Sit-Rep, 2016

In 1968 I took my final class before graduation, a course based on progressive historian Charles Beard's interpretation of the Constitution, in which he set forth that the Founders did not write the Constitution as a document of liberty but rather as a document of economic protection for the mercantile and plantation elites of the new Republic, or, as we know them today, the 1%. A few days later I picked up my grade, a B, but with a note from the professor that I had written the best essay of the class, but alas, had taken the wrong side, so it was not worth an A. I graduated with a 2.98 GPA.

I thought to myself how nice it would be, if only I had time, to find out where that professor lived and go kill his rose bushes. Instead, that week, being just a few months after the Tet Offensive in Vietnam, I was sworn in as an infantry lieutenant in the Army.

That was over 45 years ago, and the arrogance and bullying of institutional power in public universities have gotten much worse. In fact, it's endemic, even institutionalized, not only in most liberal arts and "soft" science classrooms, but behind its own desk somewhere in the student affairs office.

From that perch students and agnostic faculty are "watched" and reported on, and regulations are drafted and distributed, controlling not only the actions, but more and more, the thoughts and gestures of the campus. The arrival of "safe zones' on American campuses, as policies and programs, indicates that the conditioning of student has entered a new generational phase. For-credit "how to get along" and "how you must get along" courses are offered alongside traditional academic curricula, much of which itself has been suborned over the past two decades, stripped of almost all recognizable common moralities and truths inherent in critical inquiry. The very foundations of the Scientific Method are being redesigned, so that every fact must carry with it a political equation.

"The purpose of modern liberalism is that all human behavior should become subject to the political process>" (Mary McGrory, 1976) ...a position which is anathema to every purpose of the Constitution, standing all the pillars of human liberty on their head, creating a separate universe of every reality.

It is quintessentially Marx, including the psychopathies involved in laboratory conditioning and self-delusion.

A quickening is occurring in America, for the ability of university administrations to work hand in glove with faculty, via that little gestapo desk in the student affairs office, is a thing we didn't have in the 1960s. But my son encountered it as his midwestern university in the late 80s. By then, political correctness was everywhere on his campus, even in his animal science department, patrolling the corridors of free speech with armies of snitches, bombarding science faculty members with forms to fill out, pledges to sign, etc. Today, 25 years later, we can now see this pattern trickling beyond verbal speech to gestures and thought.

The Gimmick

I'm a charter member of a group who watches these things in the private sector, and where and when possible, impose "fines" on offending public officials who are either corrupt or have gone over to this alternate universe. But we had never gotten involved in campus activities, in part because it was our consensus belief that young students would likely take unreasonable risks, increasing the chances of being caught. (We have a 100% record on that account.)

We began rethinking our position after a student at a Florida university was ordered to stomp on a picture of Christ as part of a class exercise. He refused, shouting at the professor and then scurrying off to whatever office students report these sorts of outrages. But instead of getting justice, the student was suspended. Only it was not the professor who suspended him but the student affairs office, to whom the student complained. They said he had been abusive to the prof, in violation of subsection C of some paragraph of some code of conduct. But his story got into the newsstream, with expected public outrage, and a lawyer on behalf was hired The kid was reinstated. I think he later transferred, which may have been the institutional purpose of the exercise all along. (Many classes and schools want to invite Christian riff raff out). But the public went to bed thinking the kid had been vindicated when in all likelihood, the university won, for it there were any sanctions, even a reprimand of the professor or the gestapo desk, it was never made known...something public schools do with impunity these days, and something we hope this little campus crusade I'm suggesting here might change.

Having no known teams in Florida, we asked a retired friend, ex-Marine,  to look into putting together a task force to see if they could extract some sort of reckoning (a fine) for costs the offending parties at that school imposed on the family. I was informed some weeks later that some rose bushes indeed been killed and "the appropriate notes" sent so that the offending parties would be more watchful the next time they tried to bully a student. But I doubt a fine was imposed that matched the costs to the family.

But, there's a scheme embedded here I hope I can interest you in, for it is important that the people carrying out these minor misdemeanors, be able to know if thei fines worked.

And no, I will not ask for any money at the end of this letter. This is all gratis to do as you please.

I have given presentations all over the southeast, to groups as small as four and as large as twenty, the age group from the 40s into the 60s, and, from appearances, all walks of life. I never know their last names, and they only know me by one of a number of aliases. I give a talk, answer questions, then provided them an outline similar to what I am laying out for you here, then walked away. No follow up, no future communications. One cell (team) may result, or two, or none. I never know. I have colleagues who do the same thing in three other areas of the country, and by a rough count we have 200 plus men and women who occasionally sneak around in dark alleys, killing people’s rose bushes.

We had greater ambitions for this program in 2011, but realized publicly advertising meetings, even among tea party groups, was fraught with problems, since the we are soliciting the commissions of crimes, albeit misdemeanors, involving no physical injury to human or animal. And even misdemeanors can be considered felonies in the eyes of strident left-wing prosecutors if seen as furthering a criminal enterprise (see RICO laws). (This stresses the need for extreme security precautions in every phase of selection and killing a rose bush. It ain’t penny ante poker, in part because your targets will never view it that way.)

Instead we searched for cases in the media, such as the Florida event, tried to find someone nearby who could organize and expedition, and continue to travel regionally

to speak to groups who may or may not have born much fruit. We never know. We had a crew at the Oakland Occupy event, and tied, with great success, our own homemade variety of Skunk mentioned below, a very effective “fine” as well as psychological weapon of deterrence.

This is very inefficient, but the alternative is very costly, and when you’re selling a product you really can’t advertise…you can our problem. I even wrote a book (a manual) then decided not to publish in eBook form because of the same potential legal problems after Obama was re-elected in 2012. I’m trying to reconstruct that book now, as it was lost in a 2013 computer crash, after I found my back-up provider didn’t.

We also learned that most counties and small cities actually have few “events” that cry out for a rose bush being killed, in which there isn’t some sort of punishment issued by normal legal process. Public schools are the main offenders. So we’ve noted that most towns and cities requirethe involvement of no more than one-or-two four-man cells, and even those no than a few operations a years.

But on the American college campus, it’s a target rich environment, so we’ve decided to approach a few campus groups with the objective of forming some cells. For one, the rose bush killing season will be like the endless summer of Hawaii, a constant renewal of students and faculty. Not only will you be handing out fines by killing fines, with deeper planning, you may actually effect policyov er a 3-4 year cycle.

Moreover, you will be sought. There will be arising reactionary groups whose main purpose will be to seek you out, again, (I repeat) thinking you mean them far greater harm than you actually intend, (this is called the “guilty state of mind”, a common psychopathy among the leftist species).

