Upload
desiree-pratt
View
33
Download
2
Tags:
Embed Size (px)
DESCRIPTION
Wind Energy Update. Larry Flowers National Wind Technology Center, NREL Nebraska - November, 2009. Installed Wind Capacity through end 3Q09. > 1 GW. 100 MW - 1 GW. < 100 MW. As of end of Sept 2009, 31,109 MW of wind installed in 36 states. Wind Industry 3Q 2009. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Citation preview
Wind Energy UpdateWind Energy Update
Larry Flowers Larry Flowers National Wind Technology Center, NRELNational Wind Technology Center, NREL
Nebraska - November, 2009Nebraska - November, 2009
As of end of Sept 2009, 31,109 MW of wind installed in 36 states
> 1 GW100 MW - 1 GW< 100 MW
Installed Wind Capacity Installed Wind Capacity through end 3Q09through end 3Q09
Wind Industry 3Q 2009Wind Industry 3Q 2009W
ind
MW
In
stal
led
Total Installation in 3Q 2009:1,649 MW
Total Installation in 2009:5,800 MW
Total U.S. Installation through 3Q 2009:
31,100 MW
Geographic Spread of Wind ProjectsGeographic Spread of Wind Projectsin the United States Is Reasonably Broadin the United States Is Reasonably Broad
Texas Easily Led Other StatesTexas Easily Led Other Statesin Both Annual and Cumulative Capacityin Both Annual and Cumulative Capacity
• 13 states had >500 MW of wind capacity at the end of 2008 (7 had >1000 MW, 3 had >2500 MW)
• 2 states (IA and MN) have in-state wind generation that exceeds 10% of total in-state generation (6 other states exceed 5%)
Annual Capacity (2008, MW)
Cumulative Capacity (end of 2008, MW)
Estimated Percentage of In-State Generation
Texas 2,671 Texas 7,118 Iowa 13.3% Iowa 1,600 Iowa 2,791 Minnesota 10.4% Minnesota 456 California 2,517 South Dakota 8.8% Kansas 450 Minnesota 1,753 North Dakota 7.1% New York 407 Washington 1,447 Kansas 6.7% Wyoming 388 Colorado 1,068 Colorado 6.6% North Dakota 370 Oregon 1,067 Oregon 5.4% Wisconsin 342 Illinois 915 Texas 5.3% Washington 284 New York 832 New Mexico 4.5% West Virginia 264 Oklahoma 831 Wyoming 4.1% Illinois 216 Kansas 815 Washington 3.9% Oregon 185 North Dakota 714 Oklahoma 3.7% Oklahoma 142 Wyoming 676 Montana 3.4% Indiana 131 New Mexico 497 California 3.1% Michigan 127 Wisconsin 395 Hawaii 2.2% Montana 125 Pennsylvania 361 Idaho 1.6% Missouri 106 West Virginia 330 New York 1.4% South Dakota 89 Montana 272 Illinois 1.4% California 89 South Dakota 187 Wisconsin 1.3% Pennsylvania 67 Missouri 163 West Virginia 0.9% Rest of U.S. 52 Rest of U.S. 622 Rest of U.S. 0.2%
TOTAL 8,558 TOTAL 25,369 TOTAL 1.8% Source: AWEA project database, EIA, Berkeley Lab estimates
Wind Now >20% of Some Utilities’ SalesWind Now >20% of Some Utilities’ Sales
See full report for the many assumptions used to generate the data in this table
Total Wind Capacity (end of 2008, MW)
Estimated Percentage of Retail Sales (for utilities with > 100 MW of wind)
Xcel Energy 2,906 Minnkota Power Cooperative 22.6% MidAmerican Energy 2,363 Empire District Electric Company 20.7% Southern California Edison 1,137 Otter Tail Power 14.9% Pacific Gas & Electric 981 Southern Minn. Muni. Power Authority 13.0% Luminant 913 Austin Energy 11.7% City Public Service of San Antonio 502 Xcel Energy 10.7% American Electric Power 468 MSR Public Power Agency 9.3% Alliant Energy 446 Great River Energy 9.1% Austin Energy 439 City Public Service of San Antonio 8.2% Puget Sound Energy 435 MidAmerican Energy 8.1% Exelon Energy 351 Public Service New Mexico 6.2% Great River Energy 319 Luminant 5.6% Empire District Electric Company 255 Alliant Energy 5.4% First Energy 244 Puget Sound Energy 5.3% San Diego Gas & Electric 239 Seattle City Light 5.3% Portland General Electric 225 Northwestern Energy 5.0% Public Service New Mexico 204 Minnesota Power 4.6% MSR Public Power Agency 200 Aquila 3.9% Reliant Energy 199 Portland General Electric 3.3% Minnkota Power Cooperative 193 Southern California Edison 3.1% Source: AWEA, EIA, Berkeley Lab estimates
0%
2%
4%
6%
8%
10%
12%
14%
16%
18%
20%
22%
Den
mar
k
Spa
in
Por
tuga
l
Irel
and
Ger
man
y
Gre
ece
Net
herla
nds
Indi
a
Aus
tria UK
Italy
U.S
.
