Upload
others
View
2
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Wind and Solar Energy Projects:
Structuring EPC AgreementsUnique Issues in Wind and Solar PV Construction Contracts, including Guarantees and Warranties
Today’s faculty features:
1pm Eastern | 12pm Central | 11am Mountain | 10am Pacific
The audio portion of the conference may be accessed via the telephone or by using your computer's
speakers. Please refer to the instructions emailed to registrants for additional information. If you
have any questions, please contact Customer Service at 1-800-926-7926 ext. 1.
WEDNESDAY, NOVEMBER 20, 2019
Presenting a live 90-minute webinar with interactive Q&A
Jamie Jackson Hansen, Attorney, Holland & Knight, Denver
Stephen J. Humes, Partner, Holland & Knight, New York
Tips for Optimal Quality
Sound Quality
If you are listening via your computer speakers, please note that the quality
of your sound will vary depending on the speed and quality of your internet
connection.
If the sound quality is not satisfactory, you may listen via the phone: dial
1-877-447-0294 and enter your Conference ID and PIN when prompted.
Otherwise, please send us a chat or e-mail [email protected] immediately
so we can address the problem.
If you dialed in and have any difficulties during the call, press *0 for assistance.
Viewing Quality
To maximize your screen, press the ‘Full Screen’ symbol located on the bottom
right of the slides. To exit full screen, press the Esc button.
FOR LIVE EVENT ONLY
Continuing Education Credits
In order for us to process your continuing education credit, you must confirm your
participation in this webinar by completing and submitting the Attendance
Affirmation/Evaluation after the webinar.
A link to the Attendance Affirmation/Evaluation will be in the thank you email
that you will receive immediately following the program.
For additional information about continuing education, call us at 1-800-926-7926
ext. 2.
FOR LIVE EVENT ONLY
Program Materials
If you have not printed the conference materials for this program, please
complete the following steps:
• Click on the link to the PDF of the slides for today’s program, which is located
to the right of the slides, just above the Q&A box.
• The PDF will open a separate tab/window. Print the slides by clicking on the
printer icon.
FOR LIVE EVENT ONLY
5
Wind and Solar Energy Projects:
Structuring EPC Agreements
November 20, 2019JAMIE J. HANSEN
Holland & Knight LLP
STEPHEN J. HUMES
Holland & Knight LLP
Steve Humes
Steve Humes practices environmental, energy, public utility and
infrastructure law at Holland & Knight and advises clients on renewable
energy regulatory, project finance and development issues, including
environmental issues and project contracts. He represents project
developers, sponsors and banks on wind, solar PV, biomass,
geothermal, and energy storage projects, among other technologies,
and represents green banks along with project owners and developers
from New Jersey to California and New York to Nicaragua. He counsels
clients on and negotiates EPC Agreements, Power Purchase
Agreements and other major renewable project contracts.
He also assists clients with state and federal environmental and energy
regulatory compliance and enforcement matters and counsels clients
on energy and environmental issues in corporate M&A transactions,
including acquisitions and divestitures of fossil and renewable power
plants.
Steve is based in Holland & Knight’s New York City office.
Steve Humes
New York
212.513.3473
6
Jamie Hansen
Jamie Hansen focuses her practice on energy and infrastructure project
development, corporate and energy transactions, and securities law
matters. Jamie’s experience includes preparing engineering,
procurement and construction agreements for a range of project types,
including large-scale commercial solar power plants in the U.S. and in
Latin America.
Jamie previously worked as a mechanical engineer in the electric
power industry as well as the manufacturing industry. She is a licensed
professional engineer with experience in feasibility studies, design, and
construction of both traditional fossil fuel and renewable energy
facilities, including natural gas, coal, and solar power plants.
Jamie is an associate in the Denver office of Holland & Knight LLP.
Jamie Hansen
Denver
303.974.6546
7
Overview of a Wind or Solar PVProject Transaction Structure
• Introduction to Wind and Solar PV
Transactions
• Power Purchase Agreement
• Owner Buys Turnkey Project
• Regulatory Considerations (Net Metering
vs. Wholesale Power Project; PPAs vs.
