Upload
leslie-allison
View
215
Download
0
Tags:
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Workshop on QA/QC of GHG inventories & Establishment of National Inventory
Systems – EEA, Copenhagen, September 2004
Jean-Pierre Fontelle
French reporting activities
Overview of different steps in national system
UN and EC specifications
Statistics and other sources of information
Terms of reference
Choice of methodologies
Data identification
Data collection
Archiving
Data treatment, main results
Approval by Committee
Final reports and products
Transmission to national
authorities
Approval by authorities
Transmission to UN and EC
Publication www.citepa.org
Archiving
International review
Action plan implementation
CITEPA
Multiple organis.
National authority
Work
shop Q
A/Q
C G
HG
invento
ries
& N
ati
onal In
vento
ry S
yst
em
s -
Septe
mber
20
04
Overview of main features of QA/QC plan
The national inventory system is unique and covers all national air emission inventories (ie for UN and EC purposes)
Inventory compilation based on processus and procedures driven by a quality management system (QMS)
Only one organisation responsible for inventory compilation (CITEPA which is certified ISO 9001 version 2000)
QA/QC is operational and implemented through the QMS
It is expected that the quality of inventories will be improved on an ongoing basis, especially by reducing uncertainties, by covering more substances, both in a convenient and efficient way
Workshop QA/QC GHG inventories & National Inventory Systems - September 2004
Quality control
IPCC Tier 1 requirements implemented through QMS procedures
QC checks : conducted by CITEPA and upstream compilation by statistics offices, administrations, etc. and by some experts depending on data and priorities (key sources)
Annual process cycle based on automatic and manual procedures
Examples of main check types : Main methods
• Plausibility, reference range
• Exhaustivity of data (activity rates, check list emission factors, documentation, etc.)
• Accuracy of calculation simulation
• Comparability of estimation methods analysis and reference with guidelines (UNFCCC, IPCC, EMEP/ CORINAIR, EC, WBCSD, etc.)
• Trend in activity rates, emission analysis, statistical factors, emissions treatment
• Consistency cross-checking
Workshop QA/QC GHG inventories & National Inventory Systems - September 2004
Quality control
QC procedures are applied to all input data including those provided by statistics institutes or administrations
Priority is focussed on non validated data vs official data
However, checks of input data enables a high level of reliability more than an accurate assessment of absolute values
Common QC procedures compatible with IPCC good practices are applied to the different stages in the processes
Example :
• documentation, assumptions, primary calculations are compiled within « methodology files »• the national inventory system includes approximatively 140 files which cover the SNAP activities (some files deal with several SNAP codes). Some data (activity rates, emission factors, etc. are common to certain files. Mapping these files makes it possible to check interlinked consistency
Workshop QA/QC GHG inventories & National Inventory Systems - September 2004
C I T E P ACentre Interprofessionnel Technique d'Etudes de la Pollution Atmosphérique
10, rue du Faubourg Poissonnière - 75010 PARIS 040625Téléphone : +33 01 44 83 68 83 - Télécopie : +33 01 40 22 04 83
e-mail : [email protected]
FICHE METHODOLOGIQUE POURINVENTAIRES D'EMISSIONS
Référence du fichier : sucre.xlsACTIVITES :
040625 Production de sucre
Description sommaire, commentaire si nécessaire,....
Cette activité ne traite que les émissions de poussières liées à la fabrication de sucre.
Ce code SNAP n'existe pas dans la version SNAP 97.
Date Auteur Nature de la modification Relecteurs24/10/2003 NeA V-SS A-JPC
25/09/2002 GG Ajout année 2001 (report 2000); correction activité 200007/12/2001 NeA Création de la fiche - PM années 1990 à 2000 JPC
2000: report année 1999 car statistique non disponible au 5/12/01
N° SNAP 97
Il est ajouté à la liste de façon arbitraire par le CITEPA pour pouvoir prendre en compte cette activité émettrice de poussières.