But if you establish rigid protocols for security, drop the vanity and need to do end-zone dances or bullhorn your achievements; if you can keep your mouths shut to your BFF’s or wives/husbands/partners even, and never pick targets that you are not 100% deserving of having their rose bushes killed, you may actually change political culture in many university department.

Mission Statement

This is our purpose, then, to incite the creation of teams of young men and women who quietly and clandestinely go about the task of blighting the path of the arrogant and insufferable, to cause them to fear things that go bump in the night, and to always be looking over their shoulders because of some misdeed they have committed in the past and to be fearful of any misdeed they may commit in the future. The death of a rose bush is punishment. The threat of another dead rose bush, or that it might be worse, is terror. We don't want to reform them or reeducate them.  We only want to reestablish the ancient law of cause-and-effect, that "if I do this, I get a spanking"; to slap that sense of impunity and invulnerability right out of their mouths. To punish them, then deter them from further misdeeds.

I heartily recommend you adopt this simple philosophy by not getting too greedy. Then your team can go on forever.

All this can all be done without committing a single serious crime.  Our "crimes" amount to little more than vandalism, the "fines" we impose (damaging property) never in excess of the losses those professors, bureaucrats and gestapo factotums have inflicted on the innocent.

For instance a school teacher sees a kid draw a picture of a gun, and instead of taking the kid to the principal calls the police...usually in cahoots without someone in administration. Parents are called, lawyers are hired, the kid's record is eventually expunged, but that's about all. Cost to family" $700-$1000, the chill-effect to the community complete. So we exact $700 worth of rose bush,es more or less. That's how it works....only we send the offending teacher, and administrator if we can find out who it is, a note, telling them why their beautiful ochre-colored upper-story home has been egged, and will cost $700 to scrape and repaint. And, don't let it happen again.)

There are hundreds of ways to kill rose bushes, from tagging, to keying, to skunking clothes handbags, shoes, even car door handles, (highly recommended for serious, dramatic effect), and of course, rearranging the yard work...all quite easy, really. Just let your imagination be your guide.

The key element is to let them know why this fate befell them…in such a way they have no idea who it is from...on campus, off-campus, from riled greybeards like myself, or students, acting solo, or in unison with others. "Not knowing" is your chief tool of

terror. For that will dampen their spirit for any future adventures with students. If they drive a nice car, and have given it a name, you can easily create fear that it’s next.

In time you can change course outlines, or entire ways content is presented. Knowing they can't be protected by university process or police, and as leftist are wont to do, fearing much worse the next time (since that is what leftists would do), you may even convince a few untenured instructors to seek better teaching conditions at private schools in the northeast.

But first you need to cause them to lose sleep as they readjust their universe, and to surrender that haughty  lift in their step, as they become more afraid to go certain places alone.

How to Kill a Rose Bush and Survive to Kill Another

All these outrages can be redressed if you just know the protocols of discretion...for your own security. Doing the damage is easy. Doing it anonymously and cluelessly is the game, set, match. Our group is in perhaps its fourth or fifth generation of recruits, yet none of them know my name, and have only my outline to work with. A few hundred tops, but they have dished out fines all over the country, and to our knowledge police departments have not set out a single dragnet to capture any of these unknown gangs of vandals.

But unlike civilian communities, on campus your fight will be almost never-ending, as the new students, faculty Jonathan Grubers' with new ideas how to intimidate will never quit coming, only the names change, so your vigilance will likewise have to be non-stop.

The moment a target reaches inside that mailbox and opens a hand-written letter and reads "About that $500 paint job for your garage door...(3-4 lines at most)...and ends with "and don't let this happen again", and the faculty members mutters "that sonuvabitch!" ...you've won the first round.  He or she may show up on your radar screen again for they will stomp, and kick and screech, and will certainly tell cohorts, and probably even police. Which is not as likely in the civilian workld, as sense of guilt is greater in out here. They know they did something wrong.. On campus, that ense is more complicated. But short term, you've won. Our experie3nce with bureaucrats is

that they tend to surrender the field rather easily. This is not the case as you ascend the ladder into leftwing campus management, FYI.

But first, and I can't stress this enough, you must be willing to set vanity aside and abide by a few simple protocols to keep your operation going, and also keep you out of jail.  If you can scuttle the need to show off your handiwork, and your asses, on Facebook or to do end zone dances because some bitchy professor had to trash can her $700 Louis Vuitton knock-off because she couldn't get the fecal smell out of the leather, you may be able to turn the tables on political correctness and other sins in relatively short order.

Whereas it's been our experience that two cells of four can patrol most county offices and government, you live in a target rich environment, where there could be enough work to require several cells, depending how the workload is distributed. Just note, the more you recruit, the more you need to refine your security protocols. Compartmentalization.

In code we've referred to these as "killing rose-bushes" which, by the way, are often easy to do. Develop your own codes.

Organize: Kindred spirits for justice and outrage about injustice should outrank best friends and drinking pals. You will be rectifying wrongs, not tipping cows. Loose lips sink ships.  You will be breaking the law, at least of the vandalism variety, so go in with eyes wide open, and never forget that while the police will consider this to be a misdemeanor the first time around, your victims, usually of the Left, will look at what you have done to be a major crime once they find out the WHY of your crime. Your nameless and faceless anonymity is your greatest protection as your greatest source of terror.

 Security: NO ONE should know of your team's existence or its purpose. Not your roomate , not your wife. Save that for your memoirs when you're 70. And should you create new cells or work with others in the execution of a mission requiring more than four, only let them know only one of you, never all four. This is how the Algerians operated against the French in the 1950s, and short of torture, (see the Battle of Algiers here) the French would never have broken the system. They organized in cells

of four, knowing only those in their cell, their communication face-to-face or only by written notes (no phones).

If you are already involved in campus politics, "Young Conservatives, etc" you must learn to wear two hats. Never confuse the two. Become two people.

Communications, I favor the Algerian terrorists of the 50s who used only handwritten notes, (it's a good habit to acquire) but email should be okay but only on separate email accounts such as gmail or yahoo and not shared with your other email accounts. And keep nothing on your computers or devices. Print out then delete everything. (Another good habit to get into.)  Avoid Twitter and Facebook, and develop code words for certain unexpected events, such as BUSTED, COPS, ABORT, which can be sent in the open on open accounts. Meet face to face. Keep your cell phones clean, they are the biggest fingerprint, next to leaving a manure rake in a target's yard.

Intelligence gathering: There are two kinds of intel involved here, the first being just creating a general network of events and dossiers of people (faculty, staff and the usual student rent-a-mobs who can always be relied on to show up at any event that involves placards and yelling curse words) Cannon fodder all, from Occupy we learned they can be fun, and serve as useful purpose. Others you will find from listening posts, so you need to develop teams of snitches, none of whom all you as team.

