Upload
yo-yo-aditya-grewal
View
232
Download
2
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
William Congreve as a dramatist
William Congreve’s life
William Congreve was born in February, 1670, in a good
Staffordshire family seated at a place whence it took its name, at
a house in Bardsey, Yorkshire, near Leeds (the house belonged
to his mother’s uncle ). Congreve’s father was an army officer,
posted at youghal in Ireland, commanding a garrison there. He
later joined the Earl of Cork to become the agent of his estates.
Understandably Congreve was educated in Ireland. First he went
to Kilkenny school the best grammar School, and later to Trinity
College, Dublin, form where he took M.A. sgree. At both these
institution, Jonathan Swift was his senior by two years and they
were intimate friends. From Trinity College, Dublin, Congreve
went to Middle Temple, London to study law. But he was not
interested in a career in law. He soon turned to literatrure and
began his career with publication of a prose romance ‘ Incognita
or Love and Duty Reconciled’ under the pseudonym Cleophil, in
the year 1692.
William Congreve enjoyed fame and wielded considerable
influence during his life-time he was in affluent circumstances.
He was very popular and his friendships were very warm and
constant besides being numerous. Dryden and Swift loved and
patronized him. He was singled out by Pope for the signal
honour of dedicating his translation of ‘Iliad’ to him. Similarly
Richard Steele also dedicated his edition of Addison’s The
Drummer to Congreve.
His work
Contrive wrote FOUR comedies and one tragedy:
Comedies:
The Old Bachelor 1690
The Double dealer 1693
Love for Love 1695
Thy Way of the World 1700
Tragedy :
The Mourning Bride 1697
COMEDIES
Congreve’s four comedies advance with a singularly even and
rapid progression.
‘THE OLD BACHELOR’
It was written by Congreve to amuse himself during his
convalescence in 1690 but it was staged in 1693. This play is not
much better than Wycherley’s. its hero ( not the title hero) ,
Vainlove, is, with a young man’s exaggeation, made to out do
all the other heroes from Dorimant downward, whom he copies,
in loveless and joyless debauchery. Its plot is indifferent and it is
written under the influence of Ben Jonson.
‘THE DOUBLE DEALER’
Encouraged by the warm reception and success of this first play
The Old Bachelor, Congreve produced this play the same year,
1693. This play was better than The Bachelor although it could
not get the applause due to it. This play was saved from disaster
by the generous praise of john Dryden and by the patronage of
the Queen.
Love for Love
Love for Love, was Congreve’s nest play Congreve was gaining
in confidence, and was also maturing as a dramatist of great
power. This play was staged at the New Theatre, in Lincoln’s
Inn Fields in April, 1695. It was a grand success and Congreve
became on of the managers of the New Theatre. Many critics
consider love for love as Congreve’s masterpiece. The plot is
compact and well-defined; characters are natural and interesting;
and dialogues are scintillating.
‘THE WAY OF THE WORLD’
This play ushered in the new century for it was staged in the
year 1700 and was a failure with the audience , this is the last
and perhaps the most highly esteemed of Congreve’s plays
today. Smarting with disappointment, Congreve abruptly gave
up his dramatic writing.
In the way of world, in some points Congreve returns to the
mixed and semi-tragic, or at least serious, cast of The Double
Dealer. it is a better-knit play than love for love, and contains
Millamant , the coquettish heroine, the queen of all her kind.
Congreve has indeed borrowed the lay figure for her – and
something more- from and excellent paly which nobody reads.
Dryden’s ‘Marriage a la Mode’ but he has given her a tenfold
portion of air ad fire, and indeed left nothing to be done the
same direction. Lady Wishfort, too, is another masterly
personage, and the more sinister figures of fainall and Mrs.
Marwood are full of power , which indeed, in one way or
another, few of the characters lack. What one of them lack is
wit, the mere writing of the play being better than that of love
for love itself.
WILLIAM CONGREVE- THE ARTIST
Congreve is , of course, above all , a master of comedy. In
construction and grasp of character, Congreve improved steadily
with each succeeding play. But it must be said to the credit of
Congreve that from the very first he exhibited himself as a
master of light and witty dialogue . it was there that Congreve’s
greatness and strength lay.
The construction of The Double Dealer is greatly superior to that
of The old Bachelor, and the Dialogue is rich in happy conceits,
but the characterization is of small account. It is merely a peg
for the author’s wit.
