Www Lawteacher Net Free Law Essays English Legal System High

8/19/2019 Www Lawteacher Net Free Law Essays English Legal System High

1/21

pdfcrowd comopen in browser PRO version Are you a developer? Try out the HTML to PDF API

LawTeacher

English LegalSystem

The english legal system essay below

has been submitted to us by a student in

order to help you with your studies.

Back to Subject Index

LawTeacher / Free Law Essays / English Legal System / High Courts Power Of Revision

Enter your search terms...

http://www.lawteacher.net/free-law-essays/english-legal-systemhttp://pdfcrowd.com/http://pdfcrowd.com/redirect/?url=http%3a%2f%2fwww.lawteacher.net%2ffree-law-essays%2fenglish-legal-system%2fhigh-courts-power-of-revision.php&id=ma-160219143115-d0a8b1cchttp://pdfcrowd.com/customize/http://pdfcrowd.com/html-to-pdf-api/?ref=pdfhttp://www.lawteacher.net/http://www.lawteacher.net/free-law-essays/english-legal-systemhttp://www.lawteacher.net/http://www.lawteacher.net/free-law-essays/http://www.lawteacher.net/free-law-essays/english-legal-system/http://www.lawteacher.net/free-law-essays/english-legal-system/high-courts-power-of-revision.php


2/21


Print Download Reference This Reddit This

Tweet

High Courts Power Of RevisionIntroductionAs the code says that there is no right to appeal in every case and it is confined

to such cases as are specifically provided by the law. Even in such specified cases

the code allows only one appeal and a review of the decision of the appellant

court is not normally permissible by way of further appeal to yet another

higher court. In order to avoid the possibility of any miscarriage of justice incases where no right of appeal is available the code has devised another review

procedure, namely REVISION. Section 397 to 405 of Criminal Procedure Code

deals with the powers of revision conferred on the higher courts and the

procedure to regulate these powers. The powers of revision conferred upon the

higher courts are very wide and are purely discretionary in nature. There fore

no party has right t heard before any court exercising such powers.

This law essay is an example of a student'swork

Share

How can wehelp?

Law Essay Writing

Service

Law Dissertation

Writing Service

View All Law

Services

Place an Order

Get a Quote

Free Law Essays

Free Law

Dissertations

Latin Law Term

Definitions

All English Legal

System Resources

http://www.printfriendly.com/print/?source=site&url=http://www.lawteacher.net/free-law-essays/english-legal-system/high-courts-power-of-revision.phphttp://www.printfriendly.com/print/?source=site&url=http://www.lawteacher.net/free-law-essays/english-legal-system/high-courts-power-of-revision.phphttp://www.lawteacher.net/js/create-citation.phphttp://www.lawteacher.net/js/create-citation.phphttp://www.reddit.com/submithttp://pdfcrowd.com/redirect/?url=http%3a%2f%2fwww.lawteacher.net%2ffree-law-essays%2fenglish-legal-system%2fhigh-courts-power-of-revision.php&id=ma-160219143115-d0a8b1cchttp://pdfcrowd.com/http://pdfcrowd.com/redirect/?url=http%3a%2f%2fwww.lawteacher.net%2ffree-law-essays%2fenglish-legal-system%2fhigh-courts-power-of-revision.php&id=ma-160219143115-d0a8b1cchttp://pdfcrowd.com/customize/http://pdfcrowd.com/html-to-pdf-api/?ref=pdfhttp://www.printfriendly.com/print/?source=site&url=http://www.lawteacher.net/free-law-essays/english-legal-system/high-courts-power-of-revision.phphttp://www.lawteacher.net/js/create-citation.phphttp://www.reddit.com/submithttp://twitter.com/sharehttp://www.reddit.com/submithttps://www.facebook.com/sharer/sharer.php?app_id=436312303072397&sdk=joey&u=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.lawteacher.net%2Ffree-law-essays%2Fenglish-legal-system%2Fhigh-courts-power-of-revision.php&display=popup&ref=plugin&src=share_buttonhttp://www.lawteacher.net/order/http://www.lawteacher.net/prices.phphttp://www.lawteacher.net/services/law-essay-writing-service.phphttp://www.lawteacher.net/services/law-dissertation-writing-service.phphttp://www.lawteacher.net/services/http://www.lawteacher.net/free-law-essays/http://www.lawteacher.net/free-law-dissertations/http://www.lawteacher.net/latin-legal-terms.phphttp://www.lawteacher.net/category/english-legal-system/


