Upload
keaton-udy
View
221
Download
2
Tags:
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
WTO Dispute Settlement
A short introduction
2
How were disputes settled under the GATT 1947?
Nearly 50 years of dispute settlement under the GATT 1947 ...
Positive consensus in the GATT Council to refer a dispute to a Panel, and to adopt a Panel report
Articles XXII and XXIII of the GATT 1994
3
Challenges under the GATT 1947 dispute settlement system
• Rule of positive consensus
– Referring a dispute to a panel, adopting a panel report, authorizing countermeasures
– Risk of veto– Diplomatic character
• Yet, good results
– 101 adopted reports / 132 issued reports– Empirical research
Marrakesh Agreement Establishing the World Trade Organization (WTO Agreement)
Structure of the WTO Agreement
Annex 1
1A: MTAs on goods
(GATT + 12)
1B: GATS
1C: TRIPs
Annex 2
Dispute Settlement
Understanding
Annex 3
Trade PolicyReview
Mechanism
Annex 4
PlurilateralAgreements
5
DSU builds on Articles XXII and XXIII of the GATT 1947
Members affirm their adherence...
To the principles for the management of disputes applied under Articles XXII and XXIII of GATT 1947...
And the rules and procedures as further elaborated and modified in the DSU
Article 3.1 of the DSU
Main actors in the WTO Dispute Settlement System
Art 2 DSU, The Dispute Settlement Body (DSB)
Administers the WTO Dispute Settlement System
Establishes panels
Adopts panel and Appellate Body reports
Maintains surveillance of implementationNon-implementation? Authorizes retaliatory measures
The panel 3 – 5 panelists, ad hoc body
The Appellate Body Standing body of 7 members, 4-year term
WTO and AB Secretariat Assist panels and the AB
Main actors in the WTODispute Settlement System
7
How the Dispute Settlement System works
Panel Report Appellate Body
Establishes No appeal? DSB adopts the report
DSB adopts the reports
The Dispute Settlement Body,
All Members
8
Novelties in the DSU
• Standing Appellate Body
• DSB establishes panels and adopts panel reports by negative or reverse consensus
– Difference from dispute settlement under the GATT 1947?
– Under the GATT 1947: positive consensus
• Surveillance of implementation
9
Only WTO Members (153 as of November 2009)
Recourse to WTO dispute settlement: Who?
NOT NGOs, individuals (although may lobby governments – indirect access)
Right to bring claims
Appellate Body:– No DSU provision requiring “legal interest”– Members have a broad discretion whether or not to bring a case
10
Recourse to WTO dispute settlement: Regarding what?
Disputes under the following agreements (so-called covered agreements, “CA”), must be resolved pursuant to the DSU
WTO Agreement Multilateral Trade Agreements (GATT 1994 + 12 other agreements on trade in goods) GATS TRIPS DSU (Plurilateral Trade Agreements)
Appendix 1 to the DSU
11
Integrated system for Dispute Settlement
Article 23 of the DSU ... A single set of rules for all disputes
Article 1.2 of the DSU, Appendix 2 to the DSU … Only a few special or additional rules in the covered agreements which prevail over the DSU. For example:
Article 4.4 of the SCM Agreement ... Consultation period 30 days rather than the standard 60 days
12
Nature
• Compulsory jurisdiction
– Members obliged to bring disputes under the Covered Agreements to WTO dispute settlement
– Accession: Consent to accept jurisdiction
• Exclusive jurisdiction
– No other fora– No unilateral action
13
Objectives
Security and predictability in international trade
Preserving Members’ rights and obligations
Clarifying the existing provisions of the CA
Article 3.2 of the DSU
14
Outcome
Positive solution to a dispute
Preferred outcome: Mutually acceptable solution
Withdrawal of measures inconsistent with the covered agreements
Article 3.7 of the DSU
15
• Panel proceedings
• (Appellate Body review)
• Inconsistent measures...
– Withdrawal– Compensation / Suspension of concessions
...and if no mutually agreed solution reached
Measure
16
Main Stages
Good offices, conciliation and
mediation possible at any
moment
Consultations60 days
Panel review6 – 9 months
AB review 60 – 90 days
Adoption of report by the DSB
Implementation
17
...Consultations
• Diplomatic method of settling the dispute
• Confidential – No intervention by the Secretariat
• “Without prejudice to the rights of any Member in further legal proceedings”
Article 4 of the DSU
As of April 2010: 406 requests for consultations! !
18
Third parties joining consultations
Request filed under Article XXII of the GATT
Substantial trade interest– Notification to the consulting Parties and the DSB– Within 10 days of the circulation of the original request
(WT/DSXXX/1)
Respondent decides:– Substantial interest? No review, but the Member can
separately request consultations
DSB informed about the decision to accept
Article 4.11 of the DSU
19
Consultations according to the Covered Agreement invoked
GATT 1994, 309
SCM, 80Agriculture, 65
Anti-Dumping, 82
Licensing, 33
TBT, 39
Saf eguards, 35
TRI PS, 27
SPS, 37
Others, 129
20
Complainants
US, 93
EC, 81
Canada, 33India, 18Mexico, 21
Argentina, 15
Korea, 14
Others
(developed), 34
Brazil, 24
Others
(developing), 90
21
Panel establishment
Matter not resolved in consultations?