Solar Leases; Size Limits)
• Summary of Key Ancillary Agreements
• PPA/REC Offtake Agreements
• Interconnection Agreement
• Wind: Turbine Supply Agreement
• Solar: PV Panel Module, Racking System and Inverter Supply Agreement (if applicable)
• Real Estate Entitlements
• O&M Agreement
8
Wind and Solar Project Regulatory Considerations: Net Metering and Interconnection Issues
State Regulatory Requirements Vary Significantly
• Distributed Generation: Project is “inside the fence” and interconnected electrically to host behind the utility meter.
• Net Metering: Revenue meter tracks electric usage both ways – when host uses less electricity than the wind farm or solar PV system generates, surplus flows to local electric utility – issue is who gets the credit for surplus power and for how much?
• DG Size Limits: Could be 2 MW or less; 6 MW or less; or less than host’s annual consumption needs – states allow utility’s interconnection tariff to limit size of project.
• EPC Contract: Performance contingent on Interconnection.
• Interconnection Delays: Utility-specific, contractor experience
9
Owner Site Acquisition Risks• State and Local Regulations and Compliance
Obligations
• NIMBY Issues (e.g., Wind Farm or Solar Siting)
• Zoning and Permitting Requirements/Restrictions
• Access to Rights of Way
• Existing Easements/Land Use Restrictions
• Access to the Electrical Grid (Interconnection)
• Pre-Existing Environmental Conditions (e.g.,
Brownfields, Landfills)
• Suitability of Existing Ground Conditions
• Closure Requirements/Termination Assurances (e.g.,
Restoration of Site)
10
EPC Agreement Defined
Engineering, Procurement and Construction Agreement
(EPC) – the design-build contract between the Project Owner
(the “Owner”) and General Contractor (the “Contractor”)
• Types of EPC Agreements – Contract Structure
• Wrap vs. No Wrap
• General Overview on Interplay with Other Agreements
• Supports PPA Performance and Schedule Obligations
• Often Relies on Supply Chain Agreements
• Often Links Performance Guarantees with O&M Agreement
Solar Wind
• Modules• Inverters• Racking Systems
• Turbines• Monopoles• Foundations
11
Wind and Solar EPC Risk Allocation
12
IT’S ALL ABOUT RISK
ALLOCATION…
• CONSTRUCTION
• Price Risk
• Permitting Risk
• Performance Risk
• Schedule Risk
• EXCEPTIONS
• OTHER FINANCING
ISSUES
Price Risk
• General:
• It is unlikely that a sophisticated offtaker will agree to pay for construction cost overruns through an increase in PPA pricing.
• Non-recourse construction financings are sized based on PPA pricing, PPA term and offtaker creditworthiness, with a small contingency to cover construction cost overruns, among other things.
• Accordingly, lenders will not generally take construction cost risk, and therefore require that the EPC Agreement be fixed-price, with only limited, customary exclusions that permit price increases.
• Payment Mechanics:
• Milestones vs. Schedule of Values
• Invoice approval process
• Lien waivers
• Right to dispute in good faith
13
Price Risk (Cont.)
• Exceptions:
− Equity assumes the risk that delays in issuing the Full Notice to Proceed (“FNTP”) will result in price increases.
• Negotiate a sufficient time period between execution of the EPC Agreement and the initial drawdown of the construction financing.
• Negotiate specified price increases for a limited period.
− Scope of Work
• Wrapped vs. Unwrapped Risk
• Owner-Supplied Equipment, Other Owner Obligations and Owner-Issued Change Orders
▪ Permits and Real Property Rights
▪ Interconnection Provider
− Contractor-Issued Change Orders
− Other Negotiated Exclusions
14
15
Permitting Risk
• Land use, zoning, noise
• Building Permits
• Federal and State Authorizations
• Environmental
− Brownfields
− Closed Landfills
− Open Landfills – Wind or solar built into cap/remediation design
Permits
16
Permitting Risk (Cont.)