Correction année 2001 disponible -2002 à 2020: report 2001; vérification années 1997 à 2000
QA
Fiches Responsable
Date d'intervention
Validation méthode
Support: NoteValidation externe
Suivi des contrôles interne
Nom Nom
Orthographe/ syntaxe Orthographe/ syntaxe
Respect des consignes Respect des consignes
Validation méthode Validation méthode
transparence transparence
cohérence cohérence
exactitude exactitude
comparabilité comparabilité
Données Données
unités unités
tendance tendance
Modules de calculs Modules de calculs
Autre Autre
Verificateur ApprobateurAC (si nécessaire, par défaut cf. FM papier) AC (si nécessaire, par défaut cf. FM papier)Date Date
OK (O/ N)
OK (O/ N)
SUIVI et CONTRÔLE des FICHES METHODOLOGIQUES
SupportExperts
SupportDateDate NomNomClients
External Method CHECK
CITEPA Method
and data CHECK
CITEPA Method
and data CHECK
QC
CALCULATION FILES CHECK
CHECK SHEET
ELEMENTSGranulo_PM CARFUEL Para-socio GENERAUX
GICFUEL
ELEC CHAUFURB ENG_res CIMENT Al1-2
Dtom-elec RES_TER COMB_IND VERRE Ceramic
RAFFGENRAFFXX AG_FO_AQ SIDERUR Tuil-bri
ENERGIE
CHAUX Magnesium
PARCAUTO Petits bateauxPbZn1 Ni
F-train TraitEauxRoutier
Maritim PbZn2 FonteRoute-pneu-frein
Traffluv Conso_NP PROCEDES INDUSTRIELS
Route_usureAviation
TRANSPORTS DECHETS N2O-agr
Culture ElevagePharma-dom Solvants-dom
LUC2 LUC3 N2O-agr-DT
LUC1 AGRICULTUREPeinture Nettoyage-à-sec Dégraissage
LUC Chaussures F-pain TabacPOP-UNECE BIOTIQUE
SOLVANTS AUTRES
CARTOGRAPHIE DES FICHES METHODOLOGIQUES LIEES(sorties des FM --> éléments d'entrée d'une autre FM)
GIC
Workshop QA/QC GHG inventories & National Inventory Systems - September 2004
INPUT / OUTPUT BETWEEN METHODOLOGY FILES
Check list
Example refers to the activity
Process codes
Procedures Records
1Check that assumptions and criteria for the selection of activity data and emission factors are documented.
1a
Cross-check descriptions of activity data and emission factors with information on source categories and ensure that these are properly recorded and archived
INV-Pr-04INV-Mo-40-02 + INV-Mo-
40-03FM (INV-En-403-01)
2aConfirm that bibliographical data references are properly cited in the internal documentation.
INV-Pr-04 INV-Mo-40-03 FM (INV-En-403-01)
4aCheck that units are properly labelled in calculation sheets.
4bCheck that units are correctly carried through from beginning to end of calculations
4c Check that conversion factors are correct.
4dCheck that temporal and spatial adjustment factors are used correctly.
5aConfirm that the appropriate data processing steps are correctly represented in the database.
5bConfirm that data relationships are correctly represented in the database.
5cEnsure that data fields are properly labelled and have the correct design specifications
5dEnsure that adequate documentation of database and model structure and operation are archived
6Check for consistency in data between source categories.
6a
Identify parameters (e.g. activity data, constants) that are common to multiple source categories and confirm that there is consistency in the values used for these parameters in the emissions calculations.
INV-Pr-04
Fi-SNAP (CIT-En-400-02), références des fiches
(version des FM communes utilisées) cf. FM (INV-En-403-
01)
7a
Check that emissions data are correctly aggregated from lower reporting levels to higher reporting levels when preparing summaries.
