WorkshopWorkshop for for

Palestinian Tertiary Education Palestinian Tertiary Education Institutions Institutions

الضعف نقاطالجودة تطوير لصندوق المقدمة المقترحات في

السابقة الدورات في

Weakness Points

of the proposals submitted to (QIF) in the previous cycles

August 14th2008

Quality Improvement Fund

الضعف نقاطالجودة تطوير لصندوق المقدمة المقترحات في

السابقة الدورات في

Weakness Points

of the proposals submitted to (QIF) in the previous cycles

August 14th 2008

Quality Improvement Fund

OutlineOutline

• Objectives, Content & Expected outputs of the workshop

• Summary about submitted proposals

• List of weakness points in QIF First, Second, IT and Third Cycle

• Internal Evaluation Checklist Form

• Statistics about TEIs Which did not Awarded

• Components of an ideal proposal

• Objectives, Content & Expected outputs of the workshop

• Summary about submitted proposals

• List of weakness points in QIF First, Second, IT and Third Cycle

• Internal Evaluation Checklist Form

• Statistics about TEIs Which did not Awarded

• Components of an ideal proposal

العمل ورشة من الهدف

المقدمة • المقترحات في الضعف نقاط توضيحالسابقة الدورات في الجودة تطوير لصندوق

مقترحات كتابة عند لتجنبها وذلك الصندوق لمنحالقادمة للدورات مشاريع

المشاريع • مقترحات لتقديم المؤسسات تشجيعالصندوق منح من لالستفادة

العمل ورشة من الهدف

المقدمة • المقترحات في الضعف نقاط توضيحالسابقة الدورات في الجودة تطوير لصندوق

مقترحات كتابة عند لتجنبها وذلك الصندوق لمنحالقادمة للدورات مشاريع

المشاريع • مقترحات لتقديم المؤسسات تشجيعالصندوق منح من لالستفادة

المحتوى

المقدمة • المقترحات في الضعف نقاط عرضفي السابقة للصندوق الدورات

الصندوق • وطاقم مجلس مع مفتوح ولقاء نقاش

المحتوى

المقدمة • المقترحات في الضعف نقاط عرضفي السابقة للصندوق الدورات

الصندوق • وطاقم مجلس مع مفتوح ولقاء نقاش

المتوقعة المخرجات

نقاط بأهم العالي التعليم مؤسسات توعيةفي للصندوق المقدمة المقترحات في الضعفالجودة تطوير صندوق لمنح السابقة الدورات . الصندوق ومعايير تتناسب مقترحات وتقديم

المتوقعة المخرجات

نقاط بأهم العالي التعليم مؤسسات توعيةفي للصندوق المقدمة المقترحات في الضعفالجودة تطوير صندوق لمنح السابقة الدورات . الصندوق ومعايير تتناسب مقترحات وتقديم

Summary about submitted proposals to QIFSummary about submitted proposals to QIF

 

1st Cycle 2nd Cycle IT Cycle3rd Cycle Total

Call Cycle Jul-0515-Mar-0610- Dec. 200610-Dec-06

Deadline for receiving the proposals

29 Sep. 2005 14-May-0621-Mar-072-May-07

TEIs submitted proposals

2529192194

proposals submitted by TEIs

41463033148

List of weakness points in QIF Cycles (C1, C2, IT and C3)List of weakness points in QIF Cycles (C1, C2, IT and C3)

Internal Evaluation

Checklist Form

Internal Evaluation

Checklist Form

Tertiary Education Project - Quality Improvement Fund - Internal Evaluation Sheet

Institute :

Proposal Title :Code 

 

 

#ChecklistTick Notes

AAll elements of the application are provided fully institution should be provided by a form

A1Grant application form fits category  

A2Accreditation of the Academic Programm from AQAC (if needed)  

A3Presence of Quality Assurance Unit   

A4The project has external benefits measured by partnerships & role of the partner (added Value)   

A5Introduction and Summary  

A6Project goals and developmental objectives measured by performance indicators  

A7Expected results (outputs) measured by performance indicators  

A8Project Risks and tools to overcome them   

A9Workplan: tasks, sub activities, strategies, and implementation (should be consistent with the outcomes and results)

  

A10

Monitoring and evaluation plan   

A11

Feasibility studies, survey, training, workshops   

A12

Project financial sustainability (alternative sources of funding will be pursued)  

Part APart A

B

Institute's Credibility & Management: Negative Scoring of TEIto be filled by QIF) TEI has credibility for implementing QIF projects based on its records at QIF and as evaluated by the board and technical teams, Project management (Team) (HR and physical resources

Max Score

QIF Staff Score

B0TEI never Funded by QIF0 

B1Reliable Contact Person-) 1 or

0( 

B2Abide to Deadlines -) 1 or

0( 

B3Communication & Logistics -) 1 or

0( 

B4Feedback & Reporting -) 1 or

0( 

B5Positive cooperation -) 1 or

0( 

 

CRequested Budget  

C1Max equipments (40% of QIF)  

C2Max international consultants (20% of QIF)  

C3Min contribution of TEI (10% of the total budget)  

C4Detailed & Summarized budget  

C5Project Duration - consistent with QIF manual  

*overall project value is high (Relationship of benefits to cost)   

Continued... Part B & CContinued... Part B & C

DProject Concept: A score to be filled individually by each board member followed by

group discussion durning boar d meeting to finalize the score.Score

Aparagraph should be provided to be read by

board

D1Project is relevant to Quality Improvement of Tertiary Education (QIF objectives) 40 

D2Problem statement/project justification /Target group/ are well defined 25 

D3Project has influence and impact on labor market and/or institutional improvement 25 

D4Project has an innovative idea or concept 10 

 

QIF Board Decision: Project concept final score( (

Continued... Part DContinued... Part D

Statistics about TEIs not AwardedStatistics about TEIs not Awarded

Components of an Ideal Proposal Components of an Ideal Proposal

Merits of an Ideal Proposal Merits of an Ideal Proposal

Thank You for your AttendanceThank You for your Attendance