Upload
jonathan-ford
View
216
Download
0
Tags:
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
When did the divergence begin?
mid 17th century- Southern economic development Establishment of racial
slavery GREAT STAPLE CROP in
tobacco and other crops that were important to England and Europe.
Rise of a growing plantation sector
Why are the North and South so different?
Differences: Climate Profit possibilities Land/ Natural Resources
PATH DEPENDENCE: The North and South remained distinctly different because once the first decision was made, all future decisions are limited by those previously made.
How did this influence the colonists?
Behavior changed due to the way the colony or region responded to the economic market.
Example: South Climate: Warm- Natural Resources: good for
agriculture. The South had little experimentation to do before
they realized that the land was an agricultural gold mine.
South became organized economically, socially, politically and culturally around the plantation.
Economic Path of the South Tobacco and Rice
quickly found to be staple, money making crops
Led to the dependency on slavery Replaced free and indentured
labor because they were seen as being too expensive
Plantations went up around the South beginning in the 1620s and dominated the South by the 1770s
Who owned the plantations?
A small group of white planters and merchants Shaped the region’s economic development
Wealthy, slave-based economyDependent on agricultural staples for export
to northern Europe40% of the Southern population were slaves
Distribution of Wealth and Southern “strategy”
Southern colonies had extreme inequalities in wealth
Strategy: Benefit a few by exporting staple crops produced by slaves. Owners become wealthy because they
export (sell) MUCH more than their labor expenses.
OutcomesWeak institutional
development and slow growth of:Transportation NetworksUrban systemsEducational organizationReligious organization
The Northern Economic Path
“Lacked economic definition”Did not have exports of high
importance for EnglandNO GREAT STAPLE MARKET
few agricultural slaves ECONOMIC IMPROVISATION
Northern Strategy Economic Improvisation
A strategy based on flexibility and creativity
Flexible business organization
Quick decision making and constant change
Commercial and shipping services
Local AND regional trade
Outcome Slow growth as compared to the South Eventually became very wealthy Made way for future industrialization
BUT: Some northerners were also trying to
make money quickly by developing land, stealing, or trading slaves.
New EnglandOvercame limitations in natural
resources
Combined subsistence activities with local, regional, and international trade Led to strong export earnings and good flow
of importsSteady economic growthHigher living standards for a large portion
of the population
Middle Colonies Most ethnically diverse region NO GREAT STAPLE MARKET Agriculture, manufacturing, and trade
all worked and played off of each other Fertile valleys and great harbors Thousands of agricultural,
manufacturing and commercial activities were pursued
Outcome Family, wage, and indentured labor were used
Slave labor was used as well, but not to the extent of the South
High domestic demand for wheat Good opportunities for all economic activities,
including craft and artisanal jobs. Wealth was distributed more evenly than
in the other 2 regions
Philadelphia and New YorkExcellent harborsGreat trading postsGenerated more jobs for the
Middle Colonies Trading of goods AND
ideas/information Increased productivity Increased wealth
North South
Couldn’t produce valuable plantation staples
Limited value/use of slave labor
Economic balance and diversity
Constant innovation/change
Creative business practices
Early organization around plantation staples
High use of slave labor
No need for creativity due to the large profits that came from plantation agriculture
Led to…North South
Local and regional trade
Relatively equal distribution of wealth
More established social, educational, political and cultural institutions These were made
available to a wide variety of people
Focused on exports Very unequal
distribution of wealth Economic and social
inequalities Inflexible strategies Unskilled slave labor Low-tech Unable to develop
with the North