The second type of intel involves finding out where your target lives, his/her haunts, habits. where he./she parks her car, routines, saloons frequented, as well as the location of security cameras, etc. This requires stake-outs, stalking and a string of snitches. You will find several different kinds of rose bushes to kill. Always choose the one with the easiest ingress and egress. .

Plans and Operations: In many ways this is the easy part. During the Oakland Occupy one of our west coast members had an agent spray some very liquefied fecal material from a Sinex bottle (before we found Skunk) on the back of a young hellcat's clothing. One of the team filmed it, to establish the getaway time between the spraying (over 10 seconds) and the reaction of the victim. (This is still my favorite form of punishment, as it can be weaponized in so many different ways....keying a car will cost the owner his deductible, so can be done over and over,....while egging his house (depends on the surface material, could cost hundreds, but skunking fine clothes and

handbags, etc, can cost $50 in cleaning, more in replacement, and provides an irresistible desire to disrobe immediately, causing public embarrassment. We've found you can hire neighborhood kids to tag a garage or front door or the windshield of a BMW for as little as $20. Let your imagination be your guide,

After action: There is no profit in creating damage if the target does not know the cause.  Depending on your own intel about the type of person you've targeted, you may want to tease him with small doses, but at some point he must know that these acts are not random acts. Surely after the third key scratch he'll figure it's personal, At this point you must let him know his crime. This is called THE LETTER...a handwritten, sanitized envelope, no-lick stamp, telling him of his crime and what will happen next should he persist.

This is the reason for the season, for only at this moment will the target know why he's being set upon intentionally. Your letter must leave no tell-tale clues as to who you are, how many, etc.  Don’t say you’re from the “Committee of Anything. No drama. Once received the target will have several options, including calling the police. I have no knowledge of that ever occurring but we've never dealt with campus idiosyncrasies, so you may develop some interesting case studies of this particular animal.

But once a letter is sent the game changes. The police will open a file, as it is no longer vandalism, but a conspiracy. AND, depending on the overall politics of your jurisdiction, be aware that even though these events are misdemeanors, the police, especially the feds, may view this as a felonious conspiracy. Keep this in min. So never treat these events as a lark.

Finally, This is not a solicitation. This is by invitation only, we're contacting about 40 American campuses. I've provided enough information here for any of you to design your own cell, and execute your own plans without any further help from me.

You may also find these previous articles about Dark Alley operations helpful.

A STRATEGY DOWN A DARK ALLET, March 2013

Summarizing Parts I-II, the Left is who it is, and they feel they're in the catbird seat now. For the most part they are. It has national politics pretty

much sewn up, depending on how the states respond to the encroachments to their constitutional sovereignty, which has already been significant. For many years they have bought their way around the states' dinner table, and now the states are financially unable to ask them to leave. What was prophesied in the 1950s has come to pass.

And the American culture is safely stowed away in  #7 Priority Box, property of public schools, the academy, and entertainment industry, awaiting shipment directly to Hades. All that is needed is sufficient postage.

As Mark Twain once said about Satan: You have to give some credit for executive ability to the spiritual head of half the world, and the political head of the whole of it.

Unimpeded, we all know where this leads. So, who's left to fight? And how?

The Last Chastisement

"I tremble for my country when I reflect that God is just."(Jefferson)

"Evil triumphs when Good Men do nothing." (Burke)

For over three years I've tried to lay out in several articles what we out here in fly-over country can do to reverse this. Like professional Christians off in Amen corner, by now you probably know this sermon by heart. This is my last one.

But that Jefferson quote, from the very beginning, was directed at us, not Reince Priebus or John Boehner. Jefferson always knew how their kind would behave. And Burke's quote was also aimed at us, for no libel ever accused the political class of being made up of good men. It is the good men who hold those politician's feet to the fire. It was always the free yeomen who are the Good Men who resist tyranny. Not toads like Priebus.

Yes, I know all the reasons men with careers and families can't just lay down those earthly pleasures and run off to run the ridges and fight the forces of darkness. George Washington faced the same problems trying to keep his army intact. But all I've ever asked is that you make your area of combat your own town, your county, your local school district, and conform your battles to that territory, within your means, only occasionally venturing to the next county or state to help your neighbor.

Offer up what you can. Just drop the love affair with DC politics. That's a vanity, not a revolution. Start turning over tables in school board meetings. Washington is a milestone around your necks, and quite frankly, irrelevant.

Still, many seem content to sit in the bleachers, sending in plays to Priebus and Boehner from the sidelines, then going to bed at night feeling they'd done their part for the Cause. Many are content to sit this one out until someone finally rides out of the sky on a white charger and smites these philistines...

...without once offering up to God one single reason why we  deserve this sort of special dispensation.

The fact is, we don't. Especially me, since I've known all this for twenty years, not four.

You may know a little of the story of Moses Sands. I met him in Moscow in '91, and we began working together "tricking the government" throughout the region; Russia, Ukraine, Bulgaria, Macedonia, even Kenya.  It was 1998, during the Lewinsky scandal, that he called me up, mad as hell, wanting to write a book, because his entire 20-year stint behind the Iron Curtain was predicated on the belief that the American common man would never give up his House, as it seems he has, without a whimper.

For 8 years I helped Moses with that book, but never really bought into his belief that the Clintons and the Democrats represented a real threat to the foundations of liberty in America. To me they were just ordinary crooks. Truth is, I was having too much fun "sneaking down dark alleys" in the Balkans to believe that maybe I should be sneaking down dark alleys in America instead. I even thought the first term of GWB validated my thinking.

But a lot of what happened in Bush's second term unnerved me. The pieces no longer fit. And with the campaign of Obama in 2008 (the election was a foregone conclusion) I found myself right back where Moses Sands was in 1998, sick to my stomach, and mad as hell...at myself.

I had been fighting communism in one way or the other for over twenty years, but on foreign fields. I should have seen the handwriting on the Wall in 1992. But I left it up to someone else to fix things, through the political process, when, in truth, that boat had sailed even before GW Bush was sworn in. The war was on since 1988, only no one noticed.

When I finally did see the light in 2008, what did I do? Instead of picking up a pitchfork or box of matches, I decided to take pen in hand, and fix those bastards by writing. All is vanity, or so Ecclesiastes reports. Realizing this error two-three years ago, I began reaching out to other like-minded people, who also knew something about sneaking down dark alleys.

So, I have earned every bit of misery that has befallen me since Bill Clinton took office.

