Analysis of Cavite LGUs DataBy: Annie Q. Tacazon Anne Minnette
P. Medrano
Statement of the Problems:
Is the Political Affiliation of the City/Municipal Mayors to the
Provincial Governor in Cavite has a significant relationship to the
Total Project Cost granted to City/Municipality in 2000-2010? Test
the relationship of the Total Project Cost granted to the
City/Municipality on the Projected Population 2009, Land Area, and
the Political Affiliation of the City/Municipal Mayors to the
Provincial Governor .
Data:City/Municipality Population 2007 (Table & Bar
Chart)City/Municipality Population by District (table & pie
chart)Projected Population 2009 (table)Land Area in
HectaresPolitical Affiliation of Mayors to Governor (table &
pie chart)Total Project Cost granted to City/ Municipality
2000-2010 (pie chart or bar chart)
Generated Data thru STATA:
Generated Data thru STATA:
Linear Regression (1 Var)
Result Interpretation: At 5% level of significance, total
project cost was found to have no significant relationship with the
party affiliations of Local Chief Executives in the Municipal level
and Provincial Level. Thus, political party affiliations of LCEs
does not affect the distribution of projects from the Provincial
Government among the cities and municipalities of Cavite.Problem
Statement: Is the Political Affiliation of the City/Municipal
Mayors to the Provincial Governor in Cavite has a significant
relationship to the Total Project Cost granted to City/Municipality
in 2000-2010?
Result Interpretation: At 5% level of significance, land area of
cities and municipalities were found to have insignificant
relationship with the total amount of projects granted by the
provincial government. Likewise, the same is true with the
political party affiliation in relationship with the total project
cost. On the other hand, the Population was found to have
significant relationship with the amount of Provincially funded
projects. Therefore, among population, land area and party
affiliation of LCEs, it is only population that affects the amount
of provincially funded projects granted to a city or
municipality.Problem Statement: Test the relationship of the Total
Project Cost granted to the City/Municipality on the Projected
Population 2009, Land Area, and the Political Affiliation of the
City/Municipal Mayors to the Provincial Governor .Linear Regression
(3 Var)
Result Interpretation: To further validate the results of the
earlier regression analyses, we created another variable
(costpercap) to test the significance of, land area in hectare,
party affiliation and population density at 5% level. Results shows
that land area and party affiliation remains to be not significant
indicator of projects allocated to cities and municipalities. In
contrary, population density was found to be significant. This is
consistent with the results of the previous regression
tests.Further Analysis:
