Wilson Lee, Campus Planning Portfolio

Wilson LeeThe Pennylvania State UniversityLandscape Architecture 2016Portfolio

Wilson Lee924 Bellaire AvenueAPT: W218State College, PA 16801

[email protected]

The Pennsylvania State University Bachelor of Landscape Architecture

Minor in Architectural Studies Minor in Geographical Information Sciences (GIS) [Class of 2016]

C o n t e n t

The Unbroken Circle

Stepping Stone Park

West Campus Commons

Street Harmonics

01

02

03

04Models05Technical Work06

Wilson Lee

[Implementation]

[Competition] [Conceptual]

[Competition]

[Diagrammatic] [Implementation] [Process]

[Planting Design] [Conceptual]

[Planting Design] [Process]

West Campus Commons01The mixed garden planting over at West Campus is the perfect destination for those wanting to get away. The plantings are comprised mostly of herbaceous perennials with a couple of deciduous trees and shrubs for ornamentation and screening. The perennials are all pleasantly fragrant and attract wildlife to their flowers, making the pallet of yellows, blues, oranges, whites, and purple attractive not only to sight, but to smell and texture as well.

West Campus Commons SemesterSpring 2014

Type Planting Scheme

Software Sketchup, Photoshop, Illustrator,AutoCad

Play On The Go

Play Together

Play For All

Americans use walking as a regular mode of transportation on average

of 3 days a week.

51%of the travelling public.

3,291,401In 2005, an estimated

=

45.1%

25%of these walking trips

are used for recreational and social purposes, not work.

people used walking as their primary mode of travel for their

journey to work each week

Street Harmonics02Life is moving. Pedestrians in cities are readily in movement. Whether walking to work, to school, to anywhere - play is rarely a commodity experienced for those on-the-go. But no longer. Through manipulative play and melodies, Street Harmonics incorporates play on-the-go and activates fun within dense urban centers. Located on the street-scape, a place rarely recognized for play, Street Harmonics allows for musical play along sidewalks.

Rain Garden DemonstrationAs users play with the musical harp, its almost impossible not to notice the luxurious rain garden that the harp inhabits. With the rain garden, Street Harmonics not only improves aesthetics to city streets, but also promotes sustainable storm water management. Rain gardens allows for the inltration of water from street into the soil. Trees and native plants add greenery and aesthetics which contrast with the hardscape of the urban environment.

White Birch Rain Garden

Cinnamon Firn Rain Garden

Common Bomafast Rain Garden

Nickel Harp Strings Harp StructureConcrete

Curbing

River Stones Rain garden

Aluminum Tubing Harp Structure

Sandy Loam Top Soil Rain Garden

Pine Bark Mulch Rain Garden

6

3 (Soil Depth)

Street Harmonics Semester Summer 2013Type Design Competition

Team Wilson Lee, Tom Wenner, Julian New, Jeff Holzer

Sketchup, Photoshop, IllustratorSoftware

The Unbroken Circle

Slant High Honors Award

03After the Korean War ended in 1953, thousands of families were separated by the Demilitarized Zone. This zone which seperates North and South Korea stretches many hundreds of miles and is laden with mines, making it impossible to cross. Over 40,000 families sign up each each year in hopes to be reunitied with their families, while 3,000 family members pass away each year.

Between the towns of Daesong-dong (South Korea) and Kijong-dong (North Korea) is the place where the Unbro-ken Circle lies. This location is one of the last beacons of hope for Koreans as each town has a view of the other. This area between these towns is one of the only places along the DMZ where this is possible. The Unbroken Circle evokes memories of those missed, lost, and no longer in our lives. Through a contrast of unity and separation, the absence of human presence in this site helps remember those missing and why they were special.