But my children haven't. I have a son and grandchildren, none of whom deserve what 20 years of me sitting around on my duff has bequeathed them. Everything we have conveniently shoved to the side these past fifty years will land in their innocent laps, and with a much greater weight than it ever would have been for me had we just accepted this charge in 1992, '96, or even '08.

There's a whole generation out there that  doesn't deserve what the "good men" of America have bequeathed them by doing nothing.

The New Underground

Here I will lay out what can be done by one of you, or a thousand of you. If you can't afford to offer more, you can still offer an hour a day. Or even an hour a week. I will lay out a general strategy here that will allow you to join the underground and to "take up arms" (just a figure of speech, Mr Holder) all by yourself, or with others in your community.

Why I bother is that we, the grass roots, the common men and women, are the only part of America the Left hasn't wrapped up. We've been overlooked. They've ignored us, or taken us for granted. And when they think of us at all, they think of our guns. In fact, they can't imagine us without them.

And that may be their undoing. They should be paying more attention to our rolled up newspapers.

Think of us like the halflings of the Shire. John McCain actually had it right, only for the wrong reasons, when he called us "hobbits." In his plan to take back the world, the Dark Lord had accounted for all of Middle Earth except for the outliers of the Shire, but from that place issued the ones who would bring all his plans down. Tolkien told his story that way for a reason.

We are the only ones left who can fight the Left effectively. We are the odd men out. No one else can do this.

I'm also laying this out for you in such a way that you can participate even if all you do is pass messages, like the French underground, or swing a lantern from a church tower (does anyone even know the name of that guy or gal?). All you have to do is get up out of your bleacher seat and find out where these people in your town are, and then start conspiring.

The work will come to you.  It's a target rich environment.

Down a Dark Alleyway

I have been associated with a loose-knit group-with-no-name for about three years. They are spotted all over the country, and have an assortment of skill sets, including military psy ops, (Agitprop) and covert activities.

During this period they have been developing local stratagems for use against people of the Left who "act out", but only using very narrowly defined, mostly legal, tactics, lest you think them vigilantes. No ropes.

Their mission is to make public officials and other assorted and sundry bad people afraid. For once it becomes obvious to the Left that there are faceless, nameless people out there that go bump in the dark, this fear will trickle up.

The group-with-no-name believes the more politicians are made afraid the more they will steer clear of behavior which they know the people don't approve. Lying is just one. Politicians lie because they think they can get way with it, not because they think people are too stupid to disapprove. Pushy and arrogant indifference is another sin we like to highlight. (Being talked down to.) In this way, we can split the herd, for then only true leftists will continue to push this envelope.

The reasoning is simple: a law of politics is that public officials fear the people's wrath more than they covet money or power. This is based on the ancient axiom that the people's opinion represents their public reputations, their public legacy, while all the money, ill-gotten or not, is perceived as having arrived under the table.  Forced to choose, most will choose their personal legacies. They'd wear sack cloth and ashes if they had to in order to stay in the people's good graces. Getting caught is the politician's worst nightmare, and with the media sewn up, and often, law enforcement as well, they haven't had to worry for many years.

It's our job to cleave this association, this protective shield, starting at the bottom.

As I stated in my last piece, it's when politicians and public officials begin looking over their shoulder that they know the people really mean business. Nasty emails have no way near this effect. Only a guilty state of mind that brings this about.

But punishments must necessarily vary. We're following a story right now in south Florida where a college prof, who also doubles as a Democrat Party official, required his students to place a picture of Jesus on the floor, then stomp on it. One student (which is a story in itself, only one) refused, and was suspended for it. The university backed up the professor. There's a whole lot of bad people out there who need something washed out with Ivory soap. I'm trying to round up a crew to get to the bottom of it.

But sometimes teachers will act out on their own, at other times, backed up by administrators who are co-conspirators. So, punishments can't be premature, nor cookie-cutter. If we can teach a lesson, we do. Others, have to feel a colder fear, or maybe the taste of fresh cow patty. Sky determines.

Our group-with-no-name knows how to bring these sorts of outrages to a head. And they know how to let the broader public, not just locally, but all over the country, know how the matter was resolved. This is how fires are started, by broadcasting them, which carries its own set of security issues.

They only need the means to make these things happen.

Since thousands of such occurrences happen each year nowadays, we believe that if even 25% of those incidences are met with (publicly-broadcast) consequences, there will be a trickle-up that will cause the Left to change tactics, for it will take them into a tactical territory they have not been in over a generation.

Light and Dark

But to accomplish these things, just like the Left, we must adopt an operational philosophy of Light and Dark.

In the Light there are all sorts of things we can do with internet, Twitter, even blogs, we are not really employing. For the most part we still only talk to each other. But as I described in my last article, the Left has used the internet as a means of command and control since 2004.

We must be more clever, but also more surgical in approaching our real objectives, for they are not the same as the Left's. One does not fight their Big Lie the same way the Left fights our Big Truth.

So since our objectives are not the same as the Left, so must our tactics be different.

Consider any conservative politician (e.g, Joe Wilson of "You lie" fame).  He tells the truth but offends a protected class (anyone not white, not

Christian) or Leftwing shibboleth (gay marriage, abortion-on-demand), in this case the Immutable Righteousness of Obama, and is treated to a volcano of very concentrated and coordinated anger from every corner of the empire, and by every known means of communication, from email and Twitter, to resounding denouncements by his Democrat colleagues in the House, the mayor and ALF-CIO leader in his home town, and of course, the condemnation of the local newspaper, who endorsed Obama anyway. His office is deluged with angry letters, and also death threats. And so are his wife and children threatened, so many and of such a caliber that threat assessments have to be made. The same for the state GOP office in state capital and local GOP in Lake Wobegon. His party leaders in the Congress are also deluged. China, North Korea and al Jezeera are all amused, but never fully understanding.

Mechanically, the Left literally had thousands upon thousands people lined up, for no more than 1-2 minutes each, not in random, mind you, but in Busby Berkeley precisioned choreography, all just to cause one poor congressional schlub who had uttered an inconvenient truth to be shamed and have to march before a microphone next day and say he was in error. To apologize.

A week-long story, interestingly, it could have been over in just a day had any member of the GOP walked before a microphone, or David Gregory, and  asked "What's the story here, what's the outrage here...that Joe Wilson was ill-mannered and out of place, or that he told an ugly truth?"

You see, the Left succeeded in causing an entire political party to know fear for speaking the truth. Thirty words or less, and there would have been no pain, no scar, no fear. And no deterrence.  All that choreographed bombast would have gone for naught.

If they can do that with a Truth, don't tell me we can't do that in the target rich environment known as the Big Lie.

