Upload
sonya-james
View
43
Download
0
Tags:
Embed Size (px)
DESCRIPTION
Writing Research Papers: PY4007/PY4008 Physiotherapy Project 1 & 2. Íde O’Sullivan and Lawrence Cleary Regional Writing Centre. Workshop outline. Reflection: Writing for publication Motivation and time management Key consideration: The writing process The rhetorical situation - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Citation preview
Writing Research Writing Research Papers:Papers:
PY4007/PY4008 PY4007/PY4008 Physiotherapy Project 1 Physiotherapy Project 1
& 2& 2
Writing Research Writing Research Papers:Papers:
PY4007/PY4008 PY4007/PY4008 Physiotherapy Project 1 Physiotherapy Project 1
& 2& 2
Íde O’Sullivan and Lawrence Íde O’Sullivan and Lawrence ClearyCleary
Regional Writing Centre
Regional Writing Centre 2
Workshop outline• Reflection: Writing for publication• Motivation and time management• Key consideration:
– The writing process– The rhetorical situation
• Structuring your FYP/research paper
• Academic writing style• Strategies to develop writing: Peer
review
Regional Writing Centre 3
Reflection• Why write for publication?• Implications of publishing/not
publishing?• Misconceptions about writing and
publication• Common problems among new
writers• New writers’ worries/fears
Regional Writing Centre 4
New writers’ errors(Murray, 2005:4)
• “Writing too much about ‘the problem’.”
• “Overstating the problem and claiming too much for their solution.”
• “Overstating the critique of others’ work.”
• “Not saying what they mean, losing focus through indirect writing.”
• “Putting too many ideas in one paper.”
Regional Writing Centre 5
Difficulties associated with writing
• Anxiety and fear of writing• Lack of confidence and motivation• Cracking the codes of academic writing• Getting started• Lack of guidance, practice and feedback• Misconceptions of writing
– Good writing skills are innate X– Think first, then write X
• The writing process is recursive
Getting Started Getting Started Writing and Keeping Writing and Keeping
GoingGoing
Getting Started Getting Started Writing and Keeping Writing and Keeping
GoingGoing
Regional Writing Centre 7
It is not too late• Take stock of where you are now• Outline your research project • Make plans based on the time that is
left• Organise your time accordingly• Get writing• Keep writing• Get a writing buddy• Allow time for revision and to put it all
together• Let family and friends know• Be selfish with your time
Regional Writing Centre 8
Where am I?• What writing have you done for the
research project, and what writing do you need to do in order to complete your FYP on time?
• Keep writing non-stop for 5 minutes.• Write in sentences.• Do not edit or censor your writing.• Private writing -- no one will read it.• Discuss what you have written in
pairs.
Regional Writing Centre 9
Outlining (Murray, 2006)
• Title and draft introduction• Level 1 outlining
– Main headings
• Level 2 outlining– Sub-headings
• Level 3 outlining– Decide on content
Regional Writing Centre 10
‘Writing in layers’ (Murray 2006: 125-27)
• Outline the structure: write your section heading for the research paper.
• Write a sentence or two on the contents of each section.
• List out sub-headings for each section.• Write an introductory paragraph for
each section.• At the top of each section, write the
word count requirement, draft number and date.
Regional Writing Centre 11
Writing goalsOutline Words/Timeframe
TitleChapter 1 (title)
Section 1 (title)Section 2 (title)Section 3 (title)
Chapter 2 (title)Section 1 (title)Section 2 (title)Section 3 (title)
Chapter 3 … … …
Regional Writing Centre 12
Keep writing• Where and when do you write?• Why are you not writing?
– “I don’t feel ready to write.”– Writers’ block
• Getting unstuck– Writing to prompts/freewriting (write
anything)– Set writing goals– Write regularly– Integrate writing into your thinking– Break it down into a manageable
process
Regional Writing Centre 13
Keep writing• Be patient• Be creative• Taking pleasure in writing • Be proud of your writing• Get stuck in
Regional Writing Centre 15
Key stages in the process
• Pre-writing
• Drafting
• Revision
• Editing and Proofreading
Regional Writing Centre 16
The rhetorical situation
• Occasion
• Topic
• Audience
• Purpose
• Writer
Regional Writing Centre 18
Key tasks for academic writers
• Participating in academic conversations
• Developing and advancing balanced arguments
• Exploring your personal writing process
• Developing strategies that work for you
Regional Writing Centre 19
The process: Pre-writing
• Decide on the writing project• Choose a target journal• Get information about the journal
– Mission/vision of the journal– Identify categories of submission– Identify key subject areas
• Analyse the journal• Select a sample paper from the target
journal• Follow the guidelines for authors
Regional Writing Centre 20
Analysing the journal• Cracking the codes• Analysing the genre/text and modelling• Generate a list of the important criteria
which will make your writing more effective
• Ask yourself the following questions:– How is the paper structured?– How is the contribution articulated?– What level of context is provided?– What level of detail is used? – How long are the different sections?
