Upload
gervase-skinner
View
214
Download
1
Tags:
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Working GroupCore Team Meeting II
February 14, 2008
Meeting OverviewRecap Previous Meeting and Status Update
Work Group Structure Schedule Study Area Alternatives to be analyzed Additional model runs Discussion and concurrence on above items
Review and Approve Technical Working Group Recommendations: Wedge Area Zone splits Zonal Data: Wedge Area and Casino Additional Network Updates Highway Network Posted Speed Assumptions Transit Modeling Assumptions Transit Network Configurations Transit Service: Frequency and Proposed Speeds
Discussion of Performance Measures
Wrap up: Upcoming activities and Future Meetings 2
University Drive ConnectionWorking Group
Advisory/Oversight (Policy) GroupCore Working Group Technical Working Group
3
Schedule (Completed)01/11/2008: Joint MPO Meeting
01/23/2008: Working Group Core Team Meeting I
02/07/2008: Technical Working Group Meeting I
4
Upcoming Schedule02/14/08: Working Group Core Team Meeting II
Approve Modeling AssumptionsConduct Model RunsPrepare Model Run Results
03/06/08: Technical Working Group Meeting IIReview Model Run ResultsAssess Mitigation Needs
03/13/08: Working Group Core Team Meeting III
April 20008: Present findings to the MPOs
5
6
Study Area
Alternatives to be analyzedShown on the Model Alternative Table
5 University Drive alternatives (1a ~ 1e)3 Coral Ridge Drive alternatives(2a ~ 2c)4 SR-7 alternatives (3a ~ 3d)2 Lyons Road alternatives(4a & 4b)2 Sawgrass Expressway alternatives (5a & 5b)*1 FP&L ROW alternatives (6a)*Total: 17 Network alternatives
* for “investigation” only at this time
7
Additional Model Runs (1/2)For comparison, Alternative 1a will be run
“With” and “Without” additional developments of “Wedge” and “Expanded Casino”The “With” additional development Person Trip
Table of Alternative 1a will be the default “Locked” Trip Table for all other alternative model runs
The “Without”: 1 DU/10 Acre for Wedge Area, No Casino expansion trips (but with approved additional hotel/retail)
8
Additional Model Runs (2/2)Alternative 1d will be run with and without
the “Locked” trip table for comparison
9
Discussion and Concurrence
Proposed Zone Splits
11
Wedge Boundary
12
Zonal Data: “With” and “Without” Wedge
Wedge Development (Zone #779 SERPM)
Year HHs Autos Workers Pop H/M EmpInd EmpCom EmpServ HighEnroll2000 6 8 6 14 0 0 0 0 02030 13 20 15 34 0 0 0 0 0
Land Use Intensity Unit Net New TripsSingle Family Detached 2,822 DU 27,007
General Commercial 250,000 SF 6,610Total 33,617
New Vehicle Trips “With” Intensified Wedge Development
LRTP Zonal Data: “Without” Wedge Development
13
Zonal Data: Casino TAZ Zonal Data
Casino Development (Coconut Creek Casino Master Plan Traffic Impact Analysis)
Land Use Intensity Unit Net New Daily TripsCasino 1,363 Slots 6,363
Commercial 150,000 SF 5,890Resort Hotel 1,000 Rooms 2,419
Total 14,672
Broward TAZ #65 (SERPM TAZ 1665)
14
YearType of
DevelopmentHHs Autos Workers Pop H/M EmpInd EmpCom EmpServ HighEnroll
2000 - 0 0 0 0 0 3 706 15 0Casino 0 0 0 0 1,000 0 194 578 0Other 2,375 3,876 3,077 9,035 300 1,543 2,202 2,023 3,394Total 2,375 3,876 3,077 9,035 1,300 1,543 2,396 2,601 3,394
2030
Additional Network Update (1a)County Line Road East Terminus/connection
15
Additional Network Update (1b) County Line Road East Terminus/Connection to Hillsboro Blvd.
16
Additional Network Update (2)New Turnpike Interchange
Turnpike is studying: Full Interchange at Clint Moore Road Partial Interchanges: to/from north at Yamato Road
and to/from south at Palmetto Park Road Full interchange at Palmetto Park Road
What should be coded onto the network?Should the new interchange be coded onto all
the alternatives? Or, a new alternative for comparison?