But we don't seem to know how to choreograph such events. This is because we don't seem to know how to "shame" people who have no sense of shame. (Answer: the shame part occurs in the dark.)

Peeled away and laid naked, this strategy is rather easy to understand, although we cannot attack them in the exact same way. But neither should we need to, for this is their strategy of how a great Lie is protected after it has been elevated onto the stage as a Truth. It has nothing to do with how the Great Lie got there in the first place, as I discussed in Part II. That requires a different preventive strategy altogether.

Our objective should be to achieve the opposite, remove the Lie, and displace it with the Truth. They are not the same. Remember, when Good stands firm, Evil blinks. It is in the nature of both Good and Evil to act in accordance with their nature, so the stage naturally belongs to Truth. And Evil knows this. As long as the Left holds onto the stage, if even for a thousand years, they will still know that they are the illegal possessors of that piece of real estate.

That they possess it now is because "good men" allowed it to expropriated.

Now you can understand why I think that only the "shirelings" can topple this current form of evil that confronts us. We are America's last repository of good.

Our advantage has always been that Truth is easier to sell than Lies. Ronald Reagan did this about as good-naturedly as anyone in living memory. Truth arrives on the stage differently than Lies, and quite frankly, it is only in America that Good ever had a firm foothold on the national cultural stage. We are unique in this regard. In every country you search, Good only lives in pockets, which in Europe especially, is being ferreted out one hamlet at a time, and marked for extinction.

For you technological wizards out there, just change your frame of reference and you can see open up strategies to both remove the Great Lie from the public highway, as well as replace it with Truth. Bernie Chumm is developing our own, but I encourage you to develop yours and share them.

Out in the light of day, this is the only fight really worth fighting, and our little group-with-no-name means to fight it.

Bringing Rolled Up Newspapers to a Knife Fight

This does not mean we must fight with kid gloves against spiked knuckle-dusters. Karl Marx, with one "technology," Saul Alinsky with another, and the Democrat Party-Left Alliance with the latest technological edition, still all subscribe to the same workbook hammered out during the First International, that of manipulating opinion against opponents. In other words, it's battle tested. But its weakness is that it relies in part on the predictable behavior of those opponents, i.e., good manners, collegiality.

In fact, under congressional rules, I'm not sure anyone knows how to defend the Truth now that it's been booted from the stage.

But the Left and Marxism are so full of weaknesses, Achilles heels, it really isn't difficult to develop all sorts of strategies to combat them.

Unmasking the Left's Tactics

Now, I'm not a secret society type guy. If you'll recall, Dan Brown's Da Vinci Code was based on a non-existent one, but was so well written at least half the people who read the book came away as if they'd read history. (Time will tell how that will turn out.)

But I have studied them a little and found that people find a little romance in them, for it's grating for people of good will to see other people get away with almost every indecency and suffer no consequences. It becomes gratifying to know someone is out there, in the dark, setting things aright. This seems to be universal, from Robin Hood to Zorro to Batman, to vigilantism, which is always popular at the time, but fails almost every time it's tried because the players don't know when to hang up their rope.

(Just be careful, for much of the Left, and most terrorists see themselves in exactly the same light. See Part I. So serving the wrong god of justice, or simply getting the big head, can get you hung in the end. Be sure you're right before going ahead.)

The Left is obsessed with broadcasting it's tactics and successes, even as they are able to disguise their true purpose by controlling the message. We have to be more blunt. Clandestine sneakers for many years, now that they feel they control the universe of the Big Lie, they also feel they don't have to sneak anymore. Consequently, they are more vulnerable because they are now comfortable discussing their true purposes out loud in ways they never have before.

The assumption that they live in a consequence-free universe is apparent. And about to change.

Add consequences to their boasting and they will have to retreat to an old universe of reality 90% of them have never known. Only, can they?

You see, their loud braggadocio isn't just a result of this sense of invulnerability. It is also out a kind of arrogance and vanity going all the way back to Karl Marx. One of the things Marx's modern adherents all seem to share with him is the need to rub their enemies' noses in it. They have to drum their chests. It's a need.

Take that away and you take all the fun out of it.

You have to understand that Marx was a viral hater, and his entire philosophy was built on his pathological hatreds, not any rational sense of wanting to fix things that were broken. But most of his adherents through

the years, who never knew him, were more focused in their hatreds; toward capitalists, capitalism, ostentatious wealth, etc. You would have to hunt some to find a genuinely visceral hater in FDR's administration. Or LBJ's. In the 1930s thru 1960s the haters were still being laughed off soap boxes at Grand Central Station.

Today they are everywhere.

American "communism" is unlike any other socialist/communist experiment ever tried, as we see in public schools today where the destruction of academic excellence is still a major objective...a thing no sane communist regime would ever permit. Those kids would normally all be wearing uniforms, marching and singing the "Internationale," learning physics by 5th grade, and speaking fluent Mandarin by middle school. And those who refused to learn would be culled away from the herd and sent-off to Playdough Gulag to learn how to recap tires. And yes, they'd have to fire three out of every four teachers in the public schools to do that. A good commie apparatchik would have no problem putting all those teachers into the bread lines. And justifying kids to be either gay or straight horndogs would be a Gulag offense under true communism. Communists have always known how to condition kids to be virtually indifferent to sexuality except as one of the only two or three free pleasures they can experience in a true socialist society.

America is not your basic Karl Marx marxism at play.

It seems that Karl Marx's greatest nightmare has come true, that he finally has an entire generation that has totally captured his core essence, hatred, but one which could easier make a sentence with the word "Rotterdam" than with "class struggle."

American Marxism is almost entirely manned by know-nothings.

And they are the Left's greatest weakness, for like cats, they are also almost impossible to herd.

With this brood secret groups (with-no-name) have to never be seen, nor heard. Only felt.

I believe this should be a guiding rule of going forward against the Left as the situation now stands.

In this way the principal strategy of our group-with-no-name leads down an alley, into the dark.

There are several reasons for this, foremost security.

Principally is that within a year, if we can reach our goal of x-number of successful ground operations around the country, someone on the Left will eventually sense that all those incidences may just be connected. Then they will up the ante.

(In a 2012 operation in the Midwest it was noted that no one they "corrected" notified the police. Why? First and foremost, a sense of guilt, plus the embarrassment of getting caught, which is not the same as shame. One cannot run off to the police to say that unknown "vigilantes" had pushed his face into a bucket of fresh cow manure because he had vandalized university property a week earlier.

(There has always been a certain insularity in tweaking criminals, and how this stupid was found was his bragging on Facebook.)