• What is the timeline for issuing permits?
− Do all timelines match those of leases, PPAs and loan documents?
• Are public hearings required?
− Are hearings necessary to gain public support?
• Who is responsible for obtaining permits?
− Project Permits are obtained in the Owner’s name, but Contractor typically applies for and pursues applicable permits (with the Owner’s cooperation).
− Since Project Permits typically contain conditions to construction, the Contractor should be directly responsible for satisfying permit conditions.
− The Contractor is responsible for permits applicable to the Contractor’s tools, equipment, personnel and operations.
Performance Risk
• Will equipment and/or technology fail?
• Is the site suitable for construction and operation of the
facility?
• Will the EPC contractor fail to complete construction?
17
Performance Risk (Cont.)
TOOLS TO MANAGE RISK:
• Who has Permitting Responsibilities? (Deadlines,
Cooperation, Effects of Delay)
• Liquidated damages for performance
• E&O/Environmental Insurance
• Construction/Stop Loss Insurance (controls cost
overruns from unexpected conditions)
• Credit Support
• Owner Controlled Insurance Program (OCIP)
• Environmental Surveys
• Geotechnical Studies and Surveys
• Warranties
18
Performance Risk (Cont.)Will the Project Be Completed on
Time and within Budget?
• Completion is typically phased
• Mechanical Completion: Construction completion
• Substantial Completion:
• Required capacity tests and interconnection are complete
• Commercial Operation Date (COD)
• Typically, signifies transfer of project ownership for ITC purposes
• Final Completion:
• Final capacity tests are complete, if applicable
• Completion of all EPC scope, including punch list items and any site restoration
• Delivery of remaining documentation, including final lien waivers
19
Performance Risk (Cont.)
Will the Project Be Completed on Time and within
Budget?
• Project development risk is partially allocated to the
Contractor and insurers. The Contractor should
contractually assume the PPA’s COD and related
delivery obligations (performance guaranty, minimum
system size, etc.)
• LDs for Failure to achieve
• Warranties (linkage to O&M Agreement)
• Conditions Precedent: Interconnection
• Zoning and Land Use Approvals
20
Performance Risk (Cont.)• Capacity Guaranty:
• Minimum Guarantied Capacity
• Achievement of the minimum guarantied capacity is a condition to substantial completion, resulting in delay liquidated damages if such minimum guarantied capacity is not timely achieved
• Minimum guarantied capacity supports PPA capacity requirements
• Guarantied Capacity
• Failure to achieve the guarantied capacity results in performance liquidated damages, supporting lost revenue and a buydown of debt
• Cure Period
• Period
• Cooperation
• True-Up Payment
21
Performance Risk – Solar PV• Adjusted Energy Performance Test:
− Generally a long-term test (365 days) that occurs multiple times (1-5) after substantial completion, comparing actual energy performance to expected energy performance.
• Performance Liquidated Damages
• Module warranties last longer, but remedy is generally repair, replacement or supplemental panels.
− Adjustments are required to remove weather and operational affects, including for soiling, temperate, force majeure and irradiance.
− Risk of monitoring equipment inaccuracies increases.
• Redundancies
• Calibration requirements
22
Performance Risk – Wind• Guaranteed Power Curve Test:
− Tests the wind project’s ability to meet a Guaranteed Power Curve (wind speed vs. MWh), typically during the first year after substantial completion
− The parties may specify their own procedure, or reference the standards set forth by the International Electrotechnical Commission (e.g., IEC 61400), allowing for updates to standards between EPC contract and PPA signing and substantial completion
• Testing requirements should be aligned between the
EPC contract and the PPA
• Other tests may be required, such as sound level testing
23
Schedule Risk
• General:
− A sophisticated offtaker will impose an outside date by which the facility must be constructed, enforced through payment of delay liquidated damages and, eventually, the right to terminate the offtake agreement.
− The lenders are primarily concerned with a delay in construction resulting in the PPA being terminated (and potentially lost tax consequences, when applicable).