Regional Writing Centre 21
Analysing the journal• What organisational features/patterns are
in evidence? • How are arguments and counterarguments
presented and structured?• What types of evidence are important?• What stylistic features are prominent?• Is the text cohesive? How does the author
achieve such cohesion?• What kind(s) of persuasive devises does
the author employ?• Voice?
Regional Writing Centre 24
FYP Presentation and Layout
Preliminaries
Main Text
End Matter
A major report
or thesis is
generally
divided into
three parts.
Regional Writing Centre 25
Preliminaries• Cover page• Title page• Author’s Declaration• Table of Contents• Acknowledgements• Abstract
Regional Writing Centre 26
Abstract• Abstract (250 words)
– Background– Objectives– Methods– Results – Conclusions
• Keywords
Regional Writing Centre 27
The manuscript• Introduction
– Background and context/Literature review
• Method• Results• Discussion• Conclusions
Regional Writing Centre 28
The introduction• In academic writing, an introduction, or
opening, has four purposes: To introduce the topic of the paper To indicate the context of the
conversation through background information
To give some indication of the overall plan of the paper
To catch the reader’s attention, usually by convincing the reader of its relevance.
Regional Writing Centre 29
What should I put into the introduction?
• Identify the domain and the topic• State the problem - claim, hypothesis, or
question - to be investigated • Gives the problem context and
significance within the research community
• Identify the gaps in the literature• Outline and justify the purpose of your
proposed study• State the objectives of the paper and
outline the plan• May delineate the scope of the research
Regional Writing Centre 30
Methodology and research design
• In the methodology section, two main issues are addressed: – The methods used to gather data– The methods used to analyse the
data• How were your results obtained and
how did you came to the conclusions put forth?
Regional Writing Centre 31
Methodology and research design
Justification• Why and how did you choose the
targeted population/sample?• Why did you choose the particular
method?• Is the methodology appropriate to
your field of study?• Is the methodology appropriate to
the objectives of the study?
Regional Writing Centre 32
Methodology and research design
Justification• Methods affect results• Methods affect validity and
reliability • Methods affect conclusions
Regional Writing Centre 33
Results and discussion• The results section must not only
present the results; it must make the results meaningful for the reader.
• The discussion should not simply provide more detail about the results; it should interpret and explain the results.
• Methods of organising the results and discussion.
Regional Writing Centre 34
Results• Organising the results• Readability• Accessibility (graphs, tables)• Use of appendices for raw data• Making the results meaningful
– Explanation– Simplification– Trends– Significant results– Relationships/correlations
Regional Writing Centre 35
Discussion• Organising the discussion• Summarise the main results in order to
remind the reader of your key findings.• Put the results of the research into
context.• Support the validity of the results by
referring to similar results.• Explain the differences between your
findings and that of previous researchers.
• Can you explain the unexpected results?
Regional Writing Centre 36
Conclusion• To what extend have the aims of the
study been achieved?• How has your primary and secondary
research helped answer the research question posed?
• Have your hypotheses been proved/disproved/partially proved?
• Did the study raise any further questions?
• Any recommendations for future research?
Regional Writing Centre 37
Elements of a good conclusion
• A summary of the investigation, the results, and the analysis
• A summary of the conclusions drawn from the analysis and discussion of the data / results
• An account of whether the research has answered the research question
• An assessment of whether the hypothesis or claim has been proved, disproved, or partially proved
Regional Writing Centre 38
Elements of a good conclusion
• A discussionion of the implications of the findings
• A demonstrable awareness of the limitations of the outcome
• Suggestions for future developments – Remember: A summary alone of what you have done is a weak conclusion
• A final, strong, positive statement
Regional Writing Centre 39
Flow• Logical method of development• Effective transition signals• Good signposting• Consistent point of view• Conciseness (careful word choice)• Clarity of expression• Paragraph structure
– Unity– Coherence
Regional Writing Centre 40
Paragraph structure• What is a paragraph?
– Series of sentences– Coherent (introduction, middle, end)– Common theme
• Paragraphs signal the logically organised progression of ideas.
• The flow of information should be organised around themes and comments. The main idea in one paragraph should flow logically into the next.
• Shifts in the argument or changes in direction should be accurately signalled using appropriate adverbials, conjunctions, and prepositions.