3/21


The basic object behind the code in section 401 is to empower the high court toexercise the powers of an appellant court to prevent failure of justice in cases

where the code does not provide for appeal. The power however is to be

exercised only in exceptional cases where there has been a miscarriage of

justice owing to: - a defect in the procedure or a manifest error on the point of

law, excess of jurisdiction, abuse of power, where decision upon which the trial

court relied has since been reversed or overruled when the revision appeal is

being heard. In exercising the power of revision, which is discretionary, the

court should always bear in mind the limitation that grab of exercising its

power of revision; it cannot ion effect exercise the power of appeal in the face of

statutory prohibitions.

The revisional powers though are quite wide, have been circumscribed by

certain limitations. Such as (A) in such cases where an appeal lies but there is

no appeal brought in, originally no proceeding by way of revision shall be

entertained at the instance of the party who would have appealed. (B) The

Disclaimer

This essay has been submitted to us by a student in order to help you with

your studies. This is not an example of the work written by our

professional law writers.

Who wrote this essay?

Freelance Writing Jobs

Place an Order

Us 0115 966 7966

[email protected]

Contact Page

Search LawTeacher

Follow LawTeacher

Enter your sea

http://pdfcrowd.com/http://pdfcrowd.com/redirect/?url=http%3a%2f%2fwww.lawteacher.net%2ffree-law-essays%2fenglish-legal-system%2fhigh-courts-power-of-revision.php&id=ma-160219143115-d0a8b1cchttp://pdfcrowd.com/customize/http://pdfcrowd.com/html-to-pdf-api/?ref=pdfhttp://www.lawteacher.net/js/modal-boxes/free-law-essays.phphttp://www.lawteacher.net/freelance-writing-jobs.phphttp://www.lawteacher.net/order/?product=1http://www.facebook.com/LawTeacherNethttp://twitter.com/LawteacherNethttps://plus.google.com/+LawteacherNetUK/postshttp://www.lawteacher.net/contact/


4/21


revisional powers are not exercisable in relation to any interlocutory order

passed in any appeal, inquiry and trial. (C) The court exercising revisional

powers is not authorized to convert a finding of acquittal into one of conviction

into one of convection. (D) A person is allowed to file only one application for

revision either to the Court of Session or to the High Court if once such an

application is made to one court, no further application by the same person

shall be entertained by the other court.

All this provisions and the limitations are being given by the section 401 of the

Criminal procedure code of 1973. Further the researcher would like to go with

its provisions separately and what all lies with the high court in such matters

with the help of the case laws.

Jurisdiction Of The High Court As A

Revisional PowerThe High Courts power to jurisdiction to act as a revisional court has to be

deduced from all the provisions in section 397-401 read together. The points on

which they are read together are as follows:

1. The High Court my it self call for the record of an inferior court under

section 397 either on the application of a party aggrieved suo moto which

is section 401(1).

2. When the high court has before it on appeal the record of a criminal

proceeding, it may exercise its power of revision under section 401 in

respect of a matter in regard to which it could have otherwise exercised

its power of revision even where the appeal is incomplete. It should be

noted that where in a proceeding on appeal the court proposes to exercise

its revisional powers; its intention to that effect should be made clear in its

orders. If however high court proceeds in exercise of its power as an

http://pdfcrowd.com/http://pdfcrowd.com/redirect/?url=http%3a%2f%2fwww.lawteacher.net%2ffree-law-essays%2fenglish-legal-system%2fhigh-courts-power-of-revision.php&id=ma-160219143115-d0a8b1cchttp://pdfcrowd.com/customize/http://pdfcrowd.com/html-to-pdf-api/?ref=pdf


5/21


appellant court, assuming that the appeal is complete and subsequently it

is discovered that appeal was incompetent and that accordingly the order

passed by the high court was void, the order cannot be saved by treating

it as having been passed by the High Court as a court of revision.