− The Owner is incurring delay damages, interest during construction, and other fixed costs in the event of a construction delay, and is also foregoing revenue from the sale of power.
− Accordingly, the Owner requires a guarantied milestone date(s) from the Contractor, as well as other provisions to mitigate construction schedule risk or otherwise share construction schedule risk with the Contractor.
24
Schedule Risk (Cont.)• Guarantied Milestones: The Parties will negotiate guarantied
substantial completion dates for individual turbines or blocks of PV
panels (in larger projects) and/or an overall substantial completion
date.
• If the Contractor fails to achieve any guarantied milestone date, the Contractor will pay, as the Owner’s sole remedy, a daily amount constituting liquidated damages until such milestone is achieved.
• Sizing delay liquidated damages
• Costs (in terms of money and schedule)
• Limitations on Liability/Performance Excuses
• Delay-In-Startup Insurance
• Termination: If the Contractor is too delayed, the Owner may want
the right to:
• Declare a default and terminate the EPC Agreement upon the Contractor missing an outside date; or
• Prospectively declare a default and terminate the EPC Agreement if the Contractor could reasonably be expected to miss an outside date.
25
Schedule Risk (Cont.)• Bonus: The Owner may consider offering a bonus for
early block substantial completion or overall substantial
completion.
− Calculation and Limitations
− Negotiation Strategy
• Acceleration: The Owner usually has the right to issue
a change order accelerating performance under the
EPC Agreement.
• Subcontractor Limitations: The EPC Agreement often
specifies permitted material subcontractors and requires
the Owner’s consent to change material subcontractors.
• Other Mitigation: Diligence on Contractor selection,
management team and labor supply, progress reporting,
PPA, others.
26
Issues Affecting Owner’s Risk
27
• Credit Risk
• Limitations on Liability
• Change Order and Force
Majeure Provisions
• Tax Issues
• Assignment
• Dispute Resolution and
Governing Law
Credit Risk• General:
− From a practical standpoint, the value of a contract is based both on the terms of the contract, and the ability of the parties to perform the terms of the contract.
− Lenders want an entity with an investment grade rating from Moody’s and/or S&P to guarantee the timely construction and performance of the project for a fixed-price in accordance with the EPC Agreement.
• Guarantee also secures other obligations of Contractor under the EPC Agreement, including warranty obligations
• The Contractor provides the primary warranty, and subcontractor credit risk may arise after the expiration of that primary warranty
− The Contractor wants to secure the Owner’s timely payment of the contract price (primarily to protect profit margin and payments to third parties).
28
Contractor Credit Support• General: If the Contractor as counterparty to the EPC
Agreement is not itself creditworthy, credit support will
be required.
• Forms of Credit Support: The Contractor’s credit
support is provided in one or more of the following
forms:
− Payment and Performance Guaranty
− Payment and Performance Bond
− Retention (regardless of the Contractor’s creditworthiness)
− Other rights of the Owner to withhold payment in defined circumstances from invoiced amounts under the EPC Agreement
− Insurance (regardless of the Contractor’s creditworthiness)
29
Owner Credit Support
• General: In a non-recourse financing, the Contractor will
generally mitigate its concerns regarding the Owner’s ability to
pay the contract price by:
− Conditioning FNTP upon the initial drawdown of the construction financing; and
− Structuring the milestone payment schedule to include an upfront down payment at FNTP, as well as “front-weighted” milestones that keep the Contractor ahead of its expected costs.
• Flow through termination provisions in subcontracts
• Owner will be concerned with ROI for “front-weighted” payments
• Other Protections: (1) Suspension rights for failure to pay, (2)
limitation on Owner-Issued Change Orders, and (3)
mechanics’ liens.
30
Guaranty• General: A separate payment and performance guaranty is
executed by a parent or affiliated company of the Contractor
simultaneously with the signing of the EPC Agreement.
• Basic Obligation: The Guarantor unconditionally, absolutely
and irrevocably guarantees the full and timely payment of all
amounts when due, and performance when due, by the
Contractor under the EPC Agreement.
