Worksheet Taj Lab

8/10/2019 Worksheet Taj Lab

1/58

Ayni-Panjakent-Uzbekistan Border Road

Page 1 of 5

Form No. Description of the Form

1 Material Source

2 Particle Size Analysis of Fills

3 Chart for Determining Values of 'K' Used in Particle Size Analysis of Fills

4 Atterberg Limits

5 Dry Density vs. Moisture Content Relationship Using 2.5 kg Rammer

6 Dry Density vs. Moisture Content Relationship Using 4.54 kg Rammer

7 Field Density Test of Fill Materials by Sand Replacement Method

8 Laboratory C.B.R. Test (Determination of Unit Weight)

9 Laboratory C.B.R. Test (Penetration Test and Determination of Swelling)

10 Laboratory C.B.R. Test (Soaked CBR Results)

11 Specific Gravity Test on Soils

12 Determination of Moisture Content of Soil by Oven Drying

13 Calibration of Sand and Sand Cone Apparatus

14 Particle Size Analysis of Aggregates for Subbase

15 Particle Size Analysis of Aggregates for Lower Base(Crushed Rock or Boulder or Crushed Over Burnt Bricks)

16 Particle Size Analysis of Crushed Gravel Aggregates for Lower Base17 Particle size Analysis of Aggregates for Upper Base

18 Specific Gravity & Water Absorption of Aggregates

19 Abrasion Test on Small Size Coarse Aggregate by Use of Los Angeles Machine

20 Density Correction Chart for Coarse Particles in the Soil Compaction Test

21 Field Density Test for Subbase and Bases by Sand Replacement Method

22 Determination of Total Moisture Content of Aggregate by Drying

23 Materials Finer Than # 200 Sieve by Washing

24 Sieve Analysis of Filler

25 Particle Size Analysis of Combined Aggregates for Binder Course

26 Particle Size Analysis of Combined Aggregates for Wearing Course

27 Soundness of Aggregates by Use of Sodium Sulphate

28 Sand Equivalent Test

29 Stripping Test by AASHTO Method: T 182

30 Quantities of Bituminous Prime & Tack Coats

31 Crushed Aggregates of (>2) Fractured Faces (+ 4.75mm, visual)

32 Penetration Test on Bituminous Materials

33 Specific Gravity of Semi-Solid Bituminous Materials

34 Bituminous Extraction & Gradation of Hot Mix

35 Field Density Test of Cored Asphalt Concrete

36 Maximum Specdific Gravity of Bituminous Paving Mixtures

37 Asphalt Concrete Hot Mix Design by Marshall Method

38 Determination of the Presence of Organic Impurities in Fine Aggregate

40 Determination of Compressive Strength of Concrete Cubes

41 Sieve Analysis of Fine Aggregate for Cement Concrete

42 Sieve Analysis of 20mm Coarse Aggregate for Cement Concrete

43 Determination of Flakiness Index

44 Aggregate Crushing Value (ACV) of Coarse Aggregate

45 Clay Lumps and Friable Particles

46 Determination of Slump of Fresh Concrete

47 Normal Consistency and Setting Time of Cement

48 Compressive Strength of Hydraulic Cement Mortar

50 Deflection Test by Benkelman Beam Method

51 Concrete Pouring Record

52 Request for Inspection / Survey / Quality Test

53 MDD vs. Location

54 Sample Record Card

List of Test Forms

WORKSHEETS FOR TESTING


2/58


Page 2 of 58

Form No. Description of the Form

List of Test Forms

R1 Test Report of Ordinary Fill Material

R2 Test Report of Selected Fill (Improved Subgrade) MaterialR3 Test Report of Aggregate Subbase Material

R4 Test Report of Aggregate Lower Base Material

R5 Test Report of Aggregate Upper Base Material

R6 Test Report of Fine Aggregate for Asphalt Concrete

R7 Test Report of Coarse Aggregate for Asphalt Concrete

R8 Test Report of Combined Aggregate for Asphalt Concrete Binder & Wearing Courses

R9 Test Report of Asphalt Concrete Binder Course Mixture

R10 Test Report of Asphalt Concrete Wearing Course Mixture

R11 Test Report of Fine Aggregate for Cement Concrete

R12 Test Report of Coarse Aggregate for Cement Concrete

R13 Test Report of Compressive Strength of ConcreteR14 Test Report of Bitumen

R15 Test Report of Portland Cement

C1 One Monthly Balance Scale Value Check

C2 Six Monthly Balance Repeatability Check

C3 Balance Check Departure from Nominal Value

C4 Balance Check For The Effect of Off-Centre Loading

C5 Clibration of Thermometers

C6 Speedy/Oven Dry Moisture Content Comparison

C7 Batch Plant Calibration Departure from Nominal Value

C8 Batch Plant Calibration Repeatability Check

C9 Calibration of Liquid Limit Apparatus

C10 Calibration of Moulds

C11 Calibration of Tamping Rod

C12 Calibration of Compaction Rammer

C13 Calibration of Sieves of Openings > 2mm

C14 Calibration of Dial Gauges

C15 Calibration of Slump Cones

WORKSHEETS FOR CALIBRATION

SHEETS FOR REPORTING TEST RESULTS


3/58


Page 3 of 58

* 1

* 2

* 3

* 4

* 5

* 6

* 7

* 8

* 9

* 10

* 11

7A

* 12

* 13

* 14

* 15

* 16

* 17

* 18

*

* 19

*

*

*

*

* 24

* 25

* 26

* 27

* 28

*

* 29

* 30


4/58


Page 4 of 58

WS -


5/58


6/58

Lab Ref. No.:

Location:.......................... Date of Sampling............

