1
Letter to the Editor Wolf-Hirschhorn Syndrome and Pitt-Rogers-Danks Syndrome To the Editor: At the 46th Annual Meeting of the American Society of Human Genetics in San Francisco, we presented a paper on the natural history of Wolf-Hirschhorn syn- drome (WHS). We reported on our experience with older patients with WHS [Battaglia et al., 1996], and we reviewed the previous literature on that issue and on a similar disorder, the so-called Pitt-Rogers-Danks syndrome (PRDS) [Pitt et al., 1984; Donnai, 1986; Oor- thuys and Bleeker-Wagemakers, 1989; Lizcano-Gil et al., 1995]. We must say that the more carefully we perused the case histories and pictures of patients with PRDS, the more we became convinced that the ‘‘Pitt-Rogers- Danks syndrome’’ cases were just patients with 4p de- letion who had been missed. In addition, the described cases had received either no chromosomal studies (1 case) or only standard cytogenetics (regular G- banding, 5 cases; high-resolution banding, 1 case). None of the cases had received fluorescence in situ hy- bridization (FISH) studies. As we reported at the above-mentioned meeting, it is clear that whenever dealing with patients showing clinical signs suggestive of WHS, it is highly recom- mended to carry out high-resolution banding and FISH analyses, in order not to miss the diagnosis. Since there is little information on older patients with WHS, it is easy to misdiagnose them. Now we understand that 2 of the original patients published as PRDS [Pitt et al., 1984] did eventually receive a FISH analysis for WHS, showing a 4p micro- deletion [Clemens et al., 1996]. In addition, there have been two brief reports [Donnai, 1996; Lindeman-Kusse et al., 1996] dealing with PRDS and 4p deletion. Again, the more carefully we read them, the more we become convinced that such cases are WHS. Differences be- tween the two syndromes are negligible, while similari- ties are compelling. We think it is specious to argue that just a flat glabella or a wide mouth may be suffi- cient to retain the existence of a distinct entity, previ- ously identified only on the basis of negative standard cytogenetic studies. In addition, Clemens et al. [1996] noted that their patient 2, ‘‘previously diagnosed with PRDS, is developing a Greek warrior helmet facial ap- pearance consistent with WHS.’’ We conclude that PRDS is not a separate clinical entity. The PRDS cases represent the milder end of the WHS spectrum, with most of the older ones misdiag- nosed most likely because the WHS pictures from the literature are mostly of infants or young children. This has made it difficult to obtain a sense of the phenotype of older cases of WHS. Indeed, we agree with Donnai [1996] that all remain- ing cases labelled as PRDS should be studied with mo- lecular techniques. REFERENCES Battaglia A, Carey JC, Cederholm P, Viskochil D, Brothman A (1996): Natural history experience with 11 cases of Wolf-Hirschhorn syn- drome. Am J Hum Genet 59:36. Clemens M, Martsolf JT, Rogers JG, Mowery-Rushton P, Surti U, Mc- Pherson E (1996): Pitt-Rogers-Danks syndrome: The result of a 4p microdeletion. Am J Med Genet 66:95–100. Donnai D (1986): A further patient with the Pitt-Rogers-Danks syndrome of mental retardation, unusual face, and intrauterine growth retarda- tion. Am J Med Genet 24:29–32. Donnai D (1996): Editorial comment: Pitt-Rogers-Danks syndrome and Wolf-Hirschhorn syndrome. Am J Med Genet 66:101–103. Lindeman-Kusse MC, Van Haeringen A, Hoorweg-Nijman JJG, Brunner RG (1996): Cytogenetic abnormalities in two new patients with Pitt- Rogers-Danks phenotype. Am J Med Genet 66:104–112. Lizcano-Gil LA, Garcia-Cruz D, Garcia-Cruz O, Sanchez-Corona J (1995): Pitt-Rogers-Danks syndrome: Further delineation. Am J Med Genet 55:420–422. Oorthuys JWE, Bleeker-Wagemakers EM (1989): A girl with the Pitt- Rogers-Danks syndrome. Am J Med Genet 32:140–141. Pitt DB, Rogers JG, Danks DM (1984): Mental retardation, unusual face, and intrauterine growth retardation: A new recessive syndrome? Am J Med Genet 19:307–313. Agatino Battaglia* Institute for Clinical Research Stella Maris-Institute of Child Neurology and Psychiatry University of Pisa Calambrone (Pisa), Italy John C. Carey Division of Medical Genetics Department of Pediatrics University of Utah, HSC Salt Lake City, Utah *Correspondence to: Agatino Battaglia, Institute for Clinical Research Stella Maris-Institute of Child Neurology and Psychia- try, University of Pisa, via dei Giacinti 2, 56018 Calambrone (Pisa), Italy. Received 27 August 1997; Accepted 3 September 1997 American Journal of Medical Genetics 75:541 (1998) © 1998 Wiley-Liss, Inc.