• Limitations:
• In addition to “joint efforts” drafting clauses, a guaranty will contain a number of defense waivers.
• The Guarantor reserves any right, counterclaim and defense of the Contractor with respect to the guarantied obligations, other than specified defenses.
• Monetary and Temporal Limitations and Exceptions
• Governing Law: New York
31
Retainage• General: A percentage of each payment is withheld by the
Owner as performance security for the Contractor’s obligations
under the EPC Agreement, or a letter of credit is issued in lieu
thereof.
• Release:
− Most of the retainage is released at substantial completion.
• Except for amounts needed to complete punchlist items
• Occasionally, a minimum amount is maintained until final completion
− Post-substantial completion retainage is generally released as punchlist items are completed, with the remainder released as of final completion.
• Except for amounts spent by Owner to complete punchlist items
• Occasionally, a minimum amount is maintained through the general warranty period
32
Letter of Credit
33
• Easy execution and
provides liquidity
• Issued by a financial
institution that is sufficiently
qualified
• Irrevocable for a period of
time, but may be
automatically renewed
• Form of demand typically
attached
− Draw Conditions
Limitations on Liability• General: The Contractor’s return on investment is not substantial and
thus, the Contractor is generally not willing to expose its organization
to unlimited risk for one project. This is particularly true in a fixed-price
contract with schedule and performance guaranties that are supported
by a creditworthy parent.
• Caps on Liability:
− Delay Liquidated Damages
− Performance Liquidated Damages
− Overall Liquidated Damages
− Overall Limitation on Liability
• Before vs. After Substantial Completion
• Exceptions
▪ Third-party claims indemnifiable under the EPC Agreement
▪ Gross Negligence/Willful Misconduct/Intentional Fraud
▪ Title
▪ Insurance
34
Limitations on Liability (Cont.)• Other Waivers:
− Warranties: The Contractor waives all representations and warranties that are not expressly provided in the EPC Agreement.
− Exclusive Remedies:
• Remedies expressly set forth in the EPC Agreement
• Missing schedule milestone
• Missing performance guaranties
− Consequential Damages: Each Party waives any right to claim consequential damages under the EPC Agreement.
• Third-party claims indemnifiable under the EPC Agreement
• Gross Negligence/Willful Misconduct/Intentional Fraud
• Liquidated Damages/Termination Payments
• Others
35
Change Orders• General: Each Party has certain rights to demand a change in
the terms of the EPC Agreement. This includes the
Contractor’s rights to receive additional time and money based
on the occurrence of specified events (but generally not
modifications to other terms of the EPC Agreement).
• Events:
− Force Majeure
− Owner-Caused Delay
− Change in Law
− Subsurface Issues
− Changes in Work Required by Owner
− Suspension
36
Change Order Limitations• Mechanics: The Owner often negotiates for procedural
requirements that, if not strictly followed for a specified
event, will result in the Contractor losing its rights to a
change order for that event.
• Thresholds: The Owner often negotiates for materiality
qualifiers or dollar thresholds that must be exceeded
before the Contractor is entitled to a change order for
money.
• Schedule: The Owner often negotiates so that the
Contractor is permitted a change order for time only if the
applicable event affects the critical path and exceeds a
threshold of days.
• Other Requirements and Considerations: (1) Mitigation,
(2) Over-Head Allowances, (3) PPA, (4) Lump-Sum Pricing
and (5) Other.
37
Force Majeure
• Definition: Force Majeure generally means any
circumstance not within the reasonable control of the
claiming Party, but only if (a) such event is not due to
such Party’s negligence or willful misconduct and is not
due to such Party’s failure to perform any of its
obligations under the EPC Agreement; (b) such Party
could not have reasonably avoided such event and has
taken commercially reasonable efforts to mitigate and
eliminate the effects of such event; and (c) such Party
has provided the other Party with notice thereof within
three (3) days after such event has occurred.
