Woodlin Elementary

Montgomery County Public SchoolsWoodlin Elementary School Montgomery County Public SchoolsWoodlin Elementary School Montgomery County Public SchoolsWoodlin Elementary SchoolWoodlin Elementary School

Woodlin Elementary

State of the SchoolAnnual Summary of Data and Results

leading into the 2011-2012 School Year


Together We Explore, Learn, and Succeed

Enrollment Trends Population Demographics mClass Reading

Reading benchmark testing-Grades K, 1, 2

MAP-R Measures of Academic Progress in Reading –Grades 3, 4, 5

MSAMaryland School Assessment-Grades 3, 4, 5

Math UnitBy course enrollment based on end of year mastery

TN2Terra Nova Two-Grade 2

Climate Survey DataAnnual survey-staff, random sample of parents, grade 3, 5 students

Woodlin Performance Data


Enrollment Trends

2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 20110

100

200

300

400

500

600


2011-2012Demographic Data

Hispanic Asian American Indian

Black Multi-Racial

Pacific Is-lander

White05

101520253035404550

17

6

0.2

27.8

4.50

44.6


2011 Special Populations

% of Population0

5

10

15

20

25

13.2

9

20.5

SPED ESOL FARMS


Reading End of Year BenchmarksmClass Data

2008 2009 2010 20110

20

40

60

80

100

81

98 93

94

9288

91

97

8878

79

91

Percent of Students Meeting Benchmark

Kindergarten Grade 1 Grade 2


Reading BenchmarksSpring 2011 Data

Black Asian Hispanic White0%

20%

40%

60%

80%

100%86%

100%

93%100%97%

100%

92% 98%

84%

100%

71%

98%

Percent of Students Meeting Benchmark

Grade K Grade 1 Grade 2


Spring 2011 MAP-R% Meeting Target RIT for Grades 3-4-5- combined

2010 201130%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

74.6%78.8%

64.6%68.1%

79.7%

60.1%

90.1% 91.6%

83.3%

All Black Asian Hispanic White


Spring 2011 MAP-R% Meeting Target by Race for Grades 3-4-5

Black Asian Hispanic White All30

40

50

60

70

80

90

100

61.1

83.3

71.4

100.0

82.5

66.7

83.3

44.4

82.9

72.5

76.2

83.3

71.4

95.7

84.2

Grade 3 Grade 4 Grade 5


MAP-R% Meeting Target RIT by Spring 2011

2010 20110

102030405060708090

69.9

8481.4

72.572.6

82

Grade 3 Grade 4 Grade 5


MSA Cut Scores

Reading Math

Grade Proficient Advanced

3

388

456

4

371

437

5

384

425

Grade Proficient Advanced

3

379

441

4

374

433

5

392

453


2008 2009 2010 2011 201250556065707580859095

100

71.6

76.5

81.2

85.9

90.6

69.1

74.2

79.4

84.5

89.7

Reading Math

AMO Targets* Goal is 100% by 2014 *


Reading MSA 2011

All Black or AA

Asian Hispanic of Any Race

White Multi-Racial

FARMS SPED LEP70

75

80

85

90

95

100 96.1

89.6

100 100 98.8 100

9294.7 94.4

Percent Proficient/Advanced

Target AMO was 85.9%

Next years target of 90.6


Math MSA 2011

All Black or AA

Asian Hispanic White Multi FARMS SPED LEP40

50

60

70

80

90

100 89.9

82.1

94.4 91.4 93.8100

80

81.6 88.9

Percent Proficient/AdvancedNext years target of 89.7 Target AMO

was 84.5%


MSA TrendsAchievement Gap [Reading]

2008 2009 2010 201175

80

85

90

95

100

Black or AA Asian Hispanic White


MSA Trends

Achievement Gap [Math]

2008 2009 2010 201170

75

80

85

90

95

100

Black or AA Asian Hispanic White


MSA TrendsReading

FARMS, SPED, LEP

2008 2009 2010 20110

102030405060708090

100

86.5

96.4 96.292

79.4

94.4100

94.7

81

94.4100

94.4

FARMS SPED ELL


MSA TrendsMath

FARMS, SPED, LEP

2008 2009 2010 20110

102030405060708090

100

78.8 78.275

80

54.3

69.474.3

81.690.9 88.995.5 88.9

FARMS SPED ELL


2011 Alt-MSA% Students Proficient/Advanced

2010 20110.0

10.020.030.040.050.060.070.080.090.0

100.0

100.0 100.0100.0 100.0

Math Reading


Science MSA: Grade 5 Only

AS BL HI MU WH Grand Total0.0%

10.0%

20.0%

30.0%

40.0%

50.0%

60.0%

70.0%

80.0%

90.0%

100.0%

83.3% 84.2%87.5%

50.0%

100.0%

89.7%

Percent Prof/Adv


Math Unit Mastery by Course: NOT by grade level of enrollment, but for the course taken including on level and advanced students

Percent of Students Who Scored at or above 75% for all units combined (end of year data)