Material Type: .. Date of Testing:

Determination Number

Container Number

Number of Blows

Wt. of Can & Wet Soil (gm)

Wt. of Can & Dry Soil (gm)

Wt. of Water (1-2 = 3) (gm)

Wt. of Can (gm)

Wt. of Dry Soil (2-4=5) (gm)

Moisture Content (3/5)x100%

Results:

Remarks:

Tested By: Witnessed by:Contractor Consultant

Plasticity Index %Liquid Limit % Plastic Limit %

AYNI - PANJAKENT - UZBEKISTAN BORDER ROAD

ATTERBERG LIMITS

6

2

3

4

5

LIQUID LIMIT PLASTIC LIMIT

1

WS - 1

Form No. WS 1 Revision No. 0 Revision Date: xx/xx/xx


7/58

Lab Ref. No.:

Description of Material: Date of Testing:

Blows / Layer: ________ No. of Layers: _______ Wt. of Rammer: ... kg. Drop ht.: . mm

Mould Dia: __________ mm Mould Height: ___________ mm Vol. of Mould: _______ x 10-6

m3

Density Determination

Initial weight g

Initial moisture content %

Water added g

Target moisture content %

Weight of mould + wet mat'l g

Weight of mould g

Weight of wet mat'l g

Bulk density

Dry density

Determination of Moisture ContentMoisture container No.

Container + wet mat'l g

Container + dry mat'l g

Water g

Container g

Dry mat'l g

Moisture content %

Optimum MC = %

Oversize fraction (+19mm= %

Moisture content, %

Tested by: Witnessed by:

(Contractor) (Consultant)

Drydensity,

t/m

3

g/cm3

g/cm3

4 5 6


DRY DENSITY vs. MOISTURE CONTENT RELATIONSHIP USING 4.54 KG RAMMER

Max. dry density = g/cm3

Dry density / moisture content relationship curve

Determination No. 1 2 3

WS - 2



8/58

TEST INFORMATION :

Chainage: Lab Ref. No.:

Elevation: Date Requested:

Layer Thickness: Request No.:

Width: Date of Testing:

PREVIOUS LAYER INFORMATION : Lab Ref. No.:

Elevation:

Location of Test Done:

RESULTS:

Test Hole Location: Chainage

Offset

Weight of wet sample from hole, mw g

Depth of test hole g

Weight of sand + cylinder before test, m1 g

Weight of sand + cylinder after test, m4 g

Weight of sand in hole + cone, m1- m4 g

Weight of sand in cone, m2 g

Weight of sand in hole, mb = (m1- m4- m2) g

Bulk density of sand, ga g/cm3

Ratio, R = mw / mb

Bulk density of sample, gb= R x ga g/cm3

Dry density, gd =100gb / (100 + W) g/cm3

Can No.

Weight of can + wet sample, P g

Weight of can + dry sample, Q g

Weight of water, R = P - Q g

Weight of can, C g

Weight of dry sample, Md = Q - C g

Water content, W = 100 R / Md %

Maximum dry density (MDD) g/cm3

OMC (lab value) %

MDD Test Reference (Lab Ref. No.)% Compaction, 100 gd / MDD %

Specified compaction %

Results

Remarks :

Tested by : Witnessed by:


DETERMINATION OF DEGREE OF COMPACTION

MOISTURE CONTENT DETERMINATION


FIELD DENSITY TEST OF FILL MATERIALS BY SAND REPLACEMENT METHOD

FIELD DENSITY DETERMINATION

WS - 3



9/58

Lab Ref. No.:

Location:


MDD: OMC:

Data for Unit Weight (before soaking) :

(g)

(g)

(g)

ml

g/cm3

t/m3

Compaction Achieved %

Data for Moisture content

(g)

(g)

(g)

(g)

(g)

(%)

Remarks:



Container No.

Wt. of Dry Soil

Moisture Content

Wt. of Container + Wet Soil

Wt. of Container + Dry Soil

Wt. of Moisture

Wt. of Container

Wt. of Mould

Wt. of Wet Soil

Volume of Mould

Wet Unit Weight

Dry Unit Weight

Mould No.

Mould No.

No. of layers

No. of blows per layer


LABORATORY C.B.R. TEST (DETERMINATION OF UNIT WEIGHT)

Wt. of Wet soil + Mould

WS - 4

Form No. WS 4

Revision No. 0 Revision Date: xx/xx/xx


10/58

Lab Ref. No.:


SWELL DATA :

0

1

2

3

4

SOAKING DATA

Wt. of dry soil in mould

MOISTURE CONTENT (AFTER SOAKING)

Can No

PENETRATION TEST DATA Ring No. __________

Proving Ring Factor :


(Contractor)


LABORATORY C.B.R. TEST (PENETRATION TEST AND DETERMINATION OF SWELLING)

Mould No.

Specimen location T M B

Mould No.

BB T M

0.500 in (12.70mm)

0.300 in (7.62mm)

0.400 in (10.16mm)

0.200 in (5.08mm)

0.150 in (3.81mm)

0.100 in (2.54mm)

0.075 in (1.91mm)

0.050 in (1.27mm)

Load, kN Load Dial Div. Load, kN Load Dial Div. Load, kN

0.025 in (0.64mm)

Av. Moisture Content %

PenetrationMould No. Mould No. Mould No.