• Establishment of a panel
• Established by the DSB by negative consensus (2nd DSB meeting, defendant cannot block ( Article 6.1 of the DSU)
• Strict requirements for the request for the establishment of a panel (Article 6.2 of the DSU)
Article 6 of the DSU
22
Request for the establishment of a panel
Form? In writing
To whom?
Content?
Legal basis?
Addressed to the DSB
Distributed
Indicate whether consultations were heldIdentify the specific measures at issueBrief summary of the legal basis (claims)
Article 6.2 of the DSU and specific dispute settlement provisions of the CA
to Members as document WT/DSXXX/X
23
Rationale for precision in the request
Defines measures + claims …
Which form the panel’s mandate …
Jurisdiction + due process …
Measure 1
Panel request
24
First element: Identify the measure(s) at issue
Definition of a measure
AB: “Any act or omission attributable to a WTO Member can be a measure of that Member for the purposes of dispute settlement proceedings”
Measures may take the form of...
Laws, regulations, administrative instructions, specific application of laws etc (tariffs, quotas, anti-dumping/CVD measures, safeguards ...)
Law1
Law2
25
Second element: Identify the claims
Definition of a claim
AB: “A claim that the respondent party has violated, or nullified or impaired the benefits arising from, an identified provision of a particular covered agreement.”
How to identify the claims AB: “Provide a summary – and it may be a brief one – of the legal basis of the complaint that is ‘sufficient to present the problem clearly’.”
26
Panel composition
• No permanent panels / panelists, ad hoc• Indicative list of panelists• Secretariat proposes nominations, parties can
oppose for compelling reasons• Well-qualified government and/or non-
governmental individuals• If disagreement: Nomination by DG
(at the request of complainant)
Article 8 of the DSU
As of April 2010: 148 panels composed (88 by the DG)! !
27
Third Parties
• “Substantial interest”• No DSU deadline
– In practice Members notify their “substantial interest” at the DSB meeting at which the Panel is established
• Limited rights– Right to receive the first written submissions – Right to make written submissions to the panel– Right to be heard by the panel– Enhanced third-party rights? Granting within the“sound discretion of the panel”
Article 10 of the DSU
28
Panel proceedings
1. First written submissions of the parties
3. First substantive meeting with the parties and third parties - Third party session
4. Written rebuttals of the parties
5. Second substantive meeting with the parties6. Descriptive part of the report to the parties
7. Parties’ comments on the descriptive part8. Interim review9. Final report issued to parties
10. Final report circulated to all Members
Appendix3 DSU –
Generalworking
procedures
2. [Third party submissions]
29
Standard of review
Facts of the case
Applicability of covered agreements
Conformity of the measures with covered agreements
* More deferential standard of review under Art. 17.6 ADA
Objective assessment of the matter
30
Appellate Body
Established in 1995, innovation of the WTO dispute settlement system
A standing body of 7 Members. 4-year term, renewable once, a part-time job.
Requirements: Authority and expertise in international trade law“Unaffiliated with any government” Impartiality, broad representativeness
Appointed by the DSB on consensus, based on nominations by WTO Members
31
The current members of the Appellate Body
The current members of the Appellate Body
Ms Lilia Bautista – Philippines
Ms Jennifer Hillman – United States
Mr Shotaro Oshima – Japan
Ms Yuejiao Zhang – China
Mr David Unterhalter – South Africa(Chairman)
Mr Ricardo Ramírez Hernández - Mexico (recently appointed)
Mr Peter van den Bossche - Belgium (recently appointed)
32
What can be appealed?
• Appeals limited to “issues of law covered in the panel report and legal interpretations developed by the panel”
• No factual findings by the Appellate Body
• Panels’ factual findings: In principle, outside the scope of appellate review
Article 17.6 of the DSU Issu
e of
law
What can be appealed?
33
Third participants
• Only those Members that were third parties on the panel stage
• Cannot appeal
• Right to file written submissions and to participate in the oral hearing
34
Adoption of Panel / Appellate Body reports
The DSB adopts • Panel Report (as upheld/modified/ reversed) • Together with the Appellate Body Report• By negative consensus
Within 30 days from circulation of AB Report (60 days from circulation of Panel Report if no appeal)
35
Order of compliance-related proceduresDSB adopts report
Arbitration to determine RPT if no agreement
Request for DSB authorization to suspend concessionsif compensation not agreed
Arbitration on level and procedure
DSB authorization to suspend concessions
Order of compliance-related procedures
Implementation within reasonable period of time (RPT)
Request for review of compliance (referred to original panel)
Negotiations to agree mutually satisfactorycompensation if no compliance
36
Thank you!