3. The High Court may also exercise its revisional powers where the defect

in the record of a case before an inferior court comes to its knowledge in

any other manner.

Difference Between The Appellant AndRevisional Jurisdiction Of The High Court:

1. Though sub section (1) of the section 401 of the criminal procedure code

extends all the appellate powers of the High Court to its revisional

jurisdiction, it is subject to exceptions specified in the other sub-section as

a result of which the following points of distinction should be noted.

1. in appeal, the High Court can convert an acquittal into a

convention and vice versa, but in revision it cannot convert a

finding of acquittal into one of conviction that is in Section 401(3).

2. The power of High Court in appeal is not so wide as that in revision.

In exercising its revisional jurisdiction the High Court may even

cure any irregularity or impropriety Section 397 of CriminalProcedure Code that is not so in appeal. But normally, the High

Court would not interfere, in reyision unless there is a glaring

defect in the procedure or a manifest error in law, which has

resulted in flagrant miscarriage of justice.



6/21


This law essay is an example of astudent's work

3. In disposing of a criminal appeal against conviction, the court will

interfere, unless it is satisfied as to the guilt of the accused, while inrevision the High Court will not interfere unless the conscience of

the court is aroused to such an extent as to compel it to expressly

say that the applicant ought not to have been convicted on the

evidenced.

4. The High Court cannot dismiss an appeal without affording the

appellant or his pleader a reasonable opportunity of being heard.

DisclaimerThis essay has been submitted to us by a student in order to

help you with your studies. This is not an example of the work

written by our professional law writers.



Place an Order

http://pdfcrowd.com/http://pdfcrowd.com/redirect/?url=http%3a%2f%2fwww.lawteacher.net%2ffree-law-essays%2fenglish-legal-system%2fhigh-courts-power-of-revision.php&id=ma-160219143115-d0a8b1cchttp://pdfcrowd.com/customize/http://pdfcrowd.com/html-to-pdf-api/?ref=pdfhttp://www.lawteacher.net/js/modal-boxes/free-law-essays.phphttp://www.lawteacher.net/freelance-writing-jobs.phphttp://www.lawteacher.net/order/?product=1


7/21


But in revision the High Court is not bound to hear the applicant or

his pleader save while enhancing any sentence, in which case the

accused shall be heard as of right, this is in section 401(2) or

criminal procedure code.

5. There is no provision for abatement of revision proceeding as for

appeal.

Section 401 And Article 226 And 227 Of TheConstitution Of India:In an appropriate case, it may be permissible for High Court to protect a person

from illegal prosecution, by granting an appropriate write such as writ of

mandamus.

Section 401 of Cr.P.C and Article 227 grants the extraordinary constitutionalpower to the High Court under Article 227 which cannot be taken away by

anything in section 397, 401 of the Cr.P.C. Of course the High Court can

interfere under Article 227 only if the conditions necessary for application of

that provision exist such as where the order in question is without jurisdiction

or founded on no evidence. But Art. 227 cannot be used to interfere with a

matter in the discretion of the inferior Court.

Who May Apply For RevisionThere is a consensus of opinion that unless the High Court acts Suo Moto, it can

be moved to exercise its power of revision only when an aggrieved party makes

an application under section 397(1) to call for the records, such aggrieved party

may be the accused himself or the complainant or some other person. When a

case has been instituted on police report, a private party cannot, therefore,



8/21


make such application and move the High Court to call for the records and to

exercise its power under section 401, in revision unless there are exceptional

circumstances. But when the records come up before the High Court on appeal

against conviction by the accused, the High court entertained a revision petition

