Upload
lynn-summers
View
216
Download
1
Tags:
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Who We Are and Why We are Here?
PaCOOS Presentation to Chet Koblinski, Ned Cyr and Jack Dunnigan
Scripps Institution of Oceanography, 6 June 2005
We are oceanographers and fisheries scientists concerned with the California Current System, the impact of climate variability on ecosystems, and ecosystem-based fisheries management.
We are appealing to NOAA to bring the power of its climate research program, ocean climate observing system, and fisheries research enterprise to study climate impacts on the California Current System Large Marine Ecosystem.
Many of us are involved in planning the Pacific Coast Ocean Observing System (PaCOOS)
Why Study Climate Impacts on Ecosystems in the California Current?
1. There is large, economically important variability of the CCS ecosystem that is connected to physical climate variability by mechanisms that are not well understood.
2. 56-years of study provides a foundation of data, hypotheses and models on climate forcing of the ecosystem as well as a multi-disciplinary collaborative team committed to studying the phenomena.
3. There is a range of physical mechanisms by which physical climate affects the ecosystem and a range of species that respond differently to these different mechanisms.
Line 80 Line 90 of the CalCOFI Survey
Nutricline Depth
Vertically-Integrated Chlorophyll (0-100m)
Zooplankton Biomass
El Niño
La Niña
Bograd and Lynn (2001)
• Rapid changes in physical structure and biological response
• El Niño: deep thermocline, low productivity
• La Niña: shallow thermocline, high productvity
• Monthly sampling needed to observe El Niño evolution
Jan 1996
Oct 1999
ENSO Interannual Variability
(from Peterson and Schwing, 2003)
CCS zooplankton volume
OR coho survival
Northern copepods
Decadal Climate and Ecosystem
Variability
80% decline
Correlation is more than coincidental but mechanisms are unknown
Pacific Salmon Populations
When Alaska salmon When Alaska salmon are abundantare abundant
Washington-OregonWashington-Oregoncatches are lowcatches are low
20001900(from Mantua et al., 1997)
Sardine Has an Environmentally
Based Harvest PlanWhen 3-year SST drops below 16.85 oC the allocation drops to 5% of harvestable biomass
Why Study Climate Impacts on Ecosystems in the California Current?
1. There is large, economically important variability of the CCS ecosystem that is connected to physical climate variability by mechanisms that are not well understood.
2. 56-years of study provides a foundation of data, hypotheses and models on climate forcing of the ecosystem as well as a multi-disciplinary collaborative team committed to studying the phenomena.
3. There is a range of physical mechanisms by which physical climate affects the ecosystem and a range of species that respond differently to these different mechanisms.
Why Study Climate Impacts on Ecosystems in the California Current?
1. There is large, economically important variability of the CCS ecosystem that is connected to physical climate variability by mechanisms that are not well understood.
2. 56-years of study provides a foundation of data, hypotheses and models on climate forcing of the ecosystem as well as a multi-disciplinary collaborative team committed to studying the phenomena.
3. There is a range of physical mechanisms by which physical climate affects the ecosystem and a range of species that respond differently to these different mechanisms.
Upwelling, mixing and eddies affect nutrient nutrient supply
Temperature, stratification and surface forcing affect behavior and biological rates
Advection affects nutrient supply and plankton/egg distribution
What are Our Goals?To understand the mechanisms for, and extent of, climate variability impacts on CCS ecosystem
To use this understanding to predict the consequences to the ecosystem of changes in climate forcing
What is Our General Strategy?Carefully select species representing different functions in the ecosystem
Observe these species well enough to understand their variability
Use these observations with models/hypotheses to define mechanisms of climate impact on the ecosystem
What We Will DoAccount for
(1) temporal scales from weeks to decades,
(2) spatial scales from meters to mega-meters,
(3) differing climate impacts on organisms according to their life stage, and
(4) strong bio-geographic boundaries and water-mass boundaries that characterize the CCS
Use all observational tools (in ships, satellites, moorings, etc.) to synthesize a comprehensive picture of climate and ecosystem variability in order isolate mechanisms (e.g. mixing vs. upwelling, behavior vs. advection)
Use models to synthesize diverse observations, to link local and basin-scale variability, and encapsulate what is learned.