Fra
nce
Aus
tral
ia
Sw
eden
Bra
zil
Tur
key
Can
ada
Chi
na
Japa
n
TO
TA
L
Approximate Wind Penetration, end of 2008
Approximate Wind Penetration, end of 2007
Approximate Wind Penetration, end of 2006
Pro
ject
ed W
ind
Gen
erat
ion
as a
Pro
port
ion
of
Ele
ctric
ity C
onsu
mpt
ion
U.S Lagging Other Countries in WindU.S Lagging Other Countries in WindAs a Percentage of Electricity ConsumptionAs a Percentage of Electricity Consumption
Note: Figure only includes the 20 countries with the most installed wind capacity at the end of 2008
Wind Is a Major Source of New GenerationWind Is a Major Source of New GenerationCapacity Additions: Wind Contributed 42% Capacity Additions: Wind Contributed 42%
of New Additions in the US in 2008of New Additions in the US in 2008
• Wind was the 2nd-largest resource added for the 4th-straight year
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008
Ann
ual C
apac
ity A
dditi
ons
(GW
)
Other non-renewable
Coal
Gas (non-CCGT)
Gas (CCGT)
Other renewable
Wind0% wind
42% wind
35% wind18% wind
12% wind
2% wind
3% wind
1% wind
4% wind
Nearly 300 GW of Wind inNearly 300 GW of Wind inTransmission Interconnection QueuesTransmission Interconnection Queues
• MISO (64 GW), ERCOT (52 GW), SPP (48), and PJM (43 GW) account for >70% of total wind in queues
• Not all of this capacity will be built….
0
50
100
150
200
250
300
Wind Natural Gas Coal Nuclear Solar Other
Entered Queue in 2008 Total in Queue at end of 2008
Nam
epla
te C
apac
ity (
GW
)
Twice as much wind as next-largest resource (natural gas) in queues
Wind Power in Queues (MW)Wind Power in Queues (MW)
Iowa14,569
Minnesota20,011
New Mexico14,136
North Dakota11,493
Penn.3,391
South Dakota30,112
Oklahoma14,677
Illinois16,284
Ohio3,683
Kansas13,191
Wisconsin908
Michigan2,518
WV1,045
New York8,000
VT155
Total 311,155 MW
MA492
Montana2,327
NJ1416
Under 1000 MW
1,000 MW-8,000 MW
Over 8,000 MW
Missouri2,050
IN8,426
Maine1,398
NH 396
RI347
DE450
MD810
VA820
Arkansas210
Texas63,504
Arizona7,268
California18,629
Colorado16,602
Idaho446
Nebraska3,726
Nevada3,913
Oregon9,361
Utah1,052
Washington5,831
Wyoming7,870
Source: AWEA
Drivers for Wind PowerDrivers for Wind Power
• Declining Wind Costs• Fuel Price Uncertainty• Federal and State
Policies• Economic Development• Environment/Water• Public Support• Green Power• Energy Security• Carbon Risk
As a Result of Foregoing Trends,Wind Prices Have Been Rising Since 2002-03…
• Wind power prices bottomed out with projects built in 2002-03• Projects built in 2008 are ~$15-20/MWh higher on average
2008 Wind Market Report; LBL
Wind Has Been Competitive withWind Has Been Competitive withWholesale Power Prices in Recent YearsWholesale Power Prices in Recent Years
• Wholesale price range reflects flat block of power across 23 pricing nodes
• Wind power prices include sample of projects built from 1998-2008
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008
49 projects 62 projects 80 projects 98 projects 117 projects 145 projects
2,268 MW 3,069 MW 4,083 MW 5,165 MW 7,654 MW 9,873 MW
2008
$/M
Wh
Nationwide Wholesale Power Price Range (for a flat block of power)
Cumulative Capacity-Weighted Average Wind Power Price (with 25% and 75% quartiles)
Wind project sample includes projects built from 1998-2008
Even Among More-Recent Projects, WindEven Among More-Recent Projects, WindWas Competitive in Most Regions in 2008Was Competitive in Most Regions in 2008