for enhancement of the sentence filed by a brother of the deceased and

enhanced the sentence, after issuing notice upon the accused. The Supreme

Court upheld this order as a suo motu exercise of its revisional power, for the

purpose of which anybody could draw the attention of the High Court to the

illegality or irregularity in the order or sentence. In short, the application of a

person who has no locus standi may be treated as information to induce the

High Court to precede suo motu in a present case. 1) Section 401(4) says that

when a party is entitled to appeal against an order, it is not entitled to apply in

revision without first appealing against such order. Hence, where a state

government has failed to appeal against an order or acquittal, it cannot move

in revision against that order. Under sub section (4) of section 378, a

complainant is entitled to appeal if (a) the case has not been instituted on his

complaint and (b) if the High Court grants him special leave to file such appeal.

Hence, in such a case, the complainant cannot apply for revision without first

seeking the special leave to appeal from the High Court. The complainant, in

cases other than the above, or even a third party, may apply for revision,

provided only there are exceptional grounds such as: Absence of jurisdiction,

Miscarriage of Justice.

Whether The High Court Can Exercise ItsPower Of Revision Where An Appeal IsPending Against The Impugned Order BeforeThe Sessions Court.The usual rule of practice is that the High Court would not excise its revisional



9/21

df d mi b PRO i Are you a developer? Try out the HTML to PDF API

power under section 401, in a case where the aggrieved party has appealed

against the judgment or order before an inferior court, until that appeal is

disposed of. But there may be exceptional cases where the ends of justice

required that appeal itself be heard by the High Court and n such a case, it is

open to the High Court to call for the records of the appeal under its revisional

power, hear and dismiss the appeal and thereafter enhance the sentence under

its revisional power.


Disclaimer






Place an Order



10/21

df di b PRO i Are you a developer? Try out the HTML to PDF API

Powers Of The Court To Revision

Powers Of A Court In RevisionThe revisional powers of a High Court are very wide. Section 397 which is

linked with Sec. 401 indicates the circumstance in which such powers can be

exercised. Such powers are intended to be used by the High Court to decide allquestions as to the correctness, legality or propriety of any finding, sentence or

order, recorded or passed by an inferior criminal court and even as to the

regularity of any proceeding of any inferior court. The object of conferring

such powers on the High Court is to clothe the highest court in a state with a

jurisdiction of general supervision and superintendence in order to correct

grave failure or miscarriage of justice arising from erroneous or defective

orders. Section 401(1) confers on the High Court all the powers of the appellate

court as mentioned in Ss 386, 389 390 and 391. It also empowers the HighCourt to direct tender of pardon to the accused person as contemplated by

S.307. Apart from these powers the court has given additional powers in respect

of specific cases falling under S. 106(4), 356(4), 357(4)….etc. Any order passed in

any proceedings under the Code, except when it is specifically barred such as an

interlocutory order, is revisable by the High Court under S.401.

The revisional powers under 397 and 401 are entirely discretionary. There is no

vested right of revision in the same sense in which there is vested right of appeal. These sections do not create any right in the litigant, but only conserve

the powers of the High Court to see that justice is done in accordance with the

recognized rules of criminal jurisprudence and that subordinate criminal

courts do not exceed their jurisdiction, or abuse the powers vested in them by

the Code.



11/21

df di b PRO i A d l ? T t th HTML t PDF API

Who Can Invoke Revisional Jurisdiction:The High Court can exercise its powers suo moto or on any petition of any

aggrieved party or even on the application of any person. However, there are 2

limitations:

In a case where any application for revision is made by or on behalf of

any person before the Sessions Judge, no further proceeding by way of petition shall be entertained by the High Court.

In a case where under this Code an appeal lies but no appeal is brought,

then according to sub-section 4 of S.401, no way of revision shall be

entertained at the instance of the party who could have pleaded. This rule

is based on sound policy that a person who has not exhausted his

remedies by law should not normally be allowed to invoke revisional

jurisdiction of the High Court.

A private party has no locus standi in a case instituted on a police report and

has right to demand an adjudication on an application in revision. He cannot

claim locus standi even if the Public Prosecutor permits him to seek revision.