2nd In Peoples Choice

The Unbroken Circle Semester Summer 2013Type Design Competition

Slant High Honors Award

Team Wilson Lee, Tom Wenner

Software Sketchup, Photoshop, Illustrator

Seeing my mom in my dreams is not a happy MEMORY, but Im happy I can at least see her in my dreams

-Yoon Hee, North Korean Refugee

North Korea

South Korea

DMZ Border

Location

Daeseong-dongKijong-dong

NOr

ient

atio

nSo

il Co

nditi

onEx

istin

g Vi

ews

Solar movement does not distract from the contemplative experience but enhances the figure of the inaccessible space.

The native soil and weather conditions at this site are ideal for growing native plants. Nearby are farming communi-ties that have existed for numerous decades indicating that the soil at this site is fertile.

Looking east a view of the South Korean town, Daeseong-Dong, is visible. Looking out from the glass west lies the North Korean town Kijong-Dong, bring these conflicting nations within the Unbroken Circle.

120,000 Families Seperated40,000 Families Waiting to be Reunited3,000 Family Members Pass Away Each

20,000,000

Families in South Korea

Korean Feather Reed Grass

Seibold Magnolia Korean Boxwood Lotus Flower Awabuki Ginkgo Biloba

Rose of Sharon

North Korean National Flower

South Korean National Flower

Symbol of Unity

Stone Wall Glass WeatheredStone Seat

Wood Path

Establishing common connection to Korean

Architecture.

Enables view of Kijong-dong beyond

site.

Standing the test of time waiting for unity.

Contemplative material which casually directs

to unity.

What Defines Memories?

Are they events, activities, or places we have gone? Or are they dominated by something else? Countless memories are shaped by the people with whom weve experienced these moments. Spending time with friends, traveling with family, or letting someone you love go; people define our memoriespeople that we have met, that we have loved, that we have lost. It is their absence which evokes their memory. Their departure from our lives conjures an absence within us, remind-ing us how special they were.

Stepping Stone Park04In the center of Bellefonte is a dilapidated parcel of land, void of recreational activities and exploration within the landscape. Stepping Stone Park offers a landscape where the neighborhood integrates the downtown district in order to communicate this fulcrum. Residents of the surrounding area are but a stones throw away from wide lawns, large plazas and a multitude of amenities that offer an atmosphere imbued with exploration and community.

Design Development

Semester Fall 2013

Type Conceptual Design

Sketchup, Photoshop, Illustrator, GIS,Rhino, FormZ, AutoCad, Modeling

Software

Stepping Stone Park

Original Site Conceptual Plan

0 100 200 400 800 1200

N

Floating Wetlands

New Bridge

Large open space for mixed use recreation

Pump House and Waterfront Museum

Medium Density Housing

Semi-Private Space

Old Match Factory Frame. Stripped for Pavement and other materials

Mixed use program consisting mostly of retail and high density housing

Mixed use program consisting of industry and offices

Semi-Private Space

Expanded Creek

Lawn Areas Remniscent of River Stone

Community Center Building

New Cafe on the Park

Playground

Existing Bridge

Courtyard space for Mixed Use recreation. Bosque

Community Center Building

Central Courtyard

Central Courtyard Extension

Riparian Buffer

Soil Stabilizing vegetation

Buildings: 374,444 sqft

Open Space: 612,861 sqft (36.56% of Site)

Building Percentage: 22.34% of site

Architecture

Spatial Relationship Architectural Program

3rd Fl

oor

2nd F

loor

Grou

nd Fl

oor

Office: 38,900 sqft 7.9% of Program

Community: 74,600 sqft 13.3% of Program

Residential: 217,000 sqft 38.8% of Program

Commercial: 64,900 sqft 11.6% of Program

Other: 144,000 sqft 25.7% of Program

Parking: 19,600 sqft 4.1% of Program

Circulation

Open Space

141,470 sqft36.32%%(bldgs) 8.11%(site)

68,418 sqft17.03%(bldgs) 3.81%(site)

14,422 sqft3.85%(bldgs) .86%(site)

9,543 sqft2.54%(bldgs) .56%(site)

