Upload
ariel-stanley
View
214
Download
2
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
WorldLII’s International Courts & Tribunals Project Responding to the fragmentation of international law
Presentation by Philip Chung & Andrew Mowbray Co-Directors, AustLII & WorldLII
6th Conference on Law via the Internet
Paris, 3-5 November, 2004
Fragmentation Pre-WWII - Decisions were from a small
number of international tribunals Post-WWII - Fragmentation of international
law decisions: Regional tribunals Human rights tribunals International trade tribunals Criminal courts
Now over 30 significant ICTs
Effect of the Internet Most ICTs have put decisions on line But fragmentation has remained
30+ websites, no consolidation Often no search engine on site (30%) Often not searchable via Google (30%) Often not HTML, few navigation aids (25%)
WorldLII’s International Courts & Tribunals (ICT) Project
A response to fragmentation All final decisions of ICTs searchable together
Interim decisions not included Consistent formatting of decisions
Eg ‘Context’ links to search terms Consistent citation system
Eg McELHINNEY v. IRELAND [2001] ECHR 754
Collaborative project by LIIs ‘Decentralisation wherever practical’
Regional decisions on regional LIIs Eg ECJ is on BAILII
French language decisions on Droit Francophone
Most decisions currently located on WorldLII
Exploring methods of distributing data between LIIs
Content of the ICT project Near-complete decisions of 20 ICTs
But French, Spanish etc still being added Over 20,000 full text decisions Other content being added
Scanning text of PCIJ image decisions Other international criminal courts Database of Court statutes, rules etc
Now for a demonstration …
A few things demonstrated Scope of searches
Default is to search all decisions Popular combinations of databases provided Individual Courts or combinations can be chosen
Easy to go directly to a case (use ‘v’) Easy to ‘note up’ a case (use ‘near’) Searches can be repeated over larger
collections
Sustainability… Thanks to all the ICTs for cooperation Australian Research Council funding to
capture the backsets of decisions Ongoing funding
Requires at least one person to maintain Possible collaboration with PiCT (Project on
International Courts & Tribunals)
That was the official launch …