Note: Within a region there are a range of wholesale power prices because multiple wholesale price hubs exist in each area (see earlier map)
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
Texas Heartland Mountain Northwest Great Lakes California East New England Total US
2 projects 28 projects 10 projects 5 projects 6 projects 3 projects 4 projects 2 projects 60 projects
241 MW 2,133 MW 1,115 MW 831 MW 713 MW 233 MW 170 MW 29 MW 5,465 MW
Average 2008 Wholesale Power Price Range (by region)
2008 Capacity-Weighted Average Wind Power Price (by region) Individual Project 2008 Wind Power Price (by region)
Wind project sample includes projects built from 2006-2008
2008
$/M
Wh
Comparative Generation Costs
Source: LBL
Soaring Demand Spurs Expansion of U.S. Wind Turbine Manufacturing
COCO22 prices significantly prices significantly
increase the cost of coalincrease the cost of coal
Levelized Cost of Electricity (2010) vs. CO2 Price
50
60
70
80
90
100
110
120
130
140
0 10 20 30 40 50
Carbon Price ($/ton CO2)
20
06
$/M
Wh
Coal PC
Coal IGCC
Coal IGCC w/CCS
Gas CC
Nuclear
Wind Class 6
Wind Class 4
Wind Offshore Class 6
Economic Development OpportunitiesEconomic Development Opportunities
• Land Lease Payments: 3-5% of gross revenue $3000-4000/MW/year
• Local property tax revenue: 100 MW often brings in on the order of $500K-$1 million/yr
• 80-100 jobs/ 100 MW during construction• 6-8 permanent O&M jobs per 100 MW• Local construction and service industry:
Foundations, roads-- often done locally• Investment as Equity Owners: production
tax credit, accelerated depreciation, project revenues
• Manufacturing and Assembly plants expanding in U.S.-- single most significant economic development opportunity
19
On-site & Project Development Labor
Construction
Management and support
Earth moving, cement pouringTruck drivers, crane operators
20
Off-site and supply chain jobs, services, materials
Steel mill jobs, parts, servicesPhotos: E.C.Levy, Inc, Detroit, MI
Financing, banking, accountingEquipment manufacturing and sales
Property taxes
UtilitiesBlade and tower manufacturers
21
Induced jobs, services, materialsMoney spent on local area goods and services from increased
revenue: sandwich shops, child care, grocery stores, clothing, other retail, public transit, new cars, restaurants, medical services
22
Landowner Revenue:
Project Development & Onsite Labor Impacts
Local Revenue, Turbine, & Supply Chain Impacts
Induced Impacts
Local Property Taxes:
Construction Phase:
Operational Phase:
Construction Phase: Construction Phase:
Operational Phase: Operational Phase:
Jobs and Economic Impacts from the JEDI Model
Construction Phase = 1-2 yearsOperational Phase = 20+ years
JEDI Model Version W1.09.03e
Total economic benefit:New local jobs during construction:
New local long-term jobs:
1,000 MW of New Wind Power in Nebraska
• 87 new jobs
• $3.9 million/year
• 500 new jobs
• 51 new jobs
• $3 million/year• 3,551 new jobs • 1,388 new jobs
• 63 new jobs• $33.9 million to local economies
• $2.8 M/year to local economies
• $14.5 million/year to local economies
• $410.5 million to local economies
• $138.3 million to local economies
• $6.3 million/year to local economies
22
$1.05 billion
5,439
201
Renewable Portfolio Standards
State renewable portfolio standard
State renewable portfolio goal
www.dsireusa.org / August 2009
Solar water heating eligible *† Extra credit for solar or customer-sited renewables
Includes separate tier of non-renewable alternative resources
WA: 15% by 2020*
CA: 20% by 2010
☼ NV: 25% by 2025*
☼ AZ: 15% by 2025
☼ NM: 20% by 2020 (IOUs)
10% by 2020 (co-ops)
HI: 40% by 2030
☼ Minimum solar or customer-sited requirement
TX: 5,880 MW by 2015
UT: 20% by 2025*
☼ CO: 20% by 2020 (IOUs)
10% by 2020 (co-ops & large munis)*
MT: 15% by 2015
ND: 10% by 2015
SD: 10% by 2015
IA: 105 MW
MN: 25% by 2025(Xcel: 30% by 2020)
☼ MO: 15% by 2021
IL: 25% by 2025
WI: Varies by utility;
10% by 2015 goal
MI: 10% + 1,100 MW by 2015*
☼ OH: 25% by 2025†
ME: 30% by 2000New RE: 10% by 2017
☼ NH: 23.8% by 2025☼ MA: 15% by
2020+ 1% annual increase(Class I Renewables)RI: 16% by 2020
CT: 23% by 2020
☼ NY: 24% by 2013
☼ NJ: 22.5% by 2021
☼ PA: 18% by 2020†
☼ MD: 20% by 2022
☼ DE: 20% by 2019*
☼ DC: 20% by 2020
VA: 15% by 2025*
☼ NC: 12.5% by 2021 (IOUs)
10% by 2018 (co-ops & munis)
VT: (1) RE meets any increase in retail sales by
2012; (2) 20% RE & CHP by 2017
29 states & DC
have an RPS5 states have goals
KS: 20% by 2020
☼ OR: 25% by 2025 (large utilities)*
5% - 10% by 2025 (smaller utilities)
Policy Is Now More Favorable to WindPolicy Is Now More Favorable to WindThan At Any Other Time in the Past DecadeThan At Any Other Time in the Past Decade
• ARRA 2009 established a number of federal policies to support wind
• Federal PTC currently in place through 2012 (longest extension in history)
• Wind projects can elect a 30% ITC or a 30% cash grant in lieu of the PTC
• Subsidized financing double-dipping penalty removed for ITC / cash grant
• New allocations of Clean Renewable Energy Bonds
• Expansion and enhancement of Federal loan guarantee program
• Increased R&D funding
• Four new state RPS policies (MI, MO, OH, KS), and many revisions to existing state RPS policies (total is now 29 states plus Washington, D.C.)
• State renewable funds, tax incentives, utility planning, green power, and growing interest in carbon regulation all also played a role in 2008
• Efforts to pass an RPS and carbon regulation at the Federal level continue
Environmental BenefitsEnvironmental Benefits
• No SOx or NOx
• No particulates
• No mercury
• No CO2
• No water
Key Issues for Wind Power Key Issues for Wind Power
• Financial markets • Policy Uncertainty• Supply chain/workforce• Siting and Permitting: avian,
noise, visual, federal land
* Transmission: FERC rules, tariffs, new lines, PMA’s
• Operational impacts: variability, ancillary services, forecasting, cost allocation
• Accounting for non-monetary value: green power, no fuel price risk, reduced emissions and water use
Nebraska Wind Resources
“The future ain’t what it used to be.”
- Yogi Berra
- 200 400 600 800 1,0000
20
40
60
80
100
120
140
Quantity Available, GW
Lev
eliz
ed C
ost
of
En
erg
y, $
/MW
h
Onshore
Class 6
Class 4
Class 7
Class 5
Class 3
Offshore
Class 6
Class 4
Class 7
Class 5
Class 3
10% Available 10% Available
TransmissionTransmission
2010 Costs w/ PTC, $1,600/MW-mile, w/o Integration costs
The black open square in the center of a state representsthe land area needed for a sing le wind farm to produce thepro jected installed capacity in that state. The brown squarerepresents the actual land area that would be dedicatedto the wind turbines (2% of the b lack open square).
W ind CapacityTotal Installed (2030)
(G W )0.0 - 0.1
0.1 - 1
1 - 5
5 - 10
> 10
Includes offshore wind.