36,019 sqft9.62%(bldgs) 2.15%(site)

2,075 sqft.55%(bldgs) .12%(site)

112,613 sqft30.07%(bldgs) 6.79%(site)

Semi-Private: 217,000 sqft

Central Courtyard: 217,000 sqft

Open Lawn: 217,000 sqft

Playground: 217,000 sqft

Wetland: 217,000 sqft

Primary Pedestrian Crossing

Primary Pedestrian Movement

Secondary Pedestrian Movement

Vehicular Movement

Creek Expansion45% Increase in Stream Size

Program RelationSemi Private

Semi Public

Public

Building

Decrease in Floodplain Zone

Models05Semester Fall 2012

Type Conceptual Design

Clay PaperNatural MaterialsManual Manipulation

Medium

A conceptual model of a contemplative space at Penn States Arboretum

Details

Semester Spring 2013

Type Site Model

Chip BoardLaser CutterManual Manipulation

Medium

Representative model of City Garden in St. Louis.

Details

Fall 2012

Conceptual Design


Type Site Model

MDFAcrylicWire MeshSteel NailsColored Paper

Medium

Diagrammatic model of Bellefonte, Pennsylvania

Details


Type Diagrammatic Model

Colored PaperInsulation FoamBalsa WoodMossFoam Core

Medium

Diagrammatic model of Bellefonte, Pennsylvania

Details

Technical Work06Type Hand Renderings

Type

Technical Work Type Materials Implementation

1 East WallScale: 38" = 1' Section Elevation

Scale: 38" = 1'

Larch 331Design Implementation

Thomas BuildingSitting Walls

State College, PA 16801

L - 4

Notes

Larch 331Last Revised

9/30/13Wilson Lee

Plan

Refer to Grading Plan for Drainage10'

3"

Fros

t Dep

th1'

0"

3' 2

"8"

Pre-Cast ConcreteCap StoneSmooth Finish(Gray, Width 22")

Railing, Steel

Red Brick7 1/2"x2 1/4" Nx,Type IIIGranite pavers,MortarlessSand-ConcreteSetting BaseCIP Concrete BaseCompactedAggregate BaseCompactedSubgrade

Vertical RebarReinforcement #4

12" Expansion Joint

Pre-Cast Concrete,Broom Finish

Treads Have 1% Wash. Seegrading plan for details

Flush Mortar joint

Capstones flush to brick veneer

No Weepholes

CIP ConcreteStem Wall

CIP ConcreteSpread Footing

1 East WallScale: 38" = 1' Section Elevation

Scale: 38" = 1'




L - 5

Notes


9/30/13Wilson Lee

Plan

Refer to Grading Plan for Drainage



No Weepholes

10' 3

"

10"

3' 2

"

Fros

t Dep

th

1' 0

"

1' 10"

8' 0"

12' 5"

7' 3"

10' 10" 1' 10" 3' 1"

Steel Pin 6"x12"

Pre-Cast ConcreteCap Stone,Smooth Finish(White, Width: 22")

Red brick 4x8,Running Bond

Veneer Anchors,Steel,Every 4 Courses

CMU 12"x8"x16"

Pre-Cast Concrete,Broom Finish

CompactedAggregate Base

Compacted Subgrade

CIP ConcreteStem WallVertical RebarReinforcement #4


Steel Pins 6"x 12"

12" Expansion Joint

Planting Soil




Railing Steel

Railing Steel

12" Expansion Joint


N

1 Brick and CIP Concrete PavementScale: 38" = 1'

2' 4'1'0'Context Plan

Scale: 38" = 1'




L - 1

Notes


9/30/13Wilson Lee

Plan


33.44

TWBW

TW

BS

TW

BW

BW

TWBW

TS

BS

TW

TS

BS

TS

BS

BW

TW

BWBottomRamp

TopRamp

TS

BS

BS

TS

2L-2

1L-2

1L-3


3L-6

5L-6

2L-6

4L-6

1L-5


No Weepholes

1L-4

N

1 West WallScale: 316 " = 1' Plan




L - 2

Notes


9/30/13Wilson Lee


Treads Have 1% Wash. Seegrading plan for details6

.007

3

3' 5

"12

' 11"