Load Dial Div.

Moisture Content %

Wt. of dry soil

Wt. of Can

Wt. of Water

Wt. of dry soil + Can

Wt. of wet soil + Can

T M

Water absorbed

% Water absorbed

Wt. of soil + mould + base- plate

(before soaking)Wt. of soil + mould + base- plate

(after soaking)

Gauge

Reading

Swell

(mm)% Swell

Gauge

Reading

Swell

(mm)% Swell

Day &

Month

Time &

Day

Time

Elapsed

(Days)

Mould No.. Ht. mm Mould No.. Ht. mm Mould No.. Ht. mm

Gauge

Reading

Swell

(mm)% Swell

WS - 5



11/58

Lab Ref. No.:

Material Type: Date of testing:

Result:



SoakedCBR%

LABORATORY C.B.R. TEST (SOAKED CBR RESULTS)

Load,kN

Load,kN

10 Blows/Layer 30 Blows/Layer

65 Blows/Layer Dry Density vs. Soaked CBR


Penetration, mm Dry Density, g/cm3

Penetration, mm Penetration, mm

Load,kN

WS - 6



12/58


13/58

Lab Ref. No.:

Location: Date of Sampling:


Representative Area: Dry Weight:

Mode of Drying (Oven dry / Fry pan):

Sample ID / Lab Ref. No.

Container No.

Weight of wet aggregate + container g

Weight of dry aggregate + container g

Weight of water in aggregate g

Drying started: h-m

Drying finished: h-m

Period of drying h-m

Weight of container g

Weight of dry aggregate g

Water content %

Remarks:




DETERMINATION OF TOTAL MOISTURE CONTENT OF AGGREGATE BY DRYING

WS - 7A

Form No. 7A Revision No. 0 Revision Date: xx/xx/xx


14/58

Calibration Ref.No.:

Description of Sand: Date of Calibration:

Dimension of Mould(mm): Diam. = Ht. =

Room Temparature: = C Ambient Temp.= C Relative Humidity = %

Volume of Mould

Sand in Cone with Base Plate

Unit Weight of Sand




1

2

3 Weight of Water (2-1)

5

6

7

321Determination No.:

Weight of Empty Mould + Glass Plate

Weight of Mould Filled with Water + Glass Plate

4

Temparature Correction

Volume of Mould, cm3

Average Volume of mould, cm3

Temparature of Filling Water, C

7

8

9

10

Weight of Apparatus + Sand before Pouring, g

Weight of Apparatus + Sand after Pouring, g

Weight of Sand in Cone + Base Plate, g

Average Weight of Sand in Cone + Base Plate, g

12 Weight of Apparatus + Sand after Pouring, g

11 Weight of Apparatus + Sand before Pouring, g

14 Weight of Sand in Mould, g

13 Weight of Sand in Cone + Base Plate, g

16 Average Unit Weight of Sand, g/cm3

CALIBRATION OF SAND AND SAND CONE APPARATUS

15 Unit Weight of Sand, g/cm3

WS - 8



15/58

Lab Ref. No.:



Initial Dry Weight:

Reduction of Test Weights

Stages of subdivision

Material passed through test sieve :

Weight before reduction

Weight after reduction

Correction factor

Sieving Test Data

Remarks:


Contractor Consultant


WORKSHEET FOR PARTICLE SIZE DISTRIBUTION

1 2 3

Mb1= Mb2 =

Ma2 =

C2= C

1.M

b2/ M

a2=

Mb3=

Ma3=

C3=

Pan

Total

Spec.

Limit

Cumul.

Percent

Retained

Weight

Retained, g

Percent

Passing

Corrected

Weight

Retained, g

Cumulative

gm

gm

Sieve Size,

mm

Correction

Factor

Invidual Weight

Retained, g

Ma1 =

C1= M

b1/ M

a1 =

WS - 9



16/58

Lab Ref. No.:

Stockpile Location: Date of Sampling:

Description of Material: Date of Test:

Purpose of Use:

Determination No. 1 2

1. Weight of oven dry specimen in air A (g)

2. Weight of saturated surface dry specimen in air B (g)

3. Weight of saturated specimen under water C (g)

4. Water Absorbed B - A (g)

5. Water Absorption 100(B - A) / A %

6. Specific Gravity

a) Oven dry basis (bulk) A / (B - C)

b) Saturated surface dry (SSD) basis B / (B - C)

c) Apparent A / (A - C)

Determination No. 1 2

1. Weight of oven dry specimen A (g)

2. Weight of saturated surface dry specimen S (g)

3. Weight of bottle + water B (g)

4. Weight of bottle + saturated specimen + water C (g)

5. Water Absobed S - A (g)

6. Water Absorption 100(S - A) / A %

7. Specific Gravity

a) Oven-dry basis (bulk) A / (S + A - C)

b) Saturated surface dry (SSD) basis S / (S + B - C)

c) Apparent A / (A + B - C)

Results :

The Average Specific Gravity = (Bulk / On SSD basis / Apparent)

Water Absorption = %



FINE (Coarse Sand/Fine Sand/Filler)


SPECIFIC GRAVITY AND WATER ABSORPTION OF AGGREGATESWS - 10



17/58

Lab Ref No.:

Material Source: Date of Sampling:


Retained on

1.7mm Sieve

Passing Through

1.7mm Sieve

Total Quantity

Available, g

Remarks : Specified Values :

Max.

Max.

Max.

Max.

