WTE 24-25-12-Mumbai Outcome

8/10/2019 WTE 24-25-12-Mumbai Outcome

1/16

ST

INTERNATIONAL BRAINSTORMING

WORKSHOP ON

WASTE TO ENERGY IN INDIA

Organized under the CSIRs mission of Wealth from Waste by theCouncil of Scientific and Industrial Research-National

Environmental Engineering Research Institute (CSIR-NEERI) inassociation with Earth Engineering Centre, Columbia University,

New York

24-25th August 2012, Nehru Centre, Hall of Harmony

Worli, Mumbai, India

O U T C O M E S

O F T H E

E V E N T


2/16

Outcomes of 1stInternational Brainstorming workshop on Waste

to Energy in India

The 1st International Brainstorming workshop on Waste to Energy in India was held at Nehru

Centre, Mumbai on 24thand 25thAugust, 2012. This event was organized under the CSIRs mission of

Wealth from Waste by the Council of Scientific and Industrial Research-National Environmental

Engineering Research Institute (CSIR-NEERI) in association with Earth Engineering Centre, Columbia

University, New York. Other collaborating organizations were the Ministry of Forests and Environment

(MoEF), Maharashtra Pollution Control Board (MPCB) and Municipal corporations of different cities.

The main sponsor of the workshop was M/SHitachi Zosen INOVA (Hitz)and other sponsors included

GIZ, New Delhi; M/S Ramky Environ Engineers, Hyderabad; M/S Hanjer Biotech Energies Ltd,

M/STiedffel McClelland Waste to Energy Pvt. Ltd. (Indo-Swiss JV Co.), Mumbai; M/SUnity Infra

projects Ltd, Mumbai; M/SEcoFil, Mumbai; Maharashtra Pollution Control Board; West Bengal

Pollution Control Boardand M/S Jacob Stiefel GMBH, Mumbai.

This workshop was organized to discuss the existing waste management system in India and abroad in

general with a focus on waste to energy opportunities in India. It was attended by 238 delegates who are

working in the research and development in waste management sector. Scientists, young researchers,

service providers and entrepreneurs from different parts of world like USA, China, Thailand, Mauritius,

Germany, Hong Kong and India attended this brainstorming workshop. The workshop was divided into

three sessions viz.,inauguration, invited lectures and different technical sessions. Invited lectures were on

different themes highlighted in Figure 1.


3/16


4/16

Figure 2: Inauguration Session

The workshop was inaugurated by Dr. Rakesh Kumar (Figure 3). He briefed the delegates and

participants about the theme of workshop. He spoke about the history of waste management in India and

how management of municipal solid waste was neglected over the years when compared to other kinds of

wastes. He also highlighted different prospects of waste management in India in terms of existing

management practices, its challenges, policy issues, technological options and opportunities in terms of

waste to energy.

Figure 3: Dr. Rakesh Kumar delivering his Introductory Speech

Thereafter, distinguished speaker Dr. Sukumar Devotta (Figure 4)shared his comparative

knowledge of waste to energy from developed countries and how it could be implemented in developing

countries along with comparison of hazardous and MSW management systems in India. He also


5/16

highlighted the importance of mechanical, biological and other relevant treatment technologies for waste.

He concluded his speech by providing feedback on current Solid Waste Management and Handling Rules,

2000 and need for its amendment.

Figure 4: Dr. Sukumar Devotta delivering Distinguished Speech

Then, Guest of Honor, Mr. R. A. Rajeev, IAS (Figure 5), shared his experience about the

management practices opted by TMC and the various challenges faced by them in its implementation. He

stressed on the fact that there is an urgent need to bridge the gap between existing management practices

and motivated municipalities and municipal corporations in India for implementation of effective

sustainable waste management in which Waste to Energy along with sanitary landfills should be an

integral part.

Figure 5: Mr. R.A. Rajeev delivering Speech as a Guest of Honour


6/16


7/16

Figure 7: Prof. Gunter Busch Addressing the Audience as the Chief Guest

Finally, the inaugural session was concluded by Vote of thanks by Dr. Sunil Kumar (Figure 8),

Scientist, CSIR-NEERI, Kolkata and Head, WTERT, India.

Figure 8: Dr. Sunil Kumar Proposing Vote of Thanks

Thereafter, invited lectures were delivered under different sessions. It began with Regulatory and

Policy Issues followed by Process Modeling and Waste to Energy: Experiences in Corporate Sector.