2' 0

"

Pre-Cast Concrete Cap Stone,Smooth Finish(White, Width: 22")

Pre-Cast Concrete Cap Stone,Smooth Finish(White, Width: 30")

12" Gap Expansionbetween cap stone

2" Gap Expansionbetween cap stone

Railing, Steel, Diameter: 2"

12" Rubber Expansion JointBetween Stairs

Granite Pavers, Mortarless,Running Bond

Granite Pavers, Mortarless,Running Bond

4' 0

"5"

Fros

t Dep

th1'

0"

1' 10" 2' 6"

2' 1

0"

Steel Pin 6"x12"

Pre-Cast ConcreteCap Stone,Smooth Finish(White, Width: 22")Red brick 4x8,Running BondVeneer Anchors,Steel,Every 4 Courses

Electrical Conduit

CMU 12"x8"x16"Pre-Cast Concrete,Broom Finish

Vertical RebarReinforcement #4


2 West WallScale: 38 " = 1' Section

CompactedAggregate BaseCompactedSubgrade

0' 1' 3' 5'

Flush Mortar JointCapstones flush to brick veneer

No Weepholes

Steel Pin 6"x12"

CIP ConcreteStem Wall

Type Plating Schedule

Drain Inlet

Lights

Plug Drift 2

Plug Drift 1

Plug Drift 3

Plug Drift 1

Plug Drift 4

Pliug Drift 5

Drian Inlet

Drain Inlet

Lights

Plug Drift 2

Plug Drift 1

Plug Drift 3

Plug Drift 1

Plug Drift 4

Pliug Drift 5

Drian Inlet

Scientific Name Common Name QuantityPlug Drift 1

Aster novae-angliae New England Aster 100Echinacea purpurea Purple Coneflower 150Eupatorium purpureum Sweet Joe Pye 150Tradescantia ohiensis Ohio Spiderwort 150

Plug Drift 3

Aslepias syriaca Common Milkweed 50Aster laevis Smooth Aster 200

Plug Drift 4

Aster nove-angliae New England Aster 100Baptisia australis Blue False Indigo 100

Plug Drift 5

Cassia fasciculata Partridge Pea 150Rudbeckia hirta Black-Eyed Susan 150

Plug Drift 5Juncus effusus Joe Pye Weed 50Lobelia siphilitica Great Blue Lobelia 100Scutellaria integrifolia Hyssop Skullcap 100Spritanthes odorata Fragrant Ladies'-Tresses 50

Perennial Plug Drift Schedule

Scientific Name Common Name % Total WeightGrasses

Andropogon gerardii Big Bluestem 24%Muhlenbergia capillaris Pink Hair Grass 21%Sorghastrum natans Indian Grass 19%Tridens flavus Purpletop 18%

Forbs

Aster novae-angliae New England Aster 6%Echinacea purpurea Purple Coneflower 5%Eupatorium purpureum Sweet Joe Pye 3%Tradescantia ohiensis Ohio Spiderwort 4%


Bouteloua curtipendula Side-oats Grama 30%Schizachyrium scoparium Little Bluestem 24%Sporobolus compositus Tall Dropseed 33%

Forbs

Aslepias syriaca Common Milkweed 1%Aster laevis Smooth Aster 2%Aster nove-angliae New England Aster 4%Baptisia australis Blue False Indigo 3%Cassia fasciculata Partridge Pea 1%Rudbeckia hirta Black-Eyed Susan 2%


Andropogon glomeratus Bushy Bluestem 24%Carex grayi Gray's Sedge 20%Scirpus validus Soft Steemed Bulbrush 42%

Forbs

Juncus effusus Joe Pye Weed 3%Lobelia siphilitica Great Blue Lobelia 3%Scutellaria integrifolia Hyssop Skullcap 4%Spritanthes odorata Fragrant Ladies'-Tresses 4%

1lb. PLS per 1,000 sq.ft

Wet Meadow Mix (#3 Tall Mix)

Short Grass Meadow (#2 Short Mix)

Warm Season Grass Meadow Mix (#1 Tall Mix)

Condisderations and Reminders.