Tested By: Witnessed by:


Loss in

Weight, gPercent Wear

Asphaltic Concrete Coarse Agg.

Concrete Aggregates

Mean

%

Subbase

Road Base


ABRASION TEST ON SMALL SIZE COARSE AGGREGATE BY USE OF LOS ANGELES MACHINE

Location:

Representative Quantity:

Sample

IdentificationTest No. No. of Charges

No. of

Revolutions

Weight

Before Test, g

Weight in grams after test

WS - 11

Form No. 11 Revision No. 0 Revision Date:


18/58

Form No. 11

Revision No. 0


19/58

TEST INFORMATION :

Chainage: Lab Ref. No.:

Material: Date Requested:

Layer Thickness: Request No.:

Width: Date of Testing:

SAND CALIBRATION: Lab Ref. No.:

Date of Calibration:

Wt. of sand in cone, g

Bulk density of sand, g/cm3

Test Hole Location: KM

Offset

Weight of wet sample from hole, mw g

Depth of test hole mm

Weight of sand + cylinder before test, m1 g

Weight of sand + cylinder after test, m4 g

Weight of sand in hole + cone, m1- m4 g

Weight of sand in cone, m2 g

Weight of sand in hole, mb = (m1- m4- m2) g

Bulk density of the material, gb g/cm3

Dry density, gd=100gb / (100 + W) g/cm3

Can No.

Weight of can + wet sample, P g

Weight of can + dry sample, Q g

Weight of water, R = P - Q g

Weight of can, C g

Weight of dry sample, Md = Q - C g

Water content, W = 100 R / Md %

Weight of oversized material g

% oversize (dry basis) %

Optimum Moisture Content (lab value) %

Maximum Dry Density (lab value) g/cm3

MDD Test Reference (Lab Ref. No.)

% Compaction, 100 gd / MDD %

Specified compaction %

Results

Remarks



OVERSIZE FRACTION & DETERMINATION OF DEGREE OF COMPACTION


WORKSHEET FOR FIELD DENSITY TEST BY SAND REPLACEMENT METHOD

DETERMINATION OF FIELD DENSITY

DETERMINATION OF MOISTURE CONTENT

WS - 3



20/58

Lab Ref. No.:

Stock Pile Location: Date of Sampling:

Material: Date of Testing:

Determination No. / Sample Ref. 1 2 3

Initial Oven Dry Weight of Specimen, W1gm

Final Oven Dry Weight after Washing on # 200 Sieve,

W2gm

Material Passed Through # 200 Sieve (W1 - W2) gm

% Passing = 100(W1 - W2) / W1

Average % Passing

Specification

Remarks:




WORKSHEET FOR MATERIALS FINER THAN 0.075MM SIEVE BY WASHING

WS - 12



21/58

Lab Ref. No.:

Source: Date of Sampling:

Description: Date of Testing:

Original Weight: Oven Dry Weight:

Sieving Test Data

Remarks:




WORKSHEET FOR SIEVE ANALYSIS OF FILLER

Total

Specification

LimitRetained, g

CumulativePercent Passing

0.600

CumulativeInvidual Weight

Retained, g

0.300

Pan

0.075

0.150

Retained

Sieve Size,

mmPercentWeight

WS - 13



22/58

Lab Ref. No.:



Initial Oven Dry Weight:






Correction factor

Sieving Test Data

Remarks:

Tested by:

1

50.150

0.300

Sieve Size,

mm

Correction

Factor

Corrected

Weight

Retained, g

2.36

28

gm

gm

Cumulative

Weight

20

Invidual Weight

Retained, gRetained, g

Cumul.

Percent

Retained

14

0.075

Pan

Total

10

4.75

1.18

0.600

2

1

80

6

4

3

2

C3=

Mb2 =

Ma2 =

C2 = C1.Mb2/ Ma2=

Percent

Passing

S

1

Ma1 =

C1= Mb1/ Ma1 =


PARTICLE SIZE ANALYSIS OF COMBINED AGGREGATES FOR BINDER COURSE

Mb1=

2 3

Mb3=

Ma3=

Form No. 25 Revision No. 0 Revision Date: xx/xx/xx


23/58

~ 20

~ 13

~ 34

~ 27

~ 100

~ 80

~ 70

~ 56

~ 6

~ 44

100

pec.

imit



24/58

Lab Ref. No.:



Initial Oven Dry Weight:






Correction factor

Sieving Test Data

Remarks:

Tested by:

3

Mb1=

Ma2 =

Mb3=

Ma3=


PARTICLE SIZE ANALYSIS OF COMBINED AGGREGATES FOR WEARING COURSE

1 2

5

6

4

C3=

Mb2 =

3

2

90

7

Ma1 =

C1= Mb1/ Ma1 = C2 = C1.Mb2/ Ma2=

Percent

Passing

S

Retained

Pan

1.18

Total

10

4.75

0.600

14

0.075

20

2.36

0.300

Invidual Weight

Retained, gRetained, g

Cumul.

PercentSieve Size,

mmRetained, g

gm

gm

Cumulative

WeightCorrection

Factor

Corrected

Weight

8

1

0.150



25/58

100

~ 72

~ 10

~ 62

~ 50

~ 40

~ 100

~ 85

pec.

imit

~ 20

~ 30



26/58

Lab Ref. No.:

Source: Date Sampled:

Description: Date of Testing:

Passing Retained on

150 micron

300 micron 150 micron

600 micron 300 micron 100

1.18mm 600 micron 100

2.36mm 1.18mm 100

4.75mm 2.36mm 100

9.5mm 4.75mm 100

9.5mm 4.75mm 300

19mm 9.5mm 1000

37.5mm 19mm 1500

75mm 37.5mm 3000

9.5 to 19mm consists of 33% of 9.5 ~ 13.2mm and 67% of 13.2 ~ 19mm.