• Examples: If the definition is satisfied: war, riot,
sabotage, acts of public enemy, terrorist acts, severe
and unusual weather, flooding, explosions, fire arising
from natural causes, earth quake, hurricanes, tornados,
forest fires and hailstorms.
38
Force Majeure (Cont.)• Exclusions: The following are typically excluded:
• Changes in interest rates, inflation rates, insurance premiums, commodity prices, exchange rates, availability of financing or other general economic conditions;
• Changes in financial condition of the Owner or Contractor;
• Any strike, lockout or other labor dispute of the Contractor or its subcontractors that are not regional or national;
• Equipment or labor pricing increases or labor unavailability; and
• Subcontractor’s failure to perform, mechanical failure of equipment or delays in receiving equipment or materials, in each case, to the extent not resulting from a specified Force Majeure.
• Termination: The Owner often has the right to terminate for
extended Force Majeure claimed by the Contractor.
39
EPC Agreement and Tax Issues• Role of Federal Investment Tax Credit
− § 48 ITC (Solar): 30% of basis after placed in service, phased out through 2022
− § 45 PTC (Wind): 2.5 cents (for 2019) x kWh produced for 10 years after placed in service, phased out through 2019
Date Construction Begins Placed in Service Date ITC Amount
Before 1/1/2020 Before 1/1/2024 30%
1/1/2020 to 12/31/2020 Before 1/1/2024 26%
1/1/2021 to 12/31/2021 Before 1/1/2024 22%
Before 1/1/2022 On or after 1/1/2024 10%
On or after 1/1/2022 Any 10%
Date Construction Begins PTC Reduction Amount
After 12/31/16 and before 1/1/18 20%
After 12/31/17 and before 1/1/19 40%
After 12/31/18 and before 1/1/20 60%
After 12/31/19 N/A – Ineligible for PTC
40
EPC Agreement and Tax Issues (Cont.)
• “Placed in Service” Issues – Don’t throw the switch on
until the Owner is Ready
− Tax Equity Investor does not want EPC Risk so Tax Equity Investor will typically not accept project ownership until Substantial Completion or just prior to “Placed In Service”
• State Tax Incentives and Grants
• Understand Documentation Required to Show
Completion and Project Costs
− Accountants must certify to Treasury Qualifying Cost of Project
41
Other EPC Agreement Issues
• Assignability: Assignment is generally subject to
consent.
− Collateral assignment is required for a non-recourse financing.
− Assignment to an affiliate is generally acceptable if credit support remains or is provided and such affiliation continues.
− Assignment by the Owner to a successor to the project is generally permissible in a non-recourse financing.
− Change of control is usually not restricted.
− Breach of assignment restrictions causes assignment to be void.
42
Other EPC Agreement Issues (Cont.)
• Dispute Resolution
− Arbitration, Expert Determination or Court of Law
− If Arbitration, consider:
• Number of arbitrators
• Location
• Sharing of Costs
• Final and Binding
• Permitting injunctions/interim court relief
− Consider including officer escalation process
• Choice of Law
− Owner typically specifies governing law.
− The Contractor may have objections based on familiarity/limits on liability.
43
44
Other Financing Issues
• Cooperation by Contractor/Guarantor
with Lenders:
• Direct Agreement/Consent to Collateral Assignment
• Legal Opinion
• Officer’s Certificate
• Financial and Other Information
• Independent Engineer
• Liens:
• Waivers
• Subordination
• Cure/Reimbursement/Indemnification
• Third-Party Beneficiaries
• Attachment to system
45
Other Financing Issues (Cont. )
• Termination Rights: The Contractor
should have limited rights to terminate
the EPC Agreement after FNTP.
• Default vs. Change Order
• Suspension
• Extended Force Majeure
• Insurance:
• Coverage
• Additional Insurance
• Subrogation
• Notice
• Payment of Proceeds
46
• Others:
• Setoff
• Title
• Risk of Loss
• IP and Other Indemnities
• Subsurface Risk
Other Financing Issues (Cont. )
Thank You
Partner | New York
212.513.3473
Associate | Denver
303.974.6546
47