But it cannot be said that a private party has no right to bring to the notice of

the Sessions Judge or the High Court any illegality committed by the

subordinate court. There may be exceptional circumstances I which, on a

revision application filed by a private party, revisional jurisdiction may

appropriately be exercised. However, while dealing with such a revisionapplication it would not be irrelevant to bear in mind the fact that court's

jurisdiction has been invoked by a private party and that the criminal law is not

to be used as an instrument wreaking private vengeance by an aggrieved party

against the person who according to that party has caused injury to it. Keeping

this fact in view if the court finds that there is some glaring defect in the

procedure or there is manifest error on a point of law and consequently there



12/21df di b PRO i A d l ? T t th HTML t PDF API

has been flagrant miscarriage of justice, revisional jurisdiction should be

exercised. In a case, while the appeal was pending in the Sessions Court a

revision application was filed in the HC by the complainant ho also prayed for

transferring the appeal from the Sessions to the High Court to be heard along

with the revisions. The court rejected the prayer for the transfer and ruled that

the criminal revision case should remain pending until the disposal of the

appeal by the Sessions Court to enable the complainant to pursue the same after

the appeals are disposed of by the Sessions Court.


Disclaimer






Place an Order



13/21df di b PRO i

Are you a developer? Try out the HTML to PDF API

How The Powers Are Exercised:The exercise of jurisdiction under S.401 is discretionary and such powers are to

be used only in exceptional cases where there is a glaring defect in the

procedure or there is manifest on point of law and consequently there has been

a flagrant miscarriage of justice. The exercise of revisional power is justified

only to set right grave injustice not merely to rectify every error however

inconsequential. Merely because the lower court has taken a wrong view of law

or misapprehended the evidence on the record cannot by itself justify the

interference or revision unless it has also resulted in grave injustice? It is no

doubt not possible nor practicable to lay down any rigid test of uniform

application and the matter has to be left to the sound judicial discretion of the

HC in each case to determine if it should exercise it extraordinary power of

revision to set right injustice. Ordinarily the HC court will not interfere; but in a

case where there has been gross injustice, or where evidence has been

overlooked or not considered in its true perspective, the HC must interfere.

While exercising the power of revision, the HC has to work I conformity with

two statutory limitations:

The powers of revision shall not be exercised in any interlocutory order;

The court having exercised such power shall not have the power to

convert a finding of acquittal into one of conviction.

Section 401(1) provides that in the exercise or revisional jurisdiction the HC

may exercise any of he powers of the court of appeal. As the court of appeal is

entitled under 386(a) to reverse an order of acquittal or to direct a retrial, the

HC in the exercise of its revisional powers would also be entitled to record a

conviction by reversing the order of the acquittal.

( ) hibi h i h f i fi di f i l i



14/21df di b PRO iAre you a developer? Try out the HTML to PDF API

But 401(3) prohibit the High Court from converting a finding of acquittal into

one of conviction. This places limitations on the power of the HC to set aside a

finding of acquittal in the revision, particularly when the state had not thought

fit to appeal to the HC against the finding of the acquittal and where the HC is

exercising the revisional jurisdiction at the instance of private parties. In a

number of decisions, the Supreme Court has held that the revisional power of

the HC to set aside the order of the acquittal at the instance of private parties

should be exercised only in exceptional circumstances where there is someglaring defect in the procedure or there is a manifest error on the point of law.

It would follow from the above that where an acquittal is based on the

compounding an offence and the compounding is invalid under the law, the

acquittal would be liable to be set aside by the HC in the exercise of such

jurisdiction.

In a case, the acquittal recorded by the Sessions Court was reversed and the

accused was convicted by the HC, acting on the letter from a prosecution

witness, by treating it is a criminal revision petition. The SC disapproved of the

HC's action in the following words:

No doubt the HC in exercise of its revisional powers can set aside an order of

acquittal if it comes within the ambit of exceptional circumstance enumerated

above, but it cannot convert an order acquittal into an order of conviction. The

only course left is to order for a retrial.