- Driveway opening is fixed. Cannot be moved.

- There must be back porches behind the residents.

- The FFEs of the top floor must be 9 feet higher than the bottom floor.

- Consider putting an entry plaza for a focal point as well as an area that can collect runoff/ direct it.

- There has to be walkways con-necting the buildings to the park-ing lot. These might have to be stepped in order to walk with the contous.

- The round turn could get wet, causing dangerous conditions around the turn. Do not want Tokyo Drifting.

- Must have at least one retaining wall.

- Trees must be preserved.

- We do not want an engineer on site, so do not make retaining walls more than 4 feet tall.

- All slopes should be Desirable.

- Parking and entry must have 3 inch crown.

- Drain inlets can be useful possi-bly in spots where the contours become tight.

Type Grading

42

41

43

44

45

46

47

48

48

47

46

40

41

42

43

44

45

46

47

48

48

47

46

45

50

51

52

51

50

49

50

53

49

50

51

52

53

52

51

5049

52

51

50

49

48

51

52

50

49

48

47

46

45

5352

51 50

49

48

47

46

45

48

47

48

47

46

45

50

51

5253

54

TC 48.84BC 46.34

(48.64)

TC 52.89BC 52.39

TC 52.73BC 52.23

TC 52.89BC 52.39

TC 51.15BC 50.65

TC 48.99BC 48.49

TC 53.21BC 52.71

TC 53.03BC 52.53

TC 50.97BC 50.47

TC 51.39BC 50.89

TC 52.15BC 51.65

TC 48.78BC 48.28

TC 50.55BC 50.05

TC 50.18BC 50.68

TC 52.91BC 52.41

TC 53.06BC 52.56

TC 53.08BC 52.58

TC 52.13BC 51.63

TC 51.72BC 51.22

TC 50.14BC 49.74

TC 50.55BC 50.05

TC 53.28BC 52.78

TC 50.99BC 50.49

TC 51.44BC 50.94

TC 51.98BC 51.58

TC 50.79BC 50.29

TC 53.47BC 52.97

TC 53.47BC 52.97

TC 51.51BC 51.01

TC 52.97BC 52.47

TC 53.07BC 52.57

TC 51.86BC 51.36

TC 50.49BC 49.99

49.90

51.03

TC 52.35BC 51.85

53.10

47.518

51.65

51.96

52.27

52.45

51.58

51.75

7.00%

51.9651.56

51.79

51.46

51.67

51.57

52.34

53.43

51.55

53.33

52.27

53.0352.92

54.66

53.33

54.66

53.23

50.65

53.84

TS 54.0054.00

52.43

50.56

52.1551.95

52.87

50.7150.91

52.13

51.11

50.36

50.81

50.26

BS 50.56TS 53.76

54.00

53.07

53.03

53.94

54.6654.66

BS 52.5

TS 54.00

54.00

54.00

54.00

54.00

54.0054.00

54.00

54.00

54.00

54.00

45.0045.00

45.0045.00

45.00

BS 50.65

54.00TS 54.00

54.00

54.00

BS 53.19TS 53.69

BS 53.1952.76

TS 53.69

54.0054.0054.00

54.00

54.6654.00

BS 52.14

TS 54.00

TS 54.00BS 52.14

BS 51.69

TS 54.00

BS 51.69TS 54.00

BW 45.00TW 48.00BW 45.66

BW 45.66TW 48.00BW 45.00

BW 45.00TW 48.00BW 45.66

BW 45.00TW 48.00BW 45.66

BW 45.66TW 48.00BW 45.00

BW 45.00TW 48.00BW 45.66

51.69

54.66

54.00

BS 52.5

51.85

2.10%

3.90%

4.08%

5.43

%

7.19

%

Project 2: Grading Plan forMultiple Structures, Walls,Parking and Access

Wilson LeeLarch 231Project 2

Existing Contour

Proposed Contour

Property Line

Parking Center Line

Slope Percentage

Spot Elevation

FFE

TW

BW

TS

BS

Tree

Finished Floor Elevation

Top of Wall

Bottom of Wall

Top of Stair

Bottom of Ramp

PRODUCED BY AN AUTODESK EDUCATIONAL PRODUCT

PRO

DU

CED

BY

AN

AU

TOD

ESK

ED

UC

ATI

ON

AL

PRO

DU

CT


PRO

DU

CED

BY A

N A

UTO

DESK

EDU

CA

TION

AL PR

OD

UC

T

42

41

43

44

45

46

47

48

48

47

46

40

41

42

43

44

45

46

47

48

48

47

46

45

50

51

52

51

50

49

50

53

49

50

51

52

53

52

51

5049

52

51

50

49

48

51

52

50

49

48

47

46

45

5352

51 50

49

48

47

46

45

48

47

48

47

46

45

50

51

5253

54

TC 48.84BC 46.34

(48.64)