But if/when the Left catches on they will likely magnify every simple little flat tire into "right wing death squads" or language of that nature. If you'll recall the time I mentioned whacking a female leftie across the nose with a rolled up newspaper (my weapon of choice), the infamous leftwing DC blogger Wonkette went a little ballistic. (She thinks I'm cool, I'm sure.)  But you can see how every misdemeanor will be treated as a serious felony. And some local police will go along.

So, we have to be out in front of this, for this is both a hazard, a risk we run, but also a great asset. For it will make us appear more gruesome than we are. We really don't care what the general leftwing know-nothing public hears Or thinks) about random acts out on the hustings so long as the real targets become so afraid their behavior will change. We're not Republicans. Like characters from Dostoevsky, they may frighten themselves to death from fears of their own making.

All in all, I consider this a good thing. Like fear, guilt can become a serious laxative.

You Can do this at Home

The point is, you can do this at home, and as I mentioned earlier, the better operations require a lot of volunteer work, paper-handling shall we say, between the development of the plan and its execution. For you see, the best operation uses no emails, only hand-passed paper messages. Stalking, cell-phone photos, plotting a target's routines, locating security cameras, all require an hour here, and hour there, and usually up against to a timetable. Operations themselves are in-and-out in an hour or less. But the set-ups can

require several hours, all set up by ordinary citizens "just passing by" in the neighborhood. This is the architecture of mayhem.

Initially our group-with-no-name had a model that entailed mass recruitment and training  with the objective of having at least 1000 teams within 100 miles of a Leftie-of-interest. (In south Florida we don't have a soul, only one on the west coast, and northeast, none.)

We're hoping to procure some sponsorship to speed recruitment and response time up, and this three-part series will be part of the resume, in case you think it unnecessarily long. We need to convince prospective sponsors that 1) we halflings are about all that are left who can be effective against the Left, and 2) our operations plan will succeed in stirring up confidence in the people at the local level, not to mention 3) dispensing a little much belated justice in several quarters, instilling a little fear and a certainty of judgment among people who now think themselves invulnerable, and to assure them that 4) no, we won't break any serious laws, and absolutely no ones' legs, and 5) it really doesn't cost that much if you consider price-value.

What to do at Home.

We discussed "ronin" almost a year ago, i.e, people who might want to open their own front in the war without joining  our network. We were largely against it then, because we have rules of conduct that we'd like to see guaranteed. But there isn't time. Since our ability to get the money to set our network up is lagging, I'm trying to reduce training to a pamphlet and encourage people just to keep in touch, so maybe someday in the future we can link up.

The strategy is simple: 1) Find news of Lefties acting out. 2) Corroborate the truth, so there's no innocent victims, 3) Use intel to determine if the perp is acting along or with assistance. (Most of these will occur in administrative situations. We have other rules for violent union-like thuggery). In other words, it's important to know you're right. 4) Unless especially egregious, such as the Jesus-stomping incident cited above, allow in-place rules and process to solve the matter all by itself. Due diligence. 5) Consider all options of punishment, and determine which will have the greatest deterrent effect, with the least invasiveness, i.e., Inconvenience can be greater weapon than the amount of property damage (changing a flat tire in rain vs a new paint job.) 6) Insure the perp understands the cause and effect between that truckload of manure in his front yard and his misdeeds. We have dozens of clever ways to send this message. 7) Understand your own legal risks. Technically, swatting a person across the nose is assault-and-battery, and even if threatened first, it still may require

a lawyer and jury to agree with you. These are not schoolyard pranks, which is why we suggest mature adults only.

Operationally, you need to consider security above all other things, especially security in communications. I like land lines, but also throw-a-way phones. Snail mail is good, so is passing notes, if convenient. Just remember, never lick an envelope, and wear gloves when handling them, or their contents. (Scares hell out of bad people when they get a letter with no fingerprints, no DNA.) Learn to use little spiral notebooks. Store nothing on your computer, and keep open emails to a minimum, using code if need be. Send, print, delete.

The reason I say all these silly things is that if (we and) you are to be successful, like playing penny-ante poker, you have to have all your security habits down pat long before ever getting into the big game, when people are actually searching for the "three unknown men in hoodies" who were seen face-planting some creep in a bucket of cow manure (also assault and battery) out behind Arby's.

Never underestimate the Left's capacity for reprisals if they ever know who you are.

This isn't just for your protection, mind you. Your greatest asset is the faceless anonymity of your acts, for the fear factor alone. Nothing frightens bad people more than the image  of someone leaping out of the dark shadows, and nothing encourages good people more than to know it happened.

It's a difficult thing to discuss in an open forum things that should be done in the dark. Trust me, there are thousands of things that must be done, and millions that can be done. And they can be outcome determinative locally by repressing or deterring bad behavior by various kinds of public officials, and outcome determinative nationally if carried out in sufficient number.

But look ahead two years and ask what would Yahoo News look like if every week there was a trending story about yet another corrupt official having to wipe a custard pie off his face, or change a tire in a snowstorm, all because of a lie he'd told to a local reporter. As Stalin might say, "Two flat tires are a coincidence, but a million flat tires is a counter-revolution."

As I've already stated, there are a few people already doing this. A true league of gentlemen. And also ronin (I think).  But hundreds more, even thousands more are needed. Also needed is a safe way to advertise these

successes that show people there is a movement out there punishing bad behavior.  This is when the Dark comes back out in to the Light. We have a plan for this as well.

Summary

What has to be accomplished first, as I keep saying, is looking at the Left with the new fresh eyes of the 1940s and 1950s. Lay them bare, peel away the layers of vanities and you will expose weaknesses and fears. They all have them; fear of exposure, of appearing weak, stupid, incompetent, and corrupt. Fear of losing their position, job, or status. Fear of cow shite.

Alinsky proved, and Ayn Rand confirmed in her essays about the California student takeovers, that honest men, even clueless honest men, have different fears that Leftists.

Most of all they fear judgment...not judgmentalism, mind you, but judgment...of the inescapable, can't-hide or get-away-from variety. The fear of getting a spanking. A harmless little sting on the ass.

And they fear inconvenience when they'd rather be doing something else (especially among the young, but still a signature red button with many of my generation), whether having to make their bed or getting rid of that horrible fecal smell, not knowing it has been affixed to the back of their winter coat while in an Occupy crowd. Watching a young woman strip off her clothes in 20 degree weather to get away from that odor is a sight to behold. And friends of mine have the pictures to prove it.

We believe with a thousand men nationally there can be a seismic national swing in just a few years about several commonly held leftish ideas that have become embedded in the national culture. All because we have done just one thing: attach consequences to the conduct, and at the lowest ring of the political ladder.