19 to 37.5mm consists of 33% of 19 ~ 26.5mm and 67% of 26.5 ~ 37.5mm

37.5 to 75mm consists of 50% of 37.5 ~ 50mm and 50% of 50 ~ 75mm

Remarks:



(5-CYCLES)

WORKSHEET FOR SOUNDNESS TEST OF AGGREGATES BY USE OF SODIUM SULPHATE


(E) Actual

Loss After

Test %

(F)

Corrected

Avg.

Weight

Loss %

FineAggregate

Total

(A)

Grading

Original

Sample %

Retained

(B)

Weight of

Test

Fraction

Before

Test

(gram)

(C)

Weight of

Test

Fraction

After Test

(gram)

(D)

Loss in

Weight

After Test

(gram)

Sieve Size

E = D / B x100

F = A x E/100

CoarseAg

gregate

Total

Notes :D = B - C

WS - 14



27/58

Lab Ref. No.:



Test Data

Remarks:

Tested by:

Clay Reading

Sand Reading

Sand Equivalent, %

Average Sand Equivalent, %


SAND EQUIVALENT TEST

1 2 3Trial Nos.



28/58

Lab Ref. No.:

Location:

Weight of Aggregate: Size:

Weight of Asphalt: Type:

Visual Quality of Mix: Date of Testing:

Remarks:



% Area Coated


WORKSHEET FOR STRIPPING TEST BY AASHTO METHOD: T 182

Below 95 %Above 95 %

Visual estimation after 16 -18 hours of immersion in

water

WS - 15



29/58

Lab Ref. No.:

Area (KM): Date of Testing:

Description of Material:

Station Number

Tray Number

Weight of Tray + Bituminous Material (g)

Weight of Tray (g)

Weight of Bituminous Material (g)

Area of Tray (m2)

Quantity of Bituminous Material (g/m2)

Unit weight of Bituminous Material at 0C (g/l)

Spraying Rate (l/m2)

Average Spraying Rate (l/m2)

Temperature at Application 0C

Temperature Correction Factor

Corrected Average Rate of Application (l/m2)

Remarks:




WORKSHEET FOR QUANTITIES OF BITUMINOUS PRIME & TACK COATS

WS - 16

Form No. WS 16



30/58

Material: Lab Ref. No.:

Source: Date of Sampling:

Stockpile: Date of Testing:

Description:

Test No. 1 2

a)Total Weight of + 4.75 mm Material A g

b) Weight of (2) Fractured Faces Material (g) B g

c) Percentage of (2) Fractured Faces Material 100(B / A) %

d) Average (2) Fractured Faces Material %

e) Specification Limit %

Remarks




WORKSHEET FOR CRUSHED AGGREGATE OF (>or =2) FRACTURED FACES (+ 4.75MM, VISUAL)

WS - 17



31/58

Lab Ref. No.:

Location(KM): Date of Sampling:

Origin: Date of Testing:


Specimen No. 1

Description of the Test Specimen:

Container No.

Initial Dial Reading

Final Dial ReadingPenetration, mm

Average Penetration

Specimen No. 2


Container No.


Final Dial Reading

Penetration, mmAverage Penetration

Specimen No. 3


Container No.


Final Dial Reading

Penetration, mm

Average Penetration

Remarks:




WORKSHEET FOR PENETRATION TEST ON BITUMINOUS MATERIALS

REMARKS

REMARKS

REMARKS

WS - 18



32/58

Lab. Ref:



Origin: Date of Testing:

Determination No.

Temperature of water during test C

Weight of clean dry pycnometer & stopper (nearest 1 mg) A g

Weight of pycnometer, stopper plus water (nearest 1 mg) B g

Weight of pycnometer, stopper plus sample (nearest 1 mg) C g

Weight of pycnometer, stopper, sample plus water (nearest 1 m D g

Weight of sample C - A g

Volume of pycnometer B - A g

Specific Gravity (C - A) / [(B - A) - (D - C)]

Average Specific Gravity

Temperature correction

Corrected Specific Gravity ( at 25C)

Note

A pycnometer calibrated at one temperature cannot be used at a different temperature without recalibration at that temperature

Remarks:



1 2


WORKSHEET FOR SPECIFIC GRAVITY OF SEMI SOLID BITUMINOUS MATERIALS

3

Form No. Revision No. 0 Revision Date: xx/xx/xx


33/58

Lab Ref. No:

Sample: Date Sampled:

Chainage: Date of Testing:

Material:

(A) BITUMEN EXTRACTION

VALUE VALUE

1. Weight of pan + Sample 7. Weight of filter paper after test

2. Weight of pan

3. Weight of Mix. + Sample (1 - 2)

4. Weight of pan + Extracted Agg. 10. Weight of bitumen (3 - 9)

5. Weight of extracted Agg. (4 - 2)

6. Wt. of filter paper before test 12. Specified percent of bitumen

(B) GRADATION OF EXTRACTED AGGREGATE

Standard Sieve

size (mm)

Weight Retained

(gram)

Cumulative

Weight Retained

Cumulative

Percentage

Retained

% Passing Specification Limit

2519

12.5

9.5

4.75

2.36

1.18

0.600

0.300

0.150

0.075

Pan

Remarks:



11. Percent of bitumen by weight of

Mix. 100(10) / (3)

DESCRIPTIONDESCRIPTION


WORKSHEET FOR BITUMEN EXTRACTION & GRADATION OF HOT MIX

8. Weight of dust accumulated in

filter paper (7 - 6)

9. Weight of total extracted Agg. (5

+ 8)

WS - 19



34/58

Lab Ref. Nos

Material: Date Sampled

Description: Date Tested :

Thickness Wt. in Air Wt. in water Volume Density

mm g g ml g/ml g/ml

Test Performed by:


WORKSHEET FOR FIELD DENSITY TEST OF CORED ASPHALT CONCRETE

Specimen

No.

