calculation.) Ex. Of all children in Whatcom County who exited to adoption in 2017, half of them had been in care 25 months or fewer, the other half longer (blue circle below).
Yellow highlighted numbers: percentage of children exiting to that outcome in 2018, out of all children exiting care in 2018.
Court Name WhatcomEpisode Exit Year 2018
Gender (All)
Race (All)
Age At Filing (All)
Age At Discharge (All)
Month LOS
FAMLINK Episode Outcome Values (A) <15mnths (B) 15-24mnths (C) >24mnths Grand Total
Adoptions Cnt 12 27 39
% Row 0% 31% 69% 100%
% Column 0% 24% 44% 29%
Age of Majority/Emancipation Cnt 1 6 7
% Row 0% 14% 86% 100%
% Column 0% 2% 10% 5%
Deceased Cnt 1 1
% Row 0% 0% 100% 100%
% Column 0% 0% 2% 1%
Guardianships Cnt 1 4 5
% Row 0% 20% 80% 100%
% Column 0% 2% 6% 4%
Reunifications Cnt 21 32 17 70
% Row 30% 46% 24% 100%
% Column 95% 65% 27% 53%
Transfer of Custody Cnt 1 3 3 7
% Row 14% 43% 43% 100%
% Column 5% 6% 5% 5%
Extended FC Services Ending Cnt 4 4
% Row 0% 0% 100% 100%
% Column 0% 0% 6% 3%
Total Cnt 22 49 62 133
Court Name ThurstonEpisode Exit Year 2018
Gender (All)
Race (All)
Age At Filing (All)
Age At Discharge (All)
Month LOS
FAMLINK Episode Outcome Values (A) <15mnths (B) 15-24mnths (C) >24mnths Grand Total
Adoptions Cnt 3 9 21 33
% Row 9% 27% 64% 100%
% Column 8% 21% 40% 25%
Age of Majority/Emancipation Cnt 8 8
% Row 0% 0% 100% 100%
% Column 0% 0% 15% 6%
Guardianships Cnt 2 3 6 11
% Row 18% 27% 55% 100%
% Column 5% 7% 12% 8%
Reunifications Cnt 32 29 15 76
% Row 42% 38% 20% 100%
% Column 86% 67% 29% 58%
Transfer of Custody Cnt 1 1
% Row 0% 100% 0% 100%
% Column 0% 2% 0% 1%
Extended FC Services Ending Cnt 1 2 3
% Row 0% 33% 67% 100%
% Column 0% 2% 4% 2%
Total Cnt 37 43 52 132
Total % Row 28% 33% 39% 100%
Total % Column 100% 100% 100% 100%
Court Name StateEpisode Exit Year 2018
Gender (All)
Race (All)
Age At Filing (All)
Age At Discharge (All)
Month LOS
FAMLINK Episode Outcome Values (A) <15mnths (B) 15-24mnths (C) >24mnths Grand Total
Adoptions Cnt 30 269 985 1284
% Row 2% 21% 77% 100%
% Column 3% 26% 48% 31%
Age of Majority/Emancipation Cnt 15 11 137 163
% Row 9% 7% 84% 100%
% Column 1% 1% 7% 4%
Deceased Cnt 5 4 3 12
% Row 42% 33% 25% 100%
% Column 0% 0% 0% 0%
Guardianships Cnt 50 91 160 301
% Row 17% 30% 53% 100%
% Column 4% 9% 8% 7%
Reunifications Cnt 994 632 630 2256
% Row 44% 28% 28% 100%
% Column 88% 62% 31% 54%
Transfer of Custody Cnt 24 7 7 38
% Row 63% 18% 18% 100%
% Column 2% 1% 0% 1%
Extended FC Services Ending Cnt 13 6 113 132
% Row 10% 5% 86% 100%
% Column 1% 1% 6% 3%
Total Cnt 1131 1020 2035 4186
Total % Row 27% 24% 49% 100%
Total % Column 100% 100% 100% 100%
2015 2016 2017 2018 2019
Mason 90% 74% 60% 76% 94%
Skagit 75% 70% 65% 77% 79%
Thurston 70% 67% 77% 88% 88%
Whatcom 95% 78% 76% 80% 64%
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
(1) Fact Finding 75
2015 2016 2017 2018 2019
Mason 95% 93% 76% 85% 84%
Skagit 83% 94% 81% 74% 95%
Thurston 87% 69% 88% 93% 95%
Whatcom 92% 94% 93% 94% 95%
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
(2) First Review 6mnths
2015 2016 2017 2018 2019
Mason 95% 93% 83% 82% 100%
Skagit 96% 76% 85% 78% 100%
Thurston 87% 96% 91% 96% 100%
Whatcom 91% 88% 95% 92% 100%
0%10%20%30%40%50%60%70%80%90%
100%(4) Perm Planning 12mnths
2015 2016 2017 2018 2019
Mason 77% 55% 75% 76% 100%
Skagit 74% 81% 67% 37% 100%
Thurston 88% 93% 87% 90% 100%
Whatcom 62% 65% 45% 50% 100%
0%10%20%30%40%50%60%70%80%90%
100%(5) Term Pet 15mnths
2015 2016 2017 2018 2019
Mason 27% 54% 57% 30%
Skagit 23% 31% 30% 24%
Thurston 36% 27% 26% 29%
Whatcom 21% 24% 24% 17%
0%10%20%30%40%50%60%70%80%90%
100%(7) Perm Outcome 15mnths
2015 2016 2017 2018 2019
Mason 36% 17% 9% 8%
Skagit 55% 69% 41% 40%
Thurston 32% 47% 44% 26%
Whatcom 61% 60% 55% 36%
0%10%20%30%40%50%60%70%80%90%
100%
(6) Adopt 6mnths
TPR Pet. Filed or, “good cause” found, by 15 of past 22 months out-of-home care.
2015 2016 2017 2018 2019
Mason 3% 9% 2% 8% 4%
Skagit 10% 10% 4% 9% 7%
Thurston 5% 2% 5% 4% 3%
Whatcom 6% 4% 15% 7% 23%
0%
5%
10%
15%
20%
25%
(3) Prior Dependency
71% were 1-5
2018
Percent % DPP Filing Year
Court Name Demographic Demo Values 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018
Whatcom Age at Filing (1) <1 yrs 24% 30% 25% 27% 39%
(2) 1-2 yrs 21% 17% 20% 16% 11%
(3) 3-5 yrs 18% 15% 23% 17% 21%
(4) 6-11 yrs 21% 26% 23% 24% 22%
(5) 12-17 yrs 15% 12% 10% 16% 7%
(6) >17 yrs 1% 1%
Gender (1) Female 48% 46% 48% 53% 48%
(2) Male 52% 54% 52% 47% 52%
Race (1) AI/AN 7% 15% 19% 15% 27%
(2) Asian/PI 1% 1% 1%
(3) Black 4% 2% 1% 1%
(4) White 56% 59% 49% 52% 40%
(5) Hispanic 22% 11% 12% 12% 14%
(6) AI/AN-Multi 11% 7% 7% 11% 8%
(7) Black-Multi 3% 4% 10% 6% 5%
(8) Other-Multi 1% 1% 1% 3%
(9) Unknown 1%
Whatcom(520 Active
Cases - 2018)
Cont. rate dropping faster
than Caseload.
Continuances
Continuance Order Values 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019
ORDER OF CONTINUANCE Continuance Cnts 641 587 676 799 402 100
Count of Cases 280 249 294 273 180 57
ORDER FOR CONTINUANCE: STIPULATED Continuance Cnts
Count of Cases
ORDER FOR CONTINUANCE: SETTING Continuance Cnts
Count of Cases
ORDER FOR CONTINUANCE: PLAINTIFF ATTORNEY REQUESTED Continuance Cnts
Count of Cases
ORDER FOR CONTINUANCE: DEFENSE ATTORNEY REQUESTED Continuance Cnts
Count of Cases
ORDER FOR CONTINUANCE: CALENDAR CONFLICT Continuance Cnts
Count of Cases
ORDER FOR CONTINUANCE OF TRIAL DATE Continuance Cnts
Count of Cases
ORDER FOR CONT: COURT MANDATED Continuance Cnts
Count of Cases