17
Yamato Rd
Clint Moore Rd
Glades Rd
Palmetto Park Rd
Sawgrass Exwy
Hillsboro Blvd
SW 18th St
Lox Rd
S.R
. 7
I-95
S.R
. 7
I-95
SERPM 6.02 Proposed
Existing interchange
Future interchange in existing SERPM model
Proposed partial interchange at Yamato Rd / Palmetto Park Rd
Interchanges on Turnpike
18
Proposed Posted Speeds forNew Links on each AlternativeTypical
8LD: 50 MPH (SR-7) 6LD: 45 MPH ~ 50 MPH (SR-7)4LD: 40 MPH ~ 45 MPH2L: 30 MPH
See the example on the following slide and separate Attachment for specifics
19
Model ApplicationUsing SERPM v6.02 with 2030 analysis year“Locking” the person trip table
Using the person trip table input to mode choice from the baseline alternative (1a) for all other alternatives
Entire model is run for baseline alternative Only necessary components are run for all
other alternatives (except additional runs for Alternative 1D)
21
22
Other AssumptionsThe price of gasoline is broadly included
in the auto operating cost, which is computed on a cost per mile basis
The model assumes that the auto operating cost does not increase over and above the inflation rate through 2030
Transit fares have been modified slightly reflect changes to existing fare structures, except for PalmTran-to-BCT transfers that assume a unified fare
Modeling TransitTravel forecasting models are sensitive mainly to
Operating and Service characteristics:Provider : Routing, Stops, Speed, Service frequency, and
Fare StructureUsers : travel time, wait time, out-of-pocket cost, and
transfers
Other characteristics, such as perceived safety, station/stop amenities and reliability are accounted for in the model, but it is not directly sensitive to themE.g., improving “perceived safety” will not increase
ridership
23
Transit Speed AssumptionsAll transit service will be mixed-flow unless
operating in exclusive transit lanesTransit speeds in mixed-flow lanes are a
function of the auto speedTransit speeds in exclusive transit lanes are
computed using average speeds for local service and equations in motion with an allowance for signal pre-emption for limited-stop services
24
25
Transit FaresPropose to adjust SERPM 2030 fares so that
they reflect current valuesBCT one-way fare from $1.00 to $1.50BCT pass from $2.50 to $2.36PalmTran one-way fare from $1.25 to $1.50PalmTran pass from $3.00 to $3.50
Assume no fare difference between services on exclusive ROW and in mixed-flow
Transit Network AssumptionsBased on the 2030 LRTP transit networksModifications for cross county service
integration:Coordinate transit service between northern
Broward and southern Palm Beach CountiesProvide service in “Wedge” area
26
Transit Network AssumptionsUsing the modified transit network for all
alternatives except:Alt 1e – apply exclusive transit lanes on University
Drive between County Line Road and Palmetto Park Road
Alts 3c, 3d – apply exclusive transit lanes on SR-7 from Golden Glades to Glades Road and on Glades Road from SR7 to Florida Atlantic University
Alt 4b – apply exclusive transit lanes along Lyons Road between Commercial Blvd and Glades Road and along Glades Road from SR-7 to Florida Atlantic University
27
29
Transit Service in Year 2000F
lorida’s Turnpike
Lyons Rd
Lox Rd
Glades Rd
Sawgrass Expy
Palmetto Park Rd
Sample Rd
S.R
. 7University D
r
Coral R
idge Dr
30
“Existing” SERPM 2030 LRTP Transit ServiceF
lorida’s Turnpike
Lyons Rd
Lox Rd
Glades Rd
Sawgrass Expy
Palmetto Park Rd
Sample Rd
County Line Rd
S.R
. 7University D
r
Coral R
idge Dr
#2 and Univ. Dr “Breeze” terminate at Sample Rd
#18 and #441 “Breeze” terminate near the County Line Rd
31
Proposed Baseline Transit ServiceF
lorida’s Turnpike
Lyons Rd
Lox Rd
Glades Rd
Palmetto Park Rd
Sample Rd
County Line Rd
Proposed park and ride lot
S.R
. 7
University
Dr
#88 now serves S.R.7 & Glades Rd parking lot
#2 and Univ. Dr .“Breeze” now serves to Boca Town Center
#18 and #441 “Breeze” now serve FAU
Sawgrass Expy
32
Transit Configuration B(University Dr. & Coral Ridge Dr. not extended)
Florida’s T
urnpike
Lyons Rd
Lox Rd
Glades Rd
Sawgrass Expy
Palmetto Park Rd
Sample Rd
County Line Rd
Without University Dr. Connection
#2, Univ. Dr. “Breeze” & #88 moved onto Holmberg Rd.
S.R
. 7University D
r
Coral R
idge Dr
33
Transit Configuration C (Coral Ridge Dr Extension)
Florida’s T
urnpike
Lyons Rd
Lox Rd
Glades Rd
Sawgrass Expy
Palmetto Park Rd
Sample Rd
County Line Rd
#2, Univ. Dr. “Breeze” & #88 moved onto Coral Ridge Extension
Coral Ridge Dr. Extension
S.R
. 7University D
r
Coral R
idge Dr
34
Transit Service Frequency
RoadwayService Frequency (vehicles/hr)
2000 2030 LRTP Proposed Baseline
Coral Ridge Dr. 2 2 2
University Dr. 3 10 10-14
S.R. - 7 6 10 10
Glades Rd. 2 10 22
Proposed Speeds (1)Congested Time on S.R. - 7 (Sample Rd.
to Glades Rd.)Proposed speeds partially based on TCRP 26a
and 26b reports
DirectionDistance
(miles)
Auto Time (min)
Bus Time (min)
Proposed Time (min) on
Exclusive Transit Lanes
Local Limited Stop
NB 6.5 12 28 19 to 23 13 to 16
SB 6.5 14 31 19 to 23 13 to 16All times represent 2030 congested condition 35
Proposed Speeds (2)Congested Speeds on S.R.- 7 (Sample
Rd. to Glades Rd.)Proposed speeds partially based on TCRP 26a
and 26b Reports
DirectionDistance
(miles)
Auto Time (mph)
Bus Time (mph)
Proposed Speed (mph) on
Exclusive Transit Lanes
Local Limited Stop
NB 6.5 33 14 17 to 21 25 to 30
SB 6.5 28 13 17 to 21 25 to 30All speeds represent 2030 congested condition
36
37
Example of Model OutputDifference in Daily Traffic Volume (1c vs. 1a)
Sawgrass Expy
Florida’s T
urnpike
Lyons Rd
Coral R
idge Dr
Pow
erline Rd
University D
r
S.R
. 7
Sample Rd
Yamato Rd
Palmetto Park Rd
I-95
County Line Rd
Lox Rd
Glades Rd
Volume decrease
Volume increase
Alternatives Evaluation andPerformance MeasuresSystems Information within the study area
System and Lane MilesSystem VMT and VHTTransit route miles, runs)
LOSLink VolumesPerson throughputTransit RidershipsAdditional Lane Miles Needed for each
AlternativeOther? 38
Wrap UpFuture ActivitiesNext Meetings
39