Love for love is on a higher plane. Here within well-defined
limits, many of the characters have vitality and distinctiveness.
The surly-tempered Sir Samson Legend, the fine-natured
youthful Valentine, the pretentious impostor, astrologer, and
palmist, foresight, are acutely observed and admirably
portrayed. There is a farcical strain in the story, less happy in
invention, but the play as a whole deserves much of the
tremendous praise poured upon it by John Dryden.
In the way of the world we find Congreve at his happiest.
Construction, characterization, dialogue are alike brilliant. The
story scarcely matters. There is never much resemblance to real
life in the plots and machinations of the Restoration Drama. This
play is no exception in this respect. But such scenes as those
where reputations are murdered by gossip, such characters as
Mrs. Millamant and Mirabell, such flashes of witr in the talk
between Mrs. Marwood and Mrs. Millamant- or for the matter of
that any scene where Mrs. Millamant is to the fore- reveal the
Restoration Drama at its highest point.
Congreve is master of dialogue. He is clever, ingenious, brilliant
and he reveals the finer shades of character. He has not much to
do with the mechanical construction of a plot. At times he puts
together several episodes, and sometimes they remain separate.
It is by interlocking of dialogues that they are brought into
relation. It is the dialogue which is of the vital importance, the
connecting link, in the whole drama. The whole drift of the play,
the conic tone and spirit are imparted through dialogue.
William Congreve – his style
In his famous ‘ Lectures on the English Comic writers’, William
Hazlitt observes, “ his style is inimitable, very perfect. It is the
highest model of comic dialogue. Every sentence is replete with
sense and satire conveyed in the most polished and pointed
terms. Every page presents a shower of brilliant conceits, is a
tissue in prose, is a new triumph of wit, a new conquest over
dullness.
It bears every mark of being what he himself, in dedication to
one of his plays , tells us that it was a spirited copy taken off and
carefully revised from the most select society of his time,
exhibiting all the sprightliness, care and animation of familiar
conversation, with the correctness and delicacy of most finished
composition. ..
As we look at William Congreve’s language in order to study
his STYLE we notice that much of his language (like the
language of other Restoration Age dramatists) is borrowed from
real life, and possesses the charm of the ordinary speech turned
rhetorical. It is simple and direct. The real beauty and power of
his language lie in its concision, lucidity, economy and
brilliance.
About William Congreve’s style George Meredith writes:
“….. [ Congreve ] hits the mean of a fine style and a natural
dialogue. He is, at once, precise and voluble.” And at another
place he observes:
“Where Congreve excels all his English rivals in his literary
force, and a succinctness of style peculiar to him. He had correct
judgment, a correct ear, readiness of illustration within a narrow
range, in snapshots of the obvious, at the obvious and copious
language…. If you have ever thought upon style you will
acknowledge it to be a single achievement. In this he is a classic
and is worthy of treading a measure with Moliere.”
William Congreve was a genius. Yes, it was stroke of genius
that he chose to use prose in preference to the Heroic couplet for
his comedy. Congreve’s prose is poetic, marked, like poetry, by
shifting cadence , by sound echoing sense, by balance and
antithesis and by melodic rhythm. His wit is exquisite,
unmatched and it tempered his style. There is no sense strain , so
fluid and easy elegant. The signal achievement of Congreve is
his dialogue.
Congreve’s style is non-metaphoric but sometimes it (in
comparisons, mainly) has the power and effect of metaphor. His
language is not concerned with the immediate and sensory world
of experience. It is clear, rational and logical. Shakespeare’s
language is the language of literature while that of Congreve is
the language of logic.
Conclusion
William Congreve is undeniably a great writer whose worth is
acknowledged and recognized by such great masters as Haztitt,
Macaulay and Meredith. Congreve’s greatness as a dramatist
lies in the completeness of his vision. In the vision of a very
shallow world, he has an exquisite accuracy in depiction its
values. His words shone like diamonds in the witty setting of his
dialogues. He had the eye to discern the real potential of words
and sounds and exploited them to the full to make his prose what
is really is. The source of Congreve’s imagery are vast and
varied from life, literature, birds and animals trees and fruits ,
nature , music , love etc. Congreve is a great comic artist. The
way of the world possesses wit, humour art , vivacity and it is
equal to the best comedies. Denis says “ comedy left it with
him” when Congreve left the stage.