Regional Writing Centre 41
Paragraph structure
• Just as an essay is guided by a thesis statement, a paragraph is organised around its topic sentence.
• A topic sentence informs the reader of the topic to be discussed.
• A topic sentence contains controlling ideas which limit the scope of the discussion to ideas that are manageable in a paragraph.
Regional Writing Centre 42
Paragraph structure: Supporting sentences
• The sentences that follow expand upon the topic, using controlling ideas to limit the discussion. The main idea is supported by– Evidence in the form of facts, statistics,
theoretical probabilities, reputable, educated opinions,
– Illustrations in the form of examples and extended examples, and
– Argumentation based on the evidence presented.
– Qualifying statements indicate the limitations of the support or argument.
Regional Writing Centre 43
Paragraph structure: Concluding sentences
• Not every paragraph needs a concluding sentence.
• Concluding sentences can either comment on the information in the text, or
• They can paraphrase the topic sentence.
Regional Writing Centre 44
Paragraph structure: Unity
• Paragraphs should be unified.• ‘Unity means that only one main idea
is discussed in a paragraph. The main idea is stated in the topic sentence, and then each and every supporting sentence develops that idea’ (Oshima and Hogue 1999, p.18).
Regional Writing Centre 45
Paragraph structure: Coherence
• Coherence means that your paragraph is easy to read and understand because – your supporting sentences are in some
kind of logical order– your ideas are connected by the use of
appropriate transition signals– your pronoun references clearly point to
the intended antecedent and is consistent
– you have repeated or substituted key nouns. (Oshima and Hogue 2006, p.22)
Regional Writing Centre 46
Example: (Meei-Fang et al. 2007,
p.471) People with dementia are particularly vulnerable to malnutrition: they have a decreased ability to understand directions and to express their needs verbally, are easily distracted from eating, prone to become agitated, and may use utensils incorrectly. Inability to feed oneself (eating dependency) is a major risk factor for malnutrition among older people living in long-term care settings (Abbasi & Rudman 1994, Durnbaugh et al. 1996). When people with dementia can no longer take food voluntarily, assistance is required although, as the disease progresses, even taking food with assistance can become difficult and, in some instances, tube-feeding may be required to supply nutrition. This form of feeding can, however, cause distress and anxiety, not only for the person being fed, but also for caregivers (Akerlund & Norberg 1985, Burgener & Shimer 1993).
Regional Writing Centre 48
Features of academic writing• Complexity• Formality• Precision• Objectivity• Explicitness• Accuracy• Hedging• Responsibility
(Gillet, 2008)
Regional Writing Centre 49
Academic writing style
• Hedge. Distinguish between absolutes and probabilities. Absolutes are 100% certain. Probabilities are less than 100% certain.
• Be responsible. Provide traceable evidence and justifications for any claims you make or any opinions you have formed as a result of your research.
Regional Writing Centre 50
Persuasion and truth in academic writing
• Because they are argumentative, academic writing tends to be persuasive.
• An argument should be persuasive, but don’t sacrifice truth in favour of persuasion.
• Academic inquiry is a truth-seeking pursuit.• facts are distinguished from opinions.• relative truths are distinguished from
absolute truths.• The integrity of the conclusions reached in
an academic essay or report is based on its honest pursuit of truth.
Strategies to Strategies to Develop Writing: Develop Writing:
Peer Review Peer Review
Strategies to Strategies to Develop Writing: Develop Writing:
Peer Review Peer Review
Regional Writing Centre 52
Writing a ‘page 98 paper’
• My research question is … • Researchers who have looked at this
subject are … • They argue that … • Debate centres on the issue of … • There is work to be done on … • My research is closest to that of X in that
… • My contribution will be …
(Murray 2006:104)
Regional Writing Centre 53
Dialogue about writing• Peer-review• Generative writing• The “writing sandwich” (Murray,
2005:85): writing, talking, writing• Writing “buddies” (Murray and Moore,
2006:102)• Writers’ groups• Engaging in critiques of one another’s
work allows you to become effective critics of your own work.
Revision, Editing and Revision, Editing and ProofreadingProofreading
Revision, Editing and Revision, Editing and ProofreadingProofreading
Regional Writing Centre 55
Revising (Global)• Global issues (organisation and structure):
– Does the text achieve your writing goals as established in your evaluation of the rhetorical situation (writing context) and by your thesis?
– Is there deviation, wander and digression?– Does each paragraph treat in a controlled
manner an identifiable idea, and does that idea follow logically the ideas expressed in previous paragraphs and do they allow readers to predict the ideas expressed in the paragraphs that follow?
Regional Writing Centre 56
Revising (Global)• “If the process of writing has changed your
views, consider rethinking the thesis and reworking the paper” (Ebest et al. 2004:14).
• How does the introduction fit in with the body of the paper? Did you address what you said you would address? Did you fulfil your promises?
• Does your conclusion take into account the discoveries made during your research and writing processes.
• Strategy: Outline your paper, now that you have finished it.
Regional Writing Centre 57
Revising (Local)• Local issues (editing and proofreading):
– Look at logical and grammatical relations as expressed within paragraph boundaries.
– Is the relationship between pronouns and noun substitutes and the things they represent clear?
– Verbs express relationships of time and indicate person, number and mood. Are those relationships consistent and appropriate?
Regional Writing Centre 58
Revising (Local)• Is information logically arranged, and
is the organisation of your text clear?• Does each paragraph have a topic
sentence and is the paragraph cogent, coherent and unified?
• Do your sentences express complete ideas, and do you vary your structures? Are they grammatical? What about the mechanics?
Regional Writing Centre 59
Checklists and Feedback
• Before flying, pilots go through a methodical check of their plane. Do you have a checklist for your assignments before you hand them in?
• How can you anticipate problems that you are unable to see? Get a peer to help.– Ask for the feedback that you need and
that is appropriate to the context.
Regional Writing Centre 60
Revising (Peer review)• For example, this is an argumentative
paper: “Were you convinced by my argument? Why? Or why not?”
• I know I write poor introductions: “Could you identify my thesis?” Or “...could you tell me how the introduction attempts to grab the reader’s interest?”
• I know that my sentences tend to be long and difficult to understand: “Could you read my paper aloud so that I can listen to it and mark where you are having difficulties in reading?”
Regional Writing Centre 61
Tips for editing• Set it aside for a few days and come back
with a fresh eye• Get someone else to proofread it as well
as you• Use the print preview button to check
layout before you print• Always proofread on hardcopy• Hold paper below the line you are
proofreading• Use the find button to make changes• Be consistent!!• Editing a reference list is separate
Regional Writing Centre 62
Editing a reference list• Check that in-text dates and page
numbers match reference list• Only enter names in reference list that
you have mentioned in your text – it’s not a bibliography
• Make sure that if a name is mentioned in the document that is in included in the reference list
• Do a separate edit of your reference list, checking everything matches, everything is included and it is consistent
Regional Writing Centre 63
Common errors• Consistency of layout• Spelling, punctuation and grammar• Syntax• Correct font and spacing• Word or letter substitution• Transposition of letters• Omission of a line or lines, which does not
outwardly affect the meaning• Check finished work with original• Dates, proper names and place names,
and figures• Complete labelling of diagrams, tables,
graphs, etc
Regional Writing Centre 64
WHO: Top 10 reasons for rejecting a
manuscript• Content of the paper not suitable for an international
journal of public health. • Design of the study not appropriate for the question asked. • Lack of novelty and or timeliness. • Lack of either or both ethical committee approval and
informed consent. • Lack of an appropriate search strategy. • Conclusions not justified by the results. • Lack of a feedback step in descriptions of audit. • Insufficient sample size. • Lack of a clear message to the public health community. • Secondary analyses of demographic surveys or simple
prevalence studies that are difficult to generalise. http://www.who.int/bulletin/contributors/rejection/en/index.html
Regional Writing Centre 66
Resources• Shannon Consortium Regional Writing
Centre, UL http://www.ul.ie/rwc/• Using English for Academic Purposes
http://www.uefap.com/index.htm• The Writer’s Garden
http://www. cyberlyber.com/writermain.htm
• The OWL at Purdue http://owl.english.purdue.edu/
• The Writing Center at the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill http://www.unc.edu/depts /wcweb/handouts/index.html
Regional Writing Centre 67
Works cited• Elbow, P. (1998) Writing without Teachers (2nd edition).
New York: Oxford University Press.• Elbow, P. and Belanoff, P. (2003) Being a Writer: A
Community of Writers Revisited. New York: McGraw-Hill.• Moore, S. and Murphy, M. (2005) How to be a Student:
100 Great Ideas and Practical Hints for Students Everywhere. UK: Open University Press.
• Murray, R. (2005) Writing for Academic Journals. UK: Open University Press.
• Murray, R. (2006) How to Write a Thesis (2nd edition). UK: Open University Press.
• Murray, R. and Moore, S. (2006) The Handbook of Academic Writing: A Fresh Approach. UK: Open University Press.
• Oshima, A. and Hogue, A. (2006) Writing Academic English, 4th edition. New York: Pearson Education.