38
Willing to Pay? Testing Institutionalist Theories with Experiments G. Andrighetto, S. Ottone, F. Ponzano, N. Zhang and S. Steinmo 1

Willing to Pay? Testing Institutionalist Theories with Experiments G. Andrighetto, S. Ottone, F. Ponzano, N. Zhang and S. Steinmo 1

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Willing to Pay? Testing Institutionalist Theories with Experiments

G. Andrighetto, S. Ottone, F. Ponzano, N. Zhang and S. Steinmo

1

• Traditional economic theory suggests:– Institutional rules.– Incentives and disincentives.

• Tax Rates• Audit rates and punishment regimes.

• Additional Variables/Factors?– Norms?– Attitudes towards the state?– Belief in fairness (or unfairness) of system?– Sense of personal integrity or identity?– Values?

2

The aim of the project:

Why do people comply - or not?

• In real world people in different countries face different fiscal systems. In the laboratory we can use the same system to see different population groups behave differently.

• IF we find variation with constant institutions (we do) then we can begin to manipulate the context and/or rules (instruments’) to hopefully uncover what explains these variations.

3

Why an experimental investigation?

1. Tax Compliance Experiment:

1. A real effort experiment – clerical task

2. Three stages where we elicit tax compliance under

different conditions.

2. Social Value Orientation (SVO) exercise 3. Questionnaire (basic questions drawn from

International Public Opinion Surveys).

4

The Basic Design:Three Separate Units

• There are significant difference in compliance across locations.

• Tax rates effect behavior less than redistributive regime.

• Social Value Orientation matters.• The influence of attitudes on behavior is not clear• Some additional results: – Gender– Risk tolerance – Income

5

Some Preliminary Results:

6

Most people comply and

Institutions Matter

7

Brits cheat more that Italians! (?)

8

Round 1Compliance by location

9

Round 2 -Tax rates have small

effects

10

Round 3Progressive Taxes and

Charity

11

Unit II: Values?

12

The Social Value IndexPick a point on the scale

13

SVO – example 2

14

15

16

Unit III:Political Attitudes?

17

Attitudes towards

redistribution and compliance

18

19

20

Some additional and unexpected findings:

21

Gender

22

23

Men – more selfish everywhere?

24

Total Evaders by gender and location

25

26

Are the Rich Greedy?

27

High Earners Comply at Lower Rates

28

Risk

29

“Risk takers” are less compliant

30

Further research

• Run the baseline experiment in more countries, in different regions in each country, and with more diverse population samples.

• Test for:– Norms elicitation– Effects of diversity– Efficiency– Different institutional rules (eg. Voting)– Complexity– Different redistributive regimes.

• Suggestions … ?

31

DO NOT STEAL !The State Does not

Tolerate the Competition

32

Re-ordering the treatments

NoPot Pot DoublePot Tax10 Tax30 Tax50 Prog1 Prog2 UNICEF0

0.1

0.2

0.3

0.4

0.5

0.6

0.7

0.8

0.9

1

123456456123654123

Round

Tax

com

plia

nce

33

SwedenAll three experiments

(327)

34

Some non-findings:

• Attitudes and behavior

35

36

37

38