8/16


9/16

sketched a model for anaerobic degradation in Biocell Landfills which is essential for existing landfill

sites. Finally, Mr. K. Sreenivasa Raoshared his experience on waste to energy from the corporate sector

perspective through their ongoing project activities. He highlighted the existing projects implemented by

M/s Hitachi Zosen India Pvt. Ltd. across the world. He also focused on opportunities in India for

incineration of waste to generate energy. After the completion of invited lectures, the technical session

started.

Session I (Part I): Energy Recovery and Technical issues

This part was chaired by Prof. Jonathan W. C. Wong, Director, Hong Kong Organic Resource

Centre and Co-chaired by Er. Ackmez Mudhoo, Lecturer, Dept of Chemical and Environmental Eng.,

University of Mauritius. Names of different speakers are summarized in Figure 10.

Figure 10: Details of Speaker of Session I

The planetary lecture of the Part I was delivered by Prof. Bo-Lun Kang, Vice Dean of School of

Energy and Power Engineering, Xian Jiaotong University, China. He mainly spoke on biodiesel and its

usage. He gave few case studies of China and Hong Kong. Thereafter, paper presentations were made by

the various participants. Among papers, Dr. Nityanand Singh Maurya, presented his work on bio-waste

Session I: Energy Recovery and Technological Issues

PART

Prof. Bo-Lun

Kang

Dr. N S. Maurya

Chair: Prof. Jonathan W. C. Wong

Co-Chair: Er. Ackmez Mudhoo

Planery

Lecture

Paper

presentation

Mr. M. Lenin

babu

Dr. Mrs.) Sourja

Ghosh

Dr. Anurag Garg

Dr. S. V. Srinivasan

Mr. Paul Jacobs

PART II

Chair: Prof. Somnath Mukherjee

Co-Chair: Prof. N. S. Maurya

Prof. J. W. C.

Wong

Mr. Ackmez

Mudhoo

Planery

Lecture

Paper

presenta

tion

Ms. G. Velvizhi

Mr. Soumya

Pandit

Dr. S. V. Srinivasan

Prof. M .Vikram

Reddy

Mr. Devendra

Goyal


10/16

management and energy recovery in villages of India. Then, Mr. Lenin Babupresented his case study on

biohydrogen production through anoxic microenvironment. In his study, he compared his results with

anaerobic process. Then, Dr. (Mrs.)Sourja Ghoshhighlighted biodiesel production from algal biomass.

Then, Anurag Gargspoke on mechanical and biological treatment options for MSW. Thereafter, Dr. S.

V. Srinivasan highlighted his research work on energy recovery from vegetable waste through anaerobic

process. Finally, Mr.Paul Jacobpresented an overview of waste to energy in Thailand.

Session I (Part II): Energy Recovery and Technical issues

Part two of Session I was chaired by Prof. Somnath Mukherjee, Dept of Civil Eng., Jadavpur

Univ, Kolkata and Co-chaired by Dr. N. S. Maurya, NIT, Patna. In this part, there were two plenary

lectures. One was delivered by Prof. Jonathan W. C. Wongon current status and future prospects of two

phase anaerobic digestion. The second plenary lecture was delivered by Prof. M. Vikram Reddy, Senior

Professor, Ecology and Environment Science Department, Pondicherry University on potential of non-

conventional energy from MSW. Thereafter, Er. Ackmez Mudhoo presented his paper on anaerobic

digestion of waste and discussed on the preliminary waste-to-biogas model his research team are

developing to cater for the needs of a wide spectrum of wastes for industrial application after

customization. Then, Ms.G. Velvizhihighlighted her work on power generation from microbial cell fuel.

Again, Dr. S. V. Srinivasan spoke on energy recovery options from tannery waste. Thereafter, Mr.

Soumya Pandit presented his case studies on effect of 3D anode and organic load on bioelectricity

generation. Finally, Mr.Devendra Goyalgave a strategy about zero-tolerance for MSW. This ended the

first day of the event.

Session II (Part I): Biological Processes

The second day began with Session II (Part I) on biological process. This part was chaired by Dr.

A. D Sawant, Former Vice Chancellor, Rajasthan University and Co-Chaired by Dr. V. K. Garg,

Associate Professor, Guru Jambheswar University of Science and Technology, Hisar, India. The details of

speakers are given in Figure 11.


11/16

Figure 11: Details of Speakers of Session II

The plenary lecture was delivered by Prof. Gunter Buschon double-stage process for treatment

of biogenic fraction of MSW. Then, Dr. (Mrs.) Sutripta Sarkar highlighted about her work on bio-

energy production using Geobacillusspecies while Mrs.S. R.Ankarampresented on vermicomposting

for treatment of weeds. Mr.Mahesh Khot spoke on management of agro waste. Mr. Manu Agarwalspoke on pyrolysis process for treatment of waste and producing value added products. Dr. S.N. Mudliar

spoke on biogas generation from effluent.