46 States Would Have Substantial Wind Development by 2030
20% Wind Scenario Impact on Generation Mix in 2030
• Reduces electric utility natural gas consumption by 50%
• Reduces total natural gas consumption by 11%
• Natural gas consumer benefits: $86-214 billion*
• Reduces electric utility coal consumption by 18%
• Avoids construction of 80 GW of new coal power plants
U.S. electrical energy mix
0%
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
No New Wind 20% Wind
Natural GasCoalNuclear
Hydro
WindSource *: Hand et al., 2008
32
Landowner Revenue:
Project Development & Onsite Labor Impacts
Local Revenue, Turbine, & Supply Chain Impacts
Induced Impacts
Local Property Taxes:
Construction Phase:
Operational Phase:
Construction Phase: Construction Phase:
Operational Phase: Operational Phase:
National (U.S.) Economic Impacts
Construction Phase = 1-2 yearsOperational Phase = 20+ years
JEDI Model Version W1.09.03e
Total economic benefit:New local jobs during construction:
New local long-term jobs:
Cumulative Impacts from 2007-2030
• 1.3 M FTE jobs
• $1,877 million
• 834,072 FTE jobs
• 366,441 FTE jobs
• $783 million• 2.63 M FTE jobs • 2.75 M FTE jobs
• 1.64 M FTE jobs• $65 billion to the US economy
• $17 B to the US economy
• $207 billion to the US economy
• $526 billion to the US economy
• $353 billion to the US economy
• $192 billion to the US economy
32
$1.36 trillion
6.2 M FTE
3.3 M FTE
From the 20% Scenario – 300 GW new Onshore and Offshore Development
Construction Phase:• 13,100 new jobs• $1.2 B to local
economiesOperational Phase:• 1,500 local jobs• $145 M/yr to local
economies
Wind energy’s economic “ripple effect”
Construction Phase = 1-2 yearsOperational Phase = 20+ years
Total economic benefit = $8.9 B
New local jobs during construction = 26,000
New local long-term jobs = 3,600
Indirect & Induced Impacts
Totals (construction + 20yrs)
Nebraska – Economic Impacts From the 20% Scenario
7,880 MW new development
Direct Impacts
Payments to Landowners: • $20 Million/yr Local Property Tax Revenue:• $30 Million/yrConstruction Phase:• 12,900 new jobs• $1.5 B to local economiesOperational Phase:• 2,000 new long-term jobs• $165 M/yr to local economies
All jobs rounded to the nearest hundred jobs; Millions of dollars greater than 10 million are rounded to the nearest five million
CO2 Emissions from the Electricity SectorCO2 Emissions from the Electricity Sector
02006 2010 2014 2018 2022 2026 2030
500
1,000
1,500
2,000
2,500
3,000
3,500
4,000
4,500
No New Wind Scenario CO2 emissions 20% Wind Scenario CO2 emissionsUSCAP path to 80% below today’s levels by 2050
CO
2E
mis
sion
s in
the
Ele
ctri
c S
ecto
r
(mill
ion
met
ric to
ns)
02006 2010 2014 2018 2022 2026 2030
500
1,000
1,500
2,000
2,500
3,000
3,500
4,000
4,500
No New Wind Scenario CO2 emissions 20% Wind Scenario CO2 emissionsUSCAP path to 80% below today’s levels by 2050
02006 2010 2014 2018 2022 2026 2030
500
1,000
1,500
2,000
2,500
3,000
3,500
4,000
4,500
No New Wind Scenario CO2 emissions 20% Wind Scenario CO2 emissionsUSCAP path to 80% below today’s levels by 2050
CO
2E
mis
sion
s in
the
Ele
ctri
c S
ecto
r
(mill
ion
met
ric to
ns)
Cumulative Water Savings from 20% Scenario
Reduces water consumption of 4 trillion gallons through 2030 (represents a reduction in electric sector water consumption by
17% in 2030)
U.S. Remains on Early Track To Meet 20%U.S. Remains on Early Track To Meet 20%of Nation’s Electricity with Wind by 2030 of Nation’s Electricity with Wind by 2030
But ramping up to ~16 GW/year and maintaining that pace for a decade is an enormous challenge, requiring proactive policy, substantial transmission expansion, mitigation of output variability, and eased siting and permitting processes
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
16
18
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
2025
2026
2027
2028
2029
2030
0
35
70
105
140
175
210
245
280
315
Deployment Path in 20% Wind Report (annual)
Actual Wind Installations (annual)
Deployment Path in 20% Wind Report (cumulative)
Ann
ual C
apac
ity (
GW
)
annual projections (EER)
Cum
ulat
ive
Cap
acity
(G
W)
Big Twelve StandingsBig Twelve Standings
Football
TX 10 - 6
OK 7 - 3
KS 5 - 6
IA 2 - 4
NE 3 - 2
CO 2 - 3
MO 1 - 4
WindResourcesGW (NR)
1360 (1)
401 (9)
914 (2)
482 (7)
889 (3)
267 (12)
79 (14)
2009MW(NR)
8797 (1)
865 (12)
1,014(10
3,063 (2)
153 (22)
1,242 (9)
309 (19)
15,433
20%GW
(NR)
20.5
38.5
7.2
19.9
7.9
2.5
0.1
96.6
38
Carpe Ventem
www.windpoweringamerica.gov