Upload
wiley
View
42
Download
1
Tags:
Embed Size (px)
DESCRIPTION
Writing a research application. Ewa Ehrenborg. Research application. Write a grant application 3-4 students/group Follow-up November 14 th , 21 st and 22 nd – 20 min/group Send in title by Friday November 29 th Use the application form provided - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Citation preview
Writing a research application
Ewa Ehrenborg
1
2
Research application• Write a grant application• 3-4 students/group• Follow-up November 14th , 21st and 22nd – 20 min/group• Send in title by Friday November 29th
• Use the application form provided• Send in your application by noon, December 20th
• Oral presentations on January 15th and16th
• Each group will act as opponent for one other group• Assessment form
Research application:new for HT2013
• Include writing a “popular science” project
summary
• Early discussions/feed back - start with
groups with topics relating to lectures at start
of course
→ timetable issues regarding groups
4
• Choose your own project within the “broad” topic allocated– Interesting– Relevant
• Supply provisional title by November 29th
• Application form – Popular science description• Research plan should be a maximum of 3 A4
pages (12-point text, single spacing)• Provide a short reference list (max 20)
Research plan
5
Group 11A Regenerative cardiology:
1B Thyroid diseases: [email protected]
Group 22A Cell death in metabolism:
[email protected] Diabetes and co-morbidities
Group 3
3A Inflammation in CVD:
[email protected] 3B Immunological aspects of gastric disease: [email protected]
Group 44A Coagulation: [email protected] 4B MicroRNA and vascular disease:[email protected]
Group 55A Inflammatory lung diseases: [email protected] 5B Allergy:[email protected]
Group 66A Aneurysm: [email protected]
6B Vascular remodelling: [email protected]
Research application - Group topics
6
• Discussion partner• Facilitate the process and discuss the
strategy
NOT:• Decide what to study• Write the application• Responsible for making contact
The role of the mentor
7
Examples of previous titles
• The role of Natural Killer T cell subtypes in different stages of asthma
• An in vivo comparison of the cardiovascular effects of coffee diterpenes cafestol and kahweol in relation to diabetes
8
Follow-up meeting
• November 14th, 10.30-15.00 (6 topics – TBA)• November 21st, 13.30-15.00 (3 topics – TBA)• November 22nd, 13.00-14.30 (3 topics – TBA)• Separate schedule on the web• Present your plans • Each research team ~ 20 min• Support and discussions
9
10
Summary/abstract
• Relevant (what is your research question?)• Clearly written• Easy to follow
11
12
Research programme
• Title• Hypothesis/Aims• Background• Work plan including methods• Importance/ impact of results• References (max 20)
3 pages
13
Research plan - Title
• Informative• Interesting - attention catching• Not too long• Should not contain abbreviations
14
Research plan - Aims/Hypothesis
• State clearly the aims of the research• Explain the scientific hypothesis
– Most important part of the application– State very clearly– Is it novel?– Is it realistic?– Is it possible?– Is it well planned?
15
Research plan - Background
• Introduce the field (generally + specifically)• Place the proposed research in the context of
what is already known (or not known)• How would the proposed research add to
current knowledge?
16
Research plan - Work plan
• Define clearly the proposed research– Which research questions can the work
answer– Whom will carry out the work?– What facilities are needed?– What are the critical steps?
17
Research plan - Methods
Describe the methods of choice– Explain the choice– Are they the best to meet the objectives?– If novel, how do they compare with already
known methods?– Novel methods require detailed description– Validation– Sample size (refer to the work of others)
18
Research plan - Importance/Impact
Explain how the proposed research would contribute significantly to:– scientific knowledge– society– health care– specific patients– commercial interests
19
Research plan - References
• Relevant publications (key papers)• May include previous work published by the
applicant• Cite full reference (according to instructions)
20
Help the reader to understand
- clearly state the hypothesis and aims - include an overview slide (strategy & context)- relevant background- well described work plan- appropriate methods- include titles in the references
21
What is the evaluator looking for?
Scoring the research question
Low = Unclear wording, poorly constructed or previously conducted
Mid = Interesting but conventionalHigh = Innovative and extremely important.
22
Low = Materials, methods or applications are not entirely accurate
Mid = Correct, but not original methodologyHigh = Unique materials and techniques.
Innovative, well thought through
Scoring the methodology
23
24
Oral presentations• January 16th and17th • 15 min presentation/group + 5-10 min discussion• 3-4 students/group – all students should present• Everybody in the group should be able to present all parts
of the application – lottery• Each group will act as “opponent “for one other group• Assessment form
25
Replacement assignmentConsists of two parts:• Your own research project
– Application (filled in forms + research proposal)
– Submit a relevant article that the application is related to and explain your choice
– Powerpoint presentation of the application
• Opponent for an application from another group – Application will be e-mailed to you before January 8 (KI
mail address)
– Critically assess the hypothesis, strategies, methods and importance of the study ( ̴ one A4 page)
To be e-mailed to [email protected] by January 17
26
Take home message• Clearly state the hypothesis/aims and how
it will be tested• Specify what should be measured and why• Explain how the experiments/strategy can
contribute to an increased understanding- could include an overview figure
with strategies & pathophysiological context