TC 52.89BC 52.39

TC 52.73BC 52.23

TC 52.89BC 52.39

TC 51.15BC 50.65

TC 48.99BC 48.49

TC 53.21BC 52.71

TC 53.03BC 52.53

TC 50.97BC 50.47

TC 51.39BC 50.89

TC 52.15BC 51.65

TC 48.78BC 48.28

TC 50.55BC 50.05

TC 50.18BC 50.68

TC 52.91BC 52.41

TC 53.06BC 52.56

TC 53.08BC 52.58

TC 52.13BC 51.63

TC 51.72BC 51.22

TC 50.14BC 49.74

TC 50.55BC 50.05

TC 53.28BC 52.78

TC 50.99BC 50.49

TC 51.44BC 50.94

TC 51.98BC 51.58

TC 50.79BC 50.29

TC 53.47BC 52.97

TC 53.47BC 52.97

TC 51.51BC 51.01

TC 52.97BC 52.47

TC 53.07BC 52.57

TC 51.86BC 51.36

TC 50.49BC 49.99

49.90

51.03

TC 52.35BC 51.85

53.10

47.518

51.65

51.96

52.27

52.45

51.58

51.75

7.00%

51.9651.56

51.79

51.46

51.67

51.57

52.34

53.43

51.55

53.33

52.27

53.0352.92

54.66

53.33

54.66

53.23

50.65

53.84

TS 54.0054.00

52.43

50.56

52.1551.95

52.87

50.7150.91

52.13

51.11

50.36

50.81

50.26

BS 50.56TS 53.76

54.00

53.07

53.03

53.94

54.6654.66

BS 52.5

TS 54.00

54.00

54.00

54.00

54.00

54.0054.00

54.00

54.00

54.00

54.00

45.0045.00

45.0045.00

45.00

BS 50.65

54.00TS 54.00

54.00

54.00

BS 53.19TS 53.69

BS 53.1952.76

TS 53.69

54.0054.0054.00

54.00

54.6654.00

BS 52.14

TS 54.00

TS 54.00BS 52.14

BS 51.69

TS 54.00

BS 51.69TS 54.00

BW 45.00TW 48.00BW 45.66

BW 45.66TW 48.00BW 45.00

BW 45.00TW 48.00BW 45.66

BW 45.00TW 48.00BW 45.66

BW 45.66TW 48.00BW 45.00

BW 45.00TW 48.00BW 45.66

51.69

54.66

54.00

BS 52.5

51.85

2.10%

3.90%

4.08%

5.43

%

7.19

%



Existing Contour

Proposed Contour

Property Line

Parking Center Line

Slope Percentage

Spot Elevation

FFE

TW

BW

TS

BS

Tree


Top of Wall

Bottom of Wall

Top of Stair

Bottom of Ramp


PRO

DU

CED

BY

AN

AU

TOD

ESK

ED

UC

ATI

ON

AL

PRO

DU

CT


PRO

DU

CED

BY A

N A

UTO

DESK

EDU

CA

TION

AL PR

OD

UC

T

42

41

43

44

45

46

47

48

48

47

46

40

41

42

43

44

45

46

47

48

48

47

46

45

50

51

52

51

50

49

50

53

49

50

51

52

53

52

51

5049

52

51

50

49

48

51

52

50

49

48

47

46

45

5352

51 50

49

48

47

46

45

48

47

48

47

46

45

50

51

5253

54

TC 48.84BC 46.34

(48.64)

