Upload
bryce-nichols
View
214
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Who has the Profit and Loss Responsibility in
Your Company?
Presented by:
Fletcher L. Groves, III
Vice President
SAI Consulting
What’s behind the Question?
� The inescapable conclusion that a lot of what we do doesn’t work.– Business Performance Improvement
initiatives as just one example.
� What’s missing?– We are missing a context – a business
context – in which everything we are trying to do makes more sense.
The Human Dimension
“ . . . The human dimension of business – the wanting, the caring, the enthusiasm, the problem-solving, the initiative-taking – is where more and more of the competitive battles are being won and lost . . . the only way for a company to boost performance consistently over the long haul is to have employees who work enthusiastically and effectively, and . . . take responsibility for their own work.”
- John Case, The Open-Book Experience
“What is the greatest managerial challenge facing your company today?”
- SAI’s 1997 Reference Point survey
0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50
Employees
Profitability
Land
Processes and Structure
Subcontractor Quality
Marketing/Sales
Growth and Expansion
All Others (less than 3%)
Employee Selection, Training, and Motivation
Complexity, Financing, Government Regulation, Systems, Product Design, Competition
“What is the greatest managerial challenge facing your company today?”
- SAI’s 1996 and 1997 Reference Point survey
0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50
Employees
Profitability
Land
Processes and Structure
1997
1996
Managements’ Perspective
� The only people that need to be concerned with financial performance are owners and senior managers.
� Employees can perform their jobs without understanding the way they impact profitability and economic return.
� Companies are the sum of their individual parts.
Employees’ Perspective
“That’s your job. Don’t hold me accountable for ‘profitability’ – or anything related to ‘business performance’ – if you won’t . . .
let me see the numbers,
let me make decisions, and
give me a stake in the outcome”
The Frustration and the Fear
� Owners and senior managers are powerless to drive needed improvement in operating and financial performance.
� Employees look out for their self-interests, but they don’t have the power to insure their own job – or financial – security.
� The walls of mistrust and self-interest are built.
The Real Failure
1. We have failed to build a connection between better business performance, and the interests of those who must make it happen.
2. We have spent too much time on the what and the how-to, and ignored the why and the want-to.
Making the Case
� Companies perform better when employees see themselves as the partners in the business, instead of its hired hands.
� Everything else – the strategies, the performance initiatives, the decision-making – makes more sense within this new business context.
When you are a Company ofBusiness-people:
1. Everyone sees and learns to understand the operating and financial numbers.
2. Everyone has the responsibility and authority for moving the right numbers in the right direction.
3. Everyone has a financial stake in the outcome.
What does it do?
� Teaching them the business and being transparent with the numbers makes your employees savvy.
� Handing them responsibility and authority makes your employees mutually-accountable.
� Giving them a stake in the outcome motivates your employees and gives them a future.
You probably don’t wantto go there if . . .
. . . losing what you never had bothers you.
. . . you don’t like living in a fish bowl.
. . . you have all the answers.
. . . you want to make all the decisions.
. . . you are smarter than your employees.
. . . you like carrying people on your back.
. . . you really don’t like having fun.
When you are a Company ofBusiness-people:
1. Everyone sees and learns to understand the operating and financial numbers.
2. Everyone has the responsibility and authority for moving the right numbers in the right direction.
3. Everyone has a financial stake in the outcome.
Creating Transparency
� Everyone has to see – and learn to understand – the real operating and financial numbers of the business.
� Everyone has to be able to connect their day-to-day jobs and decision-making – to the company’s overall financial goals.
“How often do you discuss the details of the company’s financial performance with your employees?”
- SAI’s 1997 Reference Point survey
0 5 10 15 20 25 30
Never
Only as needed
Once a year
Twice a year
Quarterly
Every other month
Monthly
Twice a month
Weekly
“Our employees understand how the work they perform relates to the company’s financial performance.”
- SAI’s 1997 Reference Point survey
0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50
Describes very well
Describes somewhat
Describes a little
Doesn't describe at all
Have no idea
Understanding the Numbers
� Generic to Industry-specific� Financial Statements
– Income Statement– Balance Sheet– Cash Flow Statement
� Business Plans and Budgets� Compensation� Learn by DOING and make it FUN!!
Connecting Operating Drivers to Financial Outcomes
� Understanding – from an operational standpoint – what happens to money in a homebuilding company.
� Understanding the impact the operational perspective of money has on financial measures, like Net Profit and Return on Investment.
What happens to money?
� Throughput (T) = the rate at which a builder generates money through sales.
� Inventory (I) = all the money a builder invests in things it intends to sell.
� Operating Expense (OE) = all the money a builder spends turning Inventory into Throughput.
The Impact on Profitability and Economic Return
Productivity = Throughput ÷ Expense
Inventory Turns = Throughput ÷ Inventory
Net Profit = Throughput - Expense
ROA = (Throughput - Expense) ÷ Inventory
Seeing the Real Numbers
� The operating and financial numbers need to be presented and discussed:– Currently– Collaboratively and Collectively– Concisely and Comprehensively– Consistently
- Format- Frequency
– Conspicuously and Creatively
When you are Company ofBusiness-people:
1. Everyone sees and learns to understand the operating and financial numbers.
2. Everyone has the responsibility and authority for moving the right numbers in the right direction.
3. Everyone has a financial stake in the outcome.
Developing Accountabilityand Responsibility
� Mutual Accountability and Responsibility.� Accountability and Responsibility cannot
exist without Ownership.� Ownership requires Involvement (in the
planning process) and Authority (to make decisions).