Specimen

Idn.Station

Bulk

Density

(Lab)

Field Cored Sample

Form No. 35 Revision No. 0


35/58

Remarks

Form No. 35 Revision No. 0


36/58

Lab Ref. No.:

Sample Location: Date sampled :

Type of Materials: Date tested :

Percentage of Bitumen in the Mixture:

Determination No.

Mass of Dry Sample in Air A g

Mass of Jar + Lid + Water B g

Mass of Jar + Lid + Sample + Water C g

Temparature of Water C

K factor :

Corrected Mass of Jar + Lid + Water to Fill at 25C: D = B.K g

E = C.K g

Maximum Specific Gravity F = A / (A + D - E)

Average Maximum Specific Gravity

Remarks:



( Gmm)

Corrected Mass of Jar + Lid + Sample + Water

to Fill at 25C:


MAXIMUM SPECIFIC GRAVITY OF BITUMINOUS PAVING MIXTURES

1 2

WS - 29



37/58

In Air In Water Asphalt Aggregate Voids V.M.A VFA To

% gm gm mm cc gm/cc gm/cc

bxg (100-b)xg i x100 1

Gasp Gagg 100-j j

a b c d e f g h i j k l m

1

2

3

Av.

1

2

3

Av.

1

23

Av.

Specified Values :

Specific Gravity of Bitumen (Gasp) = Minimum Stability ( kN at 60 C)

Minimum Flow ( mm)

Air Voids in Total Mix (%)

Voids in Mineral Aggregate Filled wit

Marshall Quotient ( kN / mm)

Tested By: Marshall Quotient ( kN / mm)

(Contractor) Filler to Binder Ratio

Witnessed by:(Consultant)

100-i - jc - d

Bulk Specific Gravity of Aggregate ( Gagg) =

Wt. of Specimen

Height ofSample

BulkDensity

BulkVolume

c / fASTM

D -2041

Volume % Total Voids %MaximumTheoritical

Density

AYNI PANJAKENT UZBEKISTAN BORDER

ASPHALT CONCRETE HOT MIX DESIGN BY MARSHALL

Date of sampling :

Specimen No.

AsphaltContentby Wt. of

Mix

Form No.

Revision No. 0


38/58

Form No. Revision No. 0


39/58


DETERMINATION OF THE PRESENCE OF ORGANIC IMPURITIES IN FINE AGGREGATE

Lab. Ref. No.:

Material

Description

Location

Test mass

Date of testing Time of addition of NaOH to sample :

Use SECTION A OR SECTION B

Section A

Prepared liquid colour standard method

Time of preparation of colour standard

Time of comparison of colour

Observat ion

The colour of the supernatant liquid above the test sample was found to be:

lighter than the same as darker than

the standard colour

Section B

Glass colour standard method

Time of comparison of colour

Observat ion

The colour of the supernatant liquid above the test sample was similar to:

Gardner Colour Standard No. 5 8 11 14 16

Inference

The fine aggregate does/does notcontain organic impurities

Remarks:



40/58

Lab Ref. No.:

Pouring No.: Date of Pouring:

Concrete Grade: Structure:

Location: No. of Cylinders:

Age of concrete hr/day

Cylinder No.

Time of testing h-min

Variation in age from the target hr

Specimen condition: moist or dry

Diameter at mid height of the specimen 1) mm

2) mm

Average diameter at mid height mm

Cross sectional area (rounded to 10 mm2) mm

2

Diameter at top mm

Diameter at bottom mm

Height of the specimen mm

Whether the specimen was capped with sulphur compound

Whether the specimen was properly placed on the platen

Pace rate (should be 2.6 ~ 6.2 kN / sec ) kN / sec

Whether attempt was made to keep the pace rate constant at failure

Failure type(cone/ cone and split/ cone and shear/ shear/ columnar)

Maximum load on dial gauge kN

Compressive strength (upto 2nd place of decimal)

Compressive strength (rounded to 0.05 Mpa) MPa

Average compressive strength (test result, rounded to 0.05 MPa) MPa

Remarks:

Tested by:


DETERMINATION OF COMPRESSIVE STRENGTH OF CONCRETE CYLINDERS

Form No. 39



41/58

Lab. Ref. No.:

Cube No.