TC 52.89BC 52.39

TC 52.73BC 52.23

TC 52.89BC 52.39

TC 51.15BC 50.65

TC 48.99BC 48.49

TC 53.21BC 52.71

TC 53.03BC 52.53

TC 50.97BC 50.47

TC 51.39BC 50.89

TC 52.15BC 51.65

TC 48.78BC 48.28

TC 50.55BC 50.05

TC 50.18BC 50.68

TC 52.91BC 52.41

TC 53.06BC 52.56

TC 53.08BC 52.58

TC 52.13BC 51.63

TC 51.72BC 51.22

TC 50.14BC 49.74

TC 50.55BC 50.05

TC 53.28BC 52.78

TC 50.99BC 50.49

TC 51.44BC 50.94

TC 51.98BC 51.58

TC 50.79BC 50.29

TC 53.47BC 52.97

TC 53.47BC 52.97

TC 51.51BC 51.01

TC 52.97BC 52.47

TC 53.07BC 52.57

TC 51.86BC 51.36

TC 50.49BC 49.99

49.90

51.03

TC 52.35BC 51.85

53.10

47.518

51.65

51.96

52.27

52.45

51.58

51.75

7.00%

51.9651.56

51.79

51.46

51.67

51.57

52.34

53.43

51.55

53.33

52.27

53.0352.92

54.66

53.33

54.66

53.23

50.65

53.84

TS 54.0054.00

52.43

50.56

52.1551.95

52.87

50.7150.91

52.13

51.11

50.36

50.81

50.26

BS 50.56TS 53.76

54.00

53.07

53.03

53.94

54.6654.66

BS 52.5

TS 54.00

54.00

54.00

54.00

54.00

54.0054.00

54.00

54.00

54.00

54.00

45.0045.00

45.0045.00

45.00

BS 50.65

54.00TS 54.00

54.00

54.00

BS 53.19TS 53.69

BS 53.1952.76

TS 53.69

54.0054.0054.00

54.00

54.6654.00

BS 52.14

TS 54.00

TS 54.00BS 52.14

BS 51.69

TS 54.00

BS 51.69TS 54.00

BW 45.00TW 48.00BW 45.66

BW 45.66TW 48.00BW 45.00

BW 45.00TW 48.00BW 45.66

BW 45.00TW 48.00BW 45.66

BW 45.66TW 48.00BW 45.00

BW 45.00TW 48.00BW 45.66

51.69

54.66

54.00

BS 52.5

51.85

2.10%

3.90%

4.08%

5.43

%

7.19

%



Existing Contour

Proposed Contour

Property Line

Parking Center Line

Slope Percentage

Spot Elevation

FFE

TW

BW

TS

BS

Tree


Top of Wall

Bottom of Wall

Top of Stair

Bottom of Ramp


PRO

DU

CED

BY

AN

AU

TOD

ESK

ED

UC

ATI

ON

AL

PRO

DU

CT


PRO

DU

CED

BY A

N A

UTO

DESK

EDU

CA

TION

AL PR

OD

UC

T

42

41

43

44

45

46

47

48

48

47

46

40

41

42

43

44

45

46

47

48

48

47

46

45

50

51

52

51

50

49

50

53

49

50

51

52

53

52

51

5049

52

51

50

49

48

51

52

50

49

48

47

46

45

5352

51 50

49

48

47

46

45

48

47

48

47

46

45

50

51

5253

54

TC 48.84BC 46.34

(48.64)