Case LawsIn this chapter researcher would like to discuss some of the case laws which

deals with the Section 401 of the Criminal Procedure Code.

Connected herewith is the question about the options open to the High Court in

case a judgment of acquittal, when examined within the parameters laid down

f f f



15/21df di b PRO iAre you a developer? Try out the HTML to PDF API

by D.Stephens vs. Nosibolla (Supra), is found to call for interference. The High

Court cannot convert the acquittal into conviction. The earlier Code of 1898 also

gave similar powers to the High Court by Section 439. The earlier Code and the

present one by Sections 439(4) and 401(3) respectively have imposed a

restriction by enacting that the revisional jurisdiction cannot be exercised to

convert an acquittal into conviction:

Sec. 401 High Court's powers of revision.

Nothing in this section shall be deemed to authorize a High Court to convert a

finding of acquittal into one of conviction.

This law essay is an example of a student's

work

Disclaimer






Place an Order

http://pdfcrowd.com/http://pdfcrowd.com/redirect/?url=http%3a%2f%2fwww.lawteacher.net%2ffree-law-essays%2fenglish-legal-system%2fhigh-courts-power-of-revision.php&id=ma-160219143115-d0a8b1cchttp://pdfcrowd.com/customize/http://pdfcrowd.com/html-to-pdf-api/?ref=pdfhttp://www.lawteacher.net/js/modal-boxes/free-law-essays.phphttp://www.lawteacher.net/freelance-writing-jobs.phphttp://www.lawteacher.net/order/?product=1http://www.lawteacher.net/order/?product=1


16/21

Are you a developer? Try out the HTML to PDF API

In the case of Bansi Lal and Othres v. Laxman Singh : - The five appellants were

tried by the Court of Additional Sessions Judge, Delhi on a charge of murder

under Section 302 read with Section 34 of the Indian Penal Code. After a very

detailed consideration of the evidence adduced in the case, the learnedAdditional Sessions Judge acquitted the appellants giving them the benefit of

doubt. The respondent herein, who is a son of the deceased victim of the

murder preferred a criminal revision petition before the High Court of Delhi

under Section 397/401, Cr.P.C. challenging the order of acquittal passed by the

learned Additional Sessions Judge. A learned Single Judge of the High Court

allowed that revision petition, set aside the acquittal of the appellants and

remitted the case to the trial Court for retrial.

4. Aggrieved by the said judgment of the High Court the appellants have come

up to this Court with this appeal and the main contention raised by them is that

the learned Single Judge of the High Court has transgressed the bounds of his

revisional jurisdiction in re-appreciating the evidence and setting aside their

acquittal.

In the case of Jaspreet Singh v. A.P Singh:- This revision petition under Sections

397/401, Cr.P.C. is directed against the judgment of learned Additional Sessions

Judge, New Delhi, dated 18.2.2005, sitting as a Court of appeal, thereby

dismissing the appeal filed by the petitioner herein against his conviction of

sentence.

The petitioner herein was prosecuted by the DRI for the offence punishable

under Sections 132/135(1) (a) of the Customs Act (for short the Act) and after

trial was convicted for the said offences and sentenced to 6 months rigorous

Place an Order

imprisonment and fine of Rs 1000/ for the offence punishable under Section

http://www.lawteacher.net/order/?product=1http://www.lawteacher.net/order/?product=1http://pdfcrowd.com/http://pdfcrowd.com/redirect/?url=http%3a%2f%2fwww.lawteacher.net%2ffree-law-essays%2fenglish-legal-system%2fhigh-courts-power-of-revision.php&id=ma-160219143115-d0a8b1cchttp://pdfcrowd.com/customize/http://pdfcrowd.com/html-to-pdf-api/?ref=pdfhttp://www.lawteacher.net/order/?product=1


17/21

pdfcrowd.comopen in browser PRO version Are you a developer? Try out the HTML to PDF API

imprisonment and fine of Rs. 1000/- for the offence punishable under Section

132 of the Act or in default of payment of fine to undergo one and a half

month's simple imprisonment. The petitioner was further sentenced to 3 years

rigorous imprisonment and a fine of Rs.1000/- or in default of payment of fine

to further undergo simple imprisonment of one and a half months. Aggrieved

by his conviction and sentence the appellant preferred an appeal but without

success, the learned appellate Court upholding the conviction as well as the

sentence. Even the plea for reduction/modification of sentence did not findfavour with the appellate Court.

