22
Why is self-efficacy positively associated with activity in older adults? Rachel G. Curtis Tim D. Windsor Flinders Centre for Ageing Studies College of Education, Psychology and Social Work Flinders University

Why is self-efficacy positively associated with activity

  • Upload
    others

  • View
    5

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: Why is self-efficacy positively associated with activity

Why is self-efficacy positively associated with activity in older adults?

Rachel G. CurtisTim D. Windsor

Flinders Centre for Ageing StudiesCollege of Education, Psychology and Social Work

Flinders University

Page 2: Why is self-efficacy positively associated with activity

Why Study Predictors of Activity?

Associated with positive outcomes: • Happiness (Menec, 2003) 

• Life satisfaction (Menec & Chipperfield, 1997)

• Reduced incidence of dementia (Wang et al., 2002) 

• Longevity (Glass et al., 1999)Activity declines with age

Page 3: Why is self-efficacy positively associated with activity

Self‐Efficacy Predicts Activity

Beliefs that one can successfully perform desired behaviours (Bandura, 1977, 1997)

Positively associated with activity in older adults

I can exercise this week

SpecificI can solve problems that come my way

General

Page 4: Why is self-efficacy positively associated with activity

Possible mediators

Perceived ease of activity?

Perceived difficulty 

Perceived demands

Perceivedabilities

Social cognitive theoryWe are more likely to try activities that we think are within our capability

Page 5: Why is self-efficacy positively associated with activity

Possible mediators

Use of adaptive strategies?

Self‐efficacy

Effort Persistence Problem‐solving Compensation

Page 6: Why is self-efficacy positively associated with activity

Method: Participants and Design

• Convenience sample (n = 412) aged 50 to 93 years• Online survey

– General self‐efficacy (Schwarzer & Jerusalem 1995)

– Activity participation (Activity Characteristics Questionnaire; Bielak 2017)

– SOC strategies (selection, optimization, and compensation; Baltes 1999)– Perceived ease of activity (social, physical, and mental activity)

– Covariates

Page 7: Why is self-efficacy positively associated with activity

Method: Analysis

a1*b1 = indirect effect of self‐efficacy on activity via SOC

a2*b2 = indirect effect of self‐efficacy on activity via Perceived Ease of Activity

ActivitySelf‐Efficacy

Perceived Ease of Activity

SOC

a1

a2

b1

b2

Total Effect c

Direct Effect c’

Page 8: Why is self-efficacy positively associated with activity

Method: Analysis

a1*b1 = indirect effect of self‐efficacy on activity via SOC

a2*b2 = indirect effect of self‐efficacy on activity via Perceived Ease of Activity

ActivitySelf‐Efficacy

Perceived Ease of Activity

SOC

a1

a2

b1

b2

Total Effect c

Direct Effect c’

Page 9: Why is self-efficacy positively associated with activity

Method: Analysis

a1*b1 = indirect effect of self‐efficacy on activity via SOC

a2*b2 = indirect effect of self‐efficacy on activity via Perceived Ease of Activity

ActivitySelf‐Efficacy

Perceived Ease of Activity

SOC

a1

a2

b1

b2

Total Effect c

Direct Effect c’

Page 10: Why is self-efficacy positively associated with activity

Method: Analysis

a1*b1 = indirect effect of self‐efficacy on activity via SOC

a2*b2 = indirect effect of self‐efficacy on activity via Perceived Ease of Activity

ActivitySelf‐Efficacy

Perceived Ease of Activity

SOC

a1

a2

b1

b2

Total Effect c

Direct Effect c’

Page 11: Why is self-efficacy positively associated with activity

Results: Social ActivitySOCa1*b10.01 [‐0.02, 0.03] 0.01 [‐0.02, 0.04]

Perceived ease of activity a2*b20.04 [0.02, 0.07]0.04 [0.02, 0.07]

Social Activity

Self‐Efficacy

Perceived Ease of Social Activity

SOC0.13 [0.08, 0.19]0.14 [0.08, 0.21]

0.27 [0.17, 0.36]0.26 [0.15, 0.36]

0.06 [‐0.13, 0.27]0.07 [‐0.12, 0.28]

0.15 [0.09, 0.23]0.17 [0.11, 0.25]

Total Effect 0.09 [0.04, 0.16]0.10 [0.04, 0.17]

Direct Effect 0.05 [‐0.01, 0.11]0.05 [‐0.02, 0.12]

Page 12: Why is self-efficacy positively associated with activity

Results: Social ActivitySOCa1*b10.01 [‐0.02, 0.03] 0.01 [‐0.02, 0.04]

Perceived ease of activity a2*b20.04 [0.02, 0.07]0.04 [0.02, 0.07]

Social Activity

Self‐Efficacy

Perceived Ease of Social Activity

SOC0.13 [0.08, 0.19]0.14 [0.08, 0.21]

0.27 [0.17, 0.36]0.26 [0.15, 0.36]

0.06 [‐0.13, 0.27]0.07 [‐0.12, 0.28]

0.15 [0.09, 0.23]0.17 [0.11, 0.25]

Total Effect 0.09 [0.04, 0.16]0.10 [0.04, 0.17]

Direct Effect 0.05 [‐0.01, 0.11]0.05 [‐0.02, 0.12]

Page 13: Why is self-efficacy positively associated with activity

Results: Social ActivitySOCa1*b10.01 [‐0.02, 0.03] 0.01 [‐0.02, 0.04]