� The will to get involved, to exercise Authority, and to assume Responsibility requires Transparency and Freedom.
“We expect a higher level of job performance (solutions and decision-making) from our senior managers . . .”
- SAI’s 1997 Reference Point survey
0 10 20 30 40 50 60
Describes very well
Describes somewhat
Describes a little
Doesn't describe at all
Have no idea
“Our employees believe that their job security is based on individual job performance.”
- SAI’s 1997 Reference Point survey
0 10 20 30 40 50 60
Describes very well
Describes somewhat
Describes a little
Doesn't describe at all
Have no idea
“Our employees view their job responsibilities in terms of their job descriptions.”
- SAI’s 1997 Reference Point survey
0 10 20 30 40 50 60
Describes very well
Describes somewhat
Describes a little
Doesn't describe at all
Have no idea
Moving the Right Numbers in the Right Direction
� Involvement starts with planning – employees won’t take ownership of OPB (Other People’s Budgets).– Sales and Marketing Plan– Operating Plan and Budget
� Employees won’t take ownership of OPD (Other People’s Decisions).
� There must be a structure for presenting, discussing, and challenging numbers that allows bottom-up decision-making to take place.
� Employees won’t take ownership of OPN (Other People’s Numbers) – they have to have line-of-sight responsibility for their numbers.
� The numbers that reflect expenses are important – but the numbers that drive the rate of revenue generation are critical.
When you are a Company ofBusiness-people:
1. Everyone sees and learns to understand the operating and financial numbers.
2. Everyone has the responsibility and authority for moving the right numbers in the right direction.
3. Everyone has a financial stake in the outcome.
“Performance-based compensation for all of our employees . . . exceeds 20% of total compensation.”
- SAI’s 1997 Reference Point survey
0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50
Describes very well
Describes somewhat
Describes a little
Doesn't describe at all
Have no idea
“Our employees know . . . bonuses and profit-sharing before the numbers come in at the end of the year.”
- SAI’s 1997 Reference Point survey
0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40
Describes very well
Describes somewhat
Describes a little
Doesn't describe at all
Have no idea
“We believe employee stock ownership is a relevant issue for our company.”
- SAI’s 1997 Reference Point survey
0 10 20 30 40 50 60
Describes very well
Describes somewhat
Describes a little
Doesn't describe at all
Have no idea
Rewarding the Outcome
� It must place a bounty on the financial performance you want to achieve.
� It must be about compensation and equity, not just recognition and games.
� It must define performance as the achievement of commonly-held goals.
� It must change peoples’ behavior.
Eliminating Unproductive Compensation
� Eliminating performance compensation paid regardless of performance.
� Eliminating divisive and discriminatory compensation.– Compensation based on individual job
performance.– Bonuses for specific positions.– Bonuses exclusive to management (the
exceptions are equity or deferred comp).
Designing Bonus Plans
� Focused (critical numbers).� Simple, straightforward, and equitable� Self-funding.� Uncompromising (100%).� Non-discretionary.� Visible.� Significant (10% - 20% of total comp).� Progressive (weighted payouts).
Real Ownership
� Equity: Crossing the Rubicon. – Mentality (the end of short-term thinking).– Walls (the end of “us versus them”).
� Equity: Is it important?� Stock ownership vehicles:
– Employee Stock Ownership Plans (ESOP)– Stock Options– 401-K
Becoming a Company of Business-people
� If you start now, 2003 is realistic.� In every company, the process starts
somewhere – it might as well start with you.
– Find out more.– Start asking others “What if . . .?”
� Get a realistic picture of where you stand and the problems you will encounter.
� Start teaching business.– Make it part of the landscape.
– Formal doesn’t mean boring.– Mandatory doesn’t mean onerous.
– Start simple and generic.– Move to detailed and industry-specific.– People learn by doing – use games.
� Start sharing the real numbers.– Make it part of the landscape.– Focus on the critical numbers.– Connect the drivers to the outcomes.
� Get rid of the constraints and problems.– Policies– Compensation– People
� Push Involvement – put your freshly minted business-people in charge of producing the 2003 Business Plan.
� Develop a regular, consistent structure for presenting, discussing, and challenging the numbers.
� For 2003, find a new bonus plan.– My recommendation? Go with a pool plan
in lieu of a fixed payment plan.– 6-8 gross profit buckets per year– funded 100% by the increase in net profit – progressive weighting– 100% participation– salary – no commissions– blended allocation (50-50)– paid within one week, not tied to the calendar
Did you get it?
� RULE I– Everyone sees and understands the
numbers.
� RULE II– Everyone has the authority and
responsibility for improving performance.
� RULE III– Everyone has a stake in the outcome.
Questions and Information
Fletcher Groves is a Vice President and Senior Consultant with SAI Consulting, LLC. He can be reached at (904) 273-9840, or by
e-mail at [email protected].
A download version of this PowerPoint presentation will be available on the SAI
website at www.saiconsulting.com.