Though in the body of the revision petition, the petitioner sought to assail both

conviction and sentence as illegal and unwarranted, but during the course of

hearing of the petition, Mr. Mehta learned Counsel for the petitioner stated at

the Bar that he did not wish to press the grounds on which conviction of the

petitioner has been challenged. Accordingly, he confined his submissions only so

far as it relates to the quantum of sentence as awarded to the petitioner by thelearned trial Court and upheld by the appellate Court.

In the case of Lalsai Khunte v. Nirmal Sinha and Ors the Supreme Court of

India has observed that: - The convict had earned a remission and the period of

imprisonment reduced by the period of remission would have had the effect of

removing disqualification as the period of actual imprisonment would have

been reduced to a period of less than two years. The Constitution Bench held

that the remission of sentence under Section 401 of the Criminal ProcedureCode (old) and his release from jail before two years of actual imprisonment

would not reduce the sentence to one of a period of less than two years and save

him from incurring the disqualification.

An order of remission thus does not in any way interfere with the order of the

court; it affects only the execution of the sentence passed by the court and free

the convicted person from his liability to undergo the full term of imprisonment

inflicted by the court though the order of conviction and sentence passed by the



18/21


inflicted by the court, though the order of conviction and sentence passed by the

court still stands as it was. The Page 1084 power to grant remission is executive

power and cannot have the effect which the order of an appellate or revisional

court would have of reducing the sentence passed by the trial court and

substituting in its place the reduced sentence adjudged by the appellate or

revisional court.

In the case of State of Maharashtra v. Jagmohan Singh Kuldip Singh Anand andOrs. The Supreme Court observed that the Revisional Court is empowered to

exercise all the powers conferred on the Appellate Court by virtue of the

provisions contained in Section 410 CrPC. Section 401 CrPC is provision

enabling the High Court to exercise all powers of Appellate Court, if necessary,

in aid of power of superintendence or supervision as a part of power of revision

conferred on the High Court or the Session Court. Section 397 CrPC confers

power on the High Court or Sessions Court, as the case may be, "for the

purpose of satisfying itself or himself as to the correctness, legality or proprietyof any finding, sentence or order, recorded or passed and as to regularity of any

proceeding of such inferior court." It is for the above purpose, if necessary, the

High Court or Sessions Court can exercise all appellate powers. Section 401

CrPC conferring powers of Appellate Court on the Revisional Court is with the

above limited purpose. The provisions contained in Section 395 to Section 401

CrPC, read together, do not indicate that the revisional power of the High Court

can be exercised as a second appellate power.

Bibliography

Books ReferredK.N. Candrasekharan Pillai (rev.), R.V. Kelkar, Lectures on Criminal Procedure,

4th ed. 2006, Eastern Book Company, Lucknow.



19/21


P. Sarkar and P.M. Bakshi (rev.), S.C. Sarkar, The Law of Criminal Procedure,

7th ed. 1996, rep. 2001, India Law House, New Delhi.

Y.V.Chandrachud (rev.), Ratanlal and Dhirajlal, The Code of Criminal

Procedure, 16th ed. 2002, rep. 2003, Wadhwa & Co. Nagpur, New Delhi.