• Dramatic transition in physical and biological environment
• 2-4°C decrease in coastal SST• Large increase in fluorescence
• Followed establishment of upwelling- favorable winds• Duration of transition < one month• Typical quarterly sampling insufficient to resolve spring transition
Lynn et al. (2003)
Seasonal Variability Dictates Frequent Sampling
Frequent and well-timed sampling is also needed to account for the life stages of pertinent organisms
116°120°124° 116°120°124°
38°
34°
30°
courtesy of F. Schwing (NOAA Fisheries)
Small Scales of Pertinent Variables Must Be Resolved
El Nino Year La Nina Year
Sampling Must Account for Biogeographic Distributions
Climate Variability Impacts Depend on Biogeographic Preferences
What We Will DoAccount for
(1) temporal scales from weeks to decades,
(2) spatial scales from meters to mega-meters,
(3) differing climate impacts on organisms according to their life stage, and
(4) strong bio-geographic boundaries and water-mass boundaries that characterize the CCS
Use all observational tools (in ships, satellites, moorings, etc.) to synthesize a comprehensive picture of climate and ecosystem variability in order isolate mechanisms (e.g. mixing vs. upwelling, behavior vs. advection)
Use models to synthesize diverse observations, link local and basin-scale variability, and encapsulate what is learned.
Accuracy of ocean color products improved for 1996-2005 time period (OCTS, SeaWiFS, MODIS) compared to 1978-1986 (CZCS)
M. Kahru & G. Mitchell
Satellites Will Help Describe Carbon Fluxes
-0.4
-0.3
-0.2
-0.1
0
0.1
0.2
0.3
1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005
Time
EOF_1 NOI
First EOF of Ocean Color (left) shows the response to ENSO as described by the Northern Oscillation (above).
1. Northern oligotrophic gyre2. California coast3. Baja California coast4. Gulf of Tehuantepec and the Costa Rica dome
NOI
Carbon Export Response to El Nino Varies by Region
Export Flux (mg C m-2 day-1) is calculated from Chlorophyll, PAR and SST using the model of Laws (2004)
M. Kahru & G. Mitchell
Stratification and Thermocline Depth Affect Mixing and Upwelling
OFFSHORE COASTAL
Temp
dT/dZ
(dT/dZ)MAX
ThermoclineDepth
What We Will DoAccount for
(1) temporal scales from weeks to decades,
(2) spatial scales from meters to mega-meters,
(3) differing climate impacts on organisms according to their life stage, and
(4) strong bio-geographic boundaries and water-mass boundaries that characterize the CCS
Use all observational tools (in ships, satellites, moorings, etc.) to synthesize a comprehensive picture of climate and ecosystem variability in order isolate mechanisms (e.g. mixing vs. upwelling, behavior vs. advection)
Use models to synthesize diverse observations, link local and basin-scale variability, and encapsulate what is learned.
Models Now Skillfully Analyze and Predict Physical Variability
Courtesy A. Miller
Ecosystem Models Have Limited Skill and Great Promise
Courtesy A. Miller
Summary
1. CCS has special scientific and personnel advantages for studying climate impacts on ecosystems
2. Correlation of climate variability and ecosystem change is evident but mechanisms are unknown, limiting utility for management and prediction
3. An empirically based approach focused on organisms representing different ecosystem functions is proposed
4. NOAA’s climate research program and the ocean climate observing system could assist if climate variability that affects ecosystems were part of their focus
What Follows1. Elizabeth Clarke (NWFSC) will describe the PaCOOS
program to which our pilot project is complementary
2. William Peterson (NWFSC/Newport) will describe the proposed hake and sardine demonstration project
3. Frank Schwing (SWFSC/Monterey) will explain why NOAA needs this project in the California Current System
4. Peter Niiler (SIO) will discuss basic research needs for the California Current
5. The NOAA HQ team will lead a discussion of NOAA needs and plans for climate and ecosystem research in the CCS