Wolf-Hirschhorn syndrome and Pitt-Rogers-Danks syndrome

  • Upload
    john-c

  • View
    215

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: Wolf-Hirschhorn syndrome and Pitt-Rogers-Danks syndrome

Letter to the Editor

Wolf-Hirschhorn Syndrome andPitt-Rogers-Danks Syndrome

To the Editor:

At the 46th Annual Meeting of the American Societyof Human Genetics in San Francisco, we presented apaper on the natural history of Wolf-Hirschhorn syn-drome (WHS). We reported on our experience witholder patients with WHS [Battaglia et al., 1996], andwe reviewed the previous literature on that issue andon a similar disorder, the so-called Pitt-Rogers-Dankssyndrome (PRDS) [Pitt et al., 1984; Donnai, 1986; Oor-thuys and Bleeker-Wagemakers, 1989; Lizcano-Gil etal., 1995].

We must say that the more carefully we perused thecase histories and pictures of patients with PRDS, themore we became convinced that the ‘‘Pitt-Rogers-Danks syndrome’’ cases were just patients with 4p de-letion who had been missed. In addition, the describedcases had received either no chromosomal studies(1 case) or only standard cytogenetics (regular G-banding, 5 cases; high-resolution banding, 1 case).None of the cases had received fluorescence in situ hy-bridization (FISH) studies.

As we reported at the above-mentioned meeting, it isclear that whenever dealing with patients showingclinical signs suggestive of WHS, it is highly recom-mended to carry out high-resolution banding and FISHanalyses, in order not to miss the diagnosis. Since thereis little information on older patients with WHS, it iseasy to misdiagnose them.

Now we understand that 2 of the original patientspublished as PRDS [Pitt et al., 1984] did eventuallyreceive a FISH analysis for WHS, showing a 4p micro-deletion [Clemens et al., 1996]. In addition, there havebeen two brief reports [Donnai, 1996; Lindeman-Kusseet al., 1996] dealing with PRDS and 4p deletion. Again,the more carefully we read them, the more we becomeconvinced that such cases are WHS. Differences be-tween the two syndromes are negligible, while similari-ties are compelling. We think it is specious to arguethat just a flat glabella or a wide mouth may be suffi-cient to retain the existence of a distinct entity, previ-

ously identified only on the basis of negative standardcytogenetic studies. In addition, Clemens et al. [1996]noted that their patient 2, ‘‘previously diagnosed withPRDS, is developing a Greek warrior helmet facial ap-pearance consistent with WHS.’’

We conclude that PRDS is not a separate clinicalentity. The PRDS cases represent the milder end of theWHS spectrum, with most of the older ones misdiag-nosed most likely because the WHS pictures from theliterature are mostly of infants or young children. Thishas made it difficult to obtain a sense of the phenotypeof older cases of WHS.

Indeed, we agree with Donnai [1996] that all remain-ing cases labelled as PRDS should be studied with mo-lecular techniques.

REFERENCESBattaglia A, Carey JC, Cederholm P, Viskochil D, Brothman A (1996):

Natural history experience with 11 cases of Wolf-Hirschhorn syn-drome. Am J Hum Genet 59:36.

Clemens M, Martsolf JT, Rogers JG, Mowery-Rushton P, Surti U, Mc-Pherson E (1996): Pitt-Rogers-Danks syndrome: The result of a 4pmicrodeletion. Am J Med Genet 66:95–100.

Donnai D (1986): A further patient with the Pitt-Rogers-Danks syndromeof mental retardation, unusual face, and intrauterine growth retarda-tion. Am J Med Genet 24:29–32.

Donnai D (1996): Editorial comment: Pitt-Rogers-Danks syndrome andWolf-Hirschhorn syndrome. Am J Med Genet 66:101–103.

Lindeman-Kusse MC, Van Haeringen A, Hoorweg-Nijman JJG, BrunnerRG (1996): Cytogenetic abnormalities in two new patients with Pitt-Rogers-Danks phenotype. Am J Med Genet 66:104–112.

Lizcano-Gil LA, Garcia-Cruz D, Garcia-Cruz O, Sanchez-Corona J (1995):Pitt-Rogers-Danks syndrome: Further delineation. Am J Med Genet55:420–422.

Oorthuys JWE, Bleeker-Wagemakers EM (1989): A girl with the Pitt-Rogers-Danks syndrome. Am J Med Genet 32:140–141.

Pitt DB, Rogers JG, Danks DM (1984): Mental retardation, unusual face,and intrauterine growth retardation: A new recessive syndrome? Am JMed Genet 19:307–313.

Agatino Battaglia*Institute for Clinical Research Stella Maris-Institute

of Child Neurology and PsychiatryUniversity of PisaCalambrone (Pisa), Italy

John C. CareyDivision of Medical GeneticsDepartment of PediatricsUniversity of Utah, HSCSalt Lake City, Utah

*Correspondence to: Agatino Battaglia, Institute for ClinicalResearch Stella Maris-Institute of Child Neurology and Psychia-try, University of Pisa, via dei Giacinti 2, 56018 Calambrone(Pisa), Italy.

Received 27 August 1997; Accepted 3 September 1997

American Journal of Medical Genetics 75:541 (1998)

© 1998 Wiley-Liss, Inc.