The Big Lie is how we know them, at least for now. The Left is still very proud of their Lies, and their freedom to broadcast them. Add consequences to those lies, and as in a snowball, and people will be less enthusiastic about listening, much less joining up.

America may be taken back by politicians to an uneasy peace, who can say? But the Left can never be driven down by politicians.  That must come from us.

If you'd like to know more, and do more, and what you can do, contact francisxavier1232@gmail.com. I won't need your name, just your location.

You'll receive a reply and your email address copied to a notebook for future correspondence should our-group-with-no-name ever find sponsorship to set up a TOC and carry this out on a larger scale. If you'd like to set up your own "ronin" operation, there will be a PDF booklet available which we'll be happy to provide you, and which you can copy and pass around through your own network.

We're also encouraging people to let us know of any event that meets the criteria of a breach by a public official. You can contact our group-with-no name at the same francisxavier1232@gmail.com address. We do not plan on opening a domestic website again.

But we'd really like for you to stay in touch.

DO NOT TWEET

Finally, if you like what I have said here, I'd appreciate it if you'd Tweet individually,  but using this link at VassarBushmills.com, Or cut and paste the portions you feel are important onto a WordPerfect document, and Tweet individually, one at a time, to those you think would be interested and who might send it on via email. (Yes, it will take more time this way, so this is a test to see if you will do the tedious work of the undergound.) If you have Twitter friends you prefer me to contact instead of you, just let me know. I'll send them the links.

This is the first lesson of a stealth underground, taking a little extra time to cover your tracks.

Good luck.

Fade to dark.

PIERCING THE ADMINISTRATIVE VEIL

You can also file this Tactic under "Neutralizing High-Profile Targets".

Some bad actors on the left are high-profile simply because of their celebrity. But others are high-profile because of their conduct, a mere incident, such as doing something that gets a lot of attention. Sometime it's intentional, sometimes they just get caught.

Learn to think past the headline, even though you might find yourself right back at square one once the exercise is over.

Take Professor (sic) Deandre Poole, of Florida Atlantic University, and Student Ryan Rotela, a junior.

If you don't know, last week Student Rotela was suspended from the university because he refused to stomp on a sheet of paper with the word "Jesus" written across it, as required by Prof (sic) Deandre Poole in a class on Intercultural Communications (for the Dark Ages).

This may not be exactly the truth, but it is how early stories reported it.

I'm citing a report here by an atheist at Forbes, who does a good bi-partisan job of explaining the facts, although there are some gaps I'm still looking into. But the author seems to be uninterested in pursuing the notion that maybe this professor (sic), and his textbook, and the class curriculum, and even the administration, seeks to ostracize Christians as policy.

Prof (sic) Deandre Poole is also a local Democrat Party official. You can look him up. He told the students to print the name JESUS on a piece of paper, put it on the floor, then stomp on it. Ryan Rotela refused. Early stories also indicted that he was the only one to refuse. Believe it or not this stomping exercise was taken directly from the textbook, in which it was stated that students should be allowed  to opt out, if they wish. There is no indication such an offer was made, or how many other students also refused.

So this exercise did not arise from the mind of Mr Poole, but that does not mean he did not carry out this class exercise with enthusiasm. (Yes, you're asking what possible place does this sort of thing have in a college classroom, or a college textbook, or that matter,  in a college, but there you have it. That's why we call this a target-rich environment.)

Still, everyone seems to want to blame the  Democrat-cum-professor (sic).

On closer inspection it seems Rotela was suspended from the school by the school, but not because he refused to participate in teacher's Jesus-stomping game, but because he sounded "threatening" when he excoriated the professor (sic) for demanding he stomp on Jesus. (Understand, these days a big "How dare you?" can be construed to be a threat. Yelling "Ouch" out loud another. Private "ouches" are still allowed, I'm told.) Instead of having been the one who suspended Rotela, it seems Prof (sic) Poole was the one who ratted him out to others in the administration, on the far more serious charge of disputing a professor's authority on matters such as whether Jesus' name should be stepped on in the first place.

I'm not sure who got to his complaint bureau first, Student Rotela or Prof (sic) Poole, but within two days, Student Rotela was advised he had been

suspended, as you can read in the Forbes article. He had been held in violation of the inviolable Student Code of Conduct, (follow the Fox News link in the story), where it names an associate dean, Rozelia Williams, who reported all this. We don't know which Bureau she works for, as just a messenger, or as the actual ax-swinger, but it was clear that Prof (sic) Poole beat Student Rotela to the courthouse steps, so was never required to answer publicly for his own conduct. In fact, in the tying up loose ends department, we don't know what happened to Student Rotela's complaint at all. Probably still working its way into File 13.

In other words, Rotela was not suspended for refusing to stomp on Jesus but for complaining about it publicly, which, while the former is simply a little good natured sport at the expense of Christians, and always guaranteed to bring them down a letter grade if they don't play along, the latter is a stern refusal of the cosmic authority of the university. A big deal, not a little deal.

And also why our group (w-n-n) is now involved.

End of story, the governor's office got involved, the Liberty Institute's lawyers got involved (who, if you're going to donate money, I recommend) and the university quickly backed down, issuing an apology.  Just who, and how far up the line, we don't know. But the apology was one of those "sorry anyone was offended" types, with no remorse or judgment about the act, and certainly no hint of sanction against the responsible parties.

The university apologized with clean hands.

There are all sorts of bad guys here, friends. For it's those "clean hands" and foul mouths that need a taste of Ivory soap.

Finding: This is why we dig deeper. Deandre Poole is the only person of interest who made the 6 O'clock news. His picture is out there, and trust me, he is basking in the lime light. Shameless.

He is also untouchable as any focus of an Alinsky-style campaign. He wallows in this sort of infamy.

But where does Rozelia Williams fit in? Today, virtually every university has a jack-booted Politically Correct Department, the keepers of the scrolls, where gestapo officers are often called associate deans. Is Rozelia in Poole's direct chain of command, or in the subterranean Hate wing of the university catacombs? (Some day we'll be big enough to root out every one of those PC departments, so look for it in a theater near you. We may just begin with FAU.)

But there are other culprits. How about the textbook (author James W. Neuliep, PhD, who teaches at St Norbert's College, Wisconsin), a Catholic school, or its publisher, SAGE Press, whose textbook offerings suggest a soft-science slant? Now there's a network to put under a microscope.

Finally, what about the university administration, all the way up to the big deans and president? Ayn Rand reminded us of an old law of administration in her 1970 recollections of the students riots at Berkeley and Columbia in the 1960s. She stated that while the students groups all issued strong statements on virtually every Marxist paranoid delusion, the schools' administrators really believed in nothing (other than their own survival), so were absolutely unable to match any wrongly-held belief with any rightly-held one. In short, they administratively collapsed because they were already morally collapsed. Today we would call them upper-end low-information administrators, and if you believe Hayek and Rand, they've been around at least as long as the word "triplicate" has been in use.