TC 52.89BC 52.39

TC 52.73BC 52.23

TC 52.89BC 52.39

TC 51.15BC 50.65

TC 48.99BC 48.49

TC 53.21BC 52.71

TC 53.03BC 52.53

TC 50.97BC 50.47

TC 51.39BC 50.89

TC 52.15BC 51.65

TC 48.78BC 48.28

TC 50.55BC 50.05

TC 50.18BC 50.68

TC 52.91BC 52.41

TC 53.06BC 52.56

TC 53.08BC 52.58

TC 52.13BC 51.63

TC 51.72BC 51.22

TC 50.14BC 49.74

TC 50.55BC 50.05

TC 53.28BC 52.78

TC 50.99BC 50.49

TC 51.44BC 50.94

TC 51.98BC 51.58

TC 50.79BC 50.29

TC 53.47BC 52.97

TC 53.47BC 52.97

TC 51.51BC 51.01

TC 52.97BC 52.47

TC 53.07BC 52.57

TC 51.86BC 51.36

TC 50.49BC 49.99

49.90

51.03

TC 52.35BC 51.85

53.10

47.518

51.65

51.96

52.27

52.45

51.58

51.75

7.00%

51.9651.56

51.79

51.46

51.67

51.57

52.34

53.43

51.55

53.33

52.27

53.0352.92

54.66

53.33

54.66

53.23

50.65

53.84

TS 54.0054.00

52.43

50.56

52.1551.95

52.87

50.7150.91

52.13

51.11

50.36

50.81

50.26

BS 50.56TS 53.76

54.00

53.07

53.03

53.94

54.6654.66

BS 52.5

TS 54.00

54.00

54.00

54.00

54.00

54.0054.00

54.00

54.00

54.00

54.00

45.0045.00

45.0045.00

45.00

BS 50.65

54.00TS 54.00

54.00

54.00

BS 53.19TS 53.69

BS 53.1952.76

TS 53.69

54.0054.0054.00

54.00

54.6654.00

BS 52.14

TS 54.00

TS 54.00BS 52.14

BS 51.69

TS 54.00

BS 51.69TS 54.00

BW 45.00TW 48.00BW 45.66

BW 45.66TW 48.00BW 45.00

BW 45.00TW 48.00BW 45.66

BW 45.00TW 48.00BW 45.66

BW 45.66TW 48.00BW 45.00

BW 45.00TW 48.00BW 45.66

51.69

54.66

54.00

BS 52.5

51.85

2.10%

3.90%

4.08%

5.43

%

7.19

%



Existing Contour

Proposed Contour

Property Line

Parking Center Line

Slope Percentage

Spot Elevation

FFE

TW

BW

TS

BS

Tree


Top of Wall

Bottom of Wall

Top of Stair

Bottom of Ramp


PRO

DU

CED

BY

AN

AU

TOD

ESK

ED

UC

ATI

ON

AL

PRO

DU

CT


PRO

DU

CED

BY A

N A

UTO

DESK

EDU

CA

TION

AL PR

OD

UC

T

Wilson Lee924 Bellaire AvenueAPT: W218State College, PA 16801

[email protected]

The Pennsylvania State University Bachelor of Landscape Architecture

Minor in Architectural Studies Minor in Geographical Information Sciences (GIS) [Class of 2016]

T H A N K Y O U Wilson Lee

modelpageContent pagesOthermoreWilsonLeeotherPortfolio 85x11HQ

Portfolio 85x11HQcampusplanning

Documents

Wilson Lee, Campus Planning Portfolio