Date of casting

Date of testing

Age day

Time of testing h-m

Variation in age from the target

Received specimen immersed in laboratory for 5 min. before testing

Whether the specimen was wet during testing

Whether "go / no go" gauge was used for checking dimensions

Whether the test gauge fitted with the specimen

Height of specimen: top face : 1) mm

2) mm

Height of specimen: bottom face 1) mm

2) mm

Average height of specimen mm

Width of specimen: top face : 1) mm

2) mm

Width of specimen: bottom face 1) mm

2) mm

Average width of specimen mm

Area of specimen (rounded to 10mm2) mm 2

Machine platens were cleaned before crushing specimen

Whether surfaces of the cube were cleaned before crushing

Whether centering of the cube was made before application of load

Pace rate (should be 4.5 to 9.0 kN / sec.) kN / sec

Whether attempt was made to keep the pace rate constant at failure

Maximum load on dial gauge kN

Compressive strength (upto 2nd place of decimal) N / mm2

Cube strength (rounded to 0.5 N/mm2) N / mm

2

Normal or abnormal failure

Test result N / mm2

Remarks:




DETERMINATION OF COMPRESSIVE STRENGTH OF CONCRETE CUBES

WS - 24

Form No. WS 24 Revision No.: Revision Date: xx/xx/xx


42/58

Lab Ref. No.:

Stock Pile Location:

Date Requested: Oven Dry Weight:

Date of sampling: Date of Testing :

Sieving Test Data Dry Sieving / Wet sieving

Sieve Size, mmWeight

Retained

Cumulative

Weight Retained

Cumulative %

Retained% Passing Spec. Limit

9.5 100

4.75

2.36

1.18

0.600

0.300

0.150

0.075

Pan

Remarks :

Tested By :


SIEVE ANALYSIS OF FINE AGGREGATE FOR CEMENT CONCRETE



43/58



44/58

Lab Ref. No.:

Stock Pile Location:

Date Requested: Oven Dry Weight:

Date of sampling: Date of Testing :

Sieving Test Data Dry Sieving / Wet sieving

Sieve Size,

mm

Weight

Retained

Cumulative

WeightRetained

Cumulative

% Retained % Passing

AASHTO Limits

(Size No.67)

AASHTO Limits

(Size No.68)

25 100 100

19 90 ~ 100 90 ~ 100

9.5 20 ~ 55 30 ~ 65

4.75 0 ~ 10 5 ~ 25

2.36 0 ~ 5 0 ~ 10

1.18 - 0 ~ 5

0.075 - -

Pan

Remarks :

Tested By :


SIEVE ANALYSIS OF 20 MM COARSE AGGREGATE FOR CEMENT CONCRETE



45/58

Lab Ref. No:

Stock Pile Location: Date Requested:

Representative Quantity: Date of Sampling:

Type of Material: Date of Testing:

Wt.Retained Test Weight Passing Flaky Particles Specified Max.

Passing Retained g Weight, g (Gauge), g % Flakiness Index

63 50

50 37.5

37.5 28

28 20

20 14

14 10

10 6.3

Total

Note 1. It retained % of any fraction is equal to or less than 5, then the fraction is not considered for test.

Note 2.If any fraction does not satisfy the test quantity then achieve the required quantity and calculate the flakiness index based on

weighted average of the material retained

Remarks:




DETERMINATION OF FLAKINESS INDEX

Flakiness Index =

Sieve Size, mm% Retained

TEST ON FLAKINESSINFORMATION ON SIEVE ANALYSIS

WS - 25



46/58

Lab Ref. No.:



Representative Area: Dry Weight:

Preparation of Test Specimen

Size fraction mm-mm

Quantity of sample kg

Test sieves used for separating test portion mm

Quantity of test portion kg

Period of drying the sample h-m

Specimen compacted in the cylinder Y/NNo. of layers

No. of strokes/layer

Drop height for compaction mm

Test Data

Determination No.

Initial mass of compacted specimen M g

Loading started h-m-s

Loading finished h-m-s

Period of application of force m-s

Maximum force applied kN

Mass of crushed specimen M1 g

Sieve used for separating fines mm

Mass retained on the separating sieve M3 g

Mass passed through the separating sieve M2 g

Sum* M2+ M3 g

Fines, 100(M2/ M1) %

ACV**

* if the sum differs from M1by more than 10g, discard the result and test other specimens

** The ACV value to be reported is the mean of two results unless any single result differs by more than 0.07 times the mean

in which case the test shall be repeated on two further specimens.

Test Result: %


AGGREGATE CRUSHING VALUE (ACV) OF COARSE AGGREGATE

1 2 3 4



47/58

Lab Ref No.

Type of Material : Purpose of Use: Date of Sam

Representative Quantity : Location: Date of Test

Fraction Passing Retained

1) 37.5 19 3000 4.75

2) 19 9.5 2000 4.75

3) 9.5 4.75 1000 2.36

4) 4.75 1.18 25 0.850

Total

Note.

Include fraction 4) for a material which is a mixture of fine and coarse aggregates otherwise ignore




CLAY LUMPS AND FRIABLE PARTICLES

(For Coarse Aggregate / A Mixture of Fine and Coarse Aggregates)

Mass of Test

Fraction before

Wash, g, W

Sieve Size, mmDesignated

Fractional Sieve Size,

mm

Grading of

Original

Sample, %, G

Weight

Los

(P x G) Wt, g (min) after Wash, g, R

%

Passing, P

Mass Retained on

Designated Sieve

Designated

Form No.