Print Download Reference This Reddit This

Tweet Share

More English Legal System Essays

English Legal System Essay Writing Service

Being a law student doesn't have to be difficult

F t T k Y S T d

http://pdfcrowd.com/redirect/?url=http%3a%2f%2fwww.lawteacher.net%2ffree-law-essays%2fenglish-legal-system%2fhigh-courts-power-of-revision.php&id=ma-160219143115-d0a8b1cchttp://pdfcrowd.com/http://pdfcrowd.com/redirect/?url=http%3a%2f%2fwww.lawteacher.net%2ffree-law-essays%2fenglish-legal-system%2fhigh-courts-power-of-revision.php&id=ma-160219143115-d0a8b1cchttp://pdfcrowd.com/customize/http://pdfcrowd.com/html-to-pdf-api/?ref=pdfhttp://www.printfriendly.com/print/?source=site&url=http://www.lawteacher.net/free-law-essays/english-legal-system/high-courts-power-of-revision.phphttp://www.lawteacher.net/js/create-citation.phphttp://www.reddit.com/submithttp://twitter.com/sharehttp://www.reddit.com/submithttps://www.facebook.com/sharer/sharer.php?app_id=436312303072397&sdk=joey&u=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.lawteacher.net%2Ffree-law-essays%2Fenglish-legal-system%2Fhigh-courts-power-of-revision.php&display=popup&ref=plugin&src=share_buttonhttp://www.lawteacher.net/free-law-essays/english-legal-system/http://www.lawteacher.net/services/?subject=english-legal-system


20/21


Fast Track Your Success Today

Place an Order Get a Quote

0115 966 7966 [email protected] Contact Us About Us

Join the Conversation

Services

Essay Writing Service

Dissertation Writing Service

Assignment Writing Service

All Services

Useful Links

OSCOLA Referencing Tool

LLM Resources

Part of All Answers Ltd

Enter your search terms...

Law Help

http://pdfcrowd.com/http://pdfcrowd.com/redirect/?url=http%3a%2f%2fwww.lawteacher.net%2ffree-law-essays%2fenglish-legal-system%2fhigh-courts-power-of-revision.php&id=ma-160219143115-d0a8b1cchttp://pdfcrowd.com/customize/http://pdfcrowd.com/html-to-pdf-api/?ref=pdfhttp://www.lawteacher.net/order/http://www.lawteacher.net/prices.phpmailto:[email protected]://www.lawteacher.net/contact/http://www.lawteacher.net/company-information/about-law-teacher.phphttps://www.facebook.com/LawTeacherNethttps://twitter.com/LawTeacherNethttps://plus.google.com/+LawteacherNetUK/postshttp://www.lawteacher.net/services/law-essay-writing-service.phphttp://www.lawteacher.net/services/law-dissertation-writing-service.phphttp://www.lawteacher.net/services/law-assignment-writing-service.phphttp://www.lawteacher.net/services/http://www.lawteacher.net/oscola-referencing/http://www.lawteacher.net/llm/http://www.lawteacher.net/law-help/


21/21


Law Help

Law Resources

Copyright © 2003 - 2016 - LawTeacher is a trading name of All Answers Ltd, a company registered in

England and Wales. Company Registration No: 4964706. VAT Registration No: 842417633. Registered DataController No: Z1821391. Registered office: Venture House, Cross Street, Arnold, Nottingham,

Nottinghamshire, NG5 7PJ.

Fair Use Policy Terms & Conditions Privacy Policy Cookies Complaints
http://pdfcrowd.com/http://pdfcrowd.com/redirect/?url=http%3a%2f%2fwww.lawteacher.net%2ffree-law-essays%2fenglish-legal-system%2fhigh-courts-power-of-revision.php&id=ma-160219143115-d0a8b1cchttp://pdfcrowd.com/customize/http://pdfcrowd.com/html-to-pdf-api/?ref=pdfhttp://www.lawteacher.net/law-help/http://www.lawteacher.net/category/http://www.lawteacher.net/company-information/fair-use-policy.phphttp://www.lawteacher.net/company-information/terms-and-conditions.phphttp://www.lawteacher.net/company-information/privacy-policy.phphttp://www.lawteacher.net/company-information/cookie-policy.phphttp://www.lawteacher.net/company-information/complaints-policy.php

Documents

Www Lawteacher Net Free Law Essays English Legal System High