INV-Pr-07 INV-Mo-70-03INV-En-703-02
controle_requete
INV-Pr-07 INV-Mo-70-03INV-En-703-02
controle_requete
INV-Pr-08 INV-Mo-80-01 INV-En-801-03 et 04
INV-Pr-04 INV-Mo-40-03INV-En-403-04 (fiche de
contrôle)
7Check that the movement of
inventory data among processing steps is correct.
7bCheck that emissions data are correctly transcribed between different intermediate products.
CIT-Pr-06 CIT-Mo-60-01CIT-En-601-
01contrôle_applicatifs, cahier des charges + revues
Check the integrity of database files.
Check for transcription errors in data input and reference
Check that parameter and emission units are correctly recorded and that appropriate conversion factors are used.
QC activities
2
4
5
Procedures
Implementation of GPG requirements within the Management Quality System - extract
Quality assurance
Procedures in place : CCIIE (Coordination and Information Committee on Emission Inventories) + international review (UNFCCC) + external experts (for some activities)
Other complete external reviews are expected but not yet implemented because of resources needed but not available
An action plan is progressively drawn up over time from :
• decisions taken at recent CCIIE meetings• events occurring during the current year• changes and improvements following to remarks from reviews, errors, new information available and approved / delayed / rejected by the CCIIE
Every year, final statement by early December (data sent before31st December N+1, reports available in January / February N+2
Workshop QA/QC GHG inventories & National Inventory Systems - September 2004
CCIIE April, September & December
Action plan Engineers (experts !)
Several solutions (good practices ?)
no hope ?
generate « good » data
launch inquiries
collect new data
more in-depth investigation, or search for new method
start again
hunt out confidential data
external experts
report (NIR)
UNFCCC
EC / EEA
etc.
Reviews
QC
QC
QC
QC
QC
QC
QC
QC
QA
QA
QA
spend long
nights
data treatment
results
QA
OK !
Workshop QA/QC GHG inventories & National Inventory Systems - September 2004
OK !Authority
Verification, quality manual, quality management system, documentation, archiving,
resources
Verification : see QC + QA procedures
Resources required : QA / QC currently being integrated, no specific estimation is available but account for a significant amount (10-15% ? of total emission inventory activities, more ?).
Initial QMS implementation has required approx. 5 man . months for 2,5 years.
Example justifying the use of QMS :
Workshop QA/QC GHG inventories & National Inventory Systems - September 2004
Quality manual and quality management system : yes (see ISO 9001 certification)
Documentation, archiving : stringent requirements in QMS to trace all information used (including origin, primary data, assumptions, etc.) and all intermediate and final results
French air emissions in 1995 vs year of publication
85
90
95
100
105
110
115
120
125
130
135
1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003
Year of publication
CITEPA/CORALIE
CO2 (w ith LULUCF) CO2 (w ithout LULUCF)PCDD-F SO2NOx NMVOCs (biogenic excluded)NMVOCs (biogenic included)
Verification, quality manual, quality management system
Workshop QA/QC GHG inventories & National Inventory Systems - September 2004
National inventory system
Workshop QA/QC GHG inventories & National Inventory Systems - September 2004
Organisations involved :
• Ministry of Ecology and Sustainable Development (MEDD) oversees the national emission inventories and their dissemination
• CITEPA is responsible for inventory compilation, technical discussion with international organisations, assists the MEDD in coordinating activities, provides facilities for dissemination (Internet)
• Interministerial Mission on the Greenhouse Effect (MIES) is responsible for submitting GHG inventories to international bodies
• French Institute for the Environment (IFEN) is responsible for dissemination to EIONET and various other media
National inventory system
Workshop QA/QC GHG inventories & National Inventory Systems - September 2004
Additional legislation : none for the moment
Tools used : Excel, Access, Internal applications
Improvement plan : CITEPA + CCIIE Committee
Expert judgements documented through QMS (ie technical notes, minutes of CCIIE Committee meetings)
QA/QC integration : CITEPA certified ISO 9001 vers. 2000 by AFAQ