It seems we've seen this at FAU this past week. Anything to make the public issue disappear.

So how do we approach this?

I won't carry this out to its natural conclusion in broad dayight. Our group (w-n-n) has been on the case for a few days.

But there is much we can do to many people, as long as they are not named Deandre Poole. But we can still cut him and many others like him in that school (I'm certain there are many others. It's that type of school.) off from their support system. They are all part of a gang, and their weakest link is that hidden support network behind them who protects them when they go astray or get caught, as Prof (sic) Poole has proved.

In all likelihood the system behind the perpetrators are the far greater law breakers in this case anyway.

But for you interested observers with dark alleys on your minds,, the lesson here is 1) never be too quick to rush to judgment based on a single story. Conservative outrage-miners are as bad about this as lefties; 2) identify all the guilty parties by names and design plans for dealing with them, 3) never go after the guy in the limelight, he's untouchable, but  instead 4)  find his invisible support group, who is very touchable, then separate them from the hero.

In the end it will be Deandre Poole who will find it less fun to go to work.

There's good Alinsky wisdom in all this.

Our people are on this, but feel to send any leads, especially copies of university rules, to francisxavier1232@gmail,com.

LIGHT AND DARK, TARGETIN THE ACADEMY

In other pieces I've outlined how 3-4 man teams can wreak havoc with the stray bad actor in a local government or the local grade school, and make sure they never take a bite out of that particular apple again.

Those will always be with us. Seeking them out and making them stop, or pay what-fer if they don't, will be a never-ending mission.

But what about an academic department at the local university? What about a jack-booted department of political correctness, tasked with ensuring that codes of conduct are obeyed to the letter by students and staff alike, and that the rosaries of racial guilt are chanted ceaselessly.

Remember that kid at Florida Atlantic University who was suspended a couple of weeks ago?  Not because he refused to stomp on the name "Jesus" printed on a piece of paper, as ordered by his professor, but because he yelled "Ouch" too loudly when he refused, making it seem like he was threatening the professor.

Yeah, that kid. It was the PC-nazis, not the professor (sic), who gave him the boot. Yes, they were in cahoots, so now you also have an insight into how the system works.

What did the kid get? No real apologies. And only a little egg in the face of the university, not for being wrong, mind you, but for being taken out to the woodshed by the governor. Then it's back to business as usual.

When incidences like this arise, they call for swift, dark alley reaction. But all we can accomplish, of course, is to take away that option away from the professor (sic) or the little nazis the next time. We may quieten them. We may make them look over their shoulders.

But I don't see us winning any decisive battles that way.

For they will still be there. They will still be drawing nice paychecks, and fat retirement-plans-to-die-for, paid for by the same taxpayers who're having their kids hog-tied and forcefed an even worse manure than what we could ever rub in their faces. And now that they've been caught redhanded, they'll simply fine-tune the process, while in the meantime, the hazing action will

simply move down the hall to Room 203, in Prof (sic) Incontinentia Buttocks' class on Hallucinations and Lesbianism. Then we start all over again.

Taking on the entire university department is quite another matter.

No one has tried doing this, so there really isn't a manual. But we're working on it. But if you're going to take on an entire university department, it requires a much larger, more coordinated and complex operation, with both Light and Dark assets involved. It's like Stalingrad or the Warsaw Ghetto, a non-stop battle. So gird up for it before you do anything else.

How do you set such an organization up? Well, if you set the right objectives (ask the right questions, as Gen Eisenhower once opined), they actually just fall into place. The KISS principle still applies.

And that is the point I will make here. I'll leave the details for a chapter at another time.

If you find an academic department that is made up of more wickedness than good, with Marxist ideology, power-mad political correctness, and aggravated John-Dewey-itch in every course description and textbook, whether in the Psych, Education, History, or English departments, then you have to already know that if you run one professor off, they will simply replace him with another.

You can't win that way...

...unless you have made it abundantly clear "that kind" of professor will not be allowed to stay.

(This is the way many departments were taken over by the Left in the first place.)

This means your targets are really the people who do the hiring, which may take you all the way up the department head himself. Or herself. You have to carry out a war not just to depress, annoy and frighten the points-of-attack perps into finding a job in Connecticut, but to impress on a small coterie of on-lookers that they may want to reconsider the fundamental approaches used to teaching in this department in the first place.

So as a rule, you have to apply a total scorched-earth campaign, scrupulously avoiding the innocents in the department (every department has a few). Unrelenting Light and Dark warfare. Just ask yourself this one question:

What would it take to make an entire department unemployable?

If the department is under the thumb of Marxist theology, make sure everyone in the school's administration office knows it. Daily. If Ayn Rand is correct, the university front office these days is either 1) simpatico with the Marxists, at least politely or indulgently so, or 2) indifferent to everything but the loud squeaky wheel and their own rice bowl.

Make sure the local community knows  it. Deluge local radio, not just local talk radio., but FM Rock and Country. Even Rap. That's why God invented Twitter and Facebook.

Be that squeaky wheel, thus turning the front office against the sources of their aggravation. 75% of them will turn just to get some peace and quiet.

To effectively do this, you can't be as the Left has become, race-baiters or potty-mouthed, smarmy storm troopers. They used to be good at their Alinsky-craft, but not anymore. You have to challenge their guiding premises, found in the in fine print of their texts, but also embedded in the course syllabus. Out think them. Use their shortcomings things against them, for they know they are breaking the rules, and the law.

Be bright. Be articulate. Know how to argue without using "Skippy" or "as everyone knows" or other trite repetitions. Learn to talk down without sounding like a father. More like a kindly old granddad. Trust me, it's easier for a 30-year old to learn to talk like me than it is for me to learn to talk like a 30-year old.

Challenge the students as well as the teachers. You will find they have their own questions and their own gripes, but didn't know anyone out there cared.

Although we are seeing more and more leftist profs acting as if they have won the war, Marxists are not really like the Germans, boastfully singing "Horst Wessell-Lied". They want to boast, but in their hearts they are insecure (which no man ever accused a good Nazi of being), and just a little paranoid. So, every word out of their mouths contains an escape plan, as all but the most sociopathic of liars are. So make them stammer. Make them explain the unexplainable.

With this little bit of a schematic, I think you can engage and train at least 50, maybe 100, of like-minded who will work the magic of Light and Dark and declare total war on these people.

From this day forward, we're all a work-in-progress. Just remember the basic lessons we've passed out on security in communications, and leave no fingerprints.