Grade K Grade 1 Grade 20.0%

10.0%

20.0%

30.0%

40.0%

50.0%

60.0%

70.0%

80.0%

90.0%

100.0%

68.2%

96.0%

79.3%

100.0% 100.0%

75.0%

85.7%90.9%

98.0%94.3%

100.0%

90.4%

BL/AA Asian Hispanic White


Math Unit Mastery by Course: NOT by grade level of enrollment, but for the course taken including on level and advanced students

Percent of Students Who Scored at or above 75% for all units combined (end of year data)

Grade 3 Grade 4 Grade 5 Grade 6 Grade 70.0%

10.0%

20.0%

30.0%

40.0%

50.0%

60.0%

70.0%

80.0%

90.0%

100.0%

94.4%

74.1%78.9%

100.0%

50.0%

100.0%

84.6%

94.7%

100.0%

80.0%

100.0% 100.0%

70.0%

83.3%

0.0%

BL/AA Asian Hispanic White


Selected Celebrations PRIMARY READING

All grade levels had more than 90% of students meet the reading target!

1st grade had the highest number of BL/AA students hit the benchmark (97%)!

Kindergarten had the highest number of Hispanic students hit the benchmark (93%)!

2nd Grade had over a 20% increase in the percentage of students to meet benchmark (from 70% in 2010 to 91% in 2011)!


Selected Celebrations!

MSA Reading All special education students exceeded the target! Increase of 14.6% for the percentage of BL/AA students

scoring advanced! MSA Math

Special education performance increased by 15.6% points (from 74.3% in 2010 to 89.9% in 2011)!

Increase of 17.2% of Hispanic students and increase of 5% of FARMs students!

TN2 All students, and all subtest areas 76-80% of students scored at

the 50%ile or higher!


2nd Grade TN2 PerformancePercent of students at or above 50th %ile

Reading Language Lang Mechanics Math Math Comp4045505560657075808590

68.8 7066.3

73.8 7573.7

66.7

59.6

68.4 68.4

76

82

62

80 80

2009 2010 2011

Target is 70% of students


2011 2nd Grade TN2 PerformancePercent of students at or above 50th %ile

Reading Language Lang. Mechan-

ics

Math Math Comp.

0%10%20%30%40%50%60%70%80%90%

100%

African Amer. Asian Hispanic White

Target is 70% of students at the 50th %ile


Climate SurveyBackground Information

2010 20110%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

80% 81%

28% 29%

Student Response Rate Parent Response Rate


Climate SurveyHighlighted Gains

(Gains greater than 3.0% points)Student Survey Teachers help when I don’t understand (↑5.5%) Receive prompt feedback on assignments (↑6.0%) Feel welcomed at school (↑15.8)

Parent Survey I feel welcomed at this school (↑4.6%) Clear process for addressing concerns (↑8.7%) Atmosphere of open communication (↑4.8%)


Climate SurveyHighlighted Areas of Need

Student Survey Teachers explain how to do homework (↓3.1%) Can talk to a school administrator about a problem

(↓2.5%) Teachers explain things when I don’t understand (↓1.7%) Teasing is a problem (↓6.0%)

Parent Survey School does a good job of welcoming families of diverse

cultures (↓1.4%) School provides opportunities for parents to be involved

(↓1.4%)


Climate SurveyTop 3 Areas

Student Survey School staff encourages students to respect others

(97.2%) My teachers help me when I don’t understand (96.3%) My teachers have high expectations for me to do well in

school (95.3%)

Parent Survey Teacher expect my child to do well in class (99.0%) My child feels safe at school (99.0%) I am satisfied with the overall instruction my child

receives at this school (99.0%)


Climate SurveyLowest 3 Areas

Student Survey Students in this school are well behaved (60.7%) I can work in my classroom without being bothered by

other students (54.2%)

Parent Survey The school has a clear process for addressing my

concerns (94.9%) My child’s teacher keeps me informed about my child’s

progress (95.0%) It is easy for me to talk to my child’s teacher about things

concerning my child (96.0%)


Climate SurveyStaff Trends: Top 3

Strengths (100%) Collaborate w/ colleagues Help & support from colleagues Satisfaction with work Support from administration when working w/ parents Safe place to work Would recommend as a good place to work

Relative Areas of Need Amount of non-teaching duties is reasonable (77.8%) I have time during workday to plan instruction for my

students (50.0%) System-wide professional development opportunities meet

my needs(74.1%) Bathrooms are kept well supplied (55.3%)


Climate SurveyStaff Survey

Strengths Comparison to County

Protects In-structional Time

Shared Leadership Feedback on my work

Positive Morale0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

100

85.793.5

84.4 89.1

7177.3 70.5 72.3

Woodlin MCPS


Climate SurveyTeasing: Percent positive response

2009 2010 20110

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

68.565

71

17.721.7 15.3

34.8

46.2

54.3

Students Parents Staff

Trending upward


Climate SurveyBullying : Percent positive response

2009 2010 20110

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

55.1

61.9

64.2

23 24 16.7

30.4

38.5

17.4

Students Parents Staff


Action Items &Next Steps

Effective co-teaching Relationships and High

Expectations!!! Academic Focus Clubs Staff development on

effective Inquiry groups on areas

of professional growth during staff meetings

Documents

Woodlin Elementary