Perceived ease of activity a2*b20.04 [0.02, 0.07]0.04 [0.02, 0.07]

Social Activity

Self‐Efficacy

Perceived Ease of Social Activity

SOC0.13 [0.08, 0.19]0.14 [0.08, 0.21]

0.27 [0.17, 0.36]0.26 [0.15, 0.36]

0.06 [‐0.13, 0.27]0.07 [‐0.12, 0.28]

0.15 [0.09, 0.23]0.17 [0.11, 0.25]

Total Effect 0.09 [0.04, 0.16]0.10 [0.04, 0.17]

Direct Effect 0.05 [‐0.01, 0.11]0.05 [‐0.02, 0.12]

Page 14: Why is self-efficacy positively associated with activity

Results: Physical Activity

Physical Activity

Self‐Efficacy

Perceived Ease of Physical Activity

SOC0.14 [0.08, 0.20]0.14 [0.09, 0.20]

0.21 [0.12, 0.31]0.06 [‐0.01, 0.13]

0.32 [‐0.11, 0.84]0.32 [‐0.09, 0.82]

0.74 [0.56, 0.95]0.61 [0.41, 0.85]

Total Effect 0.18 [0.04, 0.33]0.07 [‐0.07, 0.20]

Direct Effect ‐0.02 [‐0.16, 0.11]‐0.02 [‐0.15, 0.12]

SOCa1*b10.04 [‐0.02, 0.11] 0.04 [‐0.01, 0.11]

Perceived ease of activity a2*b20.16 [0.08, 0.25]0.04 [‐0.01, 0.09]

Page 15: Why is self-efficacy positively associated with activity

Results: Physical Activity

Physical Activity

Self‐Efficacy

Perceived Ease of Physical Activity

SOC0.14 [0.08, 0.20]0.14 [0.09, 0.20]

0.21 [0.12, 0.31]0.06 [‐0.01, 0.13]

0.32 [‐0.11, 0.84]0.32 [‐0.09, 0.82]

0.74 [0.56, 0.95]0.61 [0.41, 0.85]

Total Effect 0.18 [0.04, 0.33]0.07 [‐0.07, 0.20]

Direct Effect ‐0.02 [‐0.16, 0.11]‐0.02 [‐0.15, 0.12]

SOCa1*b10.04 [‐0.02, 0.11] 0.04 [‐0.01, 0.11]

Perceived ease of activity a2*b20.16 [0.08, 0.25]0.04 [‐0.01, 0.09]

Page 16: Why is self-efficacy positively associated with activity

Results: Physical Activity

Physical Activity

Self‐Efficacy

Perceived Ease of Physical Activity

SOC0.14 [0.08, 0.20]0.14 [0.09, 0.20]

0.21 [0.12, 0.31]0.06 [‐0.01, 0.13]

0.32 [‐0.11, 0.84]0.32 [‐0.09, 0.82]

0.74 [0.56, 0.95]0.61 [0.41, 0.85]

Total Effect 0.18 [0.04, 0.33]0.07 [‐0.07, 0.20]

Direct Effect ‐0.02 [‐0.16, 0.11]‐0.02 [‐0.15, 0.12]

SOCa1*b10.04 [‐0.02, 0.11] 0.04 [‐0.01, 0.11]

Perceived ease of activity a2*b20.16 [0.08, 0.25]0.04 [‐0.01, 0.09]

Page 17: Why is self-efficacy positively associated with activity

Results: Mental Activity

Mental Activity

Self‐Efficacy

Perceived Ease of Mental Activity

SOC0.12 [0.08, 0.19]0.13 [0.08, 0.20]

0.19 [0.09, 0.28]0.17 [0.07, 0.28]

0.03 [‐0.22, 0.30]0.02 [‐0.22, 0.28]

0.07 [‐0.001, 0.14]0.07 [‐0.01, 0.14]

Total Effect 0.10 [0.03, 0.17]0.12 [0.05, 0.21]

Direct Effect 0.08 [0.004, 0.16]0.11 [0.03, 0.20]

SOCa1*b10.004 [‐0.03, 0.04] 0.003 [‐0.03, 0.04]

Perceived ease of activity a2*b20.01 [0.000, 0.03]0.01 [‐0.001, 0.03]

Page 18: Why is self-efficacy positively associated with activity

Summary and Discussion

Self‐efficacy Perceived ease of activity

Social activityPhysical activity

Self‐efficacy Perceived ease of activity Mental activity

Self‐efficacy Adaptive strategies

Activity

Page 19: Why is self-efficacy positively associated with activity

Summary and Discussion

Self‐efficacy Perceived ease of activity

Social activityPhysical activity

Self‐efficacy Perceived ease of activity Mental activity

Self‐efficacy Adaptive strategies

Activity

Page 20: Why is self-efficacy positively associated with activity

Summary and Discussion

Self‐efficacy Perceived ease of activity

Social activityPhysical activity

Self‐efficacy Perceived ease of activity Mental activity

Self‐efficacy Adaptive strategies

Activity

Page 21: Why is self-efficacy positively associated with activity

Implications

• Intervention– Self‐efficacy interventions should include methods aimed at improving evaluations of ease of activity

– Could we target perceived ease of activity directly if self‐efficacy is resistant to change?

• Longitudinal studies are needed

Page 22: Why is self-efficacy positively associated with activity

[email protected]

Funding• Australian Government Research Training Program Scholarship• Australian Research Council Centre of Excellence in Population 

Ageing Research