Session II (Part II): Biological Processes

Part two of Session II was chaired by Dr. A. N. Vaidya, Sr. Principal Scientist, NEERI, Nagpur

and co-chaired by Er. Asit Nema. The first plenary lecture was delivered by Mrs. Regina Dube,

Director, Environment Programme, GIZ, New Delhi. She mainly focused on incineration option fortreatment of MSW. She presented different case studies for solid waste management through incineration

projects in European countries. A second plenary lecture was delivered by Dr. Irfan Furniturewala,

Promoter, Hanjer Biotech Energies Pvt. Ltd. (HBEPL). He showed a film on solid waste management

strategies adopted by HBEPL and perfected in India. He also described how composting technology has

been operating in different climatic zones in India for treatment of biodegradable waste. Then, Er.

Session II: Biological Process

PART

Prof. Gunter

Busch

Dr. Sutripta Sarkar

Chair: Dr. A. D. Sawant

Co-Chair: Dr. V. K. Garg

Planery Lecture

Paper

presentation

Ms. S. R. Ankram

Mr. Mahesh Khot

Mr. Manu Agarwal

Ms. K.V. Padoley

PART II

Chair: Dr. A. N. Vaidya

Co-Chair: Er. Asit Nema

Dr. Mrs.)

Regina Dube

Mr. Ackmez

Mudhoo

Planery Lecture

Paper

presentation

Dr. V. K. Garg

Dr. L. C. Mushan

Dr. Manjeet

Banswal

Dr. Prince William

Dr. Irfan

Furniturewala

Mr. Anurag Gupta

Ms. Papiya Mandal


12/16

Ackmez Mudhoo highlighted his case study on the effects of Cu2+, total solids and autoclaving on the

anaerobic digestion of vegetable wastes using biochemical methane potential assays. Dr. V.K. Garg

presented a paper on nutrient recycling using earthworms. He elaborately discussed vermin composting

for organic wastes and detailed its strengths and weaknesses and how the weaknesses can be addressed.

Dr. (Mrs.) L. C. Mushan highlighted a case study on MSW management using exotic species of

earthworms. Dr. Manjeet Bansalpresented his work completed on the removal of heavy metals using

the biosorption technique. Dr. S. P. MPrince William shared his experience with lysimeter studies.

Mrs. Papiya Mandal shared her case study on rapid composting of urban solid waste. Mr. Anurag

Gupta, Sanjali Jain and Purvee Chauhan provided a strategic model for solid waste management in

urban areas.

Session III: Process Modeling and Review of WTE technologies

Session III was on Process Modeling and Review of WTE technologies and it was chaired by

Prof. Gunter Busch, and co-chaired by Dr. Dieter Mutz, Director, GIZ, New Delhi. The details of

speakers and other lecturer are given in Figure 12.

Figure 12: Details of Speakers of Session III

Plenary lecture was delivered by Dr. Hoysala N. Chanakya, Principal Res. Sci., IISc, Bangalore.

He highlighted about small-scale options for MSW and energy options from them. Then, Dr. Munish

Kumar Chandel presented his work on GHG emissions from different waste management practices.

Thereafter, Mr. Avick Sil presented a case study about formulating LandGEM model as per Indian

Session III: Process Modeling and Review of wte technologies

Dr. H. N. Chanakya

Dr. Munish Kumar Chandel

Chair: Prof. Gunter Busch

Co-Chair: Dr. Dieter Mutz

Planery

Lecture

Paper

presentation

Mr. Avick Sil

Mr. Monojit Chakraborty


13/16

scenario for estimating landfill gas emissions from open dumping sites. Mr. Monojit Chakraborty

spoke on energy option from waste in Delhi.

Session IV: WTE experience in industrial sector

This session was chaired by Prof.V. Sethi, Professor, IIT, Mumbai and co-chaired by Dr. C. R.

Rao. The details of speakers are given in Figure 13.

Figure 13: Details of Speakers of Session IV

First plenary lecture was delivered by Dr. Dieter Mutz on management of MSW mixed with

cement waste. A second plenary lecture was delivered by Mr. D. B. S. S. R. Sastry, Ramky Enviro

Engineers Ltd. He presented a framework to overcome the barriers in business opportunities in India for

WTE plants. Ms.Rashmi Chandrapresented her paper on bioaugmentation of photosynthetic bacteria.

Finally, this session was concluded with presentation of Mr.Soumya Pandit/ Prof. M Ghanghrekaron

wastewater treatment with production of bioelectricity.