Revision No. 0


48/58

Lab. Ref. No.:

Pouring No.: Method of sampling: Standard/Alternate Date and Time of sampling:

Batch identification Nos. of specimens taken

Place of sampling Place of test

Concrete type Source of concrete

Time elapsed from sampling to commencement of test

Period from the start of filling to removal of cone

Time to lift the slump cone

Graphical Representation

Slump = mm

Form : true / shear / collapse

Thermometer No.:

Thermometer Type:

Temperature = C

Remarks:




DETERMINATION OF SLUMP OF FRESH CONCRETEWS - 26



49/58

Date of Sampling: Lab Ref. No.:

Storage Location: Sample Idn.: Date of Testing:

Date of Consignment: Description of Sample:

Test for Normal Cosistency

Observed:

Temparature: = C

Relative Humidity = %

Test for Initial Setting Time

. en. mm

20 45

50 42

80 35

130 28

290 18

Test for Final Setting Time

Test Results: Initial Setting Time:

Final Setting Time:

Remarks:



Wt.of

CementWt.of Water % Water

Observed Pen.,

mmRequired Penetration, mmTest No.

10 1 in 30 sec

Scale

Reading, mm

Normal Consistency :

Elapsed

Time, min Clock Hrs.

Scale

Reading, mm

Elapsed

Time, min Clock Hrs.

Final Setting Time:

When the needle does not sink visibly into the cement paste.

When penetration of the needle is 25 mm.

Notes on Observation

Initial Setting Time:


NORMAL CONSISTENCY AND SETTING TIME OF CEMENT

Elapsed

Time, minClock Hrs. Observation

10

20

30

40

50

0 50 100 150 200

Penetration,

mm

Elapsed time, min

WS - 27



50/58

Structure Location: Date of Sampling: Lab Ref. No.:

Storage Location: Sample Idn.:

Date of Consignment: Description of Sample:

Other Ref.: Date of Adding Water:

Mortar

Cube no.

Testing

DateAge, days

Dimensions,

mm

Area,

mm2

TestLoad,

kN

Comp.Strength,

MPa

AverageComp.

Strength,

MPa

SpecifiedCompressive

Strength, MPa

Remarks

Remarks:




COMPRESSIVE STRENGTH OF HYDRAULIC CEMENT MORTAR

WS - 28



51/58

Lab Ref. No:

Station: Temperature: ... C Date of Testing:

FIELD TEST DATA

Tested by:

4 5

Initial of First

Reading0.5m 2nd 1.0m 3rd

Final

Reading


DEFLECTION TEST BY BENKELMAN BEAM METHOD

Rebound

Deflection Remarks

1

Chainage

2 3



52/58

Supplementary Sheet(s): Yes / No

Contract No.: __________ Structure: _______________________ Concrete Class: __________ Pumping Stages(Nos.): _____ Target volume

Trial Mix Ref.: ___________ Slump Range: ___________________ Pouring No. _____________ Batch Plant No.: _______ Weather Cond

Sl. Truck / Batching Discharge Delivery Slump Visual Concrete Cylinders / Cubes

No. Date Batch No. Time Time Time Slip No. Test Value slump Temp, C Mould Ref. Prepared 7 day 28 day

Started Finished mm check 7 day 28 day by Specimen No. Specimen No.

Batch Counted by : 1) __________________

Reviewed by: _____________2) __________________

Concrete Pouring Record


Form No. 51

Revision No. 0


53/58

.. of

Action

Taken by

Contractor



54/58

TO:

DESCRIPTION OF WORKS:

LOCATION:

Estimated time that the work will be ready .. AM/PM Date: ..

Following Operation:

_______________

Signed Time: ...

For the Contractor Date: ...

Received Time: ...

_______________

For Consultants Date: ...

FIELD OBSERVATIONS:

RE Date: ... Time: ...

Bridge Engineer . Date: ... Time: ...

Survey Engineer Date: ... Time: ...

Materials Engineer Date: ... Time: ...

APPROVAL TO PROCEED

Approval is / is not given to proceed as requested.

Remarks:

______________

Signed: Time: ...

For Consultants Date: ...

inspection as per Clause 37 and 38

of the Condition of Contract

Resident Engineer

JOC-BCL

Consultants


Ref. No.Request for checking and / or

REQUEST FOR ISPECTION / SURVEY / QUALITY TEST



55/58


56/58

%



57/58

Lab Ref. Nos:

Sampling Location: Km 24 + 500 Date of Sampling: 09 August, 2014

Purpose of Use: Construction of Date of Testing: 11 August, 2014

Masonry Wall Engineer's Test/Joint Test: Engineer's

Specimen No. 1 2 3 4

Marking No No No No

DescriptionStained brown

surface

Stained brown

surfaceDeep grey Gray

Weight after oven drying g 4373 6339 8045 9238

Period of drying hr 24 24 24 24

Weight of SSD specimen g 4402 6354 8061 9269

Period of soaking under water hr 24 24 24 24

Weight of absorbed water g 29 15 16 31

Water Absorption % 0.66 0.24 0.20 0.34

Specimen No. 5 6 7

Marking No. No. No.

DescriptionStained brown

surfaceGrey Grey

Weight after oven drying g 5779 6380 6567

Period of drying hr 24 24 24

Weight of SSD specimen g 5818 6388 6581

Period of soaking under water hr 24 24 24

Weight of absorbed water g 39 8 14

Water Absorption % 0.67 0.13 0.21


DETERMINATION OF WATER ABSORPTION OF STONEWS - 30



58/58

CONSULTANTS CONTRACTOR

Sample ID.......................................................... Contract No.:

Location:.............................................. Date: ....................................................

Sampled by: . Material Type: .................................................

Lab Ref.

No. Description of Sample Source Rep. Qty Quantity/No. Tests Required Remarks


SAMPLE RECORD CARD

Documents

Worksheet Taj Lab