Upload
gomer
View
26
Download
1
Embed Size (px)
DESCRIPTION
When Efficient Model Averaging Out-Perform Bagging and Boosting. Ian Davidson, SUNY Albany Wei Fan, IBM T.J.Watson. Ensemble Techniques. Techniques such as boosting and bagging are methods of combining models. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Citation preview
When Efficient Model Averaging Out-Perform Bagging and Boosting
Ian Davidson, SUNY Albany
Wei Fan, IBM T.J.Watson
Ensemble Techniques
• Techniques such as boosting and bagging are methods of combining models.
• Used extensively in ML and DM seems to work well in a large variety of situations.
• But model averaging is the “correct” Bayesian method of using multiple models.
• Does model averaging have a place in ML and DM?
What is Model Averaging?
Posterior weighting
Class Probability
Integration Over Model Space
Averaging of class probabilities weighted by posterior
Removes model uncertainty by averaging
Prohibitive for large model spacessuch as decision trees
Efficient Model Averaging:PBMA and Random DT
• PBMA (Davidson 04): parametric bootstrap model averaging– Use parametric model to generate multiple bootstraps
computed from a single training set.• Random Decision Tree (Fan et al 03)
– Construct each tree’s structure randomly• Categorical feature used once in a decision path• Random threshold for continuous features.
– Leaf node statistics estimated from data.– Average probability of multiple trees.
Our Empirical Study
• Idea: When model uncertainty occurs, model averaging should perform well
• Four specific but common situations when factoring in model uncertainty is beneficial– Class label noise– Many label problem– Sample selection bias– Small data sets
Class Label Noise
• Randomly flip 10% of labels
Data Set with Many Classes
Biased Training Sets
• See ICDM 2005 for a formal analysis• See KDD 2006 to look at estimating accuracy• See ICDM 2006 for a case study
Universe of Examples
Two classes:red and green
red: f2>f1green: f2<=f1
Unbiased and Biased Samples
Single Decision Tree
Unbiased 97.1% Biased 92.1%
Random Decision Tree
Unbiased 96.9% Biased 95.9%
Bagging
Unbiased 97.82% Biased 93.52%
PBMA
Unbiased 99.08% Biased 94.55
Boosting
Unbiased 96.405% Biased 92.7%
Scope of This Paper
• Identifies conditions where model averaging should outperform bagging and boosting.
• Empirically verifies these claims.
• Other questions:– Why does bagging and boosting perform
badly in these conditions?