There were also poster presentations from various budding researchers from India.


14/16

Panel Discussion and Concluding Remarks

The two-day International workshop concluded with panel discussions about the current

challenges in WTE projects in India and the future opportunities. The members of the panel discussions

are given in Figure 14.

Figure 14: Details of Panelists

It was anchored by Mr. Ranjith Aneepu and moderated by Dr.Rakesh Kumar . The panelists

were Prof.Gunter Busch, Dr. Dieter Mutz, Dr. Hoysala N. Chanakya, Prof Ashok Pandey, Prof.V.

Sethiand Mr. K. Srreenivas Rao.

THE MAJOR RECOMMENDATIONS OF THE WORKSHOP WERE:

The multiple levels of sharing of knowledge within India and also from other countries, set of

recommendations emerged. Though some of the issues could not be led to consensus, however, the need

to move ahead and move decisively and distinctly was clearly spelt out.

The status of MSW management in India has not improved substantially despite enormous

finding from JNNURM and other governmental grants. Smaller cities conditions are even more of

concern.

The MSW Management and Handling Rules need reform. Some of these need to emerge from the

areas of collection and transportation as a first step. Of the same, segregation needs to be

considered as a key component of the MSW management. In absence of segregation, most of the

downstream efficiencies are not achieved. The treatment/processing technologies have shown

poor results due to mixed waste receipts. The other area of reform is better monitoring of

Prof. Gunter

Busch

Panel Discussion and Concluding remarks

Panel host Ranjith Annepu

Panelist

Dr. Dieter

Mutz

Dr. H. N.

Chanakya

Prof. Ashok

Pandey

Prof. V. Sethi

Mr. Sreenivasa Rao


15/16

odorous gases based on scientific rationale. The monitoring protocol based on population needs to

change as the emissions and odour are not linked with the population. In fact, the increasing

population makes it necessary that odour parameters are given more importance.

The technology mix needs to emerge from the characteristics of the waste and not on what

technology is available. The use of Waste to Energy concept must keep the basic principle that

we should burn what is combustible and use biological methods for biodegradables.

It was felt that there is a tremendous scope for the generation of energy from MSW and all the

municipalities must ensure the same. This would benefit the energy starved nations like India.

There should be proper technology assessment throughout the country which must address the

issue of climate (especially rains) and also the scale of the technology. There is a need to redefine

and document technologies applicable for smaller cities, large villages, whereas large metro cities

must address through technologies option of waste to energy, volume reduction and less land

intensive options.

The need was also felt that cities assessment across the country with regard to waste generation

and management needs to be undertaken periodically. The absence of reliable data makes all

MSW management decisions unreliable.

The health burden of poor MSW management started to pile up as number of diseases and its

spread has been seen to have direct correlation with waste management efficiencies.

Awareness must be created among general public and also among technology suppliers and

providers.

There is an urgent need of research and development in this sector, especially in following areas:

Biogas technologies (small scale and large scale); landfills of low-cost for smaller cities, recycle

and reuse benchmarking, combustion technology adaptation based on Indian MSW feedstock etc.

Currently, India is facing problems in terms of solid waste management and energy demand. A

solution must be chalked out in such a way that it becomes a win-win situation both in terms of

solid waste management and energy production.

Planning regarding urban waste management must be chalked out.

One could concentrate on decentralized system for management and treatment of solid waste in

urban cities.

Policies must be framed in such a manner that minimum quantity of solid waste must be disposed

at landfill sites. Since land is a scarce resource, government agencies must concentrate now to

plan for future. Also look at the options of reducing land requirement so that sustainability is very

high.


16/16

There should be more participation from regulatory bodies, policy makers through a regular and

proper public consultation.

Benchmarking of different issues regarding MSW management needs to be undertaken which

will address the service level benchmark. This would also help in performance based payment.

Service providers and also technology suppliers within India and also those with tie ups in other

countries are looking forward to transparent communication of policies for cities in terms of

technology use and their benchmark. The uncertainties are very high for new players who come

with technology and wish to undertake projects.

Odor control measures must be highlighted in policy framework and must get reflected as a

guideline without which acceptance of waste facilities would continue to be poor.

Roles and responsibilities of different organizations, public, and rag pickers must be formulated

in policy framework. Informal sector work must be recognized as they are responsible for a

minimum of about 8-10% of waste generated. They not only provide employment but also reduce

burden on the landfills. Their contributions need to be recognized.

The MSW process of decentralized management must also be examined and encouraged as they

prevent accumulation and also creation of a big problem.

Documents

